01122020  Original Article  Issue 1/2020 Open Access
Simple PushType Wave Generating Method Using Digital Rotary Valve Control
List of symbols
A
_{p}
Area of piston
a
_{0}
Wave amplitude
B
_{c}
Total damping coefficient
C
_{d}
Flow rate coefficient
d
Depth of water
e
Amplitude of wave plate (water surface)
e
_{1}
Amplitude of plate distancing from the bottom d_{1}
e
_{2}
Amplitude of plate distancing from the bottom d_{2}
F
_{L}
Force by the action of water on the plate
f
Rotary frequency of spool
f
_{j}
Working frequency of the wave plate
g
Gravitational acceleration
H
_{0}
Wave height (2a_{0})
k
Wave number
L
Wave length
m
_{t}
Equivalent mass
p
_{L}
Pressure drop across the load
p
_{1}, p
_{2}
Pressure of hydraulic cylinder two cavity
p
_{s}
System pressure
q
_{s}
Total supply flow
q
_{L}
Flow through load
R
Radius of spool shoulder
T
Ratio of wave amplitude and paddle amplitude
S
_{i}
Orifice area of different valve ports
V
_{1}
Volume of forward chamber
V
_{2}
Volume of return chamber
V
_{o1}
Initial volume of forward chamber
V
_{t}
Total volume of cylinder chamber
x
_{v}
Axial opening width of valve
y
_{p}
Amplitude of wave plate (hydraulic cylinder)
y
_{vi}
Opening circumferential conduction width
β
_{e}
Effective bulk modulus of oil
ρ
Oil density
ω
Angular velocity of wave
ω
_{1}
Rotational angular velocity of valve spool
Φ
Velocity potential function
1 Introduction
The wave maker is one of the most important facilities in the research field of ocean engineering and hydraulic engineering. Its performance of wave simulation has an effect on the testing of sea keeping. As the wave maker plays an extremely important role in engineering research, the theory and implementation of wave generation have been attracting extensive attention for years. Scientists often perform laboratory experiments on the basis of pushtype wave makers, which move a wave plate to generate waves [
1,
2]. Refs. [
3,
4] facilitates the generation of arbitrary finiteamplitude waves at any distance from the wave maker. Moronkeji [
5] performed experimental studies using electrically driven wave plates to improve plate amplitude. Teng et al. [
6] reported a variation of the commonly used pushtype wave maker principle. By varying the speed and distance between the carriage and plate, waves of different amplitudes were generated. This method resolved the problem related to limiting the plate amplitude of pushtype wave makers. The study of Wu et al. [
7] on long waves generated by a pushtype wave maker concludes that the method proposed by Wu et al. [
8] was effective for generating solitary waves of stable height. The technology of generating white noise wave requires that wave amplitudes remain stable in a certain plate frequency range. White noise wave spectrum is basically flat in the floating objects test and this technology makes frequency response function more reliable in experiment analysis in a large frequency range [
9].
The wave generator driven by electric motor is widely used in low load; for example, rocker flap wave maker. Conversely, the hydraulic wave generator could produce high torque with quickresponse and highaccuracy, thus it can be applied in pushtype wave maker in heavy load. Electrohydraulic servo technology was frequently adopted as a solution of highpower and highaccuracy vibration systems in recent years [
10,
11]. To obtain the high flow, thrust, and frequency in these driving systems, a variety of electrohydraulic excitation devices with high thrust and high frequency were studied by many scholars, as a result, the AC servo hydraulic vibration technology, as well as the new electrohydraulic digital control technology, etc. were presented [
12,
13]. Many scholars have been seeking new control elements to satisfy specific engineering requirements. For example, Hao et al. [
14] utilized rotary valve structure to increase the wave frequency of exciter, and applied it to coal industry, metallurgical industry, construction industry, etc. Ruan et al. [
15] proposed a high frequency electrohydraulic exciter with rotary valve and studied the frequency characteristic of electrohydraulic exciter, high frequency signal acquisition and control of typical excited wave forms. Ren et al. [
