Top

Journal of Materials Science

Published in:

09-07-2021 | Review

Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites

Authors: Lekhani Tripathi, B. K. Behera

Published in: Journal of Materials Science | Issue 28/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Honeycomb is considered an excellent structural material because of its high strength and shear rigidity, excellent energy absorbing property, high impact strength, lower weight, high crushing stress, and almost constant crushing force. Honeycomb being a cellular solid is a well-known core used to build a sandwich structure while making structural composites. Because of this excellent mechanical performance, honeycombs are frequently used in the aircraft industry as a core of sandwich panels and in the automotive industry as efficient impact attenuators. The hollow spaces in the honeycomb structure reduce weight but also ensure required strength, provided they are designed correctly. 3D woven honeycomb composite has a promising future in the lightweight application areas and can be the real substitutes for aluminum and other metal alloys as these structures provide structural integrity. In this review, the basic concept of textile-based 3D woven honeycomb composites, engineering design, manufacturing process, structure-properties relationship, and applications of 3D woven honeycomb fabrics and their composites are discussed in detail. Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric and theoretical analysis of impact, flexural, and compression behavior of their composites are summarized to appreciate the potential advantages of textile-based honeycomb structural composites.

previous article Elimination of dyes by catalytic reduction in the absence of light: A review

next article Supercritical CO2-assisted microfluidization as ultra-high efficiency strategy for graphene preparation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Torre L, Kenny JM (2000) Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation. Compos Struct 50:257–267CrossRef

Shin KB, Lee JY, Cho SH (2008) An experimental study of low-velocity impact responses of sandwich panels for Korean low floor bus. Compos Struct 84:228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.002CrossRef

Miltz J, Ramon O, Mizrahi S (1989) Mechanical behavior of closed cell plastic foams used as cushioning materials. J Appl Polym Sci 38:281–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1989.070380209CrossRef

Paik JK, Lee YW, Thayamballi AK, Curry R, Hockberger W (1997) A novel concept for structural design and construction of vessels: using aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Discussion. Authors’ closure. Trans Nav Archit Mar Eng 105:191–219

Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomCrossRef

Wierzbicki T (1983) Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 1:157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0734-743X(83)90004-0CrossRef

Wu E, Jiang WS (1997) Axial crush of metallic honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 19:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00004-3CrossRef

Yamashita M, Gotoh M (2005) Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications—numerical simulation and experiment. Int J Impact Eng 32:618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.001CrossRef

Vavilov VP, Klimov AG, Nesteruk D, Shiryaev VV (2003) Detecting water in aviation honeycomb structures by using transient infrared thermographic NDT. In: Cramer KE, Maldague XP (eds) International society for optics and photonics. Florida, pp 345–355

10.

Kleineberg M, Wenner U, Hanke M (2002) Cost effective CFRP-fuselage manufacturing with liquid resin infusion ( LRI ) – technologies. Workshop at german aerospace centre (DLR) on final project of black fuselage. Braunschweig, Germany, pp 147–150

11.

Xu S, Beynon JH, Ruan D, Lu G (2012) Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 94:2326–2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024CrossRef

12.

Lombardi NJ, Liu J (2011) Glass fiber-reinforced polymer/steel hybrid honeycomb sandwich concept for bridge deck applications. Compos Struct 93:1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.10.007CrossRef

13.

Zinno A, Prota A, Di Maio E, Bakis CE (2011) Experimental characterization of phenolic-impregnated honeycomb sandwich structures for transportation vehicles. Compos Struct 93:2910–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.012CrossRef

14.

Chen DH (2011) Bending deformation of honeycomb consisting of regular hexagonal cells. Compos Struct 93:736–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.006CrossRef

15.

Lu C, Zhao M, Jie L et al (2015) Stress distribution on composite honeycomb sandwich structure suffered from bending load. Proced Eng 99:405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.554CrossRef

16.

Frank XuX, Qiao P (2002) Homogenized elastic properties of honeycomb sandwich with skin effect. Int J Solids Struct 39:2153–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00111-7CrossRef

17.

