Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Water Resources Management 11/2014

01-09-2014

Snowmelt Modelling Approaches in Watershed Models: Computation and Comparison of Efficiencies under Varying Climatic Conditions

Authors: Anand Verdhen, Bhagu R. Chahar, Om P. Sharma

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 11/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Most of the watershed models contain snowmelt-computing options but there are modelling difficulties in snow-covered watersheds either due to paucity of data or in addressing snowmelt computation weakly. The temperature index (TI) and/or energy balance (EB algorithms of HEC-1, NWSRFS, PRMS, SHE, SRM, SSARR, SWAT, TANK, and UBC models have been investigated. The performance has been evaluated at the point (station specific) snowmelt computation with and without snowpack accounting. The computations have been performed for Solang station at 2 485 m altitude located in the western Himalayas. Springtime weekly snow and meteorological data of 1 983, 2003, and 2008 have been used. Data year 2008 has been used for weekly simulation with the observed snowpack ablation. The probability of success in simulating the snowmelt using TI/EB of all the models in average is 0.77. Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) efficiency coefficients for simulation with snowpack accounting are found to vary between 0.84 and 0.97. Although NS coefficients for verification year 2003 are satisfactory (0.5 to 0.88) but snowmelt prediction/verification efficiency at an interval of 25 years (1983) is below average. However, verification on probability criteria for data year 1983 in the case of TI/EB is 0.63/0.48. Results from EB approach show wind dependent fluctuations. Uncertainty arises due to inter-decadal variability of the snowpack/snowmelt. The approach applied in this paper is valuable in order to have a quick evaluation of snowmelt algorithm before integrating it with any operational watershed model.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Anderson EA (1973) National Weather Service River Forecast System snow accumulation and ablation model. NOAA-Technical Memorandum. NWS-Hydro-17: 219p Anderson EA (1973) National Weather Service River Forecast System snow accumulation and ablation model. NOAA-Technical Memorandum. NWS-Hydro-17: 219p
go back to reference Arora M, Singh P, Goel NK, Singh RD (2008) Climate variability influences on hydrological responses in a large Himalayan Basin. Water Resour Manage 22:1461–1475CrossRef Arora M, Singh P, Goel NK, Singh RD (2008) Climate variability influences on hydrological responses in a large Himalayan Basin. Water Resour Manage 22:1461–1475CrossRef
go back to reference Bergstrom S (1975) The development of a snow routine for the HBV-2 model. Nordic Hydrol 6:73–92 Bergstrom S (1975) The development of a snow routine for the HBV-2 model. Nordic Hydrol 6:73–92
go back to reference Braithwaite RJ, Olesen OB (1990) A simple energy-balance model to calculate ice ablation at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet. J Glaciol 36(123):222–228 Braithwaite RJ, Olesen OB (1990) A simple energy-balance model to calculate ice ablation at the margin of the Greenland ice sheet. J Glaciol 36(123):222–228
go back to reference Brubaker K, Rango A, Kustas W (1996) Incorporating radiation inputs into the snowmelt runoff model. Hydrol Process 10:1329–1343CrossRef Brubaker K, Rango A, Kustas W (1996) Incorporating radiation inputs into the snowmelt runoff model. Hydrol Process 10:1329–1343CrossRef
go back to reference Chen X, Yang T, Wang X, Xu CY, Yu Z (2013) Uncertainty intercomparison of different hydrological models in simulating extreme flows. Water Resour Manage 27:1393–1409CrossRef Chen X, Yang T, Wang X, Xu CY, Yu Z (2013) Uncertainty intercomparison of different hydrological models in simulating extreme flows. Water Resour Manage 27:1393–1409CrossRef
go back to reference David GT, Al-Adhami MJ, Bowles DS (1991) A preliminary comparison of snowmelt models for erosion prediction. In Proc. of the Western Snow Conference, Juneau, Alaska, pp 79–90 David GT, Al-Adhami MJ, Bowles DS (1991) A preliminary comparison of snowmelt models for erosion prediction. In Proc. of the Western Snow Conference, Juneau, Alaska, pp 79–90
go back to reference Debele B, Srinivasan R, Gosain AK (2010) Comparison of process-based and temperature-index snowmelt modelling in SWAT. Water Resour Manage 24:1065–1088CrossRef Debele B, Srinivasan R, Gosain AK (2010) Comparison of process-based and temperature-index snowmelt modelling in SWAT. Water Resour Manage 24:1065–1088CrossRef
go back to reference Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH (2002) Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). J Hydrol 262:209–223CrossRef Fontaine TA, Cruickshank TS, Arnold JG, Hotchkiss RH (2002) Development of a snowfall-snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). J Hydrol 262:209–223CrossRef
