Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business Ethics
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2019

28-04-2018 | Editorial

Rethinking Corporate Agency in Business, Philosophy, and Law

Authors: Samuel Mansell, John Ferguson, David Gindis, Avia Pasternak

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While researchers in business ethics, moral philosophy, and jurisprudence have advanced the study of corporate agency, there have been very few attempts to bring together insights from these and other disciplines in the pages of the Journal of Business Ethics. By introducing to an audience of business ethics scholars the work of outstanding authors working outside the field, this interdisciplinary special issue addresses this lacuna. Its aim is to encourage the formulation of innovative arguments that reinvigorate the study of corporate agency and stimulate further cross-fertilization of ideas between business ethics, law, philosophy, and other disciplines.
next article Corporate Agency and Possible Futures

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
 
2
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014).
 
3
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific R. Co., 118 U.S. 394 (1886).
 
Literature
Altman, M. (2007). The decomposition of the corporate body: What Kant cannot contribute to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 253–266.CrossRef
Arnold, D. G., Goodpaster, K. E., & Weaver, G. R. (2016). Past trends and future directions in business ethics and corporate responsibility scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4), v–xv.
Ashman, I., & Wistanley, D. (2007). For or against corporate identity? Personification and the problem of moral agency. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 83–95.CrossRef
Ayer, A. A. (2006). The missing dynamic: Corporations, individuals and contracts. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 393–406.CrossRef
Beets, S. D. (2011). Critical events in the ethics of U.S. corporation history. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 193–219.CrossRef
Black, A. (2002). Guild and state: European political thought from the twelfth century to the present (Revised edn.). New Bruswick: Transaction Publishers.
Blair, M. M. (2013). Corporate personhood and the corporate persona. University of Illinois Law Review, 2013(3), 785–820.
Blair, M. M. (2015). Of corporations, courts, personhood and morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4), 415–431.CrossRef
Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective (Second edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Canning, J. P. (1996). A history of medieval political thought, 300–1450. London: Routledge.
Coleman, L. (2014). Corporate identity in Citizens United: Legal fictions and anthropological theory. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 37(2), 308–328.CrossRef
Copp, D. (2006). On the agency of certain collective entities: An argument from “Normative Autonomy”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30, 194–220.CrossRef
Danley, J. R. (1999). Corporate moral agency. In R. E. Frederick (Ed.), A companion to business ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
De George, R. T. (1981). Moral responsibility and the corporation. Philosophic Exchange, 3(2), 41–53.
Deiser, G. F. (1909). The juristic person. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 57(5), 300–314.CrossRef
Dempsey, J. (2013). Corporations and non-agential moral responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30(4), 334–350.CrossRef
Donaldson, T. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dubbink, W., & Smith, J. (2011). A political account of corporate moral responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14, 223–246.CrossRef
Erskine, T. (2011). Kicking bodies and damning souls: The danger of harming “Innocent” individuals while punishing “Delinquent” States. In T. Issacs & R. Vernon (Eds.), Accountability for collective wrongdoing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
French, P. A. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 207–215.
Freund, E. (1897). The legal nature of corporations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gierke, O. Translated with an Introduction by Maitland, F. W. (1900). Political theories of the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2002). Collective wrongdoing: Moral and legal responses. Social Theory and Practice, 28(1), 167–187.CrossRef
Gindis, D. (2016). Legal personhood and the firm: Avoiding anthropomorphism and equivocation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 12(3), 499–513.CrossRef
Goodpaster, K., & Matthews, J. (1982). Can a corporation have a conscience? Harvard Business Review, 60(1), 132–141.
Greenfield, K. (2015). In defense of corporate persons. Constitutional Commentary, 30, 309–333.
Greenwood, D. J. H. (2017). Neofeudalism: The surprising foundations of corporate constitutional rights. University of Illinois Law Review, 2017(1), 163–222.
Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2017). Focusing on ethics and broadening our intellectual base. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1), 1–3.CrossRef
Held, V. (2002). Group responsibility for ethnic conflict. Journal of Ethics, 6(2), 157–178.CrossRef
Hess, K. (2013). If you tickle us… How corporations can be moral agents without being persons. Journal of Value Inquiry, 47(3), 319–335.CrossRef
