Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2020

02-05-2019 | THE FUTURE OF ECOLABELS

Relevance of attributional and consequential information for environmental product labelling

Authors: Bo Pedersen Weidema, Moana S. Simas, Jannick Schmidt, Massimo Pizzol, Søren Løkke, Pedro L. Brancoli

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 5/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Considering the general agreement in the literature that environmental labelling should be based on consequential modelling, while all actually implemented environmental labelling schemes are based on attributional modelling, we investigate the arguments for this situation as provided in the literature, and whether a dual label, representing on the same label the attributional and consequential results for the same product, can be a relevant solution or at least contribute to a more informed discussion.

Methods

We developed a dual label for three hypothetical, comparable products and presented this for a small test audience, asking three questions, namely “Which product would you choose?”, “Was the attributional information useful?” and “Would you accept to have only the attributional information?”

Results and discussion

From this small pilot exercise, it appears that informed consumers may have a strong preference for consequential information and that the main problem in communicating consequential results is that they are perceived as less trustworthy and more uncertain due to the fact that the consequences are located in the future. It thus appears important to build into a consequential label some increased level of guarantee of future good behaviour.

Conclusions

We propose to apply the above questions to a more statistically representative audience to confirm or refute the findings of this little test exercise.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Brandão M, Clift R, Cowie A, Greenhalgh S (2014) The use of life cycle assessment in the support of robust (climate) policy making. J Ind Ecol 18(3):461–463CrossRef Brandão M, Clift R, Cowie A, Greenhalgh S (2014) The use of life cycle assessment in the support of robust (climate) policy making. J Ind Ecol 18(3):461–463CrossRef
go back to reference Christiansen K, Wesnæs M, Weidema BP (2006) Consumer demands on type III environmental declarations. Report commissioned by ANEC - the consumer voice in standardisation. Available from <http://lca-net.com/p/1027> Christiansen K, Wesnæs M, Weidema BP (2006) Consumer demands on type III environmental declarations. Report commissioned by ANEC - the consumer voice in standardisation. Available from <http://​lca-net.​com/​p/​1027>
go back to reference EPD International (2015) General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 2.5 EPD International (2015) General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 2.5
go back to reference Hall JW, Lempert RJ, Keller K, Hackbarth A, Mijere C, McInerney DJ (2012) Robust climate policies under uncertainty: a comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Anal 32(10):1657–1672CrossRef Hall JW, Lempert RJ, Keller K, Hackbarth A, Mijere C, McInerney DJ (2012) Robust climate policies under uncertainty: a comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Anal 32(10):1657–1672CrossRef
go back to reference JRC-IEA (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed guidance. First edition March 2010. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Available from <http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/> JRC-IEA (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed guidance. First edition March 2010. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Available from <http://​lct.​jrc.​ec.​europa.​eu/​>
go back to reference Muthu SS (2014) Assessing the environmental impact of textiles and the clothing supply chain. Woodhead Publishing Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles No 157 212 pages ISBN-10 1782421041 ISBN-13 978-1782421047 Muthu SS (2014) Assessing the environmental impact of textiles and the clothing supply chain. Woodhead Publishing Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles No 157 212 pages ISBN-10 1782421041 ISBN-13 978-1782421047
go back to reference Schmidt J, de Saxcé M (2016) Arla Foods Environmental Profit and Loss Accounting 2014. Environmental project No. 1860, 2016. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen. Available from <http://lca-net.com/p/2343> Schmidt J, de Saxcé M (2016) Arla Foods Environmental Profit and Loss Accounting 2014. Environmental project No. 1860, 2016. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen. Available from <http://​lca-net.​com/​p/​2343>
go back to reference Tillman A-M (2000) Significance of decision making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:113–123CrossRef Tillman A-M (2000) Significance of decision making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:113–123CrossRef
go back to reference Tillman A-M (2010) Methodology for life cycle assessment. In: Sonnesen U, Berlin J, Ziegler F (eds) Environmental assessment and management in the food industry: Life cycle assessment and related approaches. Woodhead publishing series in food science, technology and nutrition no. 194, pp 59–82 Tillman A-M (2010) Methodology for life cycle assessment. In: Sonnesen U, Berlin J, Ziegler F (eds) Environmental assessment and management in the food industry: Life cycle assessment and related approaches. Woodhead publishing series in food science, technology and nutrition no. 194, pp 59–82
go back to reference Vessia Ø (2013) LCA in merit-based regulatory policy making – LCA results determining market access. Chapter 8.1 in Sustainability assessment of future-oriented scenarios: a review of data modelling approaches in Life Cycle Assessment. Towards recommendations for policy making and business strategies edited by C. de Camillis et al. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Last accessed 13 September 2017) from <http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC82804/lb-na-26088-en-n.pdf> Vessia Ø (2013) LCA in merit-based regulatory policy making – LCA results determining market access. Chapter 8.1 in Sustainability assessment of future-oriented scenarios: a review of data modelling approaches in Life Cycle Assessment. Towards recommendations for policy making and business strategies edited by C. de Camillis et al. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Last accessed 13 September 2017) from <http://​publications.​jrc.​ec.​europa.​eu/​repository/​bitstream/​JRC82804/​lb-na-26088-en-n.​pdf>
go back to reference Wardenaar T, van Ruijven T, Mendoza Beltran A, Vad K, Guinée J, Heijungs R (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1059–1067CrossRef Wardenaar T, van Ruijven T, Mendoza Beltran A, Vad K, Guinée J, Heijungs R (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1059–1067CrossRef
go back to reference Weidema BP (2001) Two cases of misleading environmental declarations due to system boundary choices. Presentation for the 9th SETAC Europe LCA case studies symposium, Noordwijkerhout, 2001.11.14-15. Available from <http://lca-net.com/p/1131> Weidema BP (2001) Two cases of misleading environmental declarations due to system boundary choices. Presentation for the 9th SETAC Europe LCA case studies symposium, Noordwijkerhout, 2001.11.14-15. Available from <http://​lca-net.​com/​p/​1131>
go back to reference Weidema BP (2017) Estimation of the size of error introduced into consequential models by using attributional background datasets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(8):1241–1246CrossRef Weidema BP (2017) Estimation of the size of error introduced into consequential models by using attributional background datasets. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(8):1241–1246CrossRef
go back to reference Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen A-M (1999) Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:448–456 Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen A-M (1999) Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4:448–456
Metadata
Title
Relevance of attributional and consequential information for environmental product labelling
Authors
Bo Pedersen Weidema
Moana S. Simas
Jannick Schmidt
Massimo Pizzol
Søren Løkke
Pedro L. Brancoli
Publication date
02-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01628-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5/2020 Go to the issue