16] studied vibration waveforms excited by an electrohydraulic exciter with a twodimensional rotary valve theoretically and experimentally. Other similar progresses include equilibrium hydraulic rotary valve with high pressure, large flow and electrohydraulic rotary valve studied at Zhejiang University [
17,
18] and rotating shaft hydraulic rotary valve with good manufacturability designed by Marcus [
19]. A fluid driven PWM valve based on a unidirectional rotary spool was presented, and it was found that the rotary valve reduced actuation power from a cubic dependence to a square dependence by eliminating motion reversals during transition [
20]. Liu et al. [
21,
22] designed a single stage rotary valve for application to high energy and variablefrequency vibration condition. The single stage rotary valve can be used to obtain the required vibration frequency and waveform by controlling the rotary velocity of spool, and thus meet different working requirements of tamping device.
Advertisement
In this paper, to make it easier to generate waves and improve wave amplitude in a certain plate frequency range, a simple pushtype wave generating method using digital rotary valve control was proposed [
23] and developed, and the control system model was established, and different wave amplitudes and lengths were generated and further analyzed.
2 Working Principle and Test Rig
The working principle of the novel digital rotary valvecontrolled cylinder system is shown in Figure
1. It is composed mainly of a doubleacting hydraulic servo cylinder, a digital rotary valve, an electrohydraulic proportional axial variable piston pump, and a proportional relief valve. The wave experiment rig, as shown in Figure
1, includes a water tank (0.6 m wide×1.2 m high×12 m long), an electrohydraulic control system, a wave generation mechanism and a wave height meter.
×
The working principle and structure of the designed rotary valve are shown in Figure
2. It can be seen that 4 shoulders with same structure are designed and manufactured on the rotary valve spool. The rotary frequency of the spool can be controlled by a servo motor, and the axial displacement of the spool can be controlled by a linear stepper motor, thus the opening of the spool as well as the flow through the opening can be controlled. The valve ports are designed symmetrical, so that the opening area of the valve ports on the front shoulder 1 can change from zero to the maximum, and from the maximum to zero, then so can the opening area of the corresponding valve ports on the nearby shoulder 4 do. On the other hand, when one valve port is closed, another valve port on the opposite side of the same shoulder is just open, keeping the valve on working order.
×
When the valve core rotates to the specific angle as shown in Figure
2(a), oil flows from port P to port B, and then from port A to port T. In this case, the cylinder moves to the right. When the valve core rotates to another angle as shown in Figure
2(b), oil flows from P to A, and then from B to T, driving the cylinder to the left. With the change of servo motor’s speed, the frequency of the rotary valve core changes, leading to the change of wave maker’s working frequency. To meet higher flow for cylinder motion, linear flow and pressure control requirements, grooves in the valve core and windows in the sleeve are designed to be rectangular accordingly.
Advertisement
A test rig of wave experiment was established to validate the new working principle. By adjusting the stepper motor and the servo motor, we can control the axial displacement and the rotational speed of valve core respectively. Supply oil pressure can be set through the proportional relief valve. Consequently, the amplitude of wave plate becomes adjustable and the frequency of wave plate changeable. The experimental instruments are shown in Table
1. The main parameters of the new wave maker system are listed in Table
2. The operation parameters with instruments are listed in Table
3.
Table 1
Experimental instruments
Instruments

