Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strength of Materials 5/2020

27-11-2020

Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems in Amalgam Repair

Authors: Ö. Erçin, F. Alkan, N. Arhun

Published in: Strength of Materials | Issue 5/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems on shear-bond-strength between amalgam and resin composite. 48 amalgam specimens were condensed into plastic tubes (4 mm diameter × 5 mm height). The specimens were kept in incubator for 24 h at 37°C, aged by thermal cycling 1000 times between 5–55°C. The specimens’ surfaces were finished with coarse diamond burs and randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 12) with respect to different surface conditioning methods: etchant+universal adhesive (All-Bond Universal, Bisco), universal adhesive, alloy primer (Z-Prime, Bisco)+universal adhesive, self-adhesive resin cement (BisCem, Bisco). The old amalgam specimens were placed into plastic tubes (4 mm diameter × 8 mm height) and all adhesive systems were used according to manufacturer’s instructions. Resin composite (Charisma Classic, Haraeus Kulzer) was placed and polymerized 20 s. The samples were incubated in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h prior to the shear-bond-strength test. The shear-bond-strength test was accomplished using a universal testing device. Statistical analyzes were made with One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests. There was no significant difference between self-adhesive resin cement and alloy primer applied groups but showed better bond strength values than self-etch and etch&rinse adhesive applied groups. The application of self-adhesive resin cement and alloy primer+universal adhesive in amalgam repair exhibited successful outcomes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference J. Osborne, J. Summitt, and H. Roberts, “The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature,” Pediatr. Dent., 24, No. 5, 439–447 (2002). J. Osborne, J. Summitt, and H. Roberts, “The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature,” Pediatr. Dent., 24, No. 5, 439–447 (2002).
2.
go back to reference J. D. Bader, D. A. Shugars, and J. A. Martin, “Risk indicators for posterior tooth fracture,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 135, No. 7, 883–892 (2004).CrossRef J. D. Bader, D. A. Shugars, and J. A. Martin, “Risk indicators for posterior tooth fracture,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 135, No. 7, 883–892 (2004).CrossRef
3.
go back to reference R. Hickel and J. Manhart, “Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure,” J. Adhes. Dent., 3, No. 1, 45–64 (2001). R. Hickel and J. Manhart, “Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure,” J. Adhes. Dent., 3, No. 1, 45–64 (2001).
4.
go back to reference G. Moncada, E. Fernández, J. Martin, et al., “Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial,” Oper. Dent., 33, No. 3, 258–264 (2008).CrossRef G. Moncada, E. Fernández, J. Martin, et al., “Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial,” Oper. Dent., 33, No. 3, 258–264 (2008).CrossRef
5.
go back to reference J. Setcos, R. Khosravi, N. Wilson, et al., “Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school,” Oper. Dent., 29, No. 4, 392–397 (2004). J. Setcos, R. Khosravi, N. Wilson, et al., “Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school,” Oper. Dent., 29, No. 4, 392–397 (2004).
6.
go back to reference G. Moncada, J. Martin, E. Fernández, et al., “Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 140, No. 4, 425–432 (2009).CrossRef G. Moncada, J. Martin, E. Fernández, et al., “Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 140, No. 4, 425–432 (2009).CrossRef
7.
go back to reference G. Moncada, J. Martin J, E. Fernández, et al., “Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial,” Gen. Dent., 54, No. 5, 314–318 (2006). G. Moncada, J. Martin J, E. Fernández, et al., “Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial,” Gen. Dent., 54, No. 5, 314–318 (2006).
8.
go back to reference S. Çehreli, N. Arhun, and C. Celik, “Amalgam Repair: Quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments,” Oper. Dent., 35, No. 3, 337–344 (2010).CrossRef S. Çehreli, N. Arhun, and C. Celik, “Amalgam Repair: Quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments,” Oper. Dent., 35, No. 3, 337–344 (2010).CrossRef
9.
go back to reference M. Özcan, G. Schoonbeek, B. Gökçe, et al., “Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure,” Oper. Dent., 35, No. 6, 655–662 (2010).CrossRef M. Özcan, G. Schoonbeek, B. Gökçe, et al., “Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure,” Oper. Dent., 35, No. 6, 655–662 (2010).CrossRef
10.
go back to reference N. Ruse, R. Sekimoto, and D. Feduik, “The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam,” Oper. Dent., 20, 180–185 (1995). N. Ruse, R. Sekimoto, and D. Feduik, “The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam,” Oper. Dent., 20, 180–185 (1995).
