Top

Published in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Shared Mobility für jüngere und ältere Nutzer:innen – Potenziale, Akzeptanz- und Hemmnisfaktoren

Authors : Sarah Schwindt, Philip Joisten, Nina Theobald, Jakob Neumaier, Bettina Abendroth

Published in: Towards the New Normal in Mobility

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Technologische Disruption und Urbanisierung prägen als Megatrends die zukünftige Mobilitätslandschaft maßgeblich. Hinzu kommen Herausforderungen, die aus dem Bevölkerungswachstum und der Überalterung der Bevölkerung, insbesondere in ländlichen Gebieten, resultieren.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Von aufgestoßenen Türen: Urbane Mobilitätskulturen in der Digitalen Transformation – Die Coronapandemie als Katalysator für eine neue Mobilität unter Lebensälteren?

next chapter Strategische Ausrichtung und Nutzerakzeptanz als Schlüsselfaktoren bei der Einführung automatisierter und vernetzter Mobilitätslösungen

Aceves-González, C., May, A. [Andrew] & Cook, S. (2016). An observational comparison of the older and younger bus passenger experience in a developing world city. Ergonomics, 59(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1091513.

Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., & Tchouamou Njoya, E. (2020). Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: A thematic analysis study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.004.CrossRef

Alzamora-Ruiz, J., Guerrero-Medina, C., Martínez-Fiestas, M., & Serida-Nishimura, J. (2020). Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption: An Exploratory Study of Motivating Factors in a Latin American Economy. Sustainability, 12(5), 1936. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051936.CrossRef

Amirkiaee, S. Y., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2018). Why do people rideshare? An experimental study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.025.CrossRef

Broome, K., Worrall, L., Fleming, J., & Boldy, D. (2013). Evaluation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.05.003.

Brünglinghaus, C. (2016). Der Ansturm der Autohersteller auf Fahrdienste. springerprofessional.de. Zugegriffen: 30. Juni 2020. https://www.springerprofessional.de/mobilitaetskonzepte/der-ansturm-der-autohersteller-auf-fahrdienste/10299072.

Calderón, F., & Miller, E. J. (2020). A literature review of mobility services: Definitions, modelling state-of-the-art, and key considerations for a conceptual modelling framework. Transport Reviews, 40(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1704916.

Cherry, C., & Pidgeon, N. (2018). Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems. Sustainability, 10(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072289.CrossRef

Chuang, L.‑W., He, J., & Chiu, S.‑P. (Hrsg.). (2018). Understanding User Participation in Sharing Economy Services. Sustainability, an Open Access Journal from MDPI.

EL Fikri, I., Koubaa, S., & Belhcen, L. (2019). The Motivations to Engage in Sharing Economy: A Case Study of Uber Morocco. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 5(5), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.5.10002-5..

Erdoğan, S., Cirillo, C., & Tremblay, J.-M. (2015). Ridesharing as a Green Commute Alternative: A Campus Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(5), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.800619.CrossRef

Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Kerényi, T. (2020). Creation of mobility packages based on the MaaS concept. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.007.

Faber, K., & van Lierop, D. (2020). How will older adults use automated vehicles? Assessing the role of AVs in overcoming perceived mobility barriers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.022.

Gheorghiu, A., & Delhomme, P. (2018). For which types of trips do French drivers carpool? Motivations underlying carpooling for different types of trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.002.

Gipp, C., Nienaber, P., & Schiffhorst, G. (2014). Mobilitätsoptionen Älterer im ländlichen Raum. Ergebnisbericht IGES Institut GmbH im Auftrag des ADAC. Berlin. (ADAC, Hrsg.). Zugegriffen: 18. Juni 2021.

Hartl, B., Sabitzer, T., Hofmann, E., & Penz, E. (2018). “Sustainability is a nice bonus” the role of sustainability in carsharing from a consumer perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.138.CrossRef

Hörcher, D., & Graham, D. J. (2020). MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes? Economics of Transportation, 22, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2020.100167.CrossRef

Hübscher, C. (2021, 5. März). Das Reförmchen. Fahrdienste per App: Bundestag entscheidet. Zdf-heute. Zugegriffen: 4. Okt. 2021. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/uber-taxi-scheuer-100.html.

Ioakimidis, C. S., Genikomsakis, K. N., Rycerski, P., & Koutra, S. (Hrsg.). (2016). User characteristics of an e-carpooling system at UMONS as part of a smart district concept.

Jittrapirom, P., van Neerven, W., Martens, K., Trampe, D., & Meurs, H. (2019). The Dutch elderly’s preferences toward a smart demand-responsive transport service. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100383.

Karlsson, I., Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Smith, G., Koglin, T., Kronsell, A., Lund, E., et al. (2020). Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service – A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131(1), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.028.CrossRef

König, A., Bonus, T., & Grippenkoven, J. (2018). Analyzing Urban Residents’ Appraisal of Ridepooling Service Attributes with Conjoint Analysis. Sustainability, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103711..

Lavieri, P. S., & Bhat, C. R. (2019). Investigating objective and subjective factors influencing the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ride-hailing trips. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.037.CrossRef

Li, Z., Hong, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of On-Demand Ride Sharing and Traffic Congestion. In Proceeding International Conference on Information Systems 2016 (ICIS'16).

