Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09560-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
In this article, we examine the impact of risk attitudes on vote choice in the context of a salient referendum with high levels of uncertainty about the consequences of the ballot proposal. Using data from a pre- and post-referendum panel survey conducted in the context of the 2014 independence referendum in Scotland, and a specific battery to measure attitudes to risk, we determine how these attitudes operate in such political contexts. We reach two main conclusions. First, risk attitudes have a direct effect on vote choice, even after controlling for alternative explanations of vote choice such as party identification and leaders’ evaluations. In the aggregate, the effect of risk attitudes on the vote choice contributes to the status quo bias found in referendums. Second, we find that information moderates the effect of risk attitudes on vote choice. Voters who are politically knowledgeable have a greater capacity to predict the consequences of political outcomes and, therefore, they are less affected by their risk attitudes when making their ballot choices.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)11109_2019_9560_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. CrossRef
Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. CrossRef
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices, easy answers: Values, information, and American public opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, L. M. (1986). Issue voting under uncertainty: An empirical test. American Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 709–728. CrossRef
Bélanger, É., & Perrella, A. M. L. (2008). Facteurs d’appui à la souveraineté du Québec chez les jeunes: Une comparaison entre francophones, anglophones et allophones. Politique et Sociétés, 27(3), 13–40. CrossRef
Berger, M. M., Munger, M. C., & Potthoff, R. F. (2000). The Downsian model predicts divergence. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(2), 228–240. CrossRef
Berinski, A. J., & Lewis, J. B. (2007). An estimate of risk aversion in the U.S. electorate. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 139–154. CrossRef
Blais, A., & Nadeau, R. (1992). To be or not to be sovereignist: Quebeckers’ perennial dilemma. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 18(1), 89–103. CrossRef
Bond, R. (2000). Squaring the circles: Demonstrating and explaining the political “non-alignment” of Scottish national identity. Scottish Affairs, 32(Summer), 15–36. CrossRef
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding choices. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. CrossRef
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. CrossRef
Carducci, B. J., & Wong, A. S. (1998). Type A and risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12(3), 355–359. CrossRef
Carey, S. (2002). Undivided loyalties is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387–413. CrossRef
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2009). Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk taking. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 809–842. CrossRef
Christin, T., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2002). Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 759–776. CrossRef
Clarke, H. D., Elliott, E., & Stewart, M. C. (2015). Heuristics, heterogeneity and green choices voting on California’s proposition 23. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 755–774. CrossRef
Clarke, H. D., & Kornberg, A. (1994). The politics and economics of constitutional choice: Voting in Canada’s 1992 national referendum. The Journal of Politics, 56(04), 940–962. CrossRef
Clarke, H. D., & Kornberg, A. (1996). Choosing Canada? The 1995 Quebec sovereignty referendum. Political Science & Politics, 29(04), 676–682. CrossRef
Clarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., & Stewart, M. C. (2004). Referendum voting as political choice: The case of Quebec. British Journal of Political Science, 34(02), 345–355. CrossRef
Converse, P. E. (1964). The Nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Converse, P. E. (1975). Public opinion and voting behaviour. In F. I. Greenstein & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science nongovernmental politics (Vol. 4, pp. 75–169). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Converse, P. E. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 331–353. CrossRef
Dahlbäck, O. (1990). Personality and risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(12), 1235–1242. CrossRef
Dahlbäck, O. (1991). Saving and risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(3), 479–500. CrossRef
Dalton, R. J. (1999). Political support in advanced democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
de Vreese, C. H. (Ed.). (2007). The Dynamics of referendum campaigns: An international perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2004). Political campaigning in referendums: Framing the referendum issue. London: Routledge.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. CrossRef
Eckles, D. L., Kam, C. D., Maestas, C. L., & Schaffner, B. F. (2013). Risk attitudes and the incumbency advantage. Political Behavior, 36(4), 731–749. CrossRef
Eckles, D. L., & Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Risk tolerance and support for potential military interventions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 533–544. CrossRef
Ehrlich, S., & Maestas, C. (2010). Risk orientation, risk exposure, and policy opinions: The Case of free trade. Political Psychology, 31(5), 657–684. CrossRef
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2009). Psychological Advantage for the status quo. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(3), 270–281. CrossRef
Enelow, J., & Hinich, M. J. (1981). A new approach to voter uncertainty in the Downsian spatial model. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 483–493. CrossRef
Filbeck, G., Hatfield, P., & Horvath, P. (2005). Risk aversion and personality type. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(4), 170–180. CrossRef
Franklin, M. N., van der Eijk, C., & Marsh, M. (1995). Referendum outcomes and trust in government: Public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. West European Politics, 18(3), 101–117. CrossRef
Halek, M., & Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography of risk aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), 1–24. CrossRef
Henderson, A. (2014). The myth of meritocratic Scotland: political cultures in the UK. In P. Cowley & R. Ford (Eds.), Sex, lies and the ballot box: 50 things you need to know about British elections (pp. 103–107). London: Biteback.
