Top

International Journal of Social Robotics

Published in:

05-03-2020

Robotic Faciality: The Philosophy, Science and Art of Robot Faces

Authors: Chris Chesher, Fiona Andreallo

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 1/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

A key feature of the humanoid social robot is its face. A robot face is not simply a technical choice, as faces communicate identity, affect and interpersonal spatial relations, and can be key to perceptions about the virtuousness of the robot. To address the significance of the robot face we develop a transdisciplinary reading of faces that compares how science, art and philosophy offer critical knowledges to inform the design of social robotics. Science understands face perception as a physiological, neurological and psychological process that perceives identity, emotion and spatial relations. Art provides a diverse repertoire of stylised faces in visual culture that reiterates the role of likeness, affect and social space. Art presents faces as ethically loaded, such as the war face, the blessed face and the abstracted face. Philosophy proposes the influence of a machine of faciality that abstracts the face as black holes on a white wall, invoking subjectivity and significance. In the second half of the paper we use qualitative visual analysis to develop a classification of robot faces: realistic; symbolic; blank; tech; and screen. We argue that design choice has philosophical, aesthetic and ethical consequences, as people are highly sensitive to the appearance, behaviour and social space of people, robots and their faces.

previous article Personalized Robot Interventions for Autistic Children: An Automated Methodology for Attention Assessment

next article PeppeRecycle: Improving Children’s Attitude Toward Recycling by Playing with a Social Robot

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Dautenhahn K (2007) Methodology and themes of human-robot interaction: a growing research field. Int J Adv Robot Syst 4:103–108

Bethel CL, Murphy RR (2010) Review of human studies methods in HRI and recommendations. Int J Soc Robot 2:347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0064-9CrossRef

Blackwell AF (2015) HCI as an inter-discipline. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst Proc 18:503–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732505CrossRef

Deleuze G, Guattari F, Massumi B (2004) A thousand plateaus. Continuum International Publishing Group, New York

Dobson SD, Sherwood CC (2011) Correlated evolution of brain regions involved in producing and processing facial expressions in anthropoid primates. Biol Lett 7:86–88. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0427CrossRef

Pascalis O, Kelly DJ (2009) The origins of face processing in humans phylogeny and ontogeny. Perspect Psychol Sci 4:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01119.xCrossRef

Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 6:169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068CrossRef

Barrett R, Katsikitis M (2003) Foreign faces: a voyage to the land of EEPICA. In: Katsikitis M (ed) The human face: measurement and meaning. Springer, Berlin, pp 1063–1065

Argyle M (1973) Social interaction. Transaction Publishers, Piscataway

10.

McMahon AP, MacCurdy E (2006) The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Parnassus 10:33. https://doi.org/10.2307/771608CrossRef

11.

Little CT, Stein WA (2006) The face in medieval sculpture. In: Timeline art hist. https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/face/hd_face.htm. Accessed 28 Aug 2019

12.

Bennett C, Šabanović S (2015) The effects of culture and context on perceptions of robotic facial expressions. Interact Stud Stud Soc Behav Commun Biol Artif Syst 16:272–302. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.11benCrossRef

13.

Kishi T, Hashimoto K, Takanishi A (2019) Human-like face and head mechanism. In: Goswami A, Vadakkepat P (eds) Humanoid robotics: a reference. Springer, Dortrecht, pp 571–596CrossRef

14.

Mirnig N, Strasser E, Weiss A et al (2015) Can you read my face? a methodological variation for assessing facial expressions of robotic heads. Int J Soc Robot 7:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0261-zCrossRef

15.

Brave S, Nass C, Hutchinson K (2005) Computers that care: investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. Int J Hum Comput Stud 62:161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.002CrossRef

16.

McCloud S (1993) Understanding comics: the invisible art. Harper Collins, New York

17.

Bollmer G (2019) Automation of empathy. Esse Arts + Opin. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911421390CrossRef

18.

Munster A, Barker M (2016) The mutable face. In: Hinkson M (ed) Imaging identity. ANU Press, Canberra, pp 101–116

19.

Dinnen Z, McBean S (2018) The face as technology. New Form 93:122–137. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF:93.07.2017CrossRef

20.

Pearl S (2010) About faces. Physiognomy in Nineteenth-century Britain. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

21.

Deleuze G, Guattari F (1994) What is philosophy?. Columbia University Press, New York

22.

Latour B (1988) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

23.

de Graaf MMA (2016) An ethical evaluation of human–robot relationships. Int J Soc Robot 8:589–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0368-5CrossRef

24.

Gonsior B, Sosnowski S, Mayer C et al (2011) Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions. In: Proceedings IEEE international work robot human interaction communication, pp 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005294

25.

Malle BF, Scheutz M, Forlizzi J, Voiklis J (2016) Which robot am I thinking about? The impact of action and appearance on people’s evaluations of a moral robot. In: ACM/IEEE international conference human–robot interaction 2016-April, pp 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451743

26.

Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI (2000) The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4223–233(4):223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0CrossRef

27.

Domes G, Schulze L, Herpertz SC (2009) Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder—a review of the literature. J Personal Disord 23:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2009.23.1.6CrossRef

28.

