Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

24-07-2024 | LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Reduction potential of German environmental food impacts due to a planetary health diet

Authors: Ulrike Eberle, Nico Mumm

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 9/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

The current food production and consumption patterns are highly relevant for the exceedance of the planetary boundaries. Also in Germany food consumption is responsible for high environmental impacts as several studies already showed. However, not all relevant impact categories have yet been quantified for German food consumption, and also the reduction potential due to changes in dietary patterns is not fully assessed. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to analyse the environmental impacts of German food consumption with respect to impacts on climate change, biodiversity and water, and to build three scenarios for a German planetary health diet in order to identify reduction potentials.

Methods

The analysis has been conducted using life cycle assessment (LCA) according to ISO 14040 series. The modelling is based on the average German food basket at consumption level and the functional unit chosen is the food consumption for 1 year for all German citizens—the German food basket. The environmental impacts assessed within this study are greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption and water scarcity, as well as land use and related impacts on terrestrial biodiversity. Furthermore, based on the current diet (‘status quo’), three scenarios for Germany were created following the recommendations for a planetary health diet for a flexitarian, a vegetarian and a vegan diet. The scenarios were kept as close as possible to the current diet in Germany, framed by a set of rules.

Results and discussion

The results show, that today, each person in Germany consumes on average about 2650 kcal per person and day and thus 6% more than recommended in food-based dietary guidelines developed in the planetary health diet and about 25% more than recommended in the German guidelines. This finding correlates with the fact that over 50% of German inhabitants are overweight and almost a fifth (18.5%) is obese. Regarding the global environmental impacts caused by German food consumption, 216,000 kt CO₂e are emitted (of which 46,000 kt CO₂e result from dLUC), 166,000 km² of land is occupied each year, resulting in a biodiversity impact of 12,300 BVI*km²*a and 2.401 km³ of irrigation water is consumed, which causes a water scarcity footprint of 118.6 km³_worldeq. The results confirm findings of previous studies regarding climate impacts, direct land use change and occupation, and add new findings regarding water scarcity and biodiversity impacts. Furthermore, results show reduction potentials due to changes in dietary patterns. It is interesting to note that all assessed environmental impacts, including biodiversity impacts, are highly dependent on the share of animal foods in the diet, with the exception of water consumption and water footprint. It is mainly caused by plant-based foods and strongly influenced by the origin of the plant-based products, but also by the water demand of the crop itself.

previous article Sustainable astronomy: A comparative life cycle assessment of off-grid hybrid energy systems to supply large telescopes

next article Enabling comprehensive assessment of marine eutrophication impacts and their evaluation against regional safe operating space

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Béné C, Fanzo J, Haddad L, Hawkes C, Caron P, Vermeulen S, Herrero M, Oosterveer P (2020) Five priorities to operationalize the EAT–Lancet Commission report. Nat Food 1(8):8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-0136-4CrossRef

Benton TG, Bieg C, Harwatt H, Pudasaini R, Wellesley L (2021) Food system impacts on biodiversity loss. p 75

Blonk H, Tyszler M, van Paassen M, Braconi N, Draijer N, van Rijn J (2022) Agri footprint 6 methodology report

BMEL (2017–2019) Statistisches Jahrbuch. Ernährungswirtschaft, Versorgung mit Lebensmitteln. Berlin

BMEL (2022) BMEL (Hrsg.). Deutschland, wie es isst. Der BMEL-Ernährungsreport 2022. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMEL)

Boulay A-M, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(2):368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8CrossRef

Breidenassel C, Schäfer AC, Micka M, Richter M, Linseisen J, Watzl B (2022) For the German Nutrition Society (DGE): The Planetary Health Diet in contrast to the food-based dietary guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE). A DGE statement. ErnährungsUmschau 69(5):56-72.e1-e3. https://doi.org/10.4455/eu.2022.012CrossRef

Campbell B, Beare D, Bennett E, Hall-Spencer J, Ingram J, Jaramillo F, Ortiz R, Ramankutty N, Sayer J, Shindell D (2017) Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09595-220408CrossRef

Crenna E, Sinkko T, Sala S (2019) Biodiversity impacts due to food consumption in Europe. J Clean Prod 227:378–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.054CrossRef

Damiani M, Sinkko T, Caldeira C, Tosches D, Robuchon M, Sala S (2023) Critical review of methods and models for biodiversity impact assessment and their applicability in the LCA context. EIA Rev 101:107134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107134CrossRef

