Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

RC-Network and Comm-Network for Improvement of Research Collaboration and Communication Among Delhi University Teachers

Authors : Narender Kumar, Sapna Malhotra, Chitra Rajora, Ravins Dohare

Published in: Performance Management of Integrated Systems and its Applications in Software Engineering

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Research collaboration studies have become significant indicators of research, productivity, and developments of organizations. In the research work, the authors have proposed and construct research collaboration network (RC-network) and communication network (Comm-network) for the Delhi University teachers. Teachers are treated as vertices, and two vertices are connected if they have written a research document together in the case of RC-network, whereas if they communicate (talk about education, politics, rights, or other socially relevant issues) with each other, then it is a case of Comm-network. In the research work carried out, the researchers have collected the data through different resources and questionnaires. There are 712 teachers’ records of research document and 214 teacher’s records from questionnaire in the collected data. Two networks are constructed as RC-network and Comm-network. The researchers have found through the study that both networks follow scale-free degree distribution as reported by the other similar study. These networks unpacked several hidden characteristics of collaboration and communication among teachers of Delhi University. Constructed networks are sparse and partitioned in huge number of connected components. Moreover, they have identified the key clusters of research collaborations and communications among teachers. These clusters consist of teachers mostly from the same college or department or center. This indicates that the research collaborations are not of interdisciplinary nature in Delhi University. Even the communications among the teachers from different disciplines or colleges take place less frequently than those among the teachers from the same discipline or college. This study may prove to be helpful in improving and understanding the research and communication among teachers of Delhi University.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Braun, T. (2005). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Scientometrics, 63(1), 185–188. Braun, T. (2005). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Scientometrics, 63(1), 185–188.
2.
go back to reference Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583–589.CrossRef Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38(4), 583–589.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Leieken, S., & Kempner, R. (2010). Collaborate leading regional innovation clusters. The Council on Competitiveness. Leieken, S., & Kempner, R. (2010). Collaborate leading regional innovation clusters. The Council on Competitiveness.
4.
go back to reference Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.CrossRef Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.CrossRef Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
7.
go back to reference Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2–72. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 2–72.
8.
go back to reference Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.CrossRef Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377.
10.
go back to reference Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2000). Some analyses of Erdos collaboration graph. Social networks, 22(2), 173–186.CrossRef Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2000). Some analyses of Erdos collaboration graph. Social networks, 22(2), 173–186.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 231–245. Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1979). Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 231–245.
12.
go back to reference Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 145–157.CrossRef Egghe, L., Rousseau, R., & Van Hooydonk, G. (2000). Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 145–157.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barabâsi, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. Barabâsi, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614.
14.
go back to reference Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132. Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132.
15.
go back to reference Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.CrossRef Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.
17.
go back to reference Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
go back to reference Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., … & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., … & Ideker, T. (2003). Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, 13(11), 2498–2504.
19.
go back to reference Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003, January). An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 4(1), 2. Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003, January). An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 4(1), 2.
20.
go back to reference Stelzl, U., Worm, U., Lalowski, M., Haenig, C., Brembeck, F. H., Goehler, H., … & Timm, J. (2005). A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell, 122(6), 957–968. Stelzl, U., Worm, U., Lalowski, M., Haenig, C., Brembeck, F. H., Goehler, H., … & Timm, J. (2005). A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell, 122(6), 957–968.
Metadata
Title
RC-Network and Comm-Network for Improvement of Research Collaboration and Communication Among Delhi University Teachers
Authors
Narender Kumar
Sapna Malhotra
Chitra Rajora
Ravins Dohare
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8253-6_23

Premium Partner