Top

Published in:

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Risk Analysis in Internal Transport Systems in Logistics 4.0

Author : Agnieszka Tubis

Published in: The New Paradigm of Risk in Internal Transport Supporting Logistics 4.0 System

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Among the mobile solutions of Industry 4.0 that support internal transport, AGV systems and drones are the most common. Their implementation is related to the need to improve the efficiency of internal transport processes and to reduce the disruptions occurring in the process, the source of which is the human factor. Implementing these mobile solutions thus responds to the need to minimise the risks present in traditional internal logistics systems. However, at the same time, these systems generate new types of adverse events characteristic of cyber-physical systems. To confirm the research gap defined in Chap. 1 , the Author conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify current research trends related to risks in internal transport processes supported by Logistics 4.0 solutions. A summary of this research will be presented in this chapter.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Logistics Systems

next chapter The New Approach to Risk Assessment in Logistics 4.0 on the Example of the Internal Transport Process

Tubis AA, Poturaj H (2022) Risk related to AGV systems—open-access literature review. Energies (Basel) 15:8910. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238910

Tubis AA, Poturaj H (2021) Challenges in the implementation of autonomous robots in the process of feeding materials on the production line as part of Logistics 4.0. Logforum 17:411–423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.611

Tubis AA, Poturaj H, Smok A (2024) Interaction between a human and an AGV system in a shared workspace—a literature review identifying research areas. Sustainability 16:974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030974CrossRef

Zhang H, Xu L, Liang J, Sun X (2022) Research on guide line identification and lateral motion control of AGV in complex environments. Machines 10:121. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10020121CrossRef

Sun S, Hu J, Li J, Liu R, Shu M, Yang Y (2019) An INS-UWB based collision avoidance system for AGV. Algorithms 12:40. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12020040MathSciNetCrossRef

Adriaensen A, Pintelon L, Costantino F, Di Gravio G, Patriarca R (2021) An STPA safety analysis case study of a collaborative robot application. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54:534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2021.08.061CrossRef

Zamora-Cadenas L, Velez I, Sierra-Garcia JE (2021) UWB-based safety system for autonomous guided vehicles without hardware on the infrastructure. IEEE Access 9:96430–96443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3094279CrossRef

Zhang Z, Guo Q, Chen J, Yuan P (2018) Collision-free route planning for multiple AGVs in an automated warehouse based on collision classification. IEEE Access 6:26022–26035. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819199CrossRef

Klimenda F, Cizek R, Pisarik M, Sterba J (2021) Stopping the mobile robotic vehicle at a defined distance from the obstacle by means of an infrared distance sensor. Sensors 21:5959. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175959CrossRef

10.

Kutzler T, Wolter A, Kenner A, Dassow S (2021) Boosting cyber-physical system security. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54:976–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2021.08.117CrossRef

11.

Elsisi M, Tran M-Q (2021) Development of an IoT architecture based on a deep neural network against cyber attacks for automated guided vehicles. Sensors 21:8467. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248467CrossRef

12.

Garnier S, Subrin K, Arevalo-Siles P, Caverot G, Furet B (2018) Mobile robot stability for complex tasks in naval industries. Procedia CIRP 72:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.101CrossRef

13.

Zhang H, Qi L, Luan W, Ma H (2022) Double-cycling AGV scheduling considering uncertain crane operational time at container terminals. Appl Sci 12:4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104820CrossRef

14.

Guo K, Zhu J, Shen L (2021) An Improved acceleration method based on multi-agent system for AGVs conflict-free path planning in automated terminals. IEEE Access 9:3326–3338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047916CrossRef

15.

Yuan Z, Yang Z, Lv L, Shi Y (2020) A bi-level path planning algorithm for multi-AGV routing problem. Electronics (Basel) 9:1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091351

16.

Wang J, Luo Y, Tan X (2021) Path planning for automatic guided vehicles (AGVs) fusing MH-RRT with improved TEB. Actuators 10:314. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10120314CrossRef

17.

Meysami A, Cuillière J-C, François V, Kelouwani S (2022) Investigating the impact of triangle and quadrangle mesh representations on AGV path planning for various indoor environments: with or without inflation. Robotics 11:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics11020050CrossRef

18.

Szczepanski R, Tarczewski T, Erwinski K (2022) Energy efficient local path planning algorithm based on predictive artificial potential field. IEEE Access 10:39729–39742. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166632CrossRef

19.

Wu B, Chi X, Zhao C, Zhang W, Lu Y, Jiang D (2022) Dynamic path planning for Forklift AGV based on smoothing A* and improved DWA hybrid algorithm. Sensors 22:7079. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22187079CrossRef

20.

Run R-S, Xiao Z-Y (2018) Indoor autonomous vehicle navigation—a feasibility study based on infrared technology. Appl Syst Inno 1:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi1010004CrossRef

21.

Cabezas-Olivenza M, Zulueta E, Sánchez-Chica A, Teso-Fz-Betoño A, Fernandez-Gamiz U (2021) Dynamical analysis of a navigation algorithm. Mathematics 9:3139. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9233139CrossRef

22.

Reger M, Stumpenhausen J, Bernhardt H (2022) Evaluation of LiDAR for the free navigation in agriculture. AgriEngineering 4:489–506. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4020033CrossRef

23.

Nguyen PT-T, Yan S-W, Liao J-F, Kuo C-H (2021) Autonomous mobile robot navigation in sparse LiDAR feature environments. Appl Sci 11:5963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135963CrossRef

24.

Hu X, Luo Z, Jiang W (2020) AGV localization system based on ultra-wideband and vision guidance. Electronics (Basel) 9:448. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030448

25.

An X, Zhao S, Cui X, Shi Q, Lu M (2020) Distributed multi-antenna positioning for automatic-guided vehicle. Sensors 20:1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041155CrossRef

26.

De Ryck M, Versteyhe M, Debrouwere F (2020) Automated guided vehicle systems, state-of-the-art control algorithms and techniques. J Manuf Syst 54:152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMSY.2019.12.002CrossRef

27.

De Ryck M, Pissoort D, Holvoet T, Demeester E (2021) Decentral task allocation for industrial AGV-systems with resource constraints. J Manuf Syst 59:310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMSY.2021.03.008CrossRef

28.

