Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Empirical Economics 4/2020

27-04-2019

Reciprocity in bank regulatory reforms and income inequality: first evidence from a panel vector autoregression analysis

Authors: Lea Steininger, Michael Sigmund

Published in: Empirical Economics | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

Our study examines the dynamics between variations in bank regulatory policies and the income distribution, using an IMF database of quantified measures for financial reforms as well as the Standardized World Income Inequality Database. The unbalanced panel comprises 36 developed countries and covers a period over three decades from 1973 to 2005. We assess the potential endogeneity between bank regulations and inequality via a panel vector autoregression model. Among the regulatory reforms, we consider the deregulation of securities markets, entry barriers, credit and interest rate controls as well as the extent of privatization, international capital flows and banking supervision. We are able to provide support for the hypotheses that (i) overall, abolishing bank regulations enhances inequality in income and (ii) higher levels in inequality encourage laissez-faire policies in the banking sector. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of examining each regulatory reform individually. In particular, we endorse a relaxation of entry barriers for financial intermediaries while promoting interest rate controls, capital account restrictions and deliberate government intervention in securities markets.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Frequently dubbed “financialization” and comprising various phenomena such as increasing private household debt, securitization and financial deregulation (Koehler et al. 2016).
 
2
As H. P. Minsky (1919–1996) has argued since 1954.
 
3
Including the expansion of financial activities, improvements in financial markets and financial services, financial openness and direct access to capital.
 
4
Such as the neoclassical allocative efficiency theory, a structural Keynesian narrative or neo-Kaleckian approach.
 
5
We use the R package panelvar by Sigmund and Ferstl (2019) who basically extend the STATA code by Roodman (2009a) with the GMM estimators of Arellano and Bond (1991) and Blundell and Bond (1998) to panel vector autoregression models.
 
6
Unfortunately, Abiad et al. (2010) did not update their regulatory policy dataset beyond 2005.
 
7
\({\bar{y}} = \int _{0}^{\infty } y f(y) \mathrm {d}y\).
 
8
\(y_{i,t+1}^{\bot } = c_{i,t} (y_{i,t}-1/T_{i,t} \sum _{s>t} y_{i,s})\). Where \(c_{i,t} = \sqrt{T_{i,t}/(T_{i,t}+1)}\). This transformation is suggested by Arellano and Bover (1995) to minimize data losses due to data gaps.
 
9
The first difference transformation exists for \(t \in \{p+2, \ldots , T\}\), and the forward orthogonal transformation exists for \(t \in \{p+1, \ldots , T-1\}\). We denote the set of indexes t, for which the transformation exists by \({\mathbb {T}}_{\varDelta }\).
 
10
In the empirical literature, this problem is known as instrument proliferation (Roodman 2009b).
 
11
We can also rely on an alternative proof of Koenker and Machado (1999) that the first difference GMM estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normally distributed in the case of \(T \rightarrow \infty \). Koenker and Machado (1999) state the following condition: \(q^3/N \rightarrow 0\).
 
12
See also H. P. Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis (FIH).
 
13
Together with the exchange rate, par and the price level.
 
14
The private interest view suggests that in the circumstance of a (natural) monopoly or oligopoly, regulations ought to be imposed in order to improve social welfare and to correct market failure. However, in this view, politicians and supervisors of the government do not aim at maximizing public welfare but their own. Therefore, independent monitoring of banks rather than official oversight should be strengthened in order to limit the abuse of power.
 
