Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

05-08-2019 | Original Research Paper

Scientific Research on Nanotechnology in Latin American Journals Published in SciELO: Bibliometric Analysis of Gender Differences

Journal:: NanoEthics

Authors:: Elizabeth Duran, Katherine Astroza, Jaime Ocaranza-Ozimica, Damary Peñailillo, Iskra Pavez-Soto, Rodrigo Ramirez-Tagle

» Get access to the full-text

Important notes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Papers on nanotechnology in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) database were studied bibliometrically. The terms ‘nanotechnology’, ‘nanoparticle’, ‘graphene’, ‘fullerene’, ‘nanotube’ and ‘quantum dot’ were used for the search in their singular and plural forms in three languages (English, Portuguese and Spanish), and a total of 1205 papers were selected for the study to assess the frequency rates of the study variables. The results of the study are presented in this article focusing on gender differences.

Please log in to get access to this content

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 69.000 Bücher
über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Umwelt
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 58.000 Bücher
über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 30 Tage kostenlos.

inform now

Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13(2):427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0192-z CrossRef

Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: summary of international study. J Nanopart Res 13(3):897–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0275-5 CrossRef

Chen H, Roco MC (2009) Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge : global and longitudinal patent and literature analysis. Springer, Berlin

Dang Y, Zhang Y, Fan L, Chen H, Roco MC (2010) Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008. J Nanopart Res 12(3):687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9831-7 CrossRef

Ríos-Gómez C, Herrero-Solana V (2005) La Producción Científica Latinoamericana Y La Ciencia Mundial: Una Revisión Bibliográfica (1989–2003). Rev Interam Bibliot 28(1):43–61

Jorge RA, de Moya Anegón F, Jorge RA, Anegón FDM, Arencibia JR, de Moya Anegón F, Jorge RA, de Moya Anegón F (2008) La evaluación de la investigación científica: una aproximación teórica desde la cienciometría. Acimed 17(4):1–27

Beaudry C, Larivière V (2016) Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Res Policy 45(9):1790–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009 CrossRef

Urry M (2015) Science and gender: scientists must work harder on equality. Nature 528(7583):471–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/528471a CrossRef

Mendieta Ramírez A (2015) Legitimidad o reconocimiento? Las investigadoras del SNI . Retos Y Propuestas. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

10.

Bendels MHK, Brüggmann D, Schöffel N, Groneberg DA, Akhabue E, Lautenbach E, Bates T et al (2016) Gendermetrics.NET: a novel software for analyzing the gender representation in scientific authoring. J Occup Med Toxicol 11(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0133-6 CrossRef

11.

Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457417 CrossRef

12.

Camps D (2008) Limitaciones de los indicadores bibliometricos en la evaluacion de la actividad cientifica biomedica. Colombia Medica 39(1):74–79

13.

Pardo-Guerra JP (2011) Mapping emergence across the Atlantic: some (tentative) lessons on nanotechnology in Latin America. Technol Soc 33(1–2):94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.012 CrossRef

14.

Boyle PK, Smith LK, Cooper NJ, Williams KS, O’Connor H (2015) Women are funded more fairly in social science. Nature 525:181–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/525181a CrossRef

15.

Efraín-García P, García-Zorita C, Sanz-Casado E (2014) Paridad equivale a igualdad? Eficiencia de la producción científica de las investigadoras venezolanas. Investigacion Bibliotecologica 28(62):101–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-358X(14)72568-7

16.

CONICYT (2016) Realidad nacional en formación y promoción de mujeres científicas en ciencia, tecnología, ingeniería y matemáticas. https://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/PPT-Estudio-Realidad-NACIONAL-Genero-y-STEM_16_CONICYT-ISONOMA.pdf. Accessed July 2019

Title: Scientific Research on Nanotechnology in Latin American Journals Published in SciELO: Bibliometric Analysis of Gender Differences
Authors:: Elizabeth Duran
Katherine Astroza
Jaime Ocaranza-Ozimica
Damary Peñailillo
Iskra Pavez-Soto
Rodrigo Ramirez-Tagle
Publication date: 05-08-2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-019-00344-5
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Journal: NanoEthics Studies of New and Emerging Technologies
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765

Premium Partner

Image Credits