Model (manufacturer)

Range


Proportional pump

A10VSO28DR/31RPPA12N00 (Rexroth)

40 L/min

Servo motor

ECMAC20604R8 (Delta)

0‒3000 r/min

Servo motor drive

ASDB20421B (Delta)

0‒250 Hz

Linear stepper motor

57M4212002 (Haydon)

150‒890 N

Stepper motor driver

DCM4010 (Haydon)

0‒100 kHz

Servo hydraulic cylinder

CKM/2040/28×200N004V (Atos)

0‒200 mm

Proportional relief valve

DBE1030B/315XY (Huadehydraulic)

0‒31.5 MPa

Industrial Personal Computer (IPC)

DVP06XA

0‒20 mA

Pressure sensor

P200HGB250BM20M4B (Banna)

0‒31.5 MPa

Displacement sensor

EHM0220MD341V01 (MTS)

0‒220 mm

Wave height meter

YWH200DXX (Chengdu autel)

0‒1000 mm

Table 2
Main parameters of new wave maker system
Item

Value


Diameter of cylinder (
D
_{0})

40 mm

Diameter of piston rod (
d
_{0})

28 mm

Volume of cylinder (
V
_{t})

1.28×10
^{−4} m
^{3}

Effective action area of hydraulic cylinder (
A
_{p})

6.4×10
^{−4} m
^{2}

Axial opening width of rotary valve (
x
_{v})

0‒4 mm

Maximum Circumferential width of rotary valve (
y
_{vmax})

6.1 mm

Radius of the spool shoulder (
R)

8 mm

Number of grooves on a single spool (Z)

2

Oil supply pressure (
p
_{s})

0‒8 MPa

Maximum flow (
q
_{smax})

40 L/min

Equivalent mass of wave plate (
m
_{t})

30 kg

Depth of water (
d)

400 mm

Flow rate coefficient (
C
_{d})

0.62

Oil density (
ρ)

870 kg/m
^{3}

Effective bulk modulus of oil (
β
_{e})

8 × 10
^{8} Pa

Density of water

1000 kg/m
^{3}

Temperature of water

20 °C

Table 3
Operation parameters with instruments
Operation parameter

Value

Instruments


x
_{v}

0‒4 mm

Stepper motor

n (
f
_{j})

0‒60 r/min (1‒2 Hz)

Servo motor

p
_{s}

0‒2 MPa

Proportional relief valve

3 Mathematical Modelling
According to the Figure
1, the hydraulic transmission model is shown in Figure
3. The bottom of water tank is smooth and the hydrostatic depth is
d. In the distal wave trough, there is no reflection, wave completely absorbed by the wave damper. Assume that the wave propagation direction is the positive
x axis, the vertical direction is the positive
z axis, the origin of the coordinate is on the surface of the water. The wave amplitude is much less than the wave length.
Φ is the velocity potential function. The boundary value problem for the wave maker in the wave tank follows directly from the boundary value problem for twodimensional waves propagating in an inviscid, incompressible, irrotational fluid. Boundary value problem specification for periodic water waves is shown in Figure
3. According to the above assumptions, the potential flow theory and small amplitude wave theory [
24–
26], the equation of wave amplitude of the front plate a0 and plate amplitude e in different cycles is expressed as follows:
where
H
_{0} is the wave height,
d is the depth of water,
e
_{1},
e
_{2} are the amplitudes of plate motion distance from the bottom
d
_{1},
d
_{2}, respectively,
e is the amplitude of plate motion at water surface.
$$ \begin{aligned} T (\omega ,d ) & = \frac{{a_{0} }}{{e_{1} }} = \frac{{H_{0} }}{{2e_{1} }} = \frac{4{\sinh}{kd}}{\sinh{2kd} + 2kd} \hfill \\ & \quad \times (\frac{{1  e_{2} /e_{1} }}{{1  d_{2} /d_{1} }}\frac{d}{{d_{1} }}\sinh{kd} + \frac{{e_{2} /e_{1}  d_{2} /d_{1} }}{{1  d_{2} /d_{1} }}\sinh{kd} \hfill \\ & \quad + \frac{{1  e_{2} /e_{1} }}{{1  d_{2} /d_{1} }}\frac{1}{{kd_{1} }}  \frac{1}{{kd_{1} }}\frac{{1  e_{2} /e_{1} }}{{1  d_{2} /d_{1} }}\cosh{kd}), \hfill \\ \end{aligned} $$
(1)
×
For pushtype wave maker,
\( e_{1} = e_{2} = e,d_{1} = d,d_{2} = 0 \). According to the cylinder connection point of Figure
1,
e (namely, the amplitude of wave plate) is equal to the motion displacement of hydraulic cylinder
y
_{p}, so:
$$ T_{1} \left( {\omega ,d} \right) = \frac{{a_{0} }}{e} = \frac{{a_{0} }}{{y_{\text{p}} }} = \frac{{H_{0} }}{{2y_{\text{p}} }} = \frac{{4\sinh^{2} kd}}{2kd + \sinh2kd}. $$
(2)
The relation of the wave number
k and the angular velocity of wave ω meets the dispersion formula:
ω
^{2} = 4π
^{2}
f
_{j}^{2} =
gktanh(
kd) [
1], where
f
_{j} is the working frequency of the wave plate, namely the hydraulic cylinder working frequency.
k cannot be directly obtained from the above formula, where
k can be solved by means of Matlab software tool . The parameter values of
k and
T
_{1} used in the calculation are listed in Table
4.
Table 4
Corresponding parameters of hydraulic transmission
f
_{j} (Hz)