Barak S, Moghdani R, Maghsoudlou H (2021) Energy-efficient multi-objective flexible manufacturing scheduling. J Clean Prod 283:124610. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124610CrossRef

29.

Tang G, Tang C, Claramunt C, Hu X, Zhou P (2021) Geometric A-star algorithm: an improved A-star algorithm for AGV path planning in a port environment. IEEE Access 9:59196–59210. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070054CrossRef

30.

Han W, Xu J, Sun Z, Liu B, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Mei X (2022) Digital Twin-based automated guided vehicle scheduling: a solution for its charging problems. Appl Sci 12:3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073354CrossRef

31.

Witczak M, Lipiec B, Banaszak Z (2019) Fault-tolerant control-based flexible AGV transportation in a seat assembly system. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.10.028CrossRef

32.

Xu R, Feng H, Liu J, Hong W (2022) Dynamic spare point application based coordination strategy for multi-AGV systems in a WIP warehouse environment. IEEE Access 10:80249–80263. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195173CrossRef

33.

Lyu X, Song Y, He C, Lei Q, Guo W (2019) Approach to integrated scheduling problems considering optimal number of automated guided vehicles and conflict-free routing in flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Access 7:74909–74924. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919109CrossRef

34.

Mrugalska B, Stetter R (2019) Health-aware model-predictive control of a cooperative AGV-based production system. Sensors 19:532. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030532CrossRef

35.

Dang QV, Singh N, Adan I, Martagan T, van de Sande D (2021) Scheduling heterogeneous multi-load AGVs with battery constraints. Comput Oper Res 136:105517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COR.2021.105517MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Bohács G, Győrváry Zs, Gáspár D (2021) Integrating scheduling and energy efficiency aspects in production logistic using AGV systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54:294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.156

37.

Yue L, Fan H, Zhai C (2019) Joint configuration and scheduling optimization of a dual-trolley quay crane and automatic guided vehicles with consideration of vessel stability. Sustainability 12:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010024CrossRef

38.

Sperling M, Kivelä T (2022) Concept of a dual energy storage system for sustainable energy supply of automated guided vehicles. Energies (Basel) 15:479. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020479

39.

Niestrój R, Rogala T, Skarka W (2020) An energy consumption model for designing an AGV energy storage system with a PEMFC stack. Energies (Basel) 13:3435. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133435

40.

Hanschek AJ, Bouvier YE, Jesacher E, Grbović PJ (2022) Analysis and comparison of power distribution system topologies for low-voltage DC–DC automated guided vehicle applications. Energies (Basel) 15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062012

41.

Chen W, Liu J, Chen S, Zhang L (2020) Energy shaping control for wireless power transfer system in automatic guided vehicles. Energies (Basel) 13:2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112959

42.

Liang C, Zhang Y, Li Z, Yuan F, Yang G, Song K (2020) Coil positioning for wireless power transfer system of automatic guided vehicle based on magnetic sensing. Sensors 20:5304. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185304CrossRef

43.

Lu F, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhu C, Diao L, Gong M, Zhang W, Mi C (2019) A low-voltage and high-current inductive power transfer system with low harmonics for automatic guided vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 68:3351–3360. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2898418CrossRef

44.

Fellan A, Schellenberger C, Zimmermann M, Schotten HD (2018) Enabling communication technologies for automated unmanned vehicles in Industry 4.0. In: 2018 International conference on information and communication technology convergence (ICTC). IEEE, pp 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2018.8539695

45.

Nakimuli W, Garcia-Reinoso J, Sierra-Garcia JE, Serrano P, Fernandez IQ (2021) Deployment and evaluation of an Industry 4.0 use case over 5G. IEEE Commun Mag 59:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2001104

46.

Cheong HW, Lee H (2018) Requirements of AGV (automated guided vehicle) for SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises). Procedia Comput Sci 139:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2018.10.222CrossRef

47.

Seder M, Petrović L, Peršić J, Popović G, Petković T, Šelek A, Bićanić B, Cvišić I, Josić D, Marković I, Petrović I, Muhammad A (2019) Open platform based mobile robot control for automation in manufacturing logistics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.055CrossRef

48.

Martínez-Gutiérrez A, Díez-González J, Ferrero-Guillén R, Verde P, Álvarez R, Perez H (2021) Digital Twin for automatic transportation in Industry 4.0. Sensors 21:3344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103344

49.

Azangoo M, Taherkordi A, Blech JO, Vyatkin V (2021) Digital Twin-assisted controlling of AGVs in flexible manufacturing environments. In: 2021 IEEE 30th International symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE). IEEE, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE45552.2021.9576361

50.

Alexandru M, Dragos C, Bala-Constantin Z (2022) Digital Twin for automated guided vehicles fleet management. Procedia Comput Sci 199:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.01.172CrossRef

51.

Allmacher C, Schumann M, Klimant P, Putz M (2019) Optimizing development time through hybrid commissioning of control software. Procedia CIRP 79:450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2019.02.120CrossRef

52.

Kłosowski G, Gola A, Amila T (2018) Computational intelligence in control of AGV multimodal systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51:1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IFACOL.2018.08.315CrossRef

53.

Stetter R (2020) A fuzzy virtual actuator for automated guided vehicles. Sensors 20:4154. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154154CrossRef

54.

Jiang W, Zhu G, Zheng Y (2021) Iterative learning control for AGV drive motor based on linear extended state observer. Machines 9:324. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines9120324CrossRef

55.

Wang X, Shi H, Zhang C (2020) Path planning for intelligent parking system based on improved ant colony optimization. IEEE Access 8:65267–65273. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984802CrossRef

56.

Thomopoulos V, Bitas D, Papastavros K-N, Tsipianitis D, Kavga A (2021) Development of an integrated IoT-based greenhouse control three-device robotic system. Agronomy 11:405. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020405CrossRef

57.

Park S, Hwang J, Yang H, Kim S (2021) Simulation modelling for automated guided vehicle introduction to the loading process of ro-ro ships. J Mar Sci Eng 9:441. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040441CrossRef

58.

Kim J (2022) Fast route planner considering terrain information. Sensors 22:4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124518CrossRef

59.

