Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2017

04-07-2017 | Research Paper

Recommendation-Based Conceptual Modeling and Ontology Evolution Framework (CMOE+)

Authors: Prof. Dr. Frederik Gailly, Nadejda Alkhaldi, Prof. Dr. Sven Casteleyn, Prof. Dr. Wouter Verbeke

Published in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Issue 4/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Within an enterprise, various stakeholders create different conceptual models, such as process, data, and requirements models. These models are fundamentally based on similar underlying enterprise (domain) concepts, but they differ in focus, use different modeling languages, take different viewpoints, utilize different terminology, and are used to develop different enterprise artifacts; as such, they typically lack consistency and interoperability. This issue can be solved by enterprise-specific ontologies, which serve as a reference during the conceptual model creation. Using such a shared semantic repository makes conceptual models interoperable and facilitates model integration. The challenge to accomplish this is twofold: on the one hand, an up-to-date enterprise-specific ontology needs to be created and maintained, and on the other hand, different modelers also need to be supported in their use of the enterprise-specific ontology. The authors propose to tackle these challenges by means of a recommendation-based conceptual modeling and an ontology evolution framework, and we focus in particular on ontology-based modeling support. To this end, the authors present a framework for Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) as a conceptual modeling language, and focus on how modelers can be assisted during the modeling process and how this impacts the semantic quality of the resulting models. Subsequently, a first, large-scale explorative experiment is presented involving 140 business students to evaluate the BPMN instantiation of our framework. The experiments show promising results with regard to incurred overheads, intention of use and model interoperability.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Show more products
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
2
http://​www.​stardog.​com (accessed 05 May 2017).
 
3
http://​www.​promtools.​org (accessed 5 Aug 2016).
 
13
All appendices are available online at https://​github.​com/​fgailly/​CMOEplusBPMN (accessed 5 Aug 2016).
 
14
Note that the reference model corresponding to the case study only contains 14 BPMN constructs; more than two errors is thus high and indicates poor model quality.
 