Duchenne de Boulogne GB, Cuthbertson R, Andrew R (1990) The mechanism of human facial expression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

29.

Darwin C (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. John Murray, LondonCrossRef

30.

Allday E (2012) Study gives insight into facial recognition. SF Gate, San Francisco

31.

Lopatina OL, Komleva YK, Gorina YV et al (2018) Neurobiological aspects of face recognition: the role of oxytocin. Front Behav Neurosci 12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00195CrossRef

32.

Bennett CC, Šabanović S (2014) Deriving minimal features for human-like facial expressions in robotic faces. Int J Soc Robot 6:367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0237-zCrossRef

33.

Reyes ME, Meza IV, Pineda LA (2019) Robotics facial expression of anger in collaborative human–robot interaction. Int J Adv Robot Syst 16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881418817972CrossRef

34.

Chesher C (2012) FURO at robotworld: human–robot metacommunication and media studies. Cultural Studies Association of Australia, Adelaide, pp 1–10

35.

Hanheide M, Wrede S, Lang C, Sagerer G (2008) Who am I talking with? A face memory for social robots. In: Proceedings IEEE international conference robot automation, pp 3660–3665. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543772

36.

Microsoft (2019) Facial Recognition. In: Microsoft Azur. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/services/cognitive-services/face/. Accessed 3 Sep 2019

37.

Angerer M-L, Bösel B (2016) Total affect control. Digit Cult Soc. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0104CrossRef

38.

Boas F (2006) Primitive Art. In: Perkins M, Morphy H (eds) The anthropology of art. A reader, Blackwell, Malden MA, pp 39–55

39.

Da Vinci L, Suh H (eds) (2013) Leonardo's notebooks:writing and art of the great master. RunningPress, New York, p 379

40.

Huberman D, Fleischer M, Vogman E (eds), Lillis SB (Trans) (2015) The cube and the face: around a sculpture by Alberto Giocometti. Diaphanes, Zurich

41.

Giacometti A (2015) Cited in Huberman D, Fleischer M, Vogman E (eds), Lillis SB (Trans) (2015) The cube and the face: around a sculpture by Alberto Giocometti. Diaphanes, Zurich, p 15

42.

Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Rob Auton Syst 42:143–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-xCrossRefMATH

43.

Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T (2006) Reading images: the grammar of visual design. Routledge, LondonCrossRef

44.

Kriz S, Ferro TD, Damera P, Porter JR (2010) Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations. In: Proceedings IEEE international work robot human interaction communication, pp 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598620

45.

Sandoval EB, Mubin O, Obaid M (2014) Human robot interaction and fiction: a contradiction. In: Beetz M, Johnston B, Williams MA (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8755. Springer, Cham

46.

Breazeal C (2009) Role of expressive behaviour for robots that learn from people. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:3527–3538CrossRef

47.

Esau N, Kleinjohann L, Kleinjohann B (2006) Emotional communication with the robot head MEXI. In: 9th international conference control automation robot vision, 2006, ICARCV’06. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARCV.2006.345162

48.

Floridi L (2014) Smart, autonomous, and social: robots as challenge to human exceptionalism. In: Seibt J, Hakil R, Nørskov M (eds) Sociable robots and the future of social relations. IOS Press, p 11

49.

Kahn PH, Reichert AL, Gary HE et al (2011) The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. In: HRI 2011—Proceedings of 6th ACM/IEEE international conference human–robot interaction, pp 159–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957710

50.

Wu T, Butko NJ, Ruvulo P et al (2009) Learning to make facial expressions. In: 2009 IEEE 8th international conference on development learning ICDL 2009, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/DEVLRN.2009.5175536

51.

Andreallo F, Chesher C (2019) Prosthetic soul mates: sex robots as media for companionship. M/C J Vol 22, No 5. http://journal.mediaculture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/1588. Accessed 17 Feb 2020

52.

Suchman L (2011) Subject objects. Fem Theory 12:119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700111404205CrossRef

53.

Softbank (2019) Interacting with pepper. In: Aldebaran doc. http://doc.aldebaran.com/2-4/family/pepper_user_guide/interacting_pep.html. Accessed 18 Sep 2019

54.

Collins K (2014) Meet Jimmy, Intel’s 3D-printed robot for consumers. In: Wired. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/intel-jimmy-the-robot. Accessed 22 Dec 2019

55.

Kac E (1997) Foundation and development of robotic art. Art J 56:60–67CrossRef

56.

Stelarc (2003) STELARC | PROSTHETIC HEAD. http://stelarc.org/?catID=20241. Accessed 12 Dec 2019

Title: Robotic Faciality: The Philosophy, Science and Art of Robot Faces
Authors: Chris Chesher
Fiona Andreallo
Publication date: 05-03-2020
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00623-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Teaching Robots a Lesson: Determinants of Robot Punishment

How to Use Virtue Ethics for Thinking About the Moral Standing of Social Robots: A Relational Interpretation in Terms of Practices, Habits, and Performance

Designing Virtuous Sex Robots

PeppeRecycle: Improving Children’s Attitude Toward Recycling by Playing with a Social Robot

Can Robots Make us Better Humans?

Virtue and Vice in Our Relationships with Robots: Is There an Asymmetry and How Might it be Explained?

Premium Partners