Zhu HX (2010) Size-dependent elastic properties of micro- and nano-honeycombs. J Mech Phys Solids 58:696–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2010.02.009CrossRef

18.

Miller W, Smith CW, Evans KE (2011) Honeycomb cores with enhanced buckling strength. Compos Struct 93:1072–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.09.021CrossRef

19.

Burlayenko VN, Sadowski T (2010) Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. Compos Struct 92:2890–2900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.015CrossRef

20.

Mouritz AP, Bannister MK, Falzon PJ, Leong KH (1999) Review of applications for advanced three-dimensional fibre textile composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 30:1445–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2CrossRef

21.

Nguyen J, Park SI, Rosen DW et al (2012) Conformal lattice structure design and fabrication. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium. Austin, pp 138–161

22.

Ju J, Summers JD, Ziegert J, Fadel G (2009) Design of Honeycomb Meta-Materials for High Shear Flexure. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. pp 805–813

23.

Kolla A, Ju J, Summers JD, et al (2010) Design of Chiral Honeycomb Meso-Structures for High Shear Flexure. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. pp 43–49

24.

Zou Z, Reid SR, Tan PJ et al (2009) Dynamic crushing of honeycombs and features of shock fronts. Int J Impact Eng 36:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.008CrossRef

25.

Ruzzene M (2004) Vibration and sound radiation of sandwich beams with honeycomb truss core. J Sound Vib 277:741–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.026CrossRef

26.

Ashby MF (2006) The properties of foams and lattices. Phil Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 364:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1678CrossRef

27.

Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH et al (2014) Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344:1373–1377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252291CrossRef

28.

Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1747–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2CrossRef

29.

Ecklund RC, Hayase M, Walkington RJ (1989) Curved SPF/DB sandwich fabrication. U.S. Pat. Trademark Off. 1–6

30.

Zhang XD, Sun CT (1996) Formulation of an adaptive sandwich beam. Smart Mater Struct 5:814–823. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/5/6/012CrossRef

31.

Dattoma V, Marcuccio R, Pappalettere C, Smith GM (2001) Thermographic investigation of sandwich structure made of composite material. NDT E Int 34:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00082-7CrossRef

32.

Baumeister J, Banhart J, Weber M (1997) Aluminium foams for transport industry. Mater Des 18:217–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00050-2CrossRef

33.

Banhart J, Schmoll C, Neumann U (1998) Light-weight aluminium foam structures for ships. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Materials in Oceanic Environment. Pp. 55–63

34.

Kee Paik J, Thayamballi AK, Sung Kim G (1999) The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. Thin-Walled Struct 35:205–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(99)00026-9CrossRef

35.

Sypeck DJ, Wadley HNG (2002) Cellular Metal Truss Core Sandwich Structures. Adv Eng Mater 4:759–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(20021014)4:10%3c759::AID-ADEM759%3e3.0.CO;2-ACrossRef

36.

Bitzer T (1997) Honeycomb technology. Springer, Netherlands, DordrechtCrossRef

37.

Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E (2012) Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 43:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002CrossRef

38.

Bitzer TN (1995) Recent honeycomb core developments. In: Proceedings of the 3. Sandwich Construction conference. Southampton, pp. 555–563

39.

Fan X, Verpoest I, Vandepitte D (2006) Finite element analysis of out-of-plane compressive properties of thermoplastic honeycomb. J Sandw Struct Mater 8:437–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636206065862CrossRef

40.

Pflug J, Xinyu F, Lavalaye J et al (2002) Continuously produced honeycomb sandwich materials for automotive applications. SAE Technical Papers

41.

Amine S (2005) Equivalent numerical model for honeycomb subjected to high speed impact. McGill University

42.

Bitzer TN (1997) Honeycomb technology: materials, design, manufacturing, applications and testing. Springer Science & Business MediaCrossRef

43.

Takenaka K, Sato E (1991) Woven fabric having multi-layer structure and composite material comprising the woven fabric. U.S. Pat. Trademark Off

44.