k

T
_{1}


1

4.3

1.54

1.6

10.3

2.00

2

16.1

2.00

The equivalent bridge of the rotary valvecontrolled cylinder system is shown in Figure
4. It is assumed that the system pressure
p
_{s} is constant, the total supply flow is
q
_{s},
q
_{L} is the flow through the load and
p
_{L} is the pressure drop across the load.
×
The equations of flow through the orifices 1, 2, 3 and 4 are expressed as follows:
where
p
_{1} and
p
_{2} are the pressure of hydraulic cylinder two cavity respectively,
C
_{d} is the flow rate coefficient,
ρ is the oil density, and
S
_{vi} (
i = 1, 2, 3, 4) are orifice area of valve ports on the correspondent shoulder
i.
$$ q_{\text{v1}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v1}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{\text{s}}  p_{1} )}}{\rho }} , $$
(3)
$$ q_{\text{v2}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v2}} \sqrt {\frac{{2 (p_{1}  p_{0} )}}{\rho }} , $$
(4)
$$ q_{\text{v3}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v3}} \sqrt {\frac{{2 (p_{2}  p_{0} )}}{\rho }} , $$
(5)
$$ q_{\text{v4}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v4}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{\text{s}}  p_{2} )}}{\rho }} , $$
(6)
Firstly, it is assumed that the connecting pipeline between rotary valve and hydraulic cylinder is short, thick and symmetrical enough, the dynamic loss and the pressure loss of the pipe can be ignored, the oil temperature and bulk modulus of hydraulic oil are constant, and the leakage of hydraulic cylinder is zero. When the cylinder moves to the right, the flow rate continuity equations of the chamber of the cylinder can be used.
The left chamber is
whereas the right chamber is
where
V
_{1} is the volume of forward chamber,
V
_{1} =
V
_{o1}+
A
_{p}
y
_{p},
V
_{o1} is the initial volume of forward chamber,
V
_{2} is the volume of return chamber,
V
_{2} =
V
_{t} – (
V
_{o1}+
A
_{p}
y
_{p}),
V
_{t} is the total volume of cylinder chambers,
β
_{e} is the effective bulk modulus of oil and is assumed to be as constant in Low pressure test,
A
_{p} is the area of piston.
$$ q_{\text{v1}}  q_{\text{v2}} = \frac{{{\text{d}}y_{\text{p}} }}{{{\text{d}}t}}A_{\text{p}} + \frac{{V_{1} }}{{\beta_{\text{e}} }}\frac{{{\text{d}}p_{1} }}{{{\text{d}}t}}, $$
(7)
$$ q_{\text{v3}}  q_{\text{v4}} = \frac{{{\text{d}}y_{\text{p}} }}{{{\text{d}}t}}A_{\text{p}}  \frac{{V_{2} }}{{\beta_{\text{e}} }}\frac{{{\text{d}}p_{2} }}{{{\text{d}}t}}, $$
(8)
As the orifices are both matched and symmetrical, the flows in diagonally opposite arms of the bridge, as shown in Figure
4, are equal. Therefore,
\( S_{{{\text{v}}1}} \left( \theta \right) = S_{{{\text{v}}3}} \left( {\theta +\uppi} \right), \)
\( S_{{{\text{v}}4}} (\theta ) = S_{{{\text{v}}2}} (\theta +\uppi). \)
The equations of the flow through the orifices in a cycle are expressed as follows:
$$ \left\{ \begin{aligned} q_{\text{v1}} = q_{\text{v3}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v1}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{\text{s}}  p_{1} )}}{\rho }} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v3}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{2}  p_{0} )}}{\rho }} , \hfill \\ q_{\text{v2}} = q_{\text{v4}} = 0, \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. (\uppi  \theta \ge 0), $$
(9)