go back to reference Forsythe N, Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG, Archer DR (2012) Opportunities from remote sensing for supporting water resources management in village/valley scale catchments in upper Indu Basin. Water Resour Manage 26:845–871. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9933-8 CrossRef Forsythe N, Fowler HJ, Kilsby CG, Archer DR (2012) Opportunities from remote sensing for supporting water resources management in village/valley scale catchments in upper Indu Basin. Water Resour Manage 26:845–871. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-011-9933-8 CrossRef
go back to reference Hock R (2003) Temperature index melt modeling in mountain areas. J Hydrol 282:104–115CrossRef Hock R (2003) Temperature index melt modeling in mountain areas. J Hydrol 282:104–115CrossRef
go back to reference Jain SK, Goswami A, Saraf AK (2010) Assessment of snowmelt runoff using remote sensing and effect of clmate change on runoff. Water Resour Manage 24:1763–1777CrossRef Jain SK, Goswami A, Saraf AK (2010) Assessment of snowmelt runoff using remote sensing and effect of clmate change on runoff. Water Resour Manage 24:1763–1777CrossRef
go back to reference Kjaersgaard JH, Cuenea RH, Martinez-Cob A (2009) Comparison of the performance of net radiation calculation models. Theor Appl Climatol 98:57–66CrossRef Kjaersgaard JH, Cuenea RH, Martinez-Cob A (2009) Comparison of the performance of net radiation calculation models. Theor Appl Climatol 98:57–66CrossRef
go back to reference Koivusalo H, Heikinheimo M, Karvonen T (2001) Test of a simple two-layer parameterisation to simulate the energy balance and temperature of a snowpack. Theor Appl Climatol 70:65–79CrossRef Koivusalo H, Heikinheimo M, Karvonen T (2001) Test of a simple two-layer parameterisation to simulate the energy balance and temperature of a snowpack. Theor Appl Climatol 70:65–79CrossRef
go back to reference Kuras PK, Alila Y, Weiler M, Spittlehouse D, Winkler R (2011) Internal catchment process simulation in a snow dominated basin: performance evaluation with spatiotemporally variable runoff generation and groundwater dynamics. Hydrol Process 25:3187–3230CrossRef Kuras PK, Alila Y, Weiler M, Spittlehouse D, Winkler R (2011) Internal catchment process simulation in a snow dominated basin: performance evaluation with spatiotemporally variable runoff generation and groundwater dynamics. Hydrol Process 25:3187–3230CrossRef
go back to reference Leavesley GH, Lichty RW, Troutman BM, Saindon LG (1983) Precipitation-runoff modelling system: user’s manual. WR Investigations Report 83–4238, US Geological Survey Leavesley GH, Lichty RW, Troutman BM, Saindon LG (1983) Precipitation-runoff modelling system: user’s manual. WR Investigations Report 83–4238, US Geological Survey
go back to reference Lopez-Moreno JI, Revuelto J, Gilaberte M, Moran-Tejeda E, Pons M, Jover E, Esteban P, Garcia C, Pomeroy JW (2013) The effect of slope aspect on the response of snowpack to climate warming in the Pyrenees. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-013-0991-0 Lopez-Moreno JI, Revuelto J, Gilaberte M, Moran-Tejeda E, Pons M, Jover E, Esteban P, Garcia C, Pomeroy JW (2013) The effect of slope aspect on the response of snowpack to climate warming in the Pyrenees. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.​1007/​s00704-013-0991-0
go back to reference MacDonald RJ, Byrne JM, Boon S, Kienzle SW (2012) Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on snowpack in the North Saskatchewan River watershed, Alberta. Water Resour Manage 26:3053–3076. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0016-2 CrossRef MacDonald RJ, Byrne JM, Boon S, Kienzle SW (2012) Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on snowpack in the North Saskatchewan River watershed, Alberta. Water Resour Manage 26:3053–3076. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-012-0016-2 CrossRef
go back to reference Martinec J (1975) Snowmelt runoff model for river forecasts. Nord Hydrol 6:145–154 Martinec J (1975) Snowmelt runoff model for river forecasts. Nord Hydrol 6:145–154
go back to reference Martinec J, Rango A, Roberts R (1994) Snowmelt runoff model (SRM) user’s manual. Baumgartner MF (ed), Geographica Bernesia P29, Dept. of Bern, University of Bern, Bern Martinec J, Rango A, Roberts R (1994) Snowmelt runoff model (SRM) user’s manual. Baumgartner MF (ed), Geographica Bernesia P29, Dept. of Bern, University of Bern, Bern
go back to reference Melloh RA (1999) A synopsis and comparison of selected snowmelt algorithms. CREEL Report 99–8, USA Corps of Engineers, 72 LYME RD, Hanover, NH 03755-1290, New Hampshire Melloh RA (1999) A synopsis and comparison of selected snowmelt algorithms. CREEL Report 99–8, USA Corps of Engineers, 72 LYME RD, Hanover, NH 03755-1290, New Hampshire
go back to reference Moore RD, Owens IF (1984) Modelling Alpine snow accumulation and ablation using daily climate observations. J Hydrol (N.Z.) 23 (2): 73-83 Moore RD, Owens IF (1984) Modelling Alpine snow accumulation and ablation using daily climate observations. J Hydrol (N.Z.) 23 (2): 73-83