Zaccaria M, Giorgini M, Monica R, Aleotti J (2021) Multi-robot multiple camera people detection and tracking in automated warehouses. In: 2021 IEEE 19th International conference on industrial informatics (INDIN). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN45523.2021.9557363

60.

Indri M, Sibona F, David Cen Cheng P (2020) Sen3Bot Net: a meta-sensors network to enable smart factories implementation. In: 2020 25th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). IEEE, pp 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9212125

61.

Ahmed HO (2020) FLS-based collision avoidance cyber physical system for warehouse robots using FPGA. In: 2019 6th International conference on dependable systems and their applications (DSA). IEEE, pp 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSA.2019.00040

62.

Rey R, Corzetto M, Cobano JA, Merino L, Caballero F (2019) Human-robot co-working system for warehouse automation. In: 2019 24th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). IEEE, pp 578–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869178

63.

Écorchard G, Košnar K, Přeučil L (2020) Wearable camera-based human absolute localization in large warehouses. In: Osten W, Nikolaev DP (eds) Twelfth international conference on machine vision (ICMV 2019). SPIE, p 96. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2559424

64.

Holzke F, Danielis P, Golatowski F, Timmermann D (2018) A fusion approach for the localization of humans in factory environments. In: 2018 IEEE industrial cyber-physical systems (ICPS). IEEE, pp 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHYS.2018.8387638

65.

Babic J, Bilic M, Kovac I (2022) Safety vest system for human-robot collaboration. In: 2022 45th Jubilee international convention on information, communication and electronic technology (MIPRO). IEEE, pp 12–17. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO55190.2022.9803318

66.

Sabattini L, Aikio M, Beinschob P, Boehning M, Cardarelli E, Digani V, Krengel A, Magnani M, Mandici S, Oleari F, Reinke C, Ronzoni D, Stimming C, Varga R, Vatavu A, Castells Lopez S, Fantuzzi C, Mayra A, Nedevschi S, Secchi C, Fuerstenberg K (2018) The PAN-robots project: advanced automated guided vehicle systems for industrial logistics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 25:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2017.2700325CrossRef

67.

Lambert ED, Romano R, Watling D (2021) Optimal smooth paths based on clothoids for car-like vehicles in the presence of obstacles. Int J Control Autom Syst 19:2163–2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0179-1CrossRef

68.

Sun T, Wang Z, Li Q (2019) A medical garbage bin recycling system based on AGV. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international conference on robotics, intelligent control and artificial intelligence—RICAI 2019. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366194.3366232

69.

Millán M, Sierra-García JE, Santos M (2022) Generation of restricted zones for AGVs routes by clustering algorithms. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87869-6_45

70.

Elgeziry M, Costa F, Genovesi S (2022) Radio-frequency guidance system for path-following industrial autonomous guided vehicles. In: 2022 16th European conference on antennas and propagation (EuCAP). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/EuCAP53622.2022.9769288

71.

Tien TN, Nguyen K-V (2022) Updated weight graph for dynamic path planning of multi-AGVs in healthcare environments. In: 2022 International conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC). IEEE, pp 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC55345.2022.9943032

72.

Papcun P, Cabadaj J, Kajati E, Romero D, Landryova L, Vascak J, Zolotova I (2019) Augmented reality for humans-robots interaction in dynamic slotting “chaotic storage” smart warehouses. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_77

73.

Plosz S, Varga P (2018) Security and safety risk analysis of vision guided autonomous vehicles. In: 2018 IEEE industrial cyber-physical systems (ICPS). IEEE, pp 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHYS.2018.8387658

74.

Anastasi S, Monica L, Madonna M, Di Nardo M (2021) Human—collaborative machine interaction: the effects on the standardization. In: Proceedings of the 31st European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2021). Research Publishing Services, Singapore, pp 3406–3410. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_415-cd

75.

Fiolka M, Jost J, Kirks T (2020) Explorative study of a brain-computer interface for order picking tasks in logistics. In: 2020 12th International conference on intelligent human-machine systems and cybernetics (IHMSC). IEEE, pp 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC49165.2020.10135

76.

Wang Y-X, Chang C-L (2020) ROS-base multi-sensor fusion for accuracy positioning and SLAM system. In: 2020 International symposium on community-centric systems (CcS). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CcS49175.2020.9231442

77.

Gong X, Wang T, Huang T, Cui Y (2022) Toward safe and efficient human swarm collaboration: a hierarchical multi-agent pickup and delivery framework. IEEE Trans Intell Veh:1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2022.3172342

78.

Malayjerdi M, Kuts V, Sell R, Otto T, Baykara BC (2020) Virtual simulations environment development for autonomous vehicles interaction. In: Volume 2B: Advanced manufacturing. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2020-23362

79.

Nguyen TP, Nguyen H, Thinh Ngo HQ (2022) Planning the emergency collision avoidance strategy based on personal zones for safe human-machine interaction in smart cyber-physical system. Complexity 2022:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2992379CrossRef

80.

Soltani A, Stonis M, Overmeyer L (2019) Development of a case-based reasoning expert system for the disturbance management in automated guided vehicle systems. Logistics J 2019. https://doi.org/10.2195/lj_Proc_soltani_en_201912_01

81.

Bergman M, Bedaf S, van Heel G, Sturm J (2020) Can I just pass by? Testing design principles for industrial transport robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on computer-human interaction research and applications. SCITEPRESS—Science and Technology Publications, pp 178–187. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010144301780187

82.

Löcklin A, Dettinger F, Artelt M, Jazdi N, Weyrich M (2022) Trajectory prediction of workers to improve AGV and AMR operation based on the manufacturing schedule. Procedia CIRP 107:283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.04.046CrossRef

83.

Bach S-H, Yi S-Y (2022) An efficient approach for line-following automated guided vehicles based on fuzzy inference mechanism. J Robot Control (JRC) 3:395–401. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v3i4.14787

84.

Prati E, Peruzzini M, Pellicciari M, Raffaeli R (2021) How to include user eXperience in the design of human-robot interaction. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 68:102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102072CrossRef

85.

Vlachos I, Pascazzi RM, Ntotis M, Spanaki K, Despoudi S, Repoussis P (2022) Smart and flexible manufacturing systems using autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs) and the Internet of Things (IoT). Int J Prod Res:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2136282

86.