11.
go back to reference M. Özcan, C. Koolman, A. Aladag, et al., “Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam,” Oper. Dent., 36, No. 3, 318–325 (2011).CrossRef M. Özcan, C. Koolman, A. Aladag, et al., “Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of composite resin to amalgam,” Oper. Dent., 36, No. 3, 318–325 (2011).CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Y. H. Al-Jazairy, “Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 85, No. 4, 396–400 (2001).CrossRef Y. H. Al-Jazairy, “Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 85, No. 4, 396–400 (2001).CrossRef
13.
go back to reference I. R. Blum, K. Hafiana, A. Curtis, et al., “The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam,” J. Dent., 40, No. 1, 15–21 (2012).CrossRef I. R. Blum, K. Hafiana, A. Curtis, et al., “The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam,” J. Dent., 40, No. 1, 15–21 (2012).CrossRef
14.
go back to reference R. Hickel, A. Peschke, M. Tyas, et al., “FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations – update and clinical examples,” Clin. Oral Investig., 14, No. 4, 349–366 (2010).CrossRef R. Hickel, A. Peschke, M. Tyas, et al., “FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations – update and clinical examples,” Clin. Oral Investig., 14, No. 4, 349–366 (2010).CrossRef
15.
go back to reference B. Loomans, M. V. Cardoso, F. Roeters, et al., “Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?” Dent. Mater., 27, No. 7, 701–709 (2011).CrossRef B. Loomans, M. V. Cardoso, F. Roeters, et al., “Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?” Dent. Mater., 27, No. 7, 701–709 (2011).CrossRef
16.
go back to reference B. Loomans, M. Cardoso, N. Opdam, et al., “Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair,” J. Dent., 39, No. 7, 499–505 (2011).CrossRef B. Loomans, M. Cardoso, N. Opdam, et al., “Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair,” J. Dent., 39, No. 7, 499–505 (2011).CrossRef
17.
go back to reference M. Özcan, P. H. Corazza, S. M. S. Marocho, et al., “Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing,” Clin. Oral Investig., 17, No. 7, 1751–1758 (2013).CrossRef M. Özcan, P. H. Corazza, S. M. S. Marocho, et al., “Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing,” Clin. Oral Investig., 17, No. 7, 1751–1758 (2013).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference M. Özcan and G. Pekkan, “Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex,” Oper. Dent., 38, No. 1, 63–72 (2013).CrossRef M. Özcan and G. Pekkan, “Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex,” Oper. Dent., 38, No. 1, 63–72 (2013).CrossRef
19.
go back to reference M. Özcan, P. Vallittu, M.-C. Huysmans, et al., “Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam,” J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. M., 17, No. 1, 7–13 (2006).CrossRef M. Özcan, P. Vallittu, M.-C. Huysmans, et al., “Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam,” J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. M., 17, No. 1, 7–13 (2006).CrossRef
20.
go back to reference G. Alex, “Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry?” Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 36, No. 1, 15–26 (2015). G. Alex, “Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry?” Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., 36, No. 1, 15–26 (2015).
21.
go back to reference J. G. dos Santos, R. G. Fonseca, G. L. Adabo, et al., “Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 96, No. 3, 165–173 (2006).CrossRef J. G. dos Santos, R. G. Fonseca, G. L. Adabo, et al., “Shear bond strength of metal-ceramic repair systems,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 96, No. 3, 165–173 (2006).CrossRef
22.
go back to reference B. Loomans and M. Özcan, “Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines,” Oper. Dent., 41, S68–S78 (2016).CrossRef B. Loomans and M. Özcan, “Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines,” Oper. Dent., 41, S68–S78 (2016).CrossRef
23.
go back to reference L. Casagrande, M. Laske, E. M. Bronkhorst, et al., “Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations–A practice based study,” J. Dent., 64, 30–36 (2017).CrossRef L. Casagrande, M. Laske, E. M. Bronkhorst, et al., “Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations–A practice based study,” J. Dent., 64, 30–36 (2017).CrossRef
24.
go back to reference R. Adam and S. Naidoo, “The use and repair of dental amalgam restorations as practised in South Africa,” S. Afr. Dent. J., 72, No. 8, 366–371 (2017).CrossRef R. Adam and S. Naidoo, “The use and repair of dental amalgam restorations as practised in South Africa,” S. Afr. Dent. J., 72, No. 8, 366–371 (2017).CrossRef
25.
go back to reference V. V. Gordan, J. L. Riley, III, P. K. Blaser, et al., “Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 142, No. 7, 842–849 (2011). V. V. Gordan, J. L. Riley, III, P. K. Blaser, et al., “Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 142, No. 7, 842–849 (2011).
26.
go back to reference C. Shen, J. Speigel, and I. Mjor, “Repair strength of dental amalgams,” Oper. Dent., 31, No. 1, 122–126 (2006).CrossRef C. Shen, J. Speigel, and I. Mjor, “Repair strength of dental amalgams,” Oper. Dent., 31, No. 1, 122–126 (2006).CrossRef
27.
go back to reference M. Giannini, L. A. M. S. Paulillo, and G. M. B. Ambrosano, “Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems,” Braz. Dent. J., 13, No. 3, 179–183 (2002).CrossRef M. Giannini, L. A. M. S. Paulillo, and G. M. B. Ambrosano, “Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems,” Braz. Dent. J., 13, No. 3, 179–183 (2002).CrossRef
28.
go back to reference R. M. Lubow and R. L. Cooley, “Effect of air-powder abrasive instrument on restorative materials,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 55, No. 4, 462–465 (1986).CrossRef R. M. Lubow and R. L. Cooley, “Effect of air-powder abrasive instrument on restorative materials,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 55, No. 4, 462–465 (1986).CrossRef
29.
