Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Revisiting the Rationales for Media Regulation: The Quid Pro Quo Rationale and the Case for Aggregate Social Media User Data as Public Resource

Authors : Philip M. Napoli, Fabienne Graf

Published in: Digital and Social Media Regulation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the rationales that have traditionally justified media regulation in the United States and argue that the quid pro quo rationale, which has accompanied the treatment of the spectrum as a public resource in broadcast regulation, may have applicability to the social media context. Specifically, we argue that aggregations of social media user data may merit treatment as a public resource. We develop this argument through an exploration of the conceptual and policy debates surrounding the appropriate treatment of aggregate user data. We then argue that treating aggregate user data as a public resource may provide grounds for the application of a public interest regulatory framework to social media that is similar to the public interest regulatory framework that has traditionally been applied to broadcasting.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Albarran, Alan (ed.). 2013. The Social Media Industries. New York: Routledge. Albarran, Alan (ed.). 2013. The Social Media Industries. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 2019. Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report. Canberra, Australia: Author. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 2019. Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report. Canberra, Australia: Author.
go back to reference Bytwerk, Randall L. 2004. Bending Spines: The Propagandas of Nazi Germany and the German Democratic Republic. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. Bytwerk, Randall L. 2004. Bending Spines: The Propagandas of Nazi Germany and the German Democratic Republic. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
go back to reference Calabrese, Michael. 2001. Battle over the Airwaves: Principles for Spectrum Policy Reform. Working Paper, New American Foundation. Calabrese, Michael. 2001. Battle over the Airwaves: Principles for Spectrum Policy Reform. Working Paper, New American Foundation.
go back to reference Designing Accounting Safeguards to Help Broaden Oversight and Regulations on Data Act. 2019. 116th Congress, 1st Session. Designing Accounting Safeguards to Help Broaden Oversight and Regulations on Data Act. 2019. 116th Congress, 1st Session.
go back to reference Esayas, Samson Y. 2017. The Idea of ‘Emergent Properties’ in Data Privacy: Towards a Holistic Approach. International Journal of Law & Information Technology 25: 139–178. Esayas, Samson Y. 2017. The Idea of ‘Emergent Properties’ in Data Privacy: Towards a Holistic Approach. International Journal of Law & Information Technology 25: 139–178.
go back to reference Evans, A.C. 1979. An Examination of the Theories Justifying Content Regulation of the Electronic Media. Syracuse Law Review 30 (3) (Summer): 871–892. Evans, A.C. 1979. An Examination of the Theories Justifying Content Regulation of the Electronic Media. Syracuse Law Review 30 (3) (Summer): 871–892.
go back to reference Graham, Daniel. 2003. Public Interest Regulation in the Digital Age. CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Policy 11 (1): 97–144. Graham, Daniel. 2003. Public Interest Regulation in the Digital Age. CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Policy 11 (1): 97–144.
go back to reference Helberger, Natali, Kari Karppinen, and Lucia D’Acunto. 2018. Exposure Diversity as a Design Principle for Recommender Systems. Information, Communication, & Society 21 (2): 191–207.CrossRef Helberger, Natali, Kari Karppinen, and Lucia D’Acunto. 2018. Exposure Diversity as a Design Principle for Recommender Systems. Information, Communication, & Society 21 (2): 191–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Krattenmaker, Thomas G., and Lucas Powe. 1994. Regulating Broadcast Programming. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Krattenmaker, Thomas G., and Lucas Powe. 1994. Regulating Broadcast Programming. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
go back to reference Logan, Charles W., Jr. 1997. Getting Beyond Scarcity: A New Paradigm for Assessing the Constitutionality of Broadcast Regulation. California Law Review 85: 1687–1747. Logan, Charles W., Jr. 1997. Getting Beyond Scarcity: A New Paradigm for Assessing the Constitutionality of Broadcast Regulation. California Law Review 85: 1687–1747.
go back to reference McNamee, Roger. 2019. Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe. New York: Penguin Press. McNamee, Roger. 2019. Zucked: Waking Up to the Facebook Catastrophe. New York: Penguin Press.
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. 1999. Deconstructing the Diversity Principle. Journal of Communication 49 (4): 7–34.CrossRef Napoli, Philip M. 1999. Deconstructing the Diversity Principle. Journal of Communication 49 (4): 7–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. 2003. Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press. Napoli, Philip M. 2003. Audience Economics: Media Institutions and the Audience Marketplace. New York: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. 2011. Diminished, Enduring, and Emergent Diversity Policy Concerns in an Evolving Media Environment. International Journal of Communication 5: 1182–1196. Napoli, Philip M. 2011. Diminished, Enduring, and Emergent Diversity Policy Concerns in an Evolving Media Environment. International Journal of Communication 5: 1182–1196.
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. 2019a. User Data as a Public Resource: Implications for Social Media Regulation. Policy & Internet 11 (4): 439–459.CrossRef Napoli, Philip M. 2019a. User Data as a Public Resource: Implications for Social Media Regulation. Policy & Internet 11 (4): 439–459.CrossRef
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. 2019b. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press. Napoli, Philip M. 2019b. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M. in press. Beyond Information Fiduciaries: Dominant Digital Platforms as Public Trustees. In Dealing with Digital Dominance, ed. M. Moore and D. Tambini. New York: Oxford University Press. Napoli, Philip M. in press. Beyond Information Fiduciaries: Dominant Digital Platforms as Public Trustees. In Dealing with Digital Dominance, ed. M. Moore and D. Tambini. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Napoli, Philip M., Paul J. Lavrakas, and Mario Callegaro. 2014. Internet and mobile audience ratings panels. In Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, ed. M. Callegaro et al., 387–407. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRef Napoli, Philip M., Paul J. Lavrakas, and Mario Callegaro. 2014. Internet and mobile audience ratings panels. In Online Panel Research: A Data Quality Perspective, ed. M. Callegaro et al., 387–407. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRef
go back to reference Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin. Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin.
go back to reference Red Lion Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission. 1969. 395 U.S. 367. Red Lion Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission. 1969. 395 U.S. 367.
go back to reference Savin, Andrej. 2018. Regulating Internet Platforms in the EU—The Emergence of the ‘Level Playing Field’. Computer Law & Security Review 34: 1215–1231.CrossRef Savin, Andrej. 2018. Regulating Internet Platforms in the EU—The Emergence of the ‘Level Playing Field’. Computer Law & Security Review 34: 1215–1231.CrossRef
go back to reference Spitzer, Matthew L. 1989. The Constitutionality of Licensing Broadcasters. New York University Law Review 64 (5): 990–1072. Spitzer, Matthew L. 1989. The Constitutionality of Licensing Broadcasters. New York University Law Review 64 (5): 990–1072.
go back to reference Wu, Tim. 2018. The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef Wu, Tim. 2018. The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Yakowitz, Jane. 2011. Tragedy of the Data Commons. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 25 (1): 1–68. Yakowitz, Jane. 2011. Tragedy of the Data Commons. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 25 (1): 1–68.
go back to reference Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology 30: 75–89.
Metadata
Title
Revisiting the Rationales for Media Regulation: The Quid Pro Quo Rationale and the Case for Aggregate Social Media User Data as Public Resource
Authors
Philip M. Napoli
Fabienne Graf
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66759-7_3