$$ \left\{ \begin{aligned} q_{\text{v1}} = q_{\text{v3}} = 0, \hfill \\ q_{\text{v2}} = q_{\text{v4}} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v2}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{1}  p_{0} )}}{\rho }} = C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v4}} \sqrt {\frac{{2(p_{\text{s}}  p_{2} )}}{\rho }} , \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. (\uppi  \theta \le 0). $$
(10)
If the external leakage and internal leakage are zero, and
p
_{s} =
p
_{1}+
p
_{2},
p
_{L} =
p
_{1}−
p
_{2}, the load flow of the cylinder is
\( q_{\text{L}} = q_{\text{v1}}  q_{\text{v2}} \). That is,
$$ \begin{aligned} q_{\text{L}} = {\text{sign}}(\uppi  \theta )\frac{{C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{vi}} }}{\sqrt \rho }\sqrt {p_{\text{s}}  {\text{sign}}(\uppi  \theta )p_{\text{L}} } \hfill \\ = \left\{ \begin{aligned} \, C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v1}} \sqrt {\frac{{p_{\text{s}}  p_{\text{L}} }}{\rho }} , { }\uppi  \theta \ge 0, \hfill \\  C_{\text{d}} S_{\text{v2}} \sqrt {\frac{{p_{\text{s}} + p_{\text{L}} }}{\rho }} , { }\uppi  \theta \le 0. \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. \hfill \\ \end{aligned} $$
(11)
The total open area is
S
_{vi} = 2
x
_{v}
y
_{vi}, where
x
_{v} is the axial opening width of the valve.
It is assumed that the opening circumferential conduction width of B and A are
y
_{v1} and
y
_{v4}, respectively. If
y
_{v1} is from zero to the maximum, then from the maximum to zero, after that, to enter the next opening port of nearby shoulder subsequently,
y
_{v4} is also from zero to the maximum, then from the maximum to zero, so the equations of
y
_{v1} and
y
_{v4} are:
where
R is the radius of the spool shoulder,
f is the rotational frequency of spool, and ω
_{1} is the rotational angular velocity of valve spool.
$$ y_{\text{v1}} = \left\{ \begin{aligned} &2R\sin \frac{{\omega_{1} t}}{2} , { }0 \le \omega_{1} t< \frac{\uppi}{4} , { } \hfill \\ & 2R\sin \left[ {\frac{\uppi}{4}  \frac{{\omega_{1} t}}{2}} \right] , { }\frac{\uppi}{4} \le \omega_{1} t < \frac{\uppi}{2}, \hfill \\ & 0, \, \frac{\uppi}{2} \le \omega_{1} t < \frac{{3\uppi}}{4}, \hfill \\ & 0, \, \frac{{3\uppi}}{4} \le \omega_{1} t \le\uppi ,\hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. $$
(12)
$$ y_{\text{v4}} = \left\{ \begin{aligned} &0, \, 0 \le \omega_{1} t < \frac{\uppi}{4}, \hfill \\ &0 , { }\frac{\uppi}{4} \le \omega_{1} t < \frac{\uppi}{2}, \hfill \\ &2R\sin \left[ {\frac{{\omega_{1} t}}{2}  \frac{\uppi}{4}} \right] , { }\frac{\uppi}{2} \le \omega_{1} t < \frac{{3\uppi}}{4} ,\hfill \\ &2R\sin \left[ {\frac{\uppi}{2}  \frac{{\omega_{1} t}}{2}} \right] , { }\frac{{3\uppi}}{4} \le \omega_{1} t <\uppi ,\hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. \, $$
(13)
Figure
2 shows that a single complete cycle of spool and the twice of oil reversing make hydraulic cylinder oscillating back and forth twice, so the relation between the working frequency of hydraulic cylinder and the rotational frequency of spool is
\( f_{\text{j}} = 2f \).
The equation of motion for the cylinder is
where
m
_{t} is the equivalent mass,
B
_{c} is the total damping coefficient, and
F
_{L} is the force by the action of water on the plate. The system is greatly affected by the mass inertial force and the force by the action of water on the plate, the effect of other forces are so little that can be neglected when conducting actual calculation.
