Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Requisites for Open Budgeting: A Comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian Regions Using QCA

Author : Leonid Smorgunov

Published in: Digital Transformation and Global Society

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The practice of citizens’ involvement in the process of the formation, monitoring and evaluation of performance of the public budget has become one of the most important forms of cooperation of citizens and government. Of particular importance is acquiring a digital form of government where the public use of data creates a solid platform for the modern type of “co-production” of public budgets. Modern budgeting based on cooperation transforms designs of budgetary policy, accountability systems, processes of identifying public values, and others. Ensuring citizen-oriented data relating to the budget here gets particular importance, and sharing the learning of citizens and the government for inclusive budget process becomes the main requisite for successful collaboration. This paper analyzes the Russian practice of open budget and “budget for the citizens” in the context of different requisites: social-economic and informational, which construct an inclusive capacity of the regions. This practice was introduced in 2013 at the federal and regional levels. Though institutions of “budget for the citizens” inure for legitimating regimes, they are also good factors for mutual learning for cooperation. Transparency of budgetary data, its transformation for the citizens, and budgeting, initiated by citizens, affect the character of Russian designs for inclusive budgeting in the regions. On the basis of different ratings of open budgeting and requisites, this paper explains the complex configuration of requisites for the open budget and the ‘budget for citizens’ and three models of introducing forms of e-participation. The main hypothesis of the study is the higher the level of inclusive capacity of the region, the higher the openness of budget data and the “budget for citizens”. For a comparison of 22 Russian regions, the QCA method has been used.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Abell, P.: Foundations for a qualitative comparative method. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 34(1), 105–115 (1989)CrossRef Abell, P.: Foundations for a qualitative comparative method. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 34(1), 105–115 (1989)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ansell, C., Gash, A.: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(4), 543–571 (2008)CrossRef Ansell, C., Gash, A.: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18(4), 543–571 (2008)CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)CrossRef Boukhis, I., Ayachi, R., Eloedi, Z., Mellouli, S., Amor, N.B.: Decision model for policy makers in the context of citizens engagement: application on participatory budgeting. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34(6), 740–756 (2015)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)CrossRef Cabannes, Y.: Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ. Urban. 16(1), 27–31 (2004)CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (eds.): Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009) Rihoux, B., Ragin, C. (eds.): Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
7.
go back to reference Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)CrossRef Ganuza, E., Frances, F.: The deliberative turn in participation: the problem of inclusion and deliberative opportunities in participatory budgeting. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4(2), 283–302 (2012)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, New York (2006) Rihoux, B., Grimm, H. (eds.): Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Springer, New York (2006)
9.
go back to reference Kernaghan, K.: Moving towards integrated public governance: improving service delivery through community engagement. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 75(2), 239–254 (2009)CrossRef Kernaghan, K.: Moving towards integrated public governance: improving service delivery through community engagement. Int. Rev. Adm. Sci. 75(2), 239–254 (2009)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017) Krenjova, J., Raudla, R.: Policy diffusion at the local level: participatory budgeting in Estonia. Urban Aff. Rev. 3(4), 1–29 (2017)
11.
go back to reference Markoff, J.: A comparative method: reflections on Charles Ragin’s innovations in comparative analysis. Hist. Methods: J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 23(4), 177–181 (1990)CrossRef Markoff, J.: A comparative method: reflections on Charles Ragin’s innovations in comparative analysis. Hist. Methods: J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 23(4), 177–181 (1990)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ragin, C. (ed.): Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. E. J. Brill, Leiden (1991) Ragin, C. (ed.): Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research. E. J. Brill, Leiden (1991)
14.
go back to reference Ragin, C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987) Ragin, C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)
15.
go back to reference Ragin, C.: The logic of the comparative method and the algebra of logic. J. Quant. Anthropol. 1(4), 373–398 (1989) Ragin, C.: The logic of the comparative method and the algebra of logic. J. Quant. Anthropol. 1(4), 373–398 (1989)
16.
go back to reference Ragin, C., Meyer, S., Drass, K.: Assessing discrimination: a Boolean approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2), 221–234 (1984)CrossRef Ragin, C., Meyer, S., Drass, K.: Assessing discrimination: a Boolean approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49(2), 221–234 (1984)CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Pub. Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)CrossRef Rios, A.-M., Bastida, F., Benito, B.: Budget transparency and legislative budgetary oversight: an international approach. Am. Rev. Pub. Adm. 46(5), 546–568 (2014)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRef Rocker, A.: Framing Citizen Participation: Participatory Budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Romme, A.: Boolean comparative analysis of qualitative data: a methodological note. Qual. Quant. 29(3), 317–329 (1995)CrossRef Romme, A.: Boolean comparative analysis of qualitative data: a methodological note. Qual. Quant. 29(3), 317–329 (1995)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)CrossRef Souza, C.: Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environ. Urban. 13(1), 159–184 (2001)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011) Walker, P., Shannon, P.: Participatory governance: towards a strategic model. Commun. Dev. J. 46(2), ii63–ii82 (2011)
25.
go back to reference Warren, M.E.: Governance-driven democratization. Crit. Policy Stud. 3(1), 3–13 (2009)CrossRef Warren, M.E.: Governance-driven democratization. Crit. Policy Stud. 3(1), 3–13 (2009)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Requisites for Open Budgeting: A Comparison of the ‘Budget for Citizens’ in Russian Regions Using QCA
Author
Leonid Smorgunov
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_21

Premium Partner