Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 4/2016

04-05-2014

Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach

Authors: Hu-Chen Liu, Yi-Zeng Chen, Jian-Xin You, Hui Li

Published in: Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing | Issue 4/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used engineering technique for identifying and eliminating known and potential failures from systems, designs, products, processes or services. However, the conventional risk priority number method has been extensively criticized in the literature for a lot of reasons such as ignoring relative importance of risk factors, questionable multiplication procedure, and imprecisely evaluation. In this article, a new FMEA model based on fuzzy digraph and matrix approach is developed to solve the problems and improve the effectiveness of the traditional FMEA. All the information about risk factors like occurrence (O), severity (S) and detection (D) and their relative weights are expressed in linguistic terms, represented by fuzzy numbers. By considering the risk factors and their relative importance, a risk factors fuzzy digraph is developed for the optimum representation of interrelations. Then, corresponding fuzzy risk matrixes are formed for all the identified failure modes in FMEA and risk priority indexes are computed for determining the risk priorities of the failure modes. Finally, a case study of steam valve system is included to illustrate the proposed fuzzy FMEA and the advantages are highlighted by comparing with the listed methods.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Akman, G., Özcan, B., & Hatipoğlu, T. (2013). Fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach to innovative strategies based on Miles and Snow typology. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press). Akman, G., Özcan, B., & Hatipoğlu, T. (2013). Fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach to innovative strategies based on Miles and Snow typology. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
go back to reference Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2006). A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(2), 179–190.CrossRef Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2006). A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17(2), 179–190.CrossRef
go back to reference Ayağ, Z., Samanlioglu, F., & Büyüközkan, G. (2013). A fuzzy QFD approach to determine supply chain management strategies in the dairy industry. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1111–1122.CrossRef Ayağ, Z., Samanlioglu, F., & Büyüközkan, G. (2013). A fuzzy QFD approach to determine supply chain management strategies in the dairy industry. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1111–1122.CrossRef
go back to reference Baykasoglu, A. (2012). A review and analysis of “graph theoretical-matrix permanent” approach to decision making with example applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–33. Baykasoglu, A. (2012). A review and analysis of “graph theoretical-matrix permanent” approach to decision making with example applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–33.
go back to reference Baykasoğlu, A. (2009). A practical fuzzy digraph model for modeling manufacturing flexibility. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 40(6), 475–489.CrossRef Baykasoğlu, A. (2009). A practical fuzzy digraph model for modeling manufacturing flexibility. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 40(6), 475–489.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50(2), 203–213.CrossRef Bowles, J. B., & Peláez, C. E. (1995). Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 50(2), 203–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Chang, D. S., Chung, J. H., Sun, K. L. P., & Yang, F. C. (2012). A novel approach for evaluating the risk of health care failure modes. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 3967–3974.CrossRef Chang, D. S., Chung, J. H., Sun, K. L. P., & Yang, F. C. (2012). A novel approach for evaluating the risk of health care failure modes. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(6), 3967–3974.CrossRef
go back to reference Chang, K. H., Chang, Y. C., & Lai, P. T. (2013). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–15 (in Press). Chang, K. H., Chang, Y. C., & Lai, P. T. (2013). Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–15 (in Press).
go back to reference Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2011). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 113–129.CrossRef Chang, K. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2011). Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(2), 113–129.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9.CrossRef Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Chin, K. S., Chan, A., & Yang, J. B. (2008). Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7), 633–649.CrossRef Chin, K. S., Chan, A., & Yang, J. B. (2008). Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 36(7), 633–649.CrossRef
go back to reference Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research, 36(6), 1768–1779.CrossRef Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research, 36(6), 1768–1779.CrossRef
go back to reference Chou, C. (2003). The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 45(10), 1601–1610.CrossRef Chou, C. (2003). The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 45(10), 1601–1610.CrossRef
go back to reference Darvish, M., Yasaei, M., & Saeedi, A. (2009). Application of the graph theory and matrix methods to contractor ranking. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 610–619.CrossRef Darvish, M., Yasaei, M., & Saeedi, A. (2009). Application of the graph theory and matrix methods to contractor ranking. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), 610–619.CrossRef
go back to reference Gandhi, O. P., & Agrawal, V. P. (1992). FMEA—A diagraph and matrix approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 35(2), 147–158.CrossRef Gandhi, O. P., & Agrawal, V. P. (1992). FMEA—A diagraph and matrix approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 35(2), 147–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia, P. A. A., Schirru, R., & Frutuoso Emelo, P. F. (2005). A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46(3–4), 359–373.CrossRef Garcia, P. A. A., Schirru, R., & Frutuoso Emelo, P. F. (2005). A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach for FMEA. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 46(3–4), 359–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 102–110.CrossRef Gargama, H., & Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 60(1), 102–110.CrossRef
go back to reference Jong, C. H., Tay, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2013). Application of the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis methodology to edible bird nest processing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 96, 90–108.CrossRef Jong, C. H., Tay, K. M., & Lim, C. P. (2013). Application of the fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis methodology to edible bird nest processing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 96, 90–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., & Şenvar, Ö. (2013). Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(2), 538–552.CrossRef Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., & Şenvar, Ö. (2013). Healthcare failure mode and effects analysis under fuzziness. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(2), 538–552.CrossRef