$$ A_{\text{P}} (p_{1}  p_{2} ) = m_{\text{t}} \ddot{y}_{\text{p}} + B_{\text{c}} \dot{y}_{\text{p}} + F_{\text{L}}. $$
(14)
The wavefront equation of the twodimensional small amplitude propulsion wave with constant depth is
where
\( \theta \) is the phase of the wave. The determination of the constants
\( k \) and
\( \omega \) is as follows:
$$ \eta = a_{0} \cos\theta = a_{0} \cos\left( {kx  \omega t} \right), $$
(15)
(1) When
x is increased or decreased by one wave length
L, the wavefront height
η should be constant. This must make
$$ kL = 2\pi . $$
(16)
(2) When the time increments by one cycle
T, the wave surface height of the same point should be constant, that is
$$ \omega T = 2\pi . $$
(17)
Based on the above dispersion formula:
ω
^{2} =
gktanh(
kd) [
1], substitute into Eqs. (
16) and (
17), so:
$$ L = \frac{{gT^{2} }}{2\pi }{\text{tanh}}kd. $$
(18)
The relation between the working frequency of hydraulic cylinder and the rotational frequency of spool is
\( f_{\text{j}} = 2f \), so:
T = 1/
\( f_{\text{j}} = 1/2f \).
4 Theoretical and Experimental Results
Figure
5 show the wave experiment and acquisition interface system of wave height meter. The distance between the wave height meter is
X, the time difference of initial wave height data is
\( \Delta t \). We can get
L from the equation
\( L = {X \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {X {\Delta tf_{j} }}} \right. \kern0pt} {\Delta tf_{j} }} \) with the experimental data.
×
Test values in the wave experiment were compared with those obtained in the numerical analysis. It was assumed that the initial point of cylinder piston is in the middle with the maximum opening of valve port, and the cylinder to the right direction is positive to correspond to the hydraulic transmission model. The main factors and the control parameters for wave experiment can be obtained by continuously adjusting different input parameters (
x
_{v},
p
_{s} and
f
_{j}), and analyzing output curves (
y
_{p},
L and
a
_{0}) in the solution process of mathematical models by means of Simulink software tool.
In the actual operation, because no feedbacks were used in the hydraulic control system, the cylinder piston rod was set to the leftmost position in each experiment and the valve port was set to closed at the same time. Therefore, the motion displacement of hydraulic cylinder in a cycle was 2
y
_{p}. The wave height
H
_{0} (2
a
_{0max}) of experimental data was measured by the wave height meter.
4.1 Influence of Different x_{v} and f_{j} on Wave Simulation
Figure
6 and Figure
7(a) show the
y
_{p}
t and
a
_{0}
t curves under different
x
_{v} at the working frequency of 1 Hz. From equation
S = 2
x
_{v}
y
_{vi}, Figure
6 and Figure
7(a),
S
_{v} is determined by
x
_{v}, directly affecting
y
_{p} and
a
_{0}, Thus,
x
_{v} is the crucial factor for the motion amplitude of hydraulic cylinder and wave amplitude, and the bigger
x
_{v} is, the bigger
S
_{v},
y
_{p} and
a
_{0} will be. Under the condition of 1.0 MPa (oil supply pressure), 1 Hz (Plate motion frequency,
T
_{1} = 1.54), 2.0 mm (Axial opening width), the maximum wave amplitude can reach to 64 mm. It can be seen from Figure
6 and Table
5 that test value and theoretical value in the maximum wave amplitude
a
_{0max} agree relatively well.
Table 5
Main comparison between theoretical and test values of
a
_{0max} (
L) (
p
_{s} = 1 MPa) (mm)
f (Hz)

