Top

previous article Innovation durch Kultur und Kommunikation

next article The intrapreneurship reactor: how to enable a s...

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

18-06-2019 | Originalarbeit | Issue 3/2019

Research and innovation futures: challenging the dominant innovation paradigm

Journal:: e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Issue 3/2019

Authors:: Karl-Heinz Leitner, K. Matthias Weber

» Get access to the full-text

Important notes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

While new ways of doing research and innovation such as open science, Science 2.0, open innovation, user innovation or crowdsourcing have been intensively discussed in the past few years, little systematic analysis and exploration of their wider positive, but also negative effects for economy, society and environment has been conducted. Based on the findings from three European foresight projects we discuss critical aspects of changing research and innovation patterns and their challenges for innovation policy and management.

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 50.000 Bücher
über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Braungart, M., McDonough, W. (2006): Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things.

Burgelman, J.-C., Osimo, D., Bogdanowicz, M. (2010). Science 2.0 (change will happen …), First Monday, 15(7).

Chesbrough, H. (2003): Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard University Press.

De Jong, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Kalvet, T., Chesbrough, H. (2008): Policies for open innovation: theory, framework and cases. Research project funded by VISION Era-Net, Helsinki.

EC (2007): Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the expert group on science and governance to the science. Brussels: Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission.

Erdmann, L., Schirrmeister, E. (2016): Constructing transformative scenarios for research and innovation futures. Foresight, 18(3), 238–252. CrossRef

Florida, R. (2002): The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Francisco, S. (2010): The innovation paradox: how innovation products threaten the innovation process. Reconstruct.: Stud. Contemp. Culture, 10, 2.

Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Popper, R. (Eds.) (2008): The handbook of technology foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

10.

Godet, M. (1991): From anticipation to action. A handbook of strategic prospective. Paris: UNESCO.

11.

Henkel, J., von Hippel, E. (2005): Welfare implications of user innovation. J. Technol. Transf., 301/2, 73–87.

12.

Hiltunen, E. (2008): The future sign and its three dimensions. Futures, 40(3), 247–260. CrossRef

13.

Howaldt, J., et al. (2018): Atlas of social innovation. SI-DRIVE project, centre for social research, University of Technology Dortmund.

14.

Howe, J. (2006): The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag., 14, 6. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html. Accessed May 2019.

15.

Jégou, F., Leitner, K.-H., Mahn, J., Rhomberg, W., von Saldern, S., et al. (2010): Structured collection of current signals for arising changes in innovation patterns. Deliverable 1.1 of the INFU project, Vienna.

16.

Koivisto, R., Wessberg, N., Eerola, A., Ahlqvist, T., Kivisaari, S., Myllyoja, J., Halonen, M. (2009): Integrating FTA and risk assessment methodologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 1163–1176. CrossRef

17.

Latour, B. (2005): Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Partha, D., David, P. (1994): Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy, 23(5), 487–521. CrossRef

19.

Ronis, S. R. (2007): Timelines into the future: strategic visioning methods for government, business, and other organisations. United States: Hamilton Books.

20.

Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2013): Exploring the future of research. Trends and drivers in doing and governing research. RIF research report AIT, Vienna.

21.

Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. E. (2018): Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Res. Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. CrossRef

22.

Sveiby, K-E., Gripenberg, P., Segercrantz, B. (Eds.) (2012): Challenging the innovation paradigm, routledge studies in technology, work and organisations, Routledge.

23.

Stirling, A. (2005): Opening up or closing down: analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement, London, Zed (pp. 218–231).

24.

Szkuta, K., Osimo, D. (2016): Rebooting science? Implications of science 2.0 main trends for scientific method and research institutions. Foresight, 18(3), 204–223. CrossRef

25.

The Royal Society (2011): Knowledge, networks and nations: Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century London. The Royal Society.

26.

Tijssen, R. J. W., Waltman, L., et al. (2012): Research collaboration and the expanding science grid: measuring globalization processes worldwide. arXiv:1203.4194.

27.

Tuomi, I. (2002): Networks of innovation: change and meaning in the age of the Internet. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

28.

Virilio, P. (1990): Rasender stillstand. Germany: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag

29.

von Hippel, E. (2005): Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. CrossRef

30.

Warnke, P., Schirrmeister, E., Leitner, K-H. (2010): Innovation futures scripts. Nodes of change in innovation patterns emerging from the explorative dialogue on the 19 INFU visions. Deliverable D 3.1 of the INFU project, Vienna.

31.

Weber, M., Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2018): Unsere Fähigkeit, sich unser zukünftiges gesellschaftliches Leben vorzustellen, ist begrenzt/Our ability to imagine our social life in the future is limited, Interview. In H. Androsch, W. Knoll, A. Plimon (Eds.), Technologie im Gespräch 2018. Künstliche Intelligenz/Discussing Technology 2018: Artificial Intelligence (pp. 18–35). Wien: Holzhausen.

Title: Research and innovation futures: challenging the dominant innovation paradigm
Authors:: Karl-Heinz Leitner
K. Matthias Weber
Publication date: 18-06-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-019-0728-6
Publisher: Springer Vienna
Journal: e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik
Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-383X
Electronic ISSN: 1613-7620