15
Under “securitization” we understand the “process of turning illiquid assets, or certain aspect of that asset like their volatility, into financial assets that can be traded on markets. [...] This [is] supposed to slice risk into different parts and allocate it to those who [are] best equipped to hold it.” (Stockhammer 2016) On the role of banks as financial intermediaries, the “originate and distribute model of lending” (in contrast to the “originate to hold model,” banks originate credit and securitize or sell a fraction of it later or at the time of emergence) gives banks flexibility and reduces incentives so screen borrowers in the securitization process. That is, banks are building up riskier loans; the US sub-prime crisis 2007 has then infamously put securities markets back to the center stage of financial analysis.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abiad A, Detragiache E, Tressel T (2010) A new database of financial reforms. IMF Staff Pap 57(2):281–302 CrossRef Abiad A, Detragiache E, Tressel T (2010) A new database of financial reforms. IMF Staff Pap 57(2):281–302 CrossRef
go back to reference Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4):1121–1159 CrossRef Alvarez J, Arellano M (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica 71(4):1121–1159 CrossRef
go back to reference Andrews D, Lu B (2001) Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J Econom 101(1):123–164 CrossRef Andrews D, Lu B (2001) Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J Econom 101(1):123–164 CrossRef
go back to reference Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297 CrossRef Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297 CrossRef
go back to reference Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51 CrossRef Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom 68(1):29–51 CrossRef
go back to reference Baldacci E, Mello L, Inchauste G (2002) Financial crises, poverty and income distribution. IMF working paper: Fiscal Affairs Department, vol 02(4) Baldacci E, Mello L, Inchauste G (2002) Financial crises, poverty and income distribution. IMF working paper: Fiscal Affairs Department, vol 02(4)
go back to reference Barro R, Lee J (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198 CrossRef Barro R, Lee J (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198 CrossRef
go back to reference Barth J, Caprio G, Levine R (2002) Bank regulation and supervision: what works best? NBER working paper, 9323 Barth J, Caprio G, Levine R (2002) Bank regulation and supervision: what works best? NBER working paper, 9323
go back to reference Bazillier H, Hericourt J (2014) The circular relationship between inequality, leverage, and financial crises: intertwined mechanisms and competing evidence. CEPII working paper Bazillier H, Hericourt J (2014) The circular relationship between inequality, leverage, and financial crises: intertwined mechanisms and competing evidence. CEPII working paper
go back to reference Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time. World Bank Policy Research working paper, 4943 Beck T, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time. World Bank Policy Research working paper, 4943
go back to reference Beck T, Levine R, Demirgüç-Kunt A (2007) Finance, inequality and the poor. J Econ Growth 12(1):27–49 CrossRef Beck T, Levine R, Demirgüç-Kunt A (2007) Finance, inequality and the poor. J Econ Growth 12(1):27–49 CrossRef
go back to reference Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Finance 65(5):1637–1667 CrossRef Beck T, Levine R, Levkov A (2010) Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Finance 65(5):1637–1667 CrossRef
go back to reference Bertus M, Jahera J, Yost K (2007) The relation between bank regulation and economic performance: a cross-country analysis. Banks Bank Syst 2(3):32–45 Bertus M, Jahera J, Yost K (2007) The relation between bank regulation and economic performance: a cross-country analysis. Banks Bank Syst 2(3):32–45
go back to reference Birdsall N, Nellis J (2003) Winners and losers: assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World Dev 31(10):1617–1633 CrossRef Birdsall N, Nellis J (2003) Winners and losers: assessing the distributional impact of privatization. World Dev 31(10):1617–1633 CrossRef
go back to reference Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143 CrossRef Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87(1):115–143 CrossRef
go back to reference Botero J, Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) The regulation of labor. Q J Econ 119(4):1339–1382 CrossRef Botero J, Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) The regulation of labor. Q J Econ 119(4):1339–1382 CrossRef
go back to reference Bryan D, Martin R, Rafferty M (2009) Financialization and marx: giving labor and capital a financial makeover. Rev Radic Polit Econ 41(4):458–472 CrossRef Bryan D, Martin R, Rafferty M (2009) Financialization and marx: giving labor and capital a financial makeover. Rev Radic Polit Econ 41(4):458–472 CrossRef
go back to reference Delis M, Hasan I, Kazakis P (2013) Bank regulations and income inequality: empirical evidence. Rev Finance 18(5):1–36 Delis M, Hasan I, Kazakis P (2013) Bank regulations and income inequality: empirical evidence. Rev Finance 18(5):1–36
go back to reference Demirgüç-Kunt A, Laeven L, Levine R (2004) Regulations, market structure, institutions, and the cost of financial intermediation. J Money Credit Bank 36(3):623–626 Demirgüç-Kunt A, Laeven L, Levine R (2004) Regulations, market structure, institutions, and the cost of financial intermediation. J Money Credit Bank 36(3):623–626
go back to reference Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Finance and inequality: theory and evidence. Ann Rev Financ Econ 1(1):287–318 CrossRef Demirgüç-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Finance and inequality: theory and evidence. Ann Rev Financ Econ 1(1):287–318 CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman M, Schwartz A (1969) The definition of money: net wealth and neutrality as criteria. J Money Credit Bank 1(1):1–14 CrossRef Friedman M, Schwartz A (1969) The definition of money: net wealth and neutrality as criteria. J Money Credit Bank 1(1):1–14 CrossRef
go back to reference Gastwirth J (1971) A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica 39(6):1037–1039 CrossRef Gastwirth J (1971) A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica 39(6):1037–1039 CrossRef
go back to reference Greenwood J, Jovanovic B (1990) Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. J Polit Econ 89(5):1076–1107 CrossRef Greenwood J, Jovanovic B (1990) Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. J Polit Econ 89(5):1076–1107 CrossRef
go back to reference Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton Hamilton J (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
go back to reference Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4):1029–1054 CrossRef Hansen LP (1982) Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50(4):1029–1054 CrossRef
go back to reference Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56(6):1371–1395 CrossRef Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen H (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56(6):1371–1395 CrossRef
go back to reference Jaumotte F, Strahan P (1997) The benefits of branching deregulation. Fed Reserve Bank N Y Econ Policy Rev 3:4 Jaumotte F, Strahan P (1997) The benefits of branching deregulation. Fed Reserve Bank N Y Econ Policy Rev 3:4
go back to reference Jayadev A (2007) Capital account openness and the labour share of income. Camb J Econ 31:423–443 CrossRef Jayadev A (2007) Capital account openness and the labour share of income. Camb J Econ 31:423–443 CrossRef
go back to reference Johansson A, Wang X (2014) Financial sector policies, poverty and income inequality. China Econ Rev 31:367–378 CrossRef Johansson A, Wang X (2014) Financial sector policies, poverty and income inequality. China Econ Rev 31:367–378 CrossRef
go back to reference Kapetanios G (2008) A bootstrap procedure for panel data sets with many cross-sectional units. Econom J 11(2):377–395 CrossRef Kapetanios G (2008) A bootstrap procedure for panel data sets with many cross-sectional units. Econom J 11(2):377–395 CrossRef
go back to reference Kearney M, Levine P (2016) Income inequality, social mobility, and the decision to drop out of high school. NBER working paper, vol 20195(1), pp 333–396 Kearney M, Levine P (2016) Income inequality, social mobility, and the decision to drop out of high school. NBER working paper, vol 20195(1), pp 333–396
go back to reference Klein M, Olivei G (2008) Capital account liberalization, financial depth, and economic growth. J Int Money Finance 27(6):861–875 CrossRef Klein M, Olivei G (2008) Capital account liberalization, financial depth, and economic growth. J Int Money Finance 27(6):861–875 CrossRef
go back to reference Koehler K, Guschanski A, Stockhammer E (2016) How does financialization affect functional income distribution? A theoretical clarification and empirical assessment. Socio-Econ Rev 15:1–26 Koehler K, Guschanski A, Stockhammer E (2016) How does financialization affect functional income distribution? A theoretical clarification and empirical assessment. Socio-Econ Rev 15:1–26
go back to reference Koenker R, Machado J (1999) GMM inference when the number of moment conditions is large. J Econom 93(2):327–344 CrossRef Koenker R, Machado J (1999) GMM inference when the number of moment conditions is large. J Econom 93(2):327–344 CrossRef
go back to reference Kumhof M, Ranciére R, Winant P (2015) Inequality, leverage, and crises. Am Econ Rev 105(3):1217–1245 CrossRef Kumhof M, Ranciére R, Winant P (2015) Inequality, leverage, and crises. Am Econ Rev 105(3):1217–1245 CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) Government ownership of banks. J Finance 57(1):265–301 CrossRef La Porta R, Lopez-de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2002) Government ownership of banks. J Finance 57(1):265–301 CrossRef
go back to reference Lapavitsas C, Powell J (2013) Financialisation varied: a comparative analysis of advanced economies. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 6(3):359–379 CrossRef Lapavitsas C, Powell J (2013) Financialisation varied: a comparative analysis of advanced economies. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 6(3):359–379 CrossRef
go back to reference Lavoie M, Godley W (2002) Kaleckian models of growth in a coherent stock-flow monetary framework: a Kaldorian view. J Post Keynes Econ 24(2):277–311 CrossRef Lavoie M, Godley W (2002) Kaleckian models of growth in a coherent stock-flow monetary framework: a Kaldorian view. J Post Keynes Econ 24(2):277–311 CrossRef
go back to reference Lim G, McNelis P (2014) Income inequality, trade and financial openness. In: RES-SPR Conference on “Macroeconomic Challenges Facing Low-Income Countries”, IMF Lim G, McNelis P (2014) Income inequality, trade and financial openness. In: RES-SPR Conference on “Macroeconomic Challenges Facing Low-Income Countries”, IMF
go back to reference Lorenz M (1993) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ Am Stat Assoc 9(70):209–219 Lorenz M (1993) Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ Am Stat Assoc 9(70):209–219
go back to reference Lucas R (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. J Econ Theory 4:103–124 CrossRef Lucas R (1972) Expectations and the neutrality of money. J Econ Theory 4:103–124 CrossRef
go back to reference Luetkepohl H (2006) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin Luetkepohl H (2006) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin
go back to reference Mehrhoff J (2009) A solution to the problem of too many instruments in dynamic panel data GMM. Technical report. Research Centre, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt Mehrhoff J (2009) A solution to the problem of too many instruments in dynamic panel data GMM. Technical report. Research Centre, Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt
go back to reference Minsky H (1993) On the non-neutrality of money. FRBNY Q Rev 18:77–82 Minsky H (1993) On the non-neutrality of money. FRBNY Q Rev 18:77–82
go back to reference Newey W, Smith R (2004) Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72(1):219–255 CrossRef Newey W, Smith R (2004) Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72(1):219–255 CrossRef
go back to reference Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426 CrossRef Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426 CrossRef
go back to reference Ortiz I, Cummins M (2011) Global inequality: beyond the bottom billion. Social and Economic Policies: Working Paper, UNICEF Ortiz I, Cummins M (2011) Global inequality: beyond the bottom billion. Social and Economic Policies: Working Paper, UNICEF
go back to reference Palley T (2007) Financialization: what it is and why it matters. The Levy Economics Institute working paper Palley T (2007) Financialization: what it is and why it matters. The Levy Economics Institute working paper
go back to reference Perraton J (2016) Macroeconomic implications of inequality and household debt: European evidence. Working paper: University of Sheffield Perraton J (2016) Macroeconomic implications of inequality and household debt: European evidence. Working paper: University of Sheffield
go back to reference Pesaran H, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Econ Lett 58(1):17–29 CrossRef Pesaran H, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Econ Lett 58(1):17–29 CrossRef
go back to reference Piketty T, Saez E (2014) Inequality in the long run. Science 344(6186):838–843 CrossRef Piketty T, Saez E (2014) Inequality in the long run. Science 344(6186):838–843 CrossRef
go back to reference Reuveny R, Li Q (2003) Economic openness, democracy, and income inequality: an empirical analysis. Comp Polit Stud 36(5):575–601 CrossRef Reuveny R, Li Q (2003) Economic openness, democracy, and income inequality: an empirical analysis. Comp Polit Stud 36(5):575–601 CrossRef
go back to reference Roodman D (2009a) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136 CrossRef Roodman D (2009a) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in stata. Stata J 9(1):86–136 CrossRef
go back to reference Roodman D (2009b) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71(1):135–158 CrossRef Roodman D (2009b) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71(1):135–158 CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan-Collins J, Greenham T, Werner R, Jackson A (2012) Where does money come from? A guide to the UK monetary and banking system. New Economics Foundation, London Ryan-Collins J, Greenham T, Werner R, Jackson A (2012) Where does money come from? A guide to the UK monetary and banking system. New Economics Foundation, London
go back to reference Saraceno F (2014) High inequality and its impact on the economy. Revue de l’OFCE, Presses de Sciences Po, pp 177–187 Saraceno F (2014) High inequality and its impact on the economy. Revue de l’OFCE, Presses de Sciences Po, pp 177–187
go back to reference Sigmund M, Ferstl R (2019) Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar. Q Rev Econ Finance (forthcoming) Sigmund M, Ferstl R (2019) Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar. Q Rev Econ Finance (forthcoming)
go back to reference Solt F (2016) The standardized world income inequality database: Swiid version 51. Soc Sci Q 97(5):1267–1281 CrossRef Solt F (2016) The standardized world income inequality database: Swiid version 51. Soc Sci Q 97(5):1267–1281 CrossRef
go back to reference Werner R (2005) New paradigm in macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke CrossRef Werner R (2005) New paradigm in macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke CrossRef
go back to reference Wisman J (2013) Wage stagnation, rising inequality and the financial crisis of 2008. Camb J Econ 37(4):921–945 CrossRef Wisman J (2013) Wage stagnation, rising inequality and the financial crisis of 2008. Camb J Econ 37(4):921–945 CrossRef
go back to reference Wolfson M, Epstein G (2013) The handbook of political economy of financial crises. Oxford University Press, New York Wolfson M, Epstein G (2013) The handbook of political economy of financial crises. Oxford University Press, New York
Metadata
Title
Reciprocity in bank regulatory reforms and income inequality: first evidence from a panel vector autoregression analysis
Authors
Lea Steininger
Michael Sigmund
Publication date
27-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Empirical Economics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Electronic ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01693-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Empirical Economics 4/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partner