x
_{v}



1 mm

1.5 mm

2 mm


Theoretical results

Test results

Theoretical results

Test results

Theoretical results

Test results


1

48 (151)

40 (150)

55 (151)

48 (154)

64 (151)

60 (154)

1.6

32 (61)

30 (62)

36 (61)

33 (62)

42 (61)

45 (63)

2

24 (39)

19 (41)

27 (39)

23 (41)

30 (39)

26 (40)

×
×
Figure
7(b) shows
a
_{0} and
y
_{p} under different work frequencies at 1.0 MPa oil supply pressure. From Figure
7(b), it can be seen that when work frequency is 1.6 Hz (
T
_{1} = 2), the maximum amplitude of the cylinder is 16 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm) or 21 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 2 mm), and
a
_{0max} is 32 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm) or 42 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 2 mm). When work frequency is 2 Hz (
T
_{1} = 2), the maximum amplitude of the cylinder is 12 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm) or 15 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 2 mm), and
a
_{0max} is 24 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm) or 30 mm (
x
_{v} is set to 2 mm). It can be also drawn from the curve of different work frequencies that the value of
a
_{0} can be determined by
x
_{v}. A larger value of
x
_{v} will lead to larger
a
_{0}.
Figure
7(c) shows the relationship between the working frequency and
a
_{0max} (
H
_{0}/2) under different
x
_{v}. The wave amplitude descends with the increase of the plate working frequency, the higher the working frequency, the smaller the wave amplitude.
a
_{01} (
x
_{v} is set to 2 mm) is higher than
a
_{02} (
x
_{v} is set to 1.5 mm), and
a
_{02} (
x
_{v} is set to 1.5 mm) is higher than
a
_{03} (
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm). The main comparison between theoretical and test values of
a
_{0max} under the same pressure are shown in Table
5. The test results under different
x
_{v} are in accordance with the theoretical calculation results, but the test values are slightly lower than the theoretical values.
Figure
7(d) shows the relationship between the working frequency and
L under different
x
_{v}. The wave length descends with the increase of the plate working frequency, the higher the working frequency, the smaller the wave length. At the same frequency, the wave length remains unchanged with the axial opening width change. The main comparison between theoretical and test values of
L under the same pressure are shown in Table
5. The test results under different
x
_{v} are in accordance with the theoretical calculation results.
4.2 Influence of Different p_{s} and f_{j} on Wave Simulation
Figure
8(a) shows
y
_{p} and
a
_{0} curves under different oil supply pressure. It can be seen from Figure
8(a), when
f
_{j} is set to 1 Hz,
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm, the maximum amplitude of the cylinder can reach to 25 mm under the pressure of 0.9 MPa, 31 mm under the pressure of 1.0 MPa, 36 mm under the pressure of 1.2 MPa, and
a
_{0max} can reach to 39 mm under the pressure of 0.9 MPa, 48 mm under the pressure of 1.0 MPa, 55 mm under the pressure of 1.2 MPa. Numerical curve shows that
a
_{0} can be controlled by the oil supply pressure. The higher the oil supply pressure, the larger the wave plate amplitudes and wave amplitudes. It can be seen from Figure
8 and Table
6 that test value and theoretical value in the maximum wave amplitude agree relatively well.
Table 6
Main comparison between theoretical and test values of
a
_{0max} (
L) (
x
_{v} = 1 mm) (mm)
f (Hz)

p
_{s}



1 MPa

1.2 MPa


Theoretical results

Test results

Theoretical results

Test results


1

48 (151)