De Laurentiis V, Biganzoli F, Valenzano A, Caldeira C, Serenella S (2023) Building a balancing system for food wasteaccounting at national level: Model updates version 2.0. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/374244

Eberle U, Fels J (2016) Environmental impacts of German food consumption and food losses. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:759–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0983-7CrossRef

European Commission (2017) PEFCR guidance document—guidance for the development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs), version 6.3

European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) (2019) Body mass index (BMI) by sex, age and income quintile. Available at https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=hlth_ehis_bm1i&lang=en. Accessed 20 Feb 2020

Fehrenbach H, Grahl B, Giegrich J, Busch M (2015) Hemeroby as an impact category indicator for the integration of land use into life cycle (impact) assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(11):1511–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0955-yCrossRef

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020a) Detailed trade matrix. FAOSTAT. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TM. Accessed 4 Nov 2020

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020b) FishStatJ-Databse. Available at www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/FishStatJ/en. Accessed on 3 Nov 2020

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2020c) Crops. FAOSTAT. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 4 Nov 2020

Frischknecht R, Jolliet O (2019) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators, vol 2

Gallai N, Salles J-M, Settele J, Vaissière BE (2009) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol Econ 68(3):810–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014CrossRef

García-Herrero L, Gibin D, Damiani M, Sanyé-Mengual E, Sala S (2023) What is the water footprint of EU food consumption? A comparison of water footprint assessment methods. J Clean Prod 415:137807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137807CrossRef

Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U (2011) Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. Study conducted for the International Congress Save Food! at Interpack 2011, [16 - 17 May], Düsseldorf, Germany. International Congress Save Food!, Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Hirvonen K, Bai Y, Headey D, Masters WA (2020) Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8(1):e59–e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4CrossRef

IINAS (2020) GEMIS 5.0: Gesamt-Emissions-Modell-Integrierter Systeme, version 5.0. IINAS. Download https://iinas.org/downloads/gemis-downloads/

IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J.Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley, Hrsg.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

ISO 14040 series (2006): ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework Published (Edition 2, 2006) & ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines Published (Edition 1, 2006)

Leverenz D, Schneider F, Schmidt T, Hafner G, Nevárez Z, Kranert M (2021) Food waste generation in Germany in the scope of European legal requirements for monitoring and reporting. Sustainability 13(12):6616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126616CrossRef

Lindner J, Fehrenbach H, Winter L, Bloemer J, Knuepffer E (2019) Valuing biodiversity in life cycle impact assessment. Sustainability 11(20):5628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205628CrossRef

Meier T (2014) Umweltschutz mit Messer und Gabel - Der ökologische Rucksack der Ernährung in Deutschland. oekom Verlag, Munich

Meier T, Gärtner C, Christen O (2014) The susDISH analysis method - sustainability in the catering industry. Taking account of both nutritional and environmental aspects in recipe planing. Institute for Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Halle-Wittenberg University, German Agricultural Society (DLG), Frankfurt (Main)

Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Value of water research report series no. 47. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, The Netherlands. http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Report47-WaterFootprintCrops-Vol1.pdf

Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J et al (2007) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA (11 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.05.250CrossRef

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program) (Hrsg) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press

Nemecek T, Bengoa X, Lansche J, Roesch A, Faist-Emmenegger M, Rossi V, Humbert S (2020) World Food LCA Database—methodological guidelines for the life cycle inventory of agricultural products (3.5)

Notarnicola B, Tassielli G, Renzulli PA, Castellani V, Sala S (2017) Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. J Clean Prod 140:753–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080CrossRef

Nuss P, Sanyé-Mengual E, Sala S (2023) Monitoring the consumption footprint of countries to support policy-making: an assessment of data availability in Germany. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13412CrossRef

Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML, Fantke P, Hassellöv M, MacLeod M, Ryberg MW, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Villarrubia-Gómez P, Wang Z, Hauschild MZ (2022) Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. ES&T 56(3):1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158CrossRef

Petruzzelli M, García-Herrero L, De Menna F, Vittuari M (2023) Towards sustainable school meals: integrating environmental and cost implications for nutritious diets through optimisation modelling. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01346-9CrossRef

Poore J, Nemecek T (2018) Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392):987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216CrossRef

Potts S, Biesmeijer K, Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Scheper JA (2015) Status and trends of European pollinators. Key findings of the STEP project. Pensoft Publishers. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/status-and-trends-of-european-pollinators-key-findings-of-the-ste

