Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Robustness and Flexibility

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The traditional approach to Project Management focuses on the stability of the project plan as a critical success factor. However the increasing level of complexity and uncertainty in the business context requires a high level of adaptability to changes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference I. Ansoff, Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. Calif. Manage. Rev. 18(2), 21–33 (1975)CrossRef I. Ansoff, Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. Calif. Manage. Rev. 18(2), 21–33 (1975)CrossRef
go back to reference K. Artto, J. Kujala, P. Dietrich, M. Martinsuo, What is project strategy. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 4–12 (2008) K. Artto, J. Kujala, P. Dietrich, M. Martinsuo, What is project strategy. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 4–12 (2008)
go back to reference K. Artto, M. Lehtonen, K. Aaltonen, P. Aaltonen, J. Kujala,S. Lindemann, M. Murtonen M., Two types of project strategy–empirical illustrations in project risk management, IRNOP IX, October 2009 (Berlin, 2009) K. Artto, M. Lehtonen, K. Aaltonen, P. Aaltonen, J. Kujala,S. Lindemann, M. Murtonen M., Two types of project strategy–empirical illustrations in project risk management, IRNOP IX, October 2009 (Berlin, 2009)
go back to reference E.S. Bernardes, M.D. Hanna, A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 29(1), 30–53 (2008)CrossRef E.S. Bernardes, M.D. Hanna, A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 29(1), 30–53 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference B.J. Kolltveit, J.T. Karlsen, K. Gronhaug. Exploiting opportunities in uncertainty during the early project phase. J. Manage. Eng. (2004). ASCE B.J. Kolltveit, J.T. Karlsen, K. Gronhaug. Exploiting opportunities in uncertainty during the early project phase. J. Manage. Eng. (2004). ASCE
go back to reference P. Davidson, Is probability theory relevant for uncertainty? A post Keynesian perspective. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 129–143 (1991)CrossRef P. Davidson, Is probability theory relevant for uncertainty? A post Keynesian perspective. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 129–143 (1991)CrossRef
go back to reference S. Floricel, R. Miller, Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large scale engineering projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 19, 445–455 (2001)CrossRef S. Floricel, R. Miller, Strategizing for anticipated risks and turbulence in large scale engineering projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 19, 445–455 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference D.N. Ford, S. Bhargav, Project management quality and the value of flexible strategies. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manage. 23(3), 275–289 (2006)CrossRef D.N. Ford, S. Bhargav, Project management quality and the value of flexible strategies. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manage. 23(3), 275–289 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference J.G. Geraldi, L. Lee-Kelley, E. Kutsch, The balance between order and chaos in multi project firms: A conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 28, 547–558 (2010)CrossRef J.G. Geraldi, L. Lee-Kelley, E. Kutsch, The balance between order and chaos in multi project firms: A conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 28, 547–558 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference M. Hellstrom, K. Wikstrom, Project business concepts based on modularity—improved manouevrability through unstable structures. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 23, 392–397 (2005)CrossRef M. Hellstrom, K. Wikstrom, Project business concepts based on modularity—improved manouevrability through unstable structures. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 23, 392–397 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference M. Loosemore, Managing project risks, in The management of complex projects: A relationship approach, ed. by S. Pryke, H. Smyth (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2006) M. Loosemore, Managing project risks, in The management of complex projects: A relationship approach, ed. by S. Pryke, H. Smyth (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2006)
go back to reference R. Miller, D. Lessard, The strategic management of large engineering projects, shaping institutions, risks and governance (MIT, Cambridge, 2000) R. Miller, D. Lessard, The strategic management of large engineering projects, shaping institutions, risks and governance (MIT, Cambridge, 2000)
go back to reference P.W.G. Morris, A. Jamieson, Moving from corporate strategy project strategy. Proj. Manage. J. 36(4), 5–18 (2005) P.W.G. Morris, A. Jamieson, Moving from corporate strategy project strategy. Proj. Manage. J. 36(4), 5–18 (2005)
go back to reference N.O.E. Olsson, Management of flexibility in projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 24, 66–74 (2006)CrossRef N.O.E. Olsson, Management of flexibility in projects. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 24, 66–74 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference N.O.E. Olsson, External and internal flexibility—aligning projects with the business strategy and executing projects efficiently. Int. J. Proj. Organ. Manage. 1(1), 47–64 (2008)MathSciNet N.O.E. Olsson, External and internal flexibility—aligning projects with the business strategy and executing projects efficiently. Int. J. Proj. Organ. Manage. 1(1), 47–64 (2008)MathSciNet
go back to reference N.O.E. Olsson, O.M. Magnussen, Flexibility at different stages in the life cycle of projects: An empirical illustration of the freedom to maneuver. Proj. Manage. J. 38(4), 25–32 (2007)CrossRef N.O.E. Olsson, O.M. Magnussen, Flexibility at different stages in the life cycle of projects: An empirical illustration of the freedom to maneuver. Proj. Manage. J. 38(4), 25–32 (2007)CrossRef
go back to reference A.M. Ross, D.H. Rhodes, D.E. Hastings, Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Syst. Eng. 11(3), 246–262 (2008)CrossRef A.M. Ross, D.H. Rhodes, D.E. Hastings, Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. Syst. Eng. 11(3), 246–262 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference A.P. Schulz, E. Fricke, Incorporating flexibility, agility, robustness and adaptability within the design of integrated systems—key to success? Digit. Avionics Syst. Conf. 1, 1–17 (1999) A.P. Schulz, E. Fricke, Incorporating flexibility, agility, robustness and adaptability within the design of integrated systems—key to success? Digit. Avionics Syst. Conf. 1, 1–17 (1999)
Metadata
Title
Robustness and Flexibility
Author
Franco Caron
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5244-4_6