40 (150)

55 (151)

50 (149)

1.6

32 (61)

30 (62)

37 (61)

34 (62)

2

24 (39)

19 (41)

28 (39)

23 (42)

×
Figure
8(b) shows
a
_{0} at different work frequencies when
x
_{v} is set to 1 mm. It can be seen from the Figure
8(b) that when the work frequency is 1.6 Hz (
T
_{1} = 2), the maximum amplitude of the cylinder is 15 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.0 MPa) or 18 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.2 MPa), and
a
_{0max} is 30 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.0 MPa) or 36 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.2 MPa). When the work frequency is 2 Hz (
T
_{1} = 2), the maximum amplitude of the cylinder is 12 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.0 MPa) or 14 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.2 MPa), and
a
_{0max} is 24 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.0 MPa) or 28 mm (
p
_{s} is set to 1.2 MPa). It can be also drawn from the curve of different work frequencies that the value of
a
_{0} can be determined by
p
_{s}. The higher the
p
_{s}, the greater the
a
_{0}.
Figure
8(c) shows the relationship between the working frequency and the
a
_{0max} (
H
_{0}/2) under different supply pressure.
a
_{01} (
p
_{s} is set to 1.2 MPa) is higher than
a
_{02} (
p
_{s} is set to 1.0 MPa). The test results under different
p
_{s} are in accordance with the theoretical calculation results. It can be seen from Figure
7(c) and Figure
8(c),
a
_{0} descends with the increasing of working frequency. The main comparison between theoretical and test values of
a
_{0max} under the same
x
_{v} are shown in Table
6. Test values are slightly lower than the theoretical values. The differences between the test and theoretical values in Table
5 and Table
6 are mainly caused by water leaks from the gaps at both sides of the wave paddle.
Figure
8(d) shows the relationship between the working frequency and
L under different supply pressure. At the same frequency, the wave length remains unchanged with the supply pressure change. The main comparison between theoretical and test values of
L under the same
x
_{v} are shown in Table
6. The test results under different supply pressure are in accordance with the theoretical calculation results.
5 Conclusions
The experiment and analysis results show that the motion frequency and amplitude of pushtype wave maker can be continuously adjusted and the various required regular waves can be obtained conveniently. The axial opening width of the valve is the crucial factor for the plate amplitude and the wave amplitude. A larger value of the axial opening width lead to larger the wave plate amplitude and wave amplitude. The wave amplitude also depends on oil supply pressure, the higher the oil supply pressure, the greater the plate amplitude and the wave amplitude. At the same water depth, the working frequency of push plate determines wave number and wave length. Wave length is not affected by the axial opening width and the oil supply pressure. Although the wave amplitude and length descends with the increase of the working frequency, the wave amplitude can be easily improved by setting the axial opening width of the valve and the oil supply pressure of the system. These results indicate that different regular waves can be obtained conveniently by the new wave generating method, and the wave amplitude can be further improved in a certain plate frequency range. These facilitate convenient implementation of wave experiment. Based on the characteristics of high power electrohydraulic system, the new approach demonstrates its potential application to achieve highpower wave experiment with highpower wave maker system.
Considering the feasibility and practicability of the rotary valvecontrolled cylinder system applied to highpower wave experiment, future efforts will focus on practical application of the highpower wave maker. Future work includes vibration cylinder bias compensation with feedbacks, optimized and integrated design of the device.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.