David A, Birtel M, Wagner A, Ruskowski M (2020) Architecture concept for the integration of cyber-physical transport modules in modular production environments. Procedia Manuf 51:1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.156CrossRef

87.

Mohsin S, Khan IA, Ali M (2019) Ergonomics-based working flexibility for automated guided vehicle (AGV) operators. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03542-3CrossRef

88.

Ballal S, Jagannath M, Arun Venkatesh K (2019) Wireless data acquisition and communication system for automated guided vehicle. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8663-2_25

89.

Luchetti A, Carollo A, Santoro L, Nardello M, Brunelli D, Bosetti P, De Cecco M (2021) Human identification and tracking using ultra-wideband-vision data fusion in unstructured environments. ACTA IMEKO 10:124. https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.1139

90.

Allmacher C, Dudczig M, Knopp S, Klimant P (2019) Virtual reality for virtual commissioning of automated guided vehicles. In: 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, pp 838–839. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797981

91.

Yu Y-S, Yu P-Y, Chen C-W (2020) An indoor positioning technique for on-demand AGV calling system. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics—Taiwan (ICCE-Taiwan). IEEE, pp 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Taiwan49838.2020.9258150

92.

Lee S-J, Kim W, Lee YK, Yoon D, Wook LJ, Persico G, Fischer A (2019) Design of the operator tracing robot for material handling. In: 2019 International conference on information and communication technology convergence (ICTC). IEEE, pp 1254–1256. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC46691.2019.8939957

93.

Lai YL, Lai YK, Lan LC, Zheng CY, Chen SC, Tseng LW (2021) A novel automated guided vehicle for guidance applications. J Phys Conf Ser 2020:012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2020/1/012037CrossRef

94.

Ding I-J, Juang Y-C (2022) Hand-gesture-control-based navigation using wearable armband with surface electromyography and inertial measurement unit sensor data for autonomous guided vehicles with robot operation system-based simultaneous localization and mapping navigation in smart manufacturing. Sens Mater 34:3513. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4045

95.

Manitsaris S, Senteri G, Makrygiannis D, Glushkova A (2020) Human movement representation on multivariate time series for recognition of professional gestures and forecasting their trajectories. Front Robot AI 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00080

96.

Coelho F, Macedo R, Relvas S, Barbosa-Póvoa A (2022) Simulation of in-house logistics operations for manufacturing. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 35:989–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2027521CrossRef

97.

Yokota T (2019) Min-max-strategy-based optimum co-operative picking with AGVs in warehouse. In: 2019 58th Annual conference of the society of instrument and control engineers of Japan (SICE). IEEE, pp 236–242. https://doi.org/10.23919/SICE.2019.8859959

98.

Zou Y, Zhang D, Qi M (2019) Order picking system optimization based on picker-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2019 5th international conference on industrial and business engineering. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364335.3364386

99.

Löffler M, Boysen N, Schneider M (2022) Picker routing in AGV-assisted order picking systems. Informs J Comput 34:440–462. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1060MathSciNetCrossRef

100.

Park SH, Hwang J, Yun S, Kim S (2022) Automatic guided vehicles introduction impacts to roll-on/roll-off terminals: simulation and cost model analysis. J Adv Transp 2022:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6062840CrossRef

101.

Vijayakumar V, Sgarbossa F (2021) A literature review on the level of automation in picker-to-parts order picking system: research opportunities. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, pp 438–443. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.050

102.

Punekar PA, Parvati VK, Mattikalli AB, Gadad GM (2022) An innovative humanoid assistant for performing simple and repetitive tasks. In: 13th International conference on advances in computing, control, and telecommunication technologies, ACT 2022, pp 423–429

103.

Ghiyasinasab M, Lahrichi N, Lehoux N (2021) A simulation model to analyse automation scenarios in decontamination centers. Health Syst:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2021.2004933

104.

Shimmura T, Ichikari R, Okuma T (2020) Human–Robot hybrid service system introduction for enhancing labor and robot productivity. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57997-5_76

105.

Hellmann W, Marino D, Megahed M, Suggs M, Borowski J, Negahban A (2019) Human, AGV or AIV? An integrated framework for material handling system selection with real-world application in an injection molding facility. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:815–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2958-xCrossRef

106.

Shejwal Y, Behare M (2020) AGV based stretcher. In: 2020 International conference on smart innovations in design, environment, management, planning and computing (ICSIDEMPC). IEEE, pp 200–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIDEMPC49020.2020.9299646

107.

Labade S (2018) Forklift free operation: compensating downtime from bullwhip effect and escalating operation safety. Presented at the April 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1389

108.

Naeem D, Gheith M, Eltawil A (2021) Integrated scheduling of AGVs and yard cranes in automated container terminals. In: 2021 IEEE 8th international conference on industrial engineering and applications (ICIEA). IEEE, pp 632–636. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436808

109.

Fay B, Ramasubramanian AK, Murphy RD, Adderley T, Papakostas N (2022) Using a process simulation platform for reviewing automated airport baggage handling system configurations. Procedia CIRP 112:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.069CrossRef

110.

Dung BTK, Le Anh TM, Chuong TT (2021) Application of IE techniques to support businesses to make the adoption of sustainable manufacturing solutions: a case study of adoption of AGV Technology in a Garment factory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_78

111.

Afonso T, Alves CA, Carneiro P, Vieira A (2021) Simulation pulled by the need to reduce wastes and human effort in an intralogistics project. Int J Indus Eng Manage 12:274–285. https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-4-294

112.

Prabhakar M, Paulraj V, Dhanraj JA, Nagarajan S, Kannappan DAK, Hariharan A (2020) Design and simulation of an automated guided vehicle through Webots for isolated COVID-19 patients in hospitals. In: 2020 IEEE 4th conference on information & communication technology (CICT). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT51604.2020.9312063

113.

Zulkiflee HB, Elsheikh EMA (2022) Development sanitizer sprinkler for automated guided vehicle (AGV). In: 2022 IEEE 8th international conference on smart instrumentation, measurement and applications (ICSIMA). IEEE, pp 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA55652.2022.9928865

114.

Caccavale R, Finzi A (2019) An automated guided vehicle for flexible and interactive task execution in hospital scenarios. AIRO@AI*IA

115.

Tubis AA, Poturaj H, Dereń K, Żurek A (2024) Risks of drone use in light of literature studies. Sensors 24:1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041205CrossRef

116.