Literature
go back to reference Abramowicz W, Filipowska A, Kaczmarek M, Kaczmarek T (2007) Semantically enhanced business process modelling notation. CEUR Workshop Proc 251:88–91 Abramowicz W, Filipowska A, Kaczmarek M, Kaczmarek T (2007) Semantically enhanced business process modelling notation. CEUR Workshop Proc 251:88–91
go back to reference Becker J, Breuker D, Pfeiffer D, Räckers M (2009a) Constructing comparable business process models with domain specific languages—an empirical evaluation. In: Proceedings of 17th European conference on information system, pp 1–13 Becker J, Breuker D, Pfeiffer D, Räckers M (2009a) Constructing comparable business process models with domain specific languages—an empirical evaluation. In: Proceedings of 17th European conference on information system, pp 1–13
go back to reference Becker J, Delfmann P, Herwig S, Lis L, Stein A (2009b) Towards increased comparability of conceptual models-enforcing naming conventions through domain thesauri and linguistic grammars. In: ECIS 2009 proceedings, pp 1–13 Becker J, Delfmann P, Herwig S, Lis L, Stein A (2009b) Towards increased comparability of conceptual models-enforcing naming conventions through domain thesauri and linguistic grammars. In: ECIS 2009 proceedings, pp 1–13
go back to reference Becker J, Pfeiffer D, Falk T, Räckers M (2010) Semantic business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods, and information systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 187–211 Becker J, Pfeiffer D, Falk T, Räckers M (2010) Semantic business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods, and information systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 187–211
go back to reference Blomqvist E (2005) Fully automatic construction of enterprise ontologies using design patterns: initial method and first experiences. LNCS 3761:1314–1329 Blomqvist E (2005) Fully automatic construction of enterprise ontologies using design patterns: initial method and first experiences. LNCS 3761:1314–1329
go back to reference Born M, Dörr F, Weber I (2007) User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling. Web Inf Syst Eng 2007 Work. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 260–271 Born M, Dörr F, Weber I (2007) User-friendly semantic annotation in business process modeling. Web Inf Syst Eng 2007 Work. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 260–271
go back to reference Cabral L, Norton B, Domingue J (2009) The business process modelling ontology. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on semantic business process management. ACM, NY, pp 9–16 Cabral L, Norton B, Domingue J (2009) The business process modelling ontology. In: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on semantic business process management. ACM, NY, pp 9–16
go back to reference Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340CrossRef Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340CrossRef
go back to reference Di Francescomarino C, Tonella P (2009) Supporting ontology-based semantic annotation of business processes with automated suggestions. In: Halpin T, Krogstie J, Nurcan S, Proper E, Schmidt R, Soffer P, Ukor R (eds) LNBIP. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 211–223 Di Francescomarino C, Tonella P (2009) Supporting ontology-based semantic annotation of business processes with automated suggestions. In: Halpin T, Krogstie J, Nurcan S, Proper E, Schmidt R, Soffer P, Ukor R (eds) LNBIP. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 211–223
go back to reference Di Francescomarino C, Ghidini C, Rospocher M, Serafini L, Tonella P (2011) A framework for the collaborative specification of semantically annotated business processes. J Softw Maint Evol Res Pract 23:261–295. doi:10.1002/smr CrossRef Di Francescomarino C, Ghidini C, Rospocher M, Serafini L, Tonella P (2011) A framework for the collaborative specification of semantically annotated business processes. J Softw Maint Evol Res Pract 23:261–295. doi:10.​1002/​smr CrossRef
go back to reference Evermann J, Wand Y (2005) Toward formalizing domain modeling semantics in language syntax. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31:21–37CrossRef Evermann J, Wand Y (2005) Toward formalizing domain modeling semantics in language syntax. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31:21–37CrossRef
go back to reference Fill H-G (2011a) Using semantically annotated models for supporting business process benchmarking. In: Grabis J, Kirikova M (eds) Perspectives in business informatics research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 29–43CrossRef Fill H-G (2011a) Using semantically annotated models for supporting business process benchmarking. In: Grabis J, Kirikova M (eds) Perspectives in business informatics research. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 29–43CrossRef
go back to reference Fill H-G (2011b) On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations. In: Salinesi C, Pastor O (eds) Advances in information system and engineering work. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 134–148CrossRef Fill H-G (2011b) On the conceptualization of a modeling language for semantic model annotations. In: Salinesi C, Pastor O (eds) Advances in information system and engineering work. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 134–148CrossRef
go back to reference Geerts GL, McCarthy WE (1999) An accounting object infrastructure for knowledge based enterprise models. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl 14:89–94CrossRef Geerts GL, McCarthy WE (1999) An accounting object infrastructure for knowledge based enterprise models. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl 14:89–94CrossRef
go back to reference Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37:337-A6 Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37:337-A6
go back to reference Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. Int Conf Form Ontol Inf Syst. IOS, Trento, pp 3–15 Guarino N (1998) Formal ontology and information systems. Int Conf Form Ontol Inf Syst. IOS, Trento, pp 3–15
go back to reference Guarino N, Welty C (2002) Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Commun ACM 45:61–65CrossRef Guarino N, Welty C (2002) Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Commun ACM 45:61–65CrossRef
go back to reference Guizzardi G, Wagner G (2011) Can BPMN be used for making simulation models? In: Barjis J, Eldabi T, Gupta A (eds) Enterprise and organizational modeling and simulation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 100–115CrossRef Guizzardi G, Wagner G (2011) Can BPMN be used for making simulation models? In: Barjis J, Eldabi T, Gupta A (eds) Enterprise and organizational modeling and simulation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 100–115CrossRef
