We revisit the BUFF transform, which was proposed by Cremers et al. (S&P’21) as a means to achieve security properties beyond standard unforgeability for digital signature schemes. One of these properties, non-resignability (NR), has recently drawn some attention due to a strong impossibility result for the original definition of the property. Recent follow-up work then considered a variant (sNR) of the original definition, and showed that it is satisfied by the BUFF transform when the underlying hash function is modeled as a random oracle—while the original impossibility result still applies for the plain model. This raises the natural question of whether the BUFF transform satisfies sNR in a more fine-grained use of the random oracle model, when we consider a real-life iterative-hash-function design (such as Merkle-Damgård or Sponge) and instead idealize the round function. Our discoveries in this direction are two-fold:
First, contrary to what one might expect, we show that there is a simple attack on the non-resignability property sNR of the BUFF-transform when instantiated with an iterative hash function. The attack relies on leaking an intermediate result of the hash computation to the adversary who is challenged to “resign” the message. This negative result once more shows the subtlety in the non-resignability property.
Second, on the positive side, we propose a small modification to the original BUFF transform, which we call Sandwich BUFF (for reasons to become clear), and prove the non-resignability property sNR of Sandwich BUFF both for Merkle-Damgård-based hash functions in the random oracle model, and for Sponge-based hash functions in the random permutation model.