Saeki E, Sugisawa M, Yamaguchi T, Wada A (1998) Mechanical properties of additive manufacturing honeycomb structures. J Mater Civ Eng 10:143–152CrossRef

45.

Schwaber DM (1973) Impact behavior of polymeric foams: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng 2:231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602557308545019CrossRef

46.

Johnson W, Reid S, Reddy TY (1977) The compression of crossed layers of thin tubes. Int J Mech Sci 19:423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(77)90042-XCrossRef

47.

Rao KK, Rao KJ, Sarwade AG, Chandra MS (2012) Strength analysis on honeycomb sandwich panels of different materials. Int J Eng Res Appl 2:365–374

48.

Lee HS, Hong SH, Lee JR, Kim YK (2002) Mechanical behavior and failure process during compressive and shear deformation of honeycomb composite at elevated temperatures. J Mater Sci 37:1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014344228141CrossRef

49.

Hearle JWS, Chen X (2009) 3D woven preforms and properties for textile composites. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials. pp. 27–31

50.

Chen X (2015) Advances in 3D textiles. Elsevier

51.

Behera BK, Mishra R (2008) 3-Dimensional weaving. Indian J Fibre Text Res 33:274–287

52.

Gereke T, Cherif C (2019) A review of numerical models for 3D woven composite reinforcements. Compos Struct 209:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.085CrossRef

53.

Li M, Wang S, Zhang Z, Wu B (2009) Effect of structure on the mechanical behaviors of three-dimensional spacer fabric composites. Appl Compos Mater 16:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-008-9072-4CrossRef

54.

Khatkar V, Behera BK, Manjunath RN (2020) Textile structural composites for automotive leaf spring application. Compos Part B Eng 182:107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107662CrossRef

55.

Neje G, Behera BK (2019) Investigation of mechanical performance of 3D woven spacer sandwich composites with different cell geometries. Compos Part B Eng 160:306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.036CrossRef

56.

Manjunath RN, Khatkar V, Behera BK (2020) Influence of augmented tuning of core architecture in 3D woven sandwich structures on flexural and compression properties of their composites. Adv Compos Mater 29:317–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2019.1680925CrossRef

57.

Manjunath RN, Behera BK (2018) Emerging trends in three-dimensional woven preforms for composite reinforcements. Advanced textile engineering materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 463–497CrossRef

58.

Behera BK, Dash BP (2014) An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of 3D woven fabrics for structural composites. Fibers Polym 15:1950–1955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1950-9CrossRef

59.

Vassiliadis S, Kallivretaki A, Domvoglou D, Provatidis C (2011) Mechanical analysis of woven fabrics: the state of the art. In: Vassiliadis S (ed) Advances in modern woven fabrics technology. InTech, pp 41–64

60.

Bogdanovich AE (2007) Advancements in manufacturing and applications of 3-D woven preforms and composites. In: ICCM International Conferences on Composite Materials

61.

Jayan VR, Tripathi L, Behera PK et al (2021) Prediction of internal geometry and tensile behavior of 3D woven solid structures by mathematical coding. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/15280837211001348CrossRef

62.

Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera B (2020) Modeling and simulation of impact behavior of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720980467CrossRef

63.

Chen X, Spola M, Paya JG, Sellabona1 PM (1999) Experimental Studies on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Multi-layer and Angle-interlock Woven Structures. J Text Inst 90: 91–99. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405009908658693

64.

Li D, Zhao C, Jiang L, Jiang N (2014) Experimental study on the bending properties and failure mechanism of 3D integrated woven spacer composites at room and cryogenic temperature. Compos Struct 111:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.12.026CrossRef

65.

Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera BK (2020) Modelling and simulation of compression behaviour of 3D woven hollow composite structures using FEM analysis. Text leather Rev 3:6–18. https://doi.org/10.31881/TLR.2020.03CrossRef

66.

Grosicki ZJ (2004) Development of weaves from elementary bases. In: Grosicki ZJ (ed) Watson’s textile design and colour. Elsevier, pp 36–61

67.