Hobolt, S. B. (2009). Europe in question. Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2000). Referendums on European integration do institutions matter in the voter’s decision? Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 3–36. CrossRef
Johns, R. (2016). It wasn’t “The Vow” wot won it: the Scottish independence referendum. In P. Cowley & R. Ford (Eds.), More sex, lies and the ballot box: Another 50 things you need to know about elections (pp. 185–189). London: Biteback.
Johnston, R., Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (1992). Challenge of direct democracy: The 1992 Canadian referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. CrossRef
Kam, C. D. (2012). Risk attitudes and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 817–836. CrossRef
Kam, C. D., & Simas, E. N. (2010). Risk orientations and policy frames. The Journal of Politics, 72(02), 381–396. CrossRef
Kam, C. D., & Simas, E. N. (2012). Risk attitudes, candidate characteristics, and vote choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 747–760. CrossRef
Karaca-Mandic, P., Norton, E. C., & Dowd, B. (2012). Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Services Research, 47(1 Pt 1), 255–274. CrossRef
Kay, A. C., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1300–1312. CrossRef
Keating, M. (Ed.). (2017). Debating Scotland: Issues of independence and union in the 2014 referendum. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Kowert, P. A., & Hermann, M. G. (1997). Who takes risks? Daring and caution in foreign policy making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(5), 611–637. CrossRef
LeDuc, L. (2002a). Referendums and elections. How do campaigns differ? In D. M. Farrell & R. Schmitt-Beck (Eds.), Do political campaigns matter? Campaign effects in elections and referendums (pp. 145–162). London: Routledge. CrossRef
LeDuc, L. (2002b). Opinion change and voting behaviour in referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 711–732. CrossRef
LeDuc, L. (2003). The politics of direct democracy: Referendums in global perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. CrossRef
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. The American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63–76. CrossRef
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacCrimmon, K. R., Wehrung, D. A., & Stanbury, W. T. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.
McCrone, D., & Paterson, L. (2002). The conundrum of Scottish independence. Scottish Affairs, 40(1), 54–75. CrossRef
McLean, I., Lodge, G., & Gallagher, J. (2013). Scotland’s choices: The Referendum and what happens afterwards. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Meertens, R. M., & Lion, R. (2008). Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1506–1520. CrossRef
Morgenstern, S., & Zechmeister, E. (2001). Better the devil you know than the saint you don’t? Risk propensity and vote choice in Mexico. The Journal of Politics, 63(1), 93–119. CrossRef
Nadeau, R., & Fleury, C. J. (1995). Gains linguistiques anticipés et appui à la souveraineté du Québec. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 28(01), 35–50. CrossRef
Nadeau, R., Martin, P., & Blais, A. (1999). Attitude towards risk-taking and individual choice in the Quebec referendum on sovereignty. British Journal of Political Science, 29(03), 523–539. CrossRef
Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. CrossRef
Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736. CrossRef
Renwick, A. (2014). Don’t trust your poll lead: How public opinion changes during referendum campaigns. In P. Cowley & R. Ford (Eds.), Sex, lies and the ballot box: 50 things you need to know about British elections (pp. 79–84). London: Biteback.
Renwick, A. (2017). Referendums. In K. Arzheimer, J. Evans, & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour (pp. 433–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Riley, W. B., Jr., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32–37. CrossRef
Roiser, J. P., de Martino, B., Tan, G. C. Y., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., Wood, N. W., et al. (2009). A genetically mediated bias in decision making driven by failure of amygdala control. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(18), 5985–5991. CrossRef
Rosen, A. B., Tsai, J. S., & Downs, S. M. (2003). Variations in risk attitude across race, gender, and education. Medical Decision Making, 23(6), 511–517. CrossRef
Schneider, G., & Weitsman, P. A. (1996). The punishment trap integration referendums as popularity contests. Comparative Political Studies, 28(4), 582–607. CrossRef
Scottish Government. (2013). Scotland’s future. Your Guide to an independent Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
Shepsle, K. A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review, 66(2), 555–568. CrossRef
Steenbergen, M. R., & Siczek, T. (2017). Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain. European Union Politics, 18(1), 119–136. CrossRef
Sung, J., & Hanna, S. (1996). Factors related to risk tolerance. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 11–19.
Tomz, M., & Van Houweling, R. P. (2009). The electoral implications of candidate ambiguity. The American Political Science Review, 103(1), 83–98. CrossRef
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. CrossRef
Weinstein, E., & Martin, J. (1969). Generality of willingness to take risks. Psychological Reports, 24(2), 499–501. CrossRef
Whiteley, P., Clarke, H. D., Sanders, D., & Stewart, M. C. (2012). Britain says NO: Voting in the AV ballot referendum. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(2), 301–322. CrossRef
Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S105–S122. CrossRef
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group.
Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common bisocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 999–1029. CrossRef
- Risk Attitudes and Independence Vote Choice
- Publication date
- Springer US
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta