Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Regret-Based Allocation of Autonomy in Shared Visual Detection for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly in Manufacturing

Authors : S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, Zhanrui Liao, Longsheng Jiang, Yue Wang

Published in: Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Appropriate human–robot collaboration (HRC) in assembly in manufacturing will enable more flexible assembly. During the collaboration, the robot needs to make decisions on various issues such as detection of correct assembly parts and correct assembly style to ensure quality, and obstacles to ensure safety. The robot’s decisions may not be reliable due to limitations of the detection systems and disturbances. Human intervention is then necessary though too much involvement of human will increase human workload. Hence, allocation of autonomy through switching between autonomous and manual vision modes seems to be reasonable. Bayesian sequential decision-making can be used to determine the optimal allocation of autonomous and manual modes, but this approach does not fit with human’s decision style, which will result in lack of interests of the human in the collaboration. Human regret plays a critical role in decision-making under uncertainties in detection phenomena. In this case, regret-based suboptimal allocation of autonomous and manual modes in the decision-making is more humanlike, may ensure similar mental models between human and robot and thus a better fit with human psychology, which will potentially improve assembly performance. In this chapter, we include regret in Bayesian decision-making in the detection of correct assembly parts by the robot to provide a risk-based however humanlike decision-making framework, which dynamically switches between autonomous and manual modes in the decision processes in detection phenomena. We then evaluate the effectiveness of the framework for HRC in an assembly task.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Kaipa KN, Morato C, Liu J, Gupta SK (2014) Human-robot collaboration for bin-picking tasks to support low-volume assemblies. In: Proceedings of RSS workshop on human-robot collaboration for industrial manufacturing Kaipa KN, Morato C, Liu J, Gupta SK (2014) Human-robot collaboration for bin-picking tasks to support low-volume assemblies. In: Proceedings of RSS workshop on human-robot collaboration for industrial manufacturing
2.
go back to reference Wilcox R, Nikolaidis S, Shah J (2012) Optimization of temporal dynamics for adaptive human-robot interaction in assembly manufacturing. In: Proceedings of robotics: science and systems conference (RSS) Wilcox R, Nikolaidis S, Shah J (2012) Optimization of temporal dynamics for adaptive human-robot interaction in assembly manufacturing. In: Proceedings of robotics: science and systems conference (RSS)
11.
go back to reference Rahman SMM, Sadr B, Wang Y (2015) Trust-based optimal subtask allocation and model predictive control for human-robot collaborative assembly in manufacturing. In: Proceedings of ASME dynamic systems and controls conference, Columbus, Ohio, October 28–30, 2015, Paper No. DSCC2015-9850, pp V002T32A004, 10 pages Rahman SMM, Sadr B, Wang Y (2015) Trust-based optimal subtask allocation and model predictive control for human-robot collaborative assembly in manufacturing. In: Proceedings of ASME dynamic systems and controls conference, Columbus, Ohio, October 28–30, 2015, Paper No. DSCC2015-9850, pp V002T32A004, 10 pages
12.
go back to reference Mizanoor Rahman SMM, Liao Z, Jiang L, Wang Y (2016) Regret-based allocation of autonomy in human-robot shared visual detection of faulty parts in collaborative assembly in manufacturing. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), 2016, Fort Worth, Texas Mizanoor Rahman SMM, Liao Z, Jiang L, Wang Y (2016) Regret-based allocation of autonomy in human-robot shared visual detection of faulty parts in collaborative assembly in manufacturing. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), 2016, Fort Worth, Texas
13.
go back to reference Rahman SMM, Wang Y (2015) Dynamic affection-based motion control of a humanoid robot to collaborate with human in flexible assembly in manufacturing. In: Proceedings of ASME dynamic systems and controls conference, Columbus, Ohio, October 28–30, 2015, Paper No. DSCC2015-9841, pp V003T40A005, 10 pages Rahman SMM, Wang Y (2015) Dynamic affection-based motion control of a humanoid robot to collaborate with human in flexible assembly in manufacturing. In: Proceedings of ASME dynamic systems and controls conference, Columbus, Ohio, October 28–30, 2015, Paper No. DSCC2015-9841, pp V003T40A005, 10 pages
14.
go back to reference Truong X, Yoong V, Ngo T (2014) Dynamic social zone for human safety in human-robot shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of 2014 11th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI), pp 391–396, 12–15 Nov 2014 Truong X, Yoong V, Ngo T (2014) Dynamic social zone for human safety in human-robot shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of 2014 11th international conference on ubiquitous robots and ambient intelligence (URAI), pp 391–396, 12–15 Nov 2014
15.
go back to reference Schlueter R, Nussbaum-Thom M, Ney H (2012) Does the cost function matter in Bayes decision rule? IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(2):292–301CrossRef Schlueter R, Nussbaum-Thom M, Ney H (2012) Does the cost function matter in Bayes decision rule? IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(2):292–301CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263292CrossRefMATH Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263292CrossRefMATH
17.
go back to reference Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol 85(2):273CrossRef Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol 85(2):273CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang Y (2015) Regret-based Bayesian sequential decision-making for human-agent collaborative search tasks. In: Proceedings of American control conference (ACC), pp 5738–5743, 1–3 July 2015 Wang Y (2015) Regret-based Bayesian sequential decision-making for human-agent collaborative search tasks. In: Proceedings of American control conference (ACC), pp 5738–5743, 1–3 July 2015
19.
go back to reference Wang Y (2016) Regret-based automated decision-making aids for domain search tasks using human-agent collaborative teams. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol pp 1–16 Wang Y (2016) Regret-based automated decision-making aids for domain search tasks using human-agent collaborative teams. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol pp 1–16
20.
go back to reference Chorus CG (2012) Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria. Transportmetrica 8(4):291–305CrossRef Chorus CG (2012) Regret theory-based route choices and traffic equilibria. Transportmetrica 8(4):291–305CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 92:805–824CrossRef Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 92:805–824CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Coricelli G, Dolan RJ, Sirigu A (2007) Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret. Trends Cogn. Sci 11(6):258–265CrossRef Coricelli G, Dolan RJ, Sirigu A (2007) Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret. Trends Cogn. Sci 11(6):258–265CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tan J, Duan F, Zhang Y, Watanabe K, Kato R, Arai T (2009) Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: design and development. In: Proceeding of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, p 2934 Tan J, Duan F, Zhang Y, Watanabe K, Kato R, Arai T (2009) Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: design and development. In: Proceeding of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, p 2934
25.
go back to reference Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’cole amricaine. Econom J Econom Soc 21(4):503–546MathSciNetMATH Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’cole amricaine. Econom J Econom Soc 21(4):503–546MathSciNetMATH
26.
go back to reference Bleichrodt H, Cillo A, Diecidue E (2010) A quantitative measurement of regret theory. Manag Sci 56(1):161–175CrossRef Bleichrodt H, Cillo A, Diecidue E (2010) A quantitative measurement of regret theory. Manag Sci 56(1):161–175CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Marcatto F, Ferrante D (2008) The regret and disappointment scale: an instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making. Judgm Decis Mak 3:87–99 Marcatto F, Ferrante D (2008) The regret and disappointment scale: an instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making. Judgm Decis Mak 3:87–99
28.
go back to reference Carifio J, Rocco JP (2007) Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Soc Sci 3(3):106–116 Carifio J, Rocco JP (2007) Ten common misunderstandings, misconceptions, persistent myths and urban legends about Likert scales and Likert response formats and their antidotes. J Soc Sci 3(3):106–116
29.
go back to reference Hoff KA, Bashir M (2014) Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 57(3):407–434CrossRef Hoff KA, Bashir M (2014) Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 57(3):407–434CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regret-Based Allocation of Autonomy in Shared Visual DetectionShared visual detection for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly in Manufacturing
Authors
S. M. Mizanoor Rahman
Zhanrui Liao
Longsheng Jiang
Yue Wang
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_9