Ran Y, Cederberg C, Jonell M, Bergman K, De Boer IJ, Einarsson R, Karlsson J (2024) Environmental assessment of diets: overview and guidance on indicator choice. Lancet Planet Health 8(3):e172–e187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00006-8CrossRef

Rockström J, Gupta J, Qin D, Lade SJ, Abrams JF, Andersen LS, Armstrong McKay DI, Bai X, Bala G, Bunn SE, Ciobanu D, DeClerck F, Ebi K, Gifford L, Gordon C, Hasan S, Kanie N, Lenton TM, Loriani S, Zhang X (2023) Safe and just Earth system boundaries. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8CrossRef

Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472aCrossRef

Sanyé-Mengual E, Sala S (2023) Consumption footprint and domestic footprint: assessing the environmental impacts of EU consumption and production: life cycle assessment to support the European Green Deal. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2760/218540CrossRef

Schäfer AC, Boeing H, Conrad J, Watzl B (2024) Für die DGE Arbeitsgruppe Lebensmittelbezogene Ernährungsempfehlungen: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen der lebensmittelbezogenen Ernährungsempfehlungen für Deutschland. Methodik und Ableitungskonzepte. ErnährungsUmschau 71(3):M158–M166.e5–e7. https://doi.org/10.4455/eu.2024.009CrossRef

Schmidt T, Schneider F, Leverenz D, Hafner G (2019) Lebensmittelabfälle in Deutschland – Baseline 2015. Thünen Report 71. Braunschweig 2019

Sinkko T, Caldeira C, Corrado S, Sala S (2019) Food consumption and wasted food. In: Saving food. Elsevier, pp 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815357-4.00011-0CrossRef

Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855CrossRef

Tulloch AI, Borthwick F, Bogueva D, Eltholth M, Grech A, Edgar D, Boylan S, McNeill G (2023) How the EAT–Lancet Commission on Food in the Anthropocene influenced discourse and research on food systems: a systematic review covering the first 2 years post-publication. Lancet Glob Health 11(7):e1125–e1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00212-7CrossRef

Vaidyanathan G (2021) What humanity should eat to stay healthy and save the planet. Nature 600(7887):22–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03565-5CrossRef

Wang-Erlandsson L, Tobian A, van der Ent RJ, Fetzer I, te Wierik S, Porkka M, Staal A, Jaramillo F, Dahlmann H, Singh C, Greve P, Gerten D, Keys PW, Gleeson T, Cornell SE, Steffen W, Bai X, Rockström J (2022) A planetary boundary for green water. Nat Rev Earth Environ. EISSN 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00287-8

Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B (2016) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8CrossRef

Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, Vries WD, Sibanda LM, Murray CJL (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393(10170):447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4CrossRef

Xu X, Sharma P, Shu S, Lin T-S, Ciais P, Tubiello FN, Smith P, Campbell N, Jain AK (2021) Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food 2(9):724–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00358-xCrossRef

Yu Q, You L, Wood-Sichra U, Ru Y, Joglekar AKB, Fritz S, Xiong W, Lu M, Wu W, Yang P (2020) A cultivated planet in 2010 – part 2: the global gridded agricultural-production maps. ESSD 12(4):3545–3572. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3545-2020CrossRef

Zagmutt FJ, Pouzou JG, Costard S (2019) The EAT–Lancet Commission: a flawed approach? Lancet 394(10204):1140–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31903-8CrossRef

Zampori L, Pant R (2019) Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method (JRC115959, EUR 29682 EN; JRC technical reports). EC JRC

Title: Reduction potential of German environmental food impacts due to a planetary health diet
Authors: Ulrike Eberle
Nico Mumm
Publication date: 24-07-2024
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 9/2024
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02352-4

Statistics-based LCA of artisanal fishing in the Union of the Comoros: efficiency challenges

DATA AVAILABILITY, DATA QUALITY

Effect factors for marine invasion impacts on biodiversity

Open Access
OCEAN RESOURCES & MARINE CONSERVATION

Factors influencing the carbon footprint of rice production in Northeastern Vietnam

LCA FOR AGRICULTURE.

Sustainable astronomy: A comparative life cycle assessment of off-grid hybrid energy systems to supply large telescopes

Open Access
LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS

Systematising the LCA approaches’ soup: a framework based on text mining

Open Access
CRITICAL REVIEW

Unveil the carbon footprint of textiles dyed with different reactive dyestuff recipes from an industrial manufacturing perspective

CARBON FOOTPRINTING