Hernández-López D, López-Rebollo J, Moreno MA, Gonzalez-Aguilera D (2023) Automatic processing for identification of forest fire risk areas along high-voltage power lines using coarse-to-fine LiDAR data. Forests 14:662. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040662CrossRef

117.

Munawar HS, Gharineiat Z, Akram J, Imran Khan S (2022) A framework for burnt area mapping and evacuation problem using aerial imagery analysis. Fire 5:122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5040122CrossRef

118.

Shamsoshoara A, Afghah F, Razi A, Zheng L, Fulé PZ, Blasch E (2021) Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: the FLAME dataset. Comput Netw 193:108001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108001CrossRef

119.

Alsumayt A, El-Haggar N, Amouri L, Alfawaer ZM, Aljameel SS (2023) Smart flood detection with AI and blockchain integration in Saudi Arabia using drones. Sensors 23:5148. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115148CrossRef

120.

Annis A, Nardi F, Petroselli A, Apollonio C, Arcangeletti E, Tauro F, Belli C, Bianconi R, Grimaldi S (2020) UAV-DEMs for small-scale flood hazard mapping. Water (Basel) 12:1717. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061717

121.

Belcore E, Piras M, Pezzoli A (2022) Land Cover Classification from Very High-Resolution UAS Data for Flood Risk Mapping. Sensors 22:5622. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22155622CrossRef

122.

Sodnik J, Mikoš M, Bezak N (2023) Torrential hazards’ mitigation measures in a typical alpine catchment in Slovenia. Appl Sci 13:11136. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011136CrossRef

123.

Tiepolo M, Belcore E, Braccio S, Issa S, Massazza G, Rosso M, Tarchiani V (2021) Method for fluvial and pluvial flood risk assessment in rural settlements. MethodsX 8:101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101463CrossRef

124.

Whitehurst D, Friedman B, Kochersberger K, Sridhar V, Weeks J (2021) Drone-based community assessment, planning, and disaster risk management for sustainable development. Remote Sens (Basel) 13:1739. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091739

125.

Jacobsen RH, Matlekovic L, Shi L, Malle N, Ayoub N, Hageman K, Hansen S, Nyboe FF, Ebeid E (2023) Design of an autonomous cooperative drone swarm for inspections of safety critical infrastructure. Appl Sci 13:1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031256CrossRef

126.

Kim JJ, Kim I, Hwang J (2021) A change of perceived innovativeness for contactless food delivery services using drones after the outbreak of COVID-19. Int J Hosp Manag 93:102758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102758CrossRef

127.

Manzoor A, Kim K, Pandey SR, Kazmi SMA, Tran NH, Saad W, Hong CS (2021) Ruin theory for energy-efficient resource allocation in UAV-assisted cellular networks. IEEE Trans Commun 69:3943–3956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3064968CrossRef

128.

Forkan ARM, Kang Y-B, Jayaraman PP, Liao K, Kaul R, Morgan G, Ranjan R, Sinha S (2022) CorrDetector: a framework for structural corrosion detection from drone images using ensemble deep learning. Expert Syst Appl 193:116461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116461CrossRef

129.

Kabbabe Poleo K, Crowther WJ, Barnes M (2021) Estimating the impact of drone-based inspection on the levelised cost of electricity for offshore wind farms. Results Eng 9:100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2021.100201CrossRef

130.

Mandirola M, Casarotti C, Peloso S, Lanese I, Brunesi E, Senaldi I (2022) Use of UAS for damage inspection and assessment of bridge infrastructures. Int J Disast Risk Reduc 72:102824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102824CrossRef

131.

Outay F, Mengash HA, Adnan M (2020) Applications of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in road safety, traffic and highway infrastructure management: recent advances and challenges. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 141:116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.018CrossRef

132.

Kolster ME, Wigh MD, Lima Simões da Silva E, Bjerg Vilhelmsen T, Døssing A (2022) High-speed magnetic surveying for unexploded ordnance using UAV systems. Remote Sens (Basel) 14:1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051134

133.

Yoo L-S, Lee J-H, Lee Y-K, Jung S-K, Choi Y (2021) Application of a drone magnetometer system to military mine detection in the demilitarized zone. Sensors 21:3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093175CrossRef

134.

Bridgelall R (2022) Reducing risks by transporting dangerous cargo in drones. Sustainability 14:13044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013044CrossRef

135.

Sookram N, Ramsewak D, Singh S (2021) The conceptualization of an unmanned aerial system (UAS) ship-shore delivery service for the maritime industry of Trinidad. Drones 5:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030076CrossRef

136.

Umeda S, Yoshikawa N, Seo Y (2022) Cost and workload assessment of agricultural drone sprayer: a case study of rice production in Japan. Sustainability 14:10850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710850CrossRef

137.

Heiets I, Kuo Y-W, La J, Yeun RCK, Verhagen W (2023) Future trends in UAV applications in the Australian market. Aerospace 10:555. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10060555CrossRef

138.

Dams B, Chen B, Shepherd P, Ball RJ (2023) Development of cementitious mortars for aerial additive manufacturing. Appl Sci 13:641. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010641CrossRef

139.

Tubis AA, Żurek AM (2022) Analysis of adverse events related to the use of drones in material handling at a chemical manufacturer site. In: Proceedings of the 32nd European safety and reliability conference. Research Publishing Services, Singapore, pp 815–821. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-5183-4_R16-03-600-cd

140.

Tubis AA, Żurek A (2022) The use of drones to handle internal logistic flows in the company from the chemical sector. In: Conference proceedings—CLC 2022, June 15–17, pp 107–112. Bojnice. https://doi.org/10.37904/clc.2022.4572

141.

De Silvestri S, Pagliarani M, Tomasello F, Trojaniello D, Sanna A (2022) Design of a service for hospital internal transport of urgent pharmaceuticals via drones. Drones 6:70. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6030070CrossRef

142.

Barbeau M, Garcia-Alfaro J, Kranakis E (2021) Risky zone avoidance strategies for drones. In: 2021 IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE53047.2021.9569172

143.

Niglio F, Comite P, Cannas A, Pirri A, Tortora G (2022) Preliminary clinical validation of a drone-based delivery system in urban scenarios using a smart capsule for blood. Drones 6:195. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6080195CrossRef

144.