Ma, L., Zhang, X., Ding, X., & Wang, G. (2019). Risk perception and intention to discontinue use of ride-hailing services in China: Taking the example of DiDi Chuxing. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.021.CrossRef

Machado, C., Salles Hue, N. de, Berssaneti, F., & Quintanilha, J. (2018). An Overview of Shared Mobility. Sustainability, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124342..

Maier, J. (2016). Mobilität älterer Menschen in ländlichen Räumen: Wie steht es dort um die Potenziale neuer Mobilitätsformen bzw. -technologien? In C. Jacoby, & S. Wappelhorst (Hrsg.), Potenziale neuer Mobilitätsformen und -technologien für eine nachhaltige Raumentwicklung (Arbeitsberichte der ARL, Bd. 18). Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung Leibniz-Forum für Raumwissenschaften.

Malodia, S., & Singla, H. (2016). A study of carpooling behaviour using a stated preference web survey in selected cities of India. Transportation Planning and Technology, 39(5), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2016.1174368.CrossRef

Marshall, A. [Aarian]. (2017). How a Failed Experiment Could Still Be the Future of Public Transit. WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2017/03/failed-experiment-still-future-public-transit/..

Mausbach, A. G., Quinlan, D., Johnson, S., & Harmer, L. (2019). How to share what we used to own. In 2019 Fourteenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER). IEEE.

May, A., & [A.], Ross, T., Grebert, J. & Segarra, G. (2008). User reaction to car share and lift share within a transport ‘marketplace’. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its:20070026.

Merfeld, K., Wilhelms, M.-P., Henkel, S., & Kreutzer, K. (2019). Carsharing with shared autonomous vehicles: Uncovering drivers, barriers and future developments – A four-stage Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.012.

Neoh, J. G., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A., & [Alasdair]. (2017). What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis. Transportation, 44(2), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9661-7.

Nobis, C., & Kuhnimhof, T. (2018). Mobilität in Deutschland – MiD Ergebnisbericht. Studie von infas, DLR,IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des BMVI (FE-Nr. 70.904/15). Bonn, Berlin.

Park, Y., Chen, N., & Akar, G. (2018). Who is Interested in Carpooling and Why: The Importance of Individual Characteristics, Role Preferences and Carpool Markets. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756883.CrossRef

Rahman, M. M., Deb, S., Strawderman, L., Smith, B., & Burch, R. (2020). Evaluation of transportation alternatives for aging population in the era of self-driving vehicles. IATSS Research, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.05.004..

Randelhoff, M. (2014) [Definition] UberPop, WunderCar, Lyft & Co. – Ridesharing oder vielmehr Rideselling? Zugegriffen: 16. Okt 2021. https://www.zukunft-mobilitaet.net/74151/analyse/definition-ridesharing-rideselling-unterschiede-taxi-carpooling/.

Roukouni, A., & Almeida Correia, G. H. de. (2020). Evaluation Methods for the Impacts of Shared Mobility: Classification and Critical Review. Sustainability, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410504.

Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Bansal, A., & Cohen, A. (2015). Shared Mobility: A Sustainability & Technologies Workshop: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding. https://trid.trb.org/view/1375066.

Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Chan, N., & Bansal, A. (2020). Sharing strategies: Carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In E. Deakin (Hrsg.), Transportation, land use, and environmental planning. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00013-X.

Shao, Z., & Yin, H. (2019). Building customers’ trust in the ridesharing platform with institutional mechanisms. Internet Research, 29(5), 1040–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-02-2018-0086.CrossRef

Storme, T., de Vos, J., de Paepe, L., & Witlox, F. (2020). Limitations to the car-substitution effect of MaaS. Findings from a Belgian pilot study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.032.CrossRef

Tkaczyk, J., & Awdziej, M. (2017). Consumer motivations and attitude towards carsharing services. Journal of Management Cases.

Voege, T., Yanying, Li., & Beckmann, D. (2018). Transport and Mobility Services to Support Active Ageing. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1456550.

Wang, X., Yang, H., & Zhu, D. (2018). Driver-Rider Cost-Sharing Strategies and Equilibria in a Ridesharing Program. Transportation Science, 52(4), 868–881. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0801.CrossRef

Wilhelms, M.-P., Merfeld, K., & Henkel, S. (2017). Yours, mine, and ours: A user-centric analysis of opportunities and challenges in peer-to-peer asset sharing. Business Horizons, 60(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.004.CrossRef

Yu, B., Ma, Y., Xue, M., Tang, B., Wang, B., Yan, J., et al. (2017). Environmental benefits from ridesharing: A case of Beijing. Applied Energy, 191, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.052.CrossRef

Title: Shared Mobility für jüngere und ältere Nutzer:innen – Potenziale, Akzeptanz- und Hemmnisfaktoren
Authors: Sarah Schwindt
Philip Joisten
Nina Theobald
Jakob Neumaier
Bettina Abendroth
Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Book: Towards the New Normal in Mobility
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39437-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-39438-7

Copyright Year: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39438-7_57