Gong X (2011) Investigation of different geometric structure parameter for honeycomb textile composites on their mechanical performance. University of Manchester, United Kingdom

68.

Chen X, Sun Y, Gong X (2008) Design, manufacture, and experimental analysis of 3D honeycomb textile composites part I: design and manufacture. Text Res J 78:771–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517507087855CrossRef

69.

Tripathi L, Neje G, Behera BK (2020) Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. J Ind Text. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720931472CrossRef

70.

Crane RM, Camponeschi ET (1986) Experimental and analytical characterization of multidimensionally braided graphite/epoxy composites. Exp Mech 26:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02320051CrossRef

71.

Whitney JM, Stansbarger DL, Howell HB (1971) Analysis of the rail shear test-applications and limitations. J Compos Mater 5:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837100500103CrossRef

72.

Gong JC, Sankar BV (1991) Impact properties of three-dimensional braided graphite/epoxy composites. J Compos Mater 25:715–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839102500606CrossRef

73.

Dexter HB (1994) Innovative textile reinforced composite materials for aircraft structures. In: 28th Int. SAMPE Tech. Conf. pp. 404–416

74.

Bartels VT (2003) Thermal comfort of aeroplane seats: influence of different seat materials and the use of laboratory test methods. Appl Ergon 34:393–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00058-9CrossRef

75.

Sun B, Hu† H, Gu B, (2010) Responses of 3D biaxial spacer weft-knitted composite circular plate under impact loading. Part I: unit-cell and elasto-plastic constitutive model. J Text Inst 101:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000802196304CrossRef

76.

Chen X, Ma YL, Zhang H (2004) CAD/CAM for cellular woven structures. J Text Inst Part 1 Fibre Sci Text Technol 95:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1533/joti.2003.0019CrossRef

77.

Chen X, Taylor LW, Tsai L-J (2011) An overview on fabrication of three-dimensional woven textile preforms for composites. Text Res J 81:932–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517510392471CrossRef

78.

Chen X, Wang H (2006) Modelling and computer-aided design of 3D hollow woven reinforcement for composites. J Text Inst 97:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1533/joti.2005.0215CrossRef

79.

Buchanan S, Grigorash A, Quinn JP et al (2010) Modelling the geometry of the repeat unit cell of three-dimensional weave architectures. J Text Inst 101:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000902746586CrossRef

80.

Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Kumar D et al (2003) Prediction of crushing behaviour of honeycomb structures. Int J Crashworthiness 8:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2003.0227CrossRef

81.

Foo CC, Seah LK, Chai GB (2008) Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Struct 85:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016CrossRef

82.

Chen DH, Ozaki S (2009) Stress concentration due to defects in a honeycomb structure. Compos Struct 89:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.010CrossRef

83.

Besant T, Davies GA, Hitchings D (2001) Finite element modelling of low velocity impact of composite sandwich panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 32:1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00084-7CrossRef

84.

Uğur L, Duzcukoglu H, Sahin OS, Akkuş H (2020) Investigation of impact force on aluminium honeycomb structures by finite element analysis. J Sandw Struct Mater 22:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636217733235CrossRef

85.

Clarke G, Wowk D, Marsden C (2017) Characterization of low velocity impact damage in metallic honeycomb sandwich aircraft panels using finite element analysis. PhD Dissertation, Royal Military College of Canada

86.

Ivañez I, Sanchez-Saez S (2013) Numerical modelling of the low-velocity impact response of composite sandwich beams with honeycomb core. Compos Struct 106:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.025CrossRef

87.

Shaw MC, Sata T (1966) The plastic behavior of cellular materials. Int J Mech Sci 8:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(66)90019-1CrossRef

88.

Papka SD, Kyriakides S (1998) Experiments and full-scale numerical simulations of in-plane crushing of a honeycomb. Acta Mater 46:2765–2776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00453-9CrossRef

89.

Ruan D, Lu G, Chen F, Siores E (2002) Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos Struct 57:331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-9CrossRef

90.

Aktay L, Çakıroğlu C, Güden M (2011) Quasi-static axial crushing behavior of honeycomb-filled thin-walled aluminum tubes. Open Mater Sci J 5:184–193. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874088X01105010184CrossRef

91.

Hong S-T, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2005) Honeycomb specimens under combined compressive and shear displacement conditions. SAE Trans 114:111–118. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0360

92.

Zhao H, Gary G (1998) Crushing behaviour of aluminium honeycombs under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 21:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(98)00034-7CrossRef

93.

Zhang J, Ashby MF (1992) The out-of-plane properties of honeycombs. Int J Mech Sci 34:475–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(92)90013-7CrossRef

94.

Thwaites S, Clark NH (1995) Non-destructive testing of honeycomb sandwich structures using elastic waves. J Sound Vib 187:253–269. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1995.0519CrossRef

95.

Prall D, Lakes RS (1997) Properties of a chiral honeycomb with a poisson’s ratio of -1. Int J Mech Sci 39:305–314CrossRef

96.

Wu CL, Weeks CA, Sun CT (1995) Improving honeycomb-core sandwich structures for impact resistance. J Adv Mater 26:41–47

97.

Varma M (2007) Transverse compressive properties of honeycomb core under oblique loading. PhD Dissertation, Wichita State University

98.

Hong ST, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2002) Influence of shear loads on crush of honeycomb materials. SAE Technical Papers. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA

99.

McFARLAND RK (1963) Hexagonal cell structures under post-buckling axial load. Aiaa J 1:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.1798CrossRef

100.

Scarpa F, Smith FC, Chambers B, Burriesci G (2003) Mechanical and electromagnetic behaviour of auxetic honeycomb structures. Aeronaut J 107:175–183

101.

Aktay L, Johnson AF, Kröplin B-H (2008) Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour. Eng Fract Mech 75:2616–2630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008CrossRef

102.

Gary G, Klepaczko JR (2006) Quasi-static and impact tests of honeycomb. In: Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings). EDP sciences, pp. 819–826

103.

Zhang XW, Yu TX (2009) Energy absorption of pressurized thin-walled circular tubes under axial crushing. Int J Mech Sci 51:335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.03.002CrossRef

104.

Kobayashi H, Daimaruya M, Kobayashi T (1998) Dynamic and static compression tests for paper honeycomb cores and absorbed energy. JSME Int J Ser A Solid Mech Mater Eng 41:338–344CrossRef

105.

Schultz J, Griese D, Ju J et al (2012) Design of honeycomb mesostructures for crushing energy absorption. J Mech Des. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006739CrossRef

106.

Schultz J (2011) Modeling and finite element analysis methods for the dynamic crushing of honeycomb cellular meso-structures. Clemson University, South Carolina

107.

Hazizan MA, Cantwell WJ (2003) The low velocity impact response of an aluminium honeycomb sandwich structure. Compos Part B Eng 34:679–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00089-1CrossRef

108.

Castanié B, Bouvet C, Aminanda Y et al (2008) Modelling of low-energy/low-velocity impact on nomex honeycomb sandwich structures with metallic skins. Int J Impact Eng 35:620–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.008CrossRef

109.

Partovi Meran A, Toprak T, Muğan A (2014) Numerical and experimental study of crashworthiness parameters of honeycomb structures. Thin-Walled Struct 78:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2013.12.012CrossRef

110.

Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E (2011) Low-velocity impact strength of sandwich materials. J Sandw Struct Mater 13:409–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636210385285CrossRef

111.

Yang DU, Lee S, Huang FY (2003) Geometric effects on micropolar elastic honeycomb structure with negative Poisson’s ratio using the finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 39:187–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00066-5CrossRef

112.

Petrescu HA, Hadǎr A, Pastramǎ ŞD (2017) Experimental program for impact tests on a honeycomb core composite material. Proc Rom Acad Ser A - Math Phys Tech Sci Inf Sci 18:150–157

113.

Lu G, Yu T (2003) Energy absorption of structures and materials. Woodhead Publishing LimitedCrossRef

114.

Burton WS, Noor AK (1997) Structural analysis of the adhesive bond in a honeycomb core sandwich panel. Finite Elem Anal Des 26:213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(96)00081-9CrossRef

115.

Dharmasena KP, Wadley HNG, Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2008) Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng 35:1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008CrossRef

116.

Zhu F, Zhao L, Lu G, Wang Z (2008) Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels—Experimental investigations. Int J Impact Eng 35:937–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.003CrossRef

117.

Zhu F, Lu G (2007) A review of blast and impact of metallic and sandwich structures. Electron J Struct Eng 7:92–101

118.

Yuen SCK, Nurick GN, Theobald MD, Langdon GS (2009) Sandwich panels subjected to blast loading. Dynamic failure of materials and structures. Springer, US, Boston, MA, pp 297–325CrossRef

119.

Fleck NA, Deshpande VS (2004) The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. J Appl Mech 71:386–401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1629109CrossRef

120.

Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2003) Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads. Int J Mech Sci 45:687–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00108-5CrossRef

121.

Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2004) A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng 30:1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007CrossRef

122.

Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E (2013) Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: honeycomb vs. foam. Mar Struct 30:74–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002CrossRef

123.

Zhai L, Ling G, Li J, Wang Y (2006) The effect of nanoparticles on the adhesion of epoxy adhesive. Mater Lett 60:3031–3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.038CrossRef

124.

Zhou G, Hill MD (2009) Impact damage and energy-absorbing characteristics and residual in-plane compressive strength of honeycomb sandwich panels. J Sandw Struct Mater 11:329–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636209105704CrossRef

125.

Akkuş H, Ekrem M, Karabulut SE, Düzcükoğlu H, Şahin ÖS, Avcı A (2014) Impact behavior of MWCNT reinforced epoxy adhesive bonded joints made with alluinium. In: 15th International Materials Symposium (IMSP). Bildiriler Kitabı, pp. 742–748

126.

Abbadi A, Koutsawa Y, Carmasol A et al (2009) Experimental and numerical characterization of honeycomb sandwich composite panels. Simul Model Pract Theory 17:1533–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2009.05.008CrossRef

127.

Kantha Rao K, Jayathirtha Rao K, Sarwade AG, Madhava Varma B (2012) Bending behavior of aluminum honey comb sandwich panels. Int J Eng Adv Technol 1:268–272

128.

Pan S-D, Wu L-Z, Sun Y-G (2008) Transverse shear modulus and strength of honeycomb cores. Compos Struct 84:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.008CrossRef

129.

Harte A (2001) The fatigue strength of sandwich beams with an aluminium alloy foam core. Int J Fatigue 23:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00012-3CrossRef

130.

Jen Y, Chang L (2008) Evaluating bending fatigue strength of aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams using local parameters. Int J Fatigue 30:1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.006CrossRef

131.

Belingardi G, Martella P, Peroni L (2007) Fatigue analysis of honeycomb-composite sandwich beams. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38:1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.007CrossRef

132.

Demelio G, Genovese K, Pappalettere C (2001) An experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of sandwich composite panels joined by fasteners. Compos Part B Eng 32:299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00007-5CrossRef

133.

Crupi V, Montanini R (2007) Aluminium foam sandwiches collapse modes under static and dynamic three-point bending. Int J Impact Eng 34:509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.10.001CrossRef

134.

Hirth, Andreas, Paul Du Bois and KW (2002) A Material Model for Transversely Anisotropic Crushable Foams in LS-DYNA. In: 7th International LS-DYNA Users Conference. Pp. 16–23

135.

Ameen HA, Mashloosh KM (2015) Experimental and numerical analysis of AA3003 honeycomb sandwich panel with different configurations. Am J Sci Ind Res 2:25–32. https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsir.2015.6.2.25.32CrossRef

136.

Chi Y, Langdon GS, Nurick GN (2010) The influence of core height and face plate thickness on the response of honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to blast loading. Mater Des 31:1887–1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.058CrossRef

137.