Beck S, Bui T, Davies A, Courtney P, Brown A, Geudens J, Royall P (2020) An evaluation of the drone delivery of adrenaline auto-injectors for anaphylaxis: pharmacists’ perceptions, acceptance, and concerns. Drones 4:66. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4040066CrossRef

145.

Jones RW, Despotou G (2019) Unmanned aerial systems and healthcare: possibilities and challenges. In: 2019 14th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA). IEEE, pp 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2019.8834142

146.

Alsamhi SH, Shvetsov AV, Kumar S, Shvetsova SV, Alhartomi MA, Hawbani A, Rajput NS, Srivastava S, Saif A, Nyangaresi VO (2022) UAV computing-assisted search and rescue mission framework for disaster and harsh environment mitigation. Drones 6:154. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070154CrossRef

147.

Salmoral G, Rivas Casado M, Muthusamy M, Butler D, Menon P, Leinster P (2020) Guidelines for the use of unmanned aerial systems in flood emergency response. Water (Basel) 12:521. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020521

148.

Burke, McWhirter, Veitch-Michaelis, McAree, Pointon, Wich, Longmore (2019) Requirements and limitations of thermal drones for effective search and rescue in marine and coastal areas. Drones 3:78. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3040078

149.

Calamoneri T, Coro F, Mancini S (2022) A realistic model to support rescue operations after an earthquake via UAVs. IEEE Access 10:6109–6125. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3141216CrossRef

150.

Ho Y-H, Tsai Y-J (2022) Open collaborative platform for multi-drones to support search and rescue operations. Drones 6:132. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6050132CrossRef

151.

McRae JN, Gay CJ, Nielsen BM, Hunt AP (2019) Using an unmanned aircraft system (drone) to conduct a complex high altitude search and rescue operation: a case study. Wilderness Environ Med 30:287–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2019.03.004CrossRef

152.

McRae JN, Nielsen BM, Gay CJ, Hunt AP, Nigh AD (2021) Utilizing drones to restore and maintain radio communication during search and rescue operations. Wilderness Environ Med 32:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2020.11.002CrossRef

153.

Muhamat AA, Zulkifli AF, Ibrahim MA, Sulaiman S, Subramaniam G, Mohamad S, Suzuki Y (2022) Realising the corporate social performance (CSP) of Takaful (Islamic insurance) operators through drone-assisted disaster victim identification (DVI). Sustainability 14:5440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095440CrossRef

154.

Redi AANP, Sopha BM, Asih AMS, Liperda RI (2021) Collaborative hybrid aerial and ground vehicle routing for post-disaster assessment. Sustainability 13:12841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212841CrossRef

155.

Marturano F, Martellucci L, Chierici A, Malizia A, Giovanni DD, d’Errico F, Gaudio P, Ciparisse J-F (2021) Numerical fluid dynamics simulation for drones’ chemical detection. Drones 5:69. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030069CrossRef

156.

Fakhrulddin SS, Gharghan SK, Al-Naji A, Chahl J (2019) An advanced first aid system based on an unmanned aerial vehicles and a wireless body area sensor network for elderly persons in outdoor environments. Sensors 19:2955. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132955CrossRef

157.

García-Cobos FJ, Paniagua-Sánchez JM, Gordillo-Guerrero A, Marabel-Calderón C, Rufo-Pérez M, Jiménez-Barco A (2023) Personal exposimeter coupled to a drone as a system for measuring environmental electromagnetic fields. Environ Res 216:114483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114483CrossRef

158.

Restás Á (2022) Drone applications fighting COVID-19 pandemic—towards good practices. Drones 6:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6010015CrossRef

159.

Tubis AA, Ryczyński J, Żurek A (2021) Risk assessment for the use of drones in warehouse operations in the first phase of introducing the service to the market. Sensors 21:6713. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206713CrossRef

160.

Salazar F, Martínez-García MS, de Castro A, Chávez-Fuentes C, Cazorla M, Ureña-Aguirre J del P, Altamirano S (2023) UAVs for business adoptions in smart city environments: inventory management system. Electronics (Basel) 12:2090. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12092090

161.

Garcia M, Maza I, Ollero A, Gutierrez D, Aguirre I, Viguria A (2022) Release of sterile mosquitoes with drones in urban and rural environments under the European drone regulation. Appl Sci 12:1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031250CrossRef

162.

Matthews GA (2021) New technology for desert locust control. Agronomy 11:1052. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061052CrossRef

163.

Wudenka M, Muller MG, Demmel N, Wedler A, Triebel R, Cremers D, Sturzl W (2021) Towards robust monocular visual Odometry for flying robots on planetary missions. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, pp 8737–8744. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636844

164.

Granati G, Cichella F, Lucidi P (2021) High-tech training for birds of prey. Animals 11:530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020530CrossRef

165.

McDonnell S, Torcivia C (2020) Preliminary proof of the concept of wild (Feral) horses following light aircraft into a trap. Animals 10:80. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010080CrossRef

166.

Al-kabi H, Mazinani SM (2021) DNCS: New UAV navigation with considering the no-fly zone and efficient selection of the charging station. Ain Shams Eng J 12:3669–3676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.02.020CrossRef

167.

Du L, Li X, Gan Y, Leng K (2022) Optimal model and algorithm of medical materials delivery drone routing problem under major public health emergencies. Sustainability 14:4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084651CrossRef

168.

Abbass MAB, Kang H-S (2023) Drone elevation control based on Python-unity integrated framework for reinforcement learning applications. Drones 7:225. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7040225CrossRef

169.

Fan Y, Li O, Liu G (2022) An object detection algorithm for rotary-wing UAV based on AWin transformer. IEEE Access 10:13139–13150. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3147264CrossRef

170.

Qu Z, Willig A (2022) Sensorless and coordination-free lane switching on a drone road segment—a simulation study. Drones 6:411. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6120411CrossRef

171.

Rakotonarivo B, Drougard N, Conversy S, Garcia J (2022) Supporting drone mission planning and risk assessment with interactive representations of operational parameters. In: 2022 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS). IEEE, pp 1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS54217.2022.9836056

172.

