Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

04-07-2021 | Original Paper

Revisiting comparisons of income inequality when Lorenz curves intersect

Authors: James Davies, Michael Hoy, Lin Zhao

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 1/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main contribution of Davies and Hoy (Am Econ Rev 85:980–986, 1995) was a “necessary and sufficient” condition for comparing inequality between income distributions according to the principle of transfer sensitivity (PTS). Chiu (Soc Choice Welf 28:375–399, 2007) showed that although the condition is sufficient, it is not necessary. In this paper, we provide the correct necessary and sufficient condition, and demonstrate with a simple example how the corrected condition allows for more pairs of distributions to be ranked by PTS. The correction clarifies the connection between Lorenz curve comparisons and inequality rankings when the curves intersect.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In the favourable composite transfer defined by Shorrocks and Foster (1987), the progressive transfer occurs in a lower range of incomes than does the regressive transfer, although the two transfers may occur over intersecting income ranges. See Davies and Hoy (1995) for a discussion of the normative appeal of placing greater emphasis on inequality that occurs for relatively lower incomes within the distribution.
 
2
In the literature, Proposition 2 of Davies and Hoy (1995) is usually cited as an equivalence between PTS and the comparison of variances for appropriately truncated subpopulations of a pair of income distributions. See, for example, Davies and Shorrocks (2000) and Cowell (2011) for citations in monographs, and Aaberge (2009), Gajdos and Weymark (2012) and Ibragimov et al. (2018) for citations in other publications.
 
3
This is clear upon comparing his Lemma 2 and Footnote 11 with our Proposition 1 here.
 
4
Theorem 5.2.3 in Athreya and Lahiri (2006, p.155) states integration by parts under mild conditions. Since cumulative distribution functions are always nondecreasing right-continuous and the quadratic function in our derivations never has any point of discontinuity, it follows as a corollary of Theorem 5.2.3 that in our situation, integration by parts is workable for general distributions including discontinuities.
 
5
It can be shown that \(z_i^*\) is also the unique zero root of S(y) on \([G^{-1}(P_i),F^{-1}(P_i)]\). Indeed, applying integration by parts to (2) yields \(P_iG^{-1}(P_i)+\int _{(G^{-1}(P_i),z_i^*]}G(y)dy=P_iF^{-1}(P_i)-\int _{(z_i^*,F^{-1}(P_i)]}F(y)dy\), and to \(\int _{[\underline{y},G^{-1}(P_i)]}ydG(y)=\int _{[\underline{y},F^{-1}(P_i)]}ydF(y)\) yields \(\int _{[\underline{y},G^{-1}(P_i)]}G(y)dy-P_iG^{-1}(P_i)=\int _{[\underline{y},F^{-1}(P_i)]}F(y)dy-P_iF^{-1}(P_i)\). Summing up the two equations results in \(S(z_i^*)=0\).
 
Literature
go back to reference Aaberge R (2009) Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Soc Choice Welf 33:235–259CrossRef Aaberge R (2009) Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Soc Choice Welf 33:235–259CrossRef
go back to reference Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRef Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263CrossRef
go back to reference Atkinson AB (2008) More on the measurement of inequality. J Econ Inequal 6:277–283CrossRef Atkinson AB (2008) More on the measurement of inequality. J Econ Inequal 6:277–283CrossRef
go back to reference Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1978) Measures of relative equality and their meaning in terms of social welfare. J Econ Theory 18:59–80CrossRef Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1978) Measures of relative equality and their meaning in terms of social welfare. J Econ Theory 18:59–80CrossRef
go back to reference Chiu WH (2007) Intersecting Lorenz curves, the degree of downside inequality aversion, and tax reforms. Soc Choice Welf 28:375–399CrossRef Chiu WH (2007) Intersecting Lorenz curves, the degree of downside inequality aversion, and tax reforms. Soc Choice Welf 28:375–399CrossRef
go back to reference Davies J, Hoy M (1995) Making inequality comparisons when Lorenz curves intersect. Am Econ Rev 85:980–986 Davies J, Hoy M (1995) Making inequality comparisons when Lorenz curves intersect. Am Econ Rev 85:980–986
go back to reference Davies J, Shorrocks AF (2000) The distribution of wealth. In: Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam Davies J, Shorrocks AF (2000) The distribution of wealth. In: Atkinson A, Bourguignon F (eds) Handbook of income distribution, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam
go back to reference Gajdos T, Weymark JA (2012) Introduction to inequality and risk. J Econ Theory 147:1313–1330CrossRef Gajdos T, Weymark JA (2012) Introduction to inequality and risk. J Econ Theory 147:1313–1330CrossRef
go back to reference Ibragimov M, Ibragimov R, Kattuman P, Ma J (2018) Income inequality and price elasticity of market demand: the case of crossing Lorenz curves. Econ Theor 65:729–750CrossRef Ibragimov M, Ibragimov R, Kattuman P, Ma J (2018) Income inequality and price elasticity of market demand: the case of crossing Lorenz curves. Econ Theor 65:729–750CrossRef
go back to reference Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Am Econ Rev 70:921–932 Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Am Econ Rev 70:921–932
go back to reference Shorrocks AF, Foster JE (1987) Transfer sensitive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 54:485–497CrossRef Shorrocks AF, Foster JE (1987) Transfer sensitive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 54:485–497CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revisiting comparisons of income inequality when Lorenz curves intersect
Authors
James Davies
Michael Hoy
Lin Zhao
Publication date
04-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01343-w

Premium Partner