Tran, V. X., Hong, S. T., Pan, J., Tyan, T., & Prasad P (2006) Crush behaviors of aluminum honeycombs of different cell geometries under compression dominant combined loads. In: SAE Transactions. pp. 163–170

138.

Dempsey BM, Eisele S, McDowell DL (2005) Heat sink applications of extruded metal honeycombs. Int J Heat Mass Transf 48:527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.09.013CrossRef

139.

Abbadi A, Tixier C, Gilgert J, Azari Z (2015) Experimental study on the fatigue behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels with artificial defects. Compos Struct 120:394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.020CrossRef

140.

Jen Y, Ko C, Lin H (2009) Effect of the amount of adhesive on the bending fatigue strength of adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams. Int J Fatigue 31:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.07.008CrossRef

141.

Kılıçaslan C, Güden M, Odacı İK, Taşdemirci A (2013) The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures. Mater Des 46:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.059CrossRef

142.

Nakada I, Haug E (1994) Numerical simulation of crash behavior of composite structures for automotive applications. Mater Tech 82:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1051/mattech/199482010033CrossRef

143.

Hong S, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2008) Dynamic crush behaviors of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant inclined loads. Int J Plast 24:89–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.02.003CrossRef

144.

Hong S, Pan J, Tyan T, Prasad P (2006) Quasi-static crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under non-proportional compression-dominant combined loads. Int J Plast 22:1062–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.07.003CrossRef

145.

Akatay A, Bora MÖ, Çoban O et al (2015) The influence of low velocity repeated impacts on residual compressive properties of honeycomb sandwich structures. Compos Struct 125:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.057CrossRef

146.

Liu L, Wang H, Guan Z (2015) Experimental and numerical study on the mechanical response of Nomex honeycomb core under transverse loading. Compos Struct 121:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.034CrossRef

147.

Berglind L (2010) Design tool development for cellular structure synthesis to achieve desired properties. Clemson University

148.

Ju, J., Summers, J. D., Ziegert, J., & Fadel G (2009) Cyclic Energy Loss of Honeycombs Under In-Plane Shear Loading. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, pp. 283–289

149.

Jha AK (2007) Free vibration analysis of sandwich panel. National Institute of Technology Rourkela

150.

Ding Y (1987) Optimum design of sandwich constructions. Comput Struct 25:51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90217-3CrossRef

151.

Zhou G, Hill M, Loughlan J, Hookham N (2006) Damage characteristics of composite honeycomb sandwich panels in bending under quasi-static loading. J Sandw Struct Mater 8:55–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636206056888CrossRef

152.

Scipio LA (1967) Structural design concepts some NASA contributions. Technology Utilization Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington D.C

153.

Rahman H (2013) Effectivess of honeycomb structure in main battle tank design. Cranfield University

154.

Griese D (2012) Finite element modeling and design of honeycomb sandwich panels for acoustic performance. Clemson University

155.

Ge Z, Hu H (2015) A theoretical analysis of deformation behavior of an innovative 3D auxetic textile structure. J Text Inst 106:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.906099CrossRef

156.

Liu Y, Hu H (2010) A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials. Sci Res Essays 5:1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000104CrossRef

157.

Alderson KL, Alderson A, Smart G et al (2002) Auxetic polypropylene fibres: part 1—manufacture and characterisation. Plast Rubber Compos 31:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1179/146580102225006495CrossRef

158.

Ravirala N, Alderson KL, Davies PJ et al (2006) Negative poisson’s ratio polyester fibers. Text Res J 76:540–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517506065255CrossRef

159.

Wright JR, Burns MK, James E et al (2012) On the design and characterisation of low-stiffness auxetic yarns and fabrics. Text Res J 82:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512436824CrossRef

160.

Wright JR, Sloan MR, Evans KE (2010) Tensile properties of helical auxetic structures: a numerical study. J Appl Phys 108:044905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3465378CrossRef

161.

Hong Hu, Wang Z, Liu S (2011) Development of auxetic fabrics using flat knitting technology. Text Res J 81:1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517511404594CrossRef

162.