Liu C, van Kampen E-J, de Croon GCHE (2023) Adaptive risk-tendency: nano drone navigation in cluttered environments with distributional reinforcement learning. In: 2023 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 7198–7204. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160324

173.

Bektash O, Pedersen JN, Ramirez Gomez A, la Cour-Harbo A (2020) Automated emergency landing system for drones: SafeEYE project. In: 2020 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS). IEEE, pp 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS48674.2020.9214073

174.

Yuan B, Ma W, Wang F (2022) High speed safe autonomous landing marker tracking of fixed wing drone based on deep learning. IEEE Access 10:80415–80436. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195286CrossRef

175.

Saavedra-Ruiz M, Pinto-Vargas AM, Romero-Cano V (2022) Monocular visual autonomous landing system for quadcopter drones using software in the loop. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag 37:2–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAES.2021.3115208CrossRef

176.

Myeong W, Myung H (2019) Development of a wall-climbing drone capable of vertical soft landing using a tilt-rotor mechanism. IEEE Access 7:4868–4879. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889686CrossRef

177.

Serrano JR, Tiseira AO, García-Cuevas LM, Varela P (2021) Computational study of the propeller position effects in wing-mounted, distributed electric propulsion with boundary layer ingestion in a 25 kg remotely piloted aircraft. Drones 5:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030056CrossRef

178.

Carlson DF, Akbulut S, Rasmussen JF, Hestbech CS, Andersen MH, Melvad C (2023) Compact and modular autonomous surface vehicle for water research: the naval operating research drone assessing climate change (NORDACC). HardwareX 15:e00453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2023.e00453CrossRef

179.

Bui ST, Luu QK, Nguyen DQ, Le NDM, Loianno G, Ho VA (2023) Tombo propeller: bioinspired deformable structure toward collision-accommodated control for drones. IEEE Trans Rob 39:521–538. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2022.3198494CrossRef

180.

Ma M, Xu Y, Wang Z, Fu X, Gui G (2023) Decentralized learning and model averaging based automatic modulation classification in drone communication systems. Drones 7:391. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7060391CrossRef

181.

Alon O, Rabinovich S, Fyodorov C, Cauchard JR (2021) First step toward gestural recognition in harsh environments. Sensors 21:3997. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21123997CrossRef

182.

Svatý Z, Nouzovský L, Mičunek T, Frydrýn M (2022) Evaluation of the drone-human collision consequences. Heliyon 8:e11677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11677CrossRef

183.

Zhu R, Yang Z, Chen J (2022) Conflict risk assessment between non-cooperative drones and manned aircraft in airport terminal areas. Appl Sci 12:10377. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010377CrossRef

184.

Uddin Z, Altaf M, Bilal M, Nkenyereye L, Bashir AK (2020) Amateur drones detection: a machine learning approach utilizing the acoustic signals in the presence of strong interference. Comput Commun 154:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.065CrossRef

185.

Morio J, Levasseur B, Bertrand S (2021) Drone ground impact footprints with importance sampling: estimation and sensitivity analysis. Appl Sci 11:3871. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093871CrossRef

186.

Jeelani I, Gheisari M (2021) Safety challenges of UAV integration in construction: conceptual analysis and future research roadmap. Saf Sci 144:105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105473CrossRef

187.

Ažaltovič V, Škvareková I, Pecho P, Kandera B (2020) Calculation of the ground casualty risk during aerial work of unmanned aerial vehicles in the urban environment. Transp Res Proc 44:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.043CrossRef

188.

Lercel DJ, Hupy JP (2023) Exploring the use of geographic information systems to identify spatial patterns of remote UAS pilots and possible national airspace risk. Safety 9:18. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9010018CrossRef

189.

Lenzi J, Felege CJ, Newman R, McCann B, Ellis-Felege SN (2022) Feral horses and Bison at Theodore Roosevelt National Park (North Dakota, United States) exhibit shifts in behaviors during drone flights. Drones 6:136. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6060136CrossRef

190.

Sorrell K, Dawlings F, Mackay C, Clarke R (2023) Routine and safe operation of remotely piloted aircraft systems in areas with high densities of flying birds. Drones 7:510. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7080510CrossRef

191.

Howell LG, Allan BM, Driscoll DA, Ierodiaconou D, Doran TA, Weston MA (2023) Attenuation of responses of waterbirds to repeat drone surveys involving a sequence of altitudes and drone types: a case study. Drones 7:497. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7080497CrossRef

192.

Frixione MG, Salvadeo C (2021) Drones, gulls and urbanity: interaction between new technologies and human subsidized species in coastal areas. Drones 5:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5020030CrossRef

193.

Thomas K, Granberg TA (2023) Quantifying visual pollution from urban air mobility. Drones 7:396. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7060396CrossRef

194.

Ahmed M, Cox D, Simpson B, Aloufi A (2022) ECU-IoFT: a dataset for analysing cyber-attacks on internet of flying things. Appl Sci 12:1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041990CrossRef

195.

Aldaej A, Ahanger TA, Atiquzzaman M, Ullah I, Yousufudin M (2022) Smart cybersecurity framework for IoT-empowered drones: machine learning perspective. Sensors 22:2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072630CrossRef

196.

Tanveer M, Khan AU, Shah H, Chaudhry SA, Naushad A (2021) PASKE-IoD: privacy-protecting authenticated key establishment for internet of drones. IEEE Access 9:145683–145698. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123142CrossRef

197.

Hamadi R, Ghazzai H, Massoud Y (2023) Reinforcement learning based intrusion detection systems for drones: a brief survey. In: 2023 IEEE international conference on smart mobility (SM). IEEE, pp 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/SM57895.2023.10112557

198.

Lei Y, Zeng L, Li Y-X, Wang M-X, Qin H (2021) A lightweight authentication protocol for UAV networks based on security and computational resource optimization. IEEE Access 9:53769–53785. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070683CrossRef

199.

Jahan F, Sun W, Niyaz Q (2020) A non-cooperative game based model for the cybersecurity of autonomous systems. In: 2020 IEEE security and privacy workshops (SPW). IEEE, pp 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW50608.2020.00049

200.

Nalamati M, Kapoor A, Saqib M, Sharma N, Blumenstein M (2019) Drone detection in long-range surveillance videos. In: 2019 16th IEEE international conference on advanced video and signal based surveillance (AVSS). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/AVSS.2019.8909830

201.