go back to reference Koulouriotis, D. E., & Ketipi, M. K. (2011). A fuzzy digraph method for robot evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11901–11910.CrossRef Koulouriotis, D. E., & Ketipi, M. K. (2011). A fuzzy digraph method for robot evaluation and selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11901–11910.CrossRef
go back to reference Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61–67.CrossRef Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61–67.CrossRef
go back to reference Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367–377.CrossRef Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367–377.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, Q. L., Liu, H. C., Wang, D. J., & Liu, L. (2013). Integrating systematic layout planning with fuzzy constraint theory to design and optimize the facility layout for operating theatre in hospitals. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press). Lin, Q. L., Liu, H. C., Wang, D. J., & Liu, L. (2013). Integrating systematic layout planning with fuzzy constraint theory to design and optimize the facility layout for operating theatre in hospitals. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
go back to reference Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., & Xu, P. C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4403–4415.CrossRef Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., & Xu, P. C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4403–4415.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Li, P. (2013a). Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator. International Journal of Systems Science (in Press). Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Li, P. (2013a). Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted Euclidean distance operator. International Journal of Systems Science (in Press).
go back to reference Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Lin, Q. L. (2013b). Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(1), 23–36.CrossRef Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Lin, Q. L. (2013b). Fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning and belief rule-based methodology. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(1), 23–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013c). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838.CrossRef Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013c). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838.CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926–12934.CrossRef Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926–12934.CrossRef
go back to reference Paramasivam, V., Senthil, V., & Rajam Ramasamy, N. (2011). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9–12), 1233–1244.CrossRef Paramasivam, V., Senthil, V., & Rajam Ramasamy, N. (2011). Decision making in equipment selection: An integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9–12), 1233–1244.CrossRef
go back to reference Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), 69–85.CrossRef Pillay, A., & Wang, J. (2003). Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), 69–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. V. (2006). A decision-making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30(11–12), 1101–1110.CrossRef Rao, R. V. (2006). A decision-making framework model for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems using digraph and matrix methods. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30(11–12), 1101–1110.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002a). Digraph and matrix methods for the machinability evaluation of work materials. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(3), 321–330.CrossRef Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002a). Digraph and matrix methods for the machinability evaluation of work materials. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(3), 321–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002b). Failure cause analysis of machine tools using digraph and matrix methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(4), 521–528.CrossRef Rao, R. V., & Gandhi, O. P. (2002b). Failure cause analysis of machine tools using digraph and matrix methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42(4), 521–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2006). Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22(4), 373–383.CrossRef Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2006). Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22(4), 373–383.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2007). Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 194(1), 81–88.CrossRef Rao, R. V., & Padmanabhan, K. K. (2007). Rapid prototyping process selection using graph theory and matrix approach. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 194(1), 81–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 22(9), 986–1004.CrossRef Sharma, R. K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2005). Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 22(9), 986–1004.CrossRef
go back to reference Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2013). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International (in Press). Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2013). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International (in Press).
go back to reference Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. New York: ASQC Press. Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. New York: ASQC Press.
go back to reference Vinodh, S., Aravindraj, S., Narayanan, R. S., & Yogeshwaran, N. (2012). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for rotary switches: A case study. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 461–475.CrossRef Vinodh, S., Aravindraj, S., Narayanan, R. S., & Yogeshwaran, N. (2012). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for rotary switches: A case study. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 461–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, C. H., & Wu, H. S. (2014). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: A fuzzy MCDM perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press). Wang, C. H., & Wu, H. S. (2014). A novel framework to evaluate programmable logic controllers: A fuzzy MCDM perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (in Press).
go back to reference Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207. Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1195–1207.
go back to reference Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.CrossRef Zadeh, L. A. (1975a). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199–249.CrossRef
go back to reference Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Information Sciences, 8(4), 301–357.CrossRef Zadeh, L. A. (1975b). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-II. Information Sciences, 8(4), 301–357.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang, Z. F., & Chu, X. N. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 206–214.CrossRef Zhang, Z. F., & Chu, X. N. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 206–214.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach
Authors
Hu-Chen Liu
Yi-Zeng Chen
Jian-Xin You
Hui Li
Publication date
04-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0956-5515
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8145
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0915-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 4/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partners