Isaacs, T. (2011). Moral responsibility in collective contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Kurki, V. A. J., & Pietrzykowski, T. (Eds.). (2017). Legal personhood: Animals, artificial intelligence and the unborn. Cham: Springer.
Lampert, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the supposed moral agency of corporations. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 16(1), 79–105.
Laski, H. (1916). The personality of associations. Harvard Law Review, 29(4), 404–426.CrossRef
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design and status of corporate actors. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Machen, A. W. (1911). Corporate personality. Harvard Law Review, 24(4), 253–267.CrossRef
Maitland, F. (1905). Moral personality and legal personality. Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation, 6(2), 192–200.
Manning, R. C. (1984). Corporate responsibility and corporate personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 77–84.CrossRef
May, L. (1987). The morality of groups: Collective responsibility, group-based harm and corporate rights. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Miller, S., & Makela, P. (2005). The collectivist approach to collective moral responsibility. Metaphilosophy, 36(5), 634–651.CrossRef
Moore, G. (1999). Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 329–343.CrossRef
Néron, P.-Y. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post-citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 715–728.CrossRef
Orts, E., & Smith, N. C. (2017). The moral responsibility of firms. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Pasternak, A. (2011). Sharing the costs of political injustice. Politics, Philosophy, Economics, 10(2), 188–210.CrossRef
Pfeiffer, R. (1990). The central distinction in the theory of corporate moral personhood. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 473–480.CrossRef
Phillips, M. (1992). Corporate moral personhood and three conceptions of the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(4), 435–439.CrossRef
Piety, T. S. (2015). Why personhood matters. Constitutional Commentary, 30(2), 361–390.
Pollman, E. (2011). Reconceiving corporate personhood. Utah Law Review, 2011(4), 1629–1675.
Preda, A. (2012). Group rights and group agency. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9(2), 229–254.CrossRef
Ripken, S. K. (2011). Corporate first amendment rights after Citizens United: An analysis of the popular movement to end the constitutional personhood of corporations. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 14(1), 209–259.
Robinson, Z. (2016). Constitutional personhood. George Washington Law Review, 84(3), 605–667.
Rönnegard, D. (2013). How autonomy alone debunks corporate moral agency. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 32(1/2), 77–107.CrossRef
Runciman, D. (1997). Pluralism and the personality of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sepinwall, A. J. (2015). Denying corporate rights and punishing corporate wrongs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(4), 517–534.CrossRef
Silver, D. (2015). Business ethics after Citizens United: A contractualist analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 385–397.CrossRef
Stilz, A. (2011). Collective responsibility and the state. Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(2), 190–208.CrossRef
Stoll, M. L. (2005). Corporate rights to free speech? Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 261–269.CrossRef
Stoll, M. L. (2015). Corporate political speech and moral obligation. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(3), 553–563.CrossRef
Turner, H. S. (2016). The corporate commonwealth: Pluralism and political fictions in England, 1516–1651. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Velasquez, M. (1983). Why corporations are not morally responsible for anything they do. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 2(3), 1–18.CrossRef
Velasquez, M. (2003). Debunking corporate moral responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 531–562.CrossRef
Watson, G. W., Freeman, R. E., & Parmar, B. (2008). Connected moral agency in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 323–341.CrossRef
Wellman, C. (1995). Real rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Werhane, P. (1985). Persons, rights and corporations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wringe, W. (2012). Collective agents and the communicative theory of punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43(4), 436–456.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rethinking Corporate Agency in Business, Philosophy, and Law
Authors
Samuel Mansell
John Ferguson
David Gindis
Avia Pasternak
Publication date
28-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3895-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2019 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Collective Responsibility Gaps

Original Paper

The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance

Original Paper

Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance

Original Paper

Corporate Essence and Identity in Criminal Law

Original Paper

A Discursive Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility Education: A Story Co-creation Exercise

Original Paper

Regulation Enables: Corporate Agency and Practices of Responsibility