Taha B, Shoufan A (2019) Machine learning-based drone detection and classification: state-of-the-art in research. IEEE Access 7:138669–138682. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942944CrossRef

202.

Yang J, Gu H, Hu C, Zhang X, Gui G, Gacanin H (2022) Deep complex-valued convolutional neural network for drone recognition based on RF fingerprinting. Drones 6:374. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6120374CrossRef

203.

Sun Y, Zhi X, Han H, Jiang S, Shi T, Gong J, Zhang W (2023) Enhancing UAV detection in surveillance camera videos through spatiotemporal information and optical flow. Sensors 23:6037. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23136037CrossRef

204.

Alam SS, Chakma A, Rahman MH, Bin Mofidul R, Alam MM, Utama IBKY, Jang YM (2023) RF-enabled deep-learning-assisted drone detection and identification: an end-to-end approach. Sensors 23:4202. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094202

205.

Ciaburro G, Iannace G (2020) Improving smart cities safety using sound events detection based on deep neural network algorithms. Informatics 7:23. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7030023CrossRef

206.

Yang T, Li Z, Zhang F, Xie B, Li J, Liu L (2019) Panoramic UAV surveillance and recycling system based on structure-free camera array. IEEE Access 7:25763–25778. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900167CrossRef

207.

Ajakwe SO, Ihekoronye VU, Kim D-S, Lee J-M (2023) ALIEN: assisted learning invasive encroachment neutralization for secured drone transportation system. Sensors 23:1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031233CrossRef

208.

Alharbi A, Poujade A, Malandrakis K, Petrunin I, Panagiotakopoulos D, Tsourdos A (2020) Rule-based conflict management for unmanned traffic management scenarios. In: 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital avionics systems conference (DASC). IEEE, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256690

209.

Minucci F, Vinogradov E, Pollin S (2020) Avoiding collisions at any (low) cost: ADS-B like position broadcast for UAVs. IEEE Access 8:121843–121857. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007315CrossRef

210.

Pedro D, Matos-Carvalho JP, Azevedo F, Sacoto-Martins R, Bernardo L, Campos L, Fonseca JM, Mora A (2020) FFAU—framework for fully autonomous UAVs. Remote Sens (Basel) 12:3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213533

211.

Shan L, Li H-B, Miura R, Matsuda T, Matsumura T (2023) A novel collision avoidance strategy with D2D communications for UAV systems. Drones 7:283. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7050283CrossRef

212.

Kuru K, Pinder JM, Watkinson BJ, Ansell D, Vinning K, Moore L, Gilbert C, Sujit A, Jones D (2023) Toward mid-air collision-free trajectory for autonomous and pilot-controlled unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Access 11:100323–100342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314504CrossRef

213.

Campana I, Bergesio L, Besada JA, de Miguel G (2019) Air tracking and monitoring for unmanned aircraft traffic management. In: 2019 Integrated communications, navigation and surveillance conference (ICNS). IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2019.8735284

214.

Vagal V, Markantonakis K, Shepherd C (2021) A new approach to complex dynamic geofencing for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: 2021 IEEE/AIAA 40th digital avionics systems conference (DASC). IEEE, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC52595.2021.9594499

215.

Silalahi S, Ahmad T, Studiawan H (2023) Transformer-based named entity recognition on drone flight logs to support forensic investigation. IEEE Access 11:3257–3274. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3234605CrossRef

216.

Chen Y-C, Huang C (2021) Smart data-driven policy on unmanned aircraft systems (UAS): analysis of drone users in U.S. cities. Smart Cities 4:78–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010005

217.

Henderson IL (2022) Examining New Zealand unmanned aircraft users’ measures for mitigating operational risks. Drones 6:32. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6020032CrossRef

218.

Koç D, Seçkin AÇ, Satı ZE (2021) Evaluation of participant success in gamified drone training simulator using brain signals and key logs. Brain Sci 11:1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11081024CrossRef

219.

Covaciu F, Iordan A-E (2022) Control of a drone in virtual reality using MEMS sensor technology and machine learning. Micromachines (Basel) 13:521. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040521

220.

Chi NTK, Phong LT, Hanh NT (2023) The drone delivery services: an innovative application in an emerging economy. Asian J Ship Logis 39:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2023.01.002CrossRef

221.

Jasim NI, Kasim H, Mahmoud MA (2022) Towards the development of smart and sustainable transportation system for foodservice industry: modelling factors influencing customer’s intention to adopt drone food delivery (DFD) services. Sustainability 14:2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052852CrossRef

222.

Valencia-Arias A, Rodríguez-Correa PA, Patiño-Vanegas JC, Benjumea-Arias M, De La Cruz-Vargas J, Moreno-López G (2022) Factors associated with the adoption of drones for product delivery in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Medellín, Colombia. Drones 6:225. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6090225CrossRef

223.

Truog S, Maxim L, Matemba C, Blauvelt C, Ngwira H, Makaya A, Moreira S, Lawrence E, Ailstock G, Weitz A, West M, Defawe O (2020) Insights before flights: how community perceptions can make or break medical drone deliveries. Drones 4:51. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030051CrossRef

224.

Del-Real C, Díaz-Fernández AM (2021) Lifeguards in the sky: examining the public acceptance of beach-rescue drones. Technol Soc 64:101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101502CrossRef

225.

Yaprak Ü, Kılıç F, Okumuş A (2021) Is the Covid-19 pandemic strong enough to change the online order delivery methods? Changes in the relationship between attitude and behavior towards order delivery by drone. Technol Forecast Soc Change 169:120829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120829CrossRef

226.

Tubis A, Werbińska-Wojciechowska S, Sliwinski P, Zimroz R (2022) Fuzzy risk-based maintenance strategy with safety considerations for the mining industry. Sensors 22:441. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020441CrossRef

227.

Yan R, Dunnett SJ, Jackson LM (2018) Novel methodology for optimising the design, operation and maintenance of a multi-AGV system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 178:130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2018.06.003CrossRef

Title: Risk Analysis in Internal Transport Systems in Logistics 4.0
Author: Agnieszka Tubis
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland
Book: The New Paradigm of Risk in Internal Transport Supporting Logistics 4.0 System
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-64919-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-64920-2

Copyright Year: 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64920-2_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"