go back to reference R. E. Goldstein and F. M. Parkins, “Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 125, No. 5, 551–557 (1994).CrossRef R. E. Goldstein and F. M. Parkins, “Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 125, No. 5, 551–557 (1994).CrossRef
30.
go back to reference B. S. Lim, S. M. Heo, Y. K. Lee, and C. W. Kim, “Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: Sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 64, No. 1, 38–43 (2003).CrossRef B. S. Lim, S. M. Heo, Y. K. Lee, and C. W. Kim, “Shear bond strength between titanium alloys and composite resin: Sandblasting versus fluoride-gel treatment,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 64, No. 1, 38–43 (2003).CrossRef
31.
go back to reference N. V. Ballal, D. Khandelwal, K. S. Bhat, et al., “Effect of various surface treatments on shear bond strength of repaired amalgam – an in vitro study,” Int. J. Clin. Dent., 7, No. 4, 315–325 (2015). N. V. Ballal, D. Khandelwal, K. S. Bhat, et al., “Effect of various surface treatments on shear bond strength of repaired amalgam – an in vitro study,” Int. J. Clin. Dent., 7, No. 4, 315–325 (2015).
32.
go back to reference W. W. Barkmeier and M. A. Latta, “Laboratory evaluation of a metal-priming agent for adhesive bonding,” Quintessence Int., 31, No. 10, 749–752 (2000). W. W. Barkmeier and M. A. Latta, “Laboratory evaluation of a metal-priming agent for adhesive bonding,” Quintessence Int., 31, No. 10, 749–752 (2000).
33.
go back to reference A. Mikami, “Comparative evaluation of metal priming agents applied for bonding of magnetic stainless steel with acrylic repair resin,” J. Oral Sci., 49, No. 4, 277–281 (2007).CrossRef A. Mikami, “Comparative evaluation of metal priming agents applied for bonding of magnetic stainless steel with acrylic repair resin,” J. Oral Sci., 49, No. 4, 277–281 (2007).CrossRef
34.
go back to reference M. Kern and V. P. Thompson, “Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 73, No. 3, 240–249 (1995).CrossRef M. Kern and V. P. Thompson, “Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 73, No. 3, 240–249 (1995).CrossRef
35.
go back to reference S. M. Wegner and M. Kern, “Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic,” J. Adhes. Dent., 2, No. 2, 139–147 (2000). S. M. Wegner and M. Kern, “Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic,” J. Adhes. Dent., 2, No. 2, 139–147 (2000).
36.
go back to reference B. Miller, K. Arita, N. Tamura, et al., “Bond strengths of various materials to dentin using Amalgambond,” Am. J. Dent., 5, No. 5, 272–276 (1992). B. Miller, K. Arita, N. Tamura, et al., “Bond strengths of various materials to dentin using Amalgambond,” Am. J. Dent., 5, No. 5, 272–276 (1992).
37.
go back to reference S.-S. Choo, Y.-H. Huh, L.-R. Cho, et al., “Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin,” J. Adv. Prosthodont., 7, No. 5, 392–399 (2015).CrossRef S.-S. Choo, Y.-H. Huh, L.-R. Cho, et al., “Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin,” J. Adv. Prosthodont., 7, No. 5, 392–399 (2015).CrossRef
38.
go back to reference H. Balkaya, S. Demirbuga, N. N. Çakir, et al., “Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer,” J. Conserv. Dent., 21, No. 3, 274–279 (2018).CrossRef H. Balkaya, S. Demirbuga, N. N. Çakir, et al., “Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer,” J. Conserv. Dent., 21, No. 3, 274–279 (2018).CrossRef
39.
go back to reference D. R. Haselton, A. M. Diaz-Arnold, and J. T. Dunne, Jr, “Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 86, No. 5, 526–531 (2001).CrossRef D. R. Haselton, A. M. Diaz-Arnold, and J. T. Dunne, Jr, “Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates,” J. Prosthet. Dent., 86, No. 5, 526–531 (2001).CrossRef
40.
go back to reference M. Dündar, M. Özcan, B. Gökçe, et al., “Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics,” Dent. Mater., 23, No. 5, 630–636 (2007).CrossRef M. Dündar, M. Özcan, B. Gökçe, et al., “Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics,” Dent. Mater., 23, No. 5, 630–636 (2007).CrossRef
41.
go back to reference F. Tulumbaci, M. E. Almaz, V. Arikan, and M. S. Mutluay, “Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine,” J. Conserv. Dent., 20, No. 5, 292 (2017).CrossRef F. Tulumbaci, M. E. Almaz, V. Arikan, and M. S. Mutluay, “Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine,” J. Conserv. Dent., 20, No. 5, 292 (2017).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems in Amalgam Repair
Authors
Ö. Erçin
F. Alkan
N. Arhun
Publication date
27-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Strength of Materials / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0039-2316
Electronic ISSN: 1573-9325
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-020-00234-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Strength of Materials 5/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partners