go back to reference Guizzardi G, Wagner G, Almeida JPA, Guizzardi RSS (2015) Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl Ontol 10:259–271. doi:10.3233/AO-150157 CrossRef Guizzardi G, Wagner G, Almeida JPA, Guizzardi RSS (2015) Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl Ontol 10:259–271. doi:10.​3233/​AO-150157 CrossRef
go back to reference Hepp M, Leymann F, Domingue J, Wahler A, Fensel D (2005) Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic web services for business process management. IEEE ICEBE. IEEE, Beijing, pp 535–540 Hepp M, Leymann F, Domingue J, Wahler A, Fensel D (2005) Semantic business process management: a vision towards using semantic web services for business process management. IEEE ICEBE. IEEE, Beijing, pp 535–540
go back to reference Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2010) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28:75–105 Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2010) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28:75–105
go back to reference Leutgeb A, Utz W, Woitsch R, Fill H-G (2007) Adaptive processes in e-government—a field report about semantic-based approaches from the EU-project FIT. ICEIS 2007. Proceedings of ninth international conference on enterprise information system, vol EIS. Funchal, Madeira, pp 264–269 Leutgeb A, Utz W, Woitsch R, Fill H-G (2007) Adaptive processes in e-government—a field report about semantic-based approaches from the EU-project FIT. ICEIS 2007. Proceedings of ninth international conference on enterprise information system, vol EIS. Funchal, Madeira, pp 264–269
go back to reference Lindland OI, Sindre G, Solvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11:42–49CrossRef Lindland OI, Sindre G, Solvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11:42–49CrossRef
go back to reference Mylopoulos J (1992) Conceptual modelling and telos. In: Loucopoulos P, Zicari R (eds) Concept model databases, CASE. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 49–68 Mylopoulos J (1992) Conceptual modelling and telos. In: Loucopoulos P, Zicari R (eds) Concept model databases, CASE. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 49–68
go back to reference Object Manament Group (OMG) (2011) Business process modeling notation specification Version 2.0 (formal/2011-01-03) Object Manament Group (OMG) (2011) Business process modeling notation specification Version 2.0 (formal/2011-01-03)
go back to reference Opdahl AL, Henderson-Sellers B (2002) Ontological evaluation of the uml using the bunge–wand–weber model. Softw Syst Model 1:43–67 Opdahl AL, Henderson-Sellers B (2002) Ontological evaluation of the uml using the bunge–wand–weber model. Softw Syst Model 1:43–67
go back to reference Opdahl AL, Berio G, Harzallah M, Matulevicius R (2012) An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling. Appl Ontol 7:49–92. doi:10.3233/ao-2011-0101 Opdahl AL, Berio G, Harzallah M, Matulevicius R (2012) An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling. Appl Ontol 7:49–92. doi:10.​3233/​ao-2011-0101
go back to reference Pinggera J, Zugal S, Weber B (2010) Investigating the process of process modeling with cheetah experimental platform-tool paper. In: Mutschler B, Recker J, Wieringa R, Ralyté J, Plebani P (eds) CAiSE 2010 Workshop ER-POIS, Hammamet, Tunisia, pp 13–18 Pinggera J, Zugal S, Weber B (2010) Investigating the process of process modeling with cheetah experimental platform-tool paper. In: Mutschler B, Recker J, Wieringa R, Ralyté J, Plebani P (eds) CAiSE 2010 Workshop ER-POIS, Hammamet, Tunisia, pp 13–18
go back to reference Pittke F, Leopold H, Mendling J (2013) Spotting terminology deficiencies in process model repositories. In: Nurcan S et al (eds) Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 147. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 292–307 Pittke F, Leopold H, Mendling J (2013) Spotting terminology deficiencies in process model repositories. In: Nurcan S et al (eds) Enterprise, business-process and information systems modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 147. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 292–307
go back to reference Ruy FB, Reginato CC, Santos VA, Falbo RA, Guizzardi G (2015) Ontology engineering by combining ontology patterns. In: Johannesson P, Lee M, Liddle S, Opdahl A, Pastor López Ó (eds) Conceptual modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9381. Springer, Cham, pp 173–186 Ruy FB, Reginato CC, Santos VA, Falbo RA, Guizzardi G (2015) Ontology engineering by combining ontology patterns. In: Johannesson P, Lee M, Liddle S, Opdahl A, Pastor López Ó (eds) Conceptual modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9381. Springer, Cham, pp 173–186
go back to reference Suárez-Figueroa MC, Gómez-Pérez A, Motta E, Gangemi A (2012) Ontology engineering in an networked world. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Suárez-Figueroa MC, Gómez-Pérez A, Motta E, Gangemi A (2012) Ontology engineering in an networked world. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
go back to reference Thomas O, Fellmann MAM, Fellmann MAM (2009) Semantic process modeling—design and implementation of an ontology-based representation of business processes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1:438–451. doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0078-8 CrossRef Thomas O, Fellmann MAM, Fellmann MAM (2009) Semantic process modeling—design and implementation of an ontology-based representation of business processes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1:438–451. doi:10.​1007/​s12599-009-0078-8 CrossRef
go back to reference Uschold M, King M, Moralee S, Zorgios Y (1998) The enterprise ontology. Knowl Eng Rev Spec Issue Putt Ontol Use 13:31–89 Uschold M, King M, Moralee S, Zorgios Y (1998) The enterprise ontology. Knowl Eng Rev Spec Issue Putt Ontol Use 13:31–89
go back to reference Winkler W (1990) String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the Fellegi–Sunter model of record linkage Winkler W (1990) String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the Fellegi–Sunter model of record linkage
go back to reference Yu ESK (1997) Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international symposium on requirement engineering, pp 226–235 Yu ESK (1997) Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international symposium on requirement engineering, pp 226–235
Metadata
Title
Recommendation-Based Conceptual Modeling and Ontology Evolution Framework (CMOE+)
Authors
Prof. Dr. Frederik Gailly
Nadejda Alkhaldi
Prof. Dr. Sven Casteleyn
Prof. Dr. Wouter Verbeke
Publication date
04-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Published in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Electronic ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0488-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2017 Go to the issue

Premium Partner