Liu Y, Hong Hu, Lam JKC, Liu Su (2010) Negative poisson’s ratio weft-knitted fabrics. Text Res J 80:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517509349788CrossRef

163.

Ugbolue SC, Kim YK, Warner SB et al (2011) The formation and performance of auxetic textiles. Part II: geometry and structural properties. J Text Inst 102:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2010.486183CrossRef

164.

Wang Z, Hu H (2014) 3D auxetic warp-knitted spacer fabrics. Phys status solidi 251:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201384239CrossRef

165.

Wang Z, Hu H, Xiao X (2014) Deformation behaviors of three-dimensional auxetic spacer fabrics. Text Res J 84:1361–1372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517514521120CrossRef

166.

Hou Y, Neville R, Scarpa F et al (2014) Graded conventional-auxetic Kirigami sandwich structures: flatwise compression and edgewise loading. Compos Part B Eng 59:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.084CrossRef

167.

Lakes R (1987) Foam structures with a negative poisson’s ratio. Science 235:1038–1040. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.1038CrossRef

168.

Evans KE, Alderson A (2000) Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking! Adv Mater 12:617–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9%3c617::AID-ADMA617%3e3.0.CO;2-3CrossRef

169.

Grima JN, Caruana-Gauci R, Attard D, Gatt R (2012) Three-dimensional cellular structures with negative poisson’s ratio and negative compressibility properties. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 468:3121–3138. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2011.0667CrossRef

170.

Prawoto Y (2012) Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci 58:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012CrossRef

171.

Yang W, Li Z, Shi W et al (2004) Review on auxetic materials. J Mater Sci 39:3269–3279. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026928.93231.e0CrossRef

172.

Ju J, Summers JD (2011) Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain. Mater Des 32:512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.029CrossRef

173.

Scarpa F, Blain S, Lew T et al (2007) Elastic buckling of hexagonal chiral cell honeycombs. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 38:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.007CrossRef

174.

Scarpa F, Ciffo LG, Yates JR (2004) Dynamic properties of high structural integrity auxetic open cell foam. Smart Mater Struct 13:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006CrossRef

175.

Davalos JF, Chen A (2005) Buckling behavior of honeycomb FRP core with partially restrained loaded edges under out-of-plane compression. J Compos Mater 39:1465–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998305050436CrossRef

176.

Othman AR, Barton DC (2008) Failure initiation and propagation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich composites. Compos Struct 85:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.034CrossRef

177.

Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G (2000) Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs. J Strain Anal Eng Des 35:383–388. https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324001514152CrossRef

178.

Zhang X, Ding H, An L, Wang X (2015) Numerical investigation on dynamic crushing behavior of auxetic honeycombs with various cell-wall angles. Adv Mech Eng 7:679678. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/679678CrossRef

179.

Wan H, Ohtaki H, Kotosaka S, Hu G (2004) A study of negative Poisson’s ratios in auxetic honeycombs based on a large deflection model. Eur J Mech - A/Solids 23:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006CrossRef

180.

Hu LL, Zhou MZ, Deng H (2019) Dynamic indentation of auxetic and non-auxetic honeycombs under large deformation. Compos Struct 207:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.066CrossRef

Title: Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites
Authors: Lekhani Tripathi
B. K. Behera
Publication date: 09-07-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Materials Science / Issue 28/2021
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Electronic ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06302-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 28/2021

Magnetic and phonon transport properties of two-dimensional room-temperature ferromagnet VSe2

Adsorption of nitrogen-based gases on different layers of blue phosphorene oxides

Supercritical CO2-assisted microfluidization as ultra-high efficiency strategy for graphene preparation

NiP2/FeP heterostructural nanoflowers interwoven by carbon nanotubes as highly efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction

A liquid phase anion-exchange approach to high-quality all-inorganic halide perovskite micro- and nanowires

Degradable bio-based epoxy vitrimers based on imine chemistry and their application in recyclable carbon fiber composites

Premium Partners