go back to reference Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–292CrossRef Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I: A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–292CrossRef
go back to reference NIH (1988) Hydrologic models for mountainous area. Report TN-33 (Verdhen et al.), NIH, Roorkee, India NIH (1988) Hydrologic models for mountainous area. Report TN-33 (Verdhen et al.), NIH, Roorkee, India
go back to reference Pipes A, Quick MC (1977) UBC Watershed Model Users Guide Department of Civil Engineering. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Pipes A, Quick MC (1977) UBC Watershed Model Users Guide Department of Civil Engineering. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
go back to reference Pradhanang SM, Anandhi A, Mukundan R et al (2011) Application of SWAT model to assess snowpack development and stream flow in the Cannonsville watershed, New York, USA. Hydrol Process 25:3268–3277. doi:10.1002/hyp. 8171 CrossRef Pradhanang SM, Anandhi A, Mukundan R et al (2011) Application of SWAT model to assess snowpack development and stream flow in the Cannonsville watershed, New York, USA. Hydrol Process 25:3268–3277. doi:10.​1002/​hyp.​ 8171 CrossRef
go back to reference Rahman K, Maringanti C, Beniston M, Widmer F, Abbaspour K, Lehmann A (2013) Streamflow modeling in a highly managed mountainous glacier watershed using SWAT: the Upper Rhone River watershed case in Switzerland. Water Resour Manage 27:323–339CrossRef Rahman K, Maringanti C, Beniston M, Widmer F, Abbaspour K, Lehmann A (2013) Streamflow modeling in a highly managed mountainous glacier watershed using SWAT: the Upper Rhone River watershed case in Switzerland. Water Resour Manage 27:323–339CrossRef
go back to reference Rango A, Martinec J (1995) Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations. Water Resour Bull 31(4):657–669CrossRef Rango A, Martinec J (1995) Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations. Water Resour Bull 31(4):657–669CrossRef
go back to reference Rao NM, Bandopadhya BK, Verdhen A (1991) Snow hydrology studies in the Beas basin for developing snowmelt runoff model. J Institution of Engineers (I) 72 (CV3): 92-102 Rao NM, Bandopadhya BK, Verdhen A (1991) Snow hydrology studies in the Beas basin for developing snowmelt runoff model. J Institution of Engineers (I) 72 (CV3): 92-102
go back to reference Sensoy A, Uysal G (2012) The value of snow depletion forecasting methods towards operational snowmelt runoff estimation using MODIS and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Water Resour Manage 26:3415–3440. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0079-0 CrossRef Sensoy A, Uysal G (2012) The value of snow depletion forecasting methods towards operational snowmelt runoff estimation using MODIS and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Water Resour Manage 26:3415–3440. doi:10.​1007/​s11269-012-0079-0 CrossRef
go back to reference Shrestha AB, Aryal R (2011) Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalyan glaciers. Reg Environ Change 11(Suppl 1):S65–S77CrossRef Shrestha AB, Aryal R (2011) Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalyan glaciers. Reg Environ Change 11(Suppl 1):S65–S77CrossRef
go back to reference Sugawara M, Watanabe I, Ozaki E, Katsuyama Y (1984) Tank model with snow component. In: Research Note of the National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, N. 65,Tennodai, Japan Sugawara M, Watanabe I, Ozaki E, Katsuyama Y (1984) Tank model with snow component. In: Research Note of the National Research Center for Disaster Prevention, N. 65,Tennodai, Japan
go back to reference Sui J, Koehler G (2007) Impacts of snowmelt on peak flows in a forest watershed. Water Resour Manage 21(8):1263–1275CrossRef Sui J, Koehler G (2007) Impacts of snowmelt on peak flows in a forest watershed. Water Resour Manage 21(8):1263–1275CrossRef
go back to reference USACE (1956) Snow hydrology. In Summary report of the snow investigation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon USACE (1956) Snow hydrology. In Summary report of the snow investigation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon
go back to reference USACE (1975) User manual: SSARR model Stream-flow Synthesis and Reservoir Regulation. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon USACE (1975) User manual: SSARR model Stream-flow Synthesis and Reservoir Regulation. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers North Pacific Division, Portland, Oregon
go back to reference Verdhen A, Prasad T (1993) Snowmelt runoff simulation models and their suitability in Himalayan conditions. In: Young GJ (ed) Proc. of Kathmandu International Symposium on Snow and Glacier Hydrology. IAHS Publ 218:239–248 Verdhen A, Prasad T (1993) Snowmelt runoff simulation models and their suitability in Himalayan conditions. In: Young GJ (ed) Proc. of Kathmandu International Symposium on Snow and Glacier Hydrology. IAHS Publ 218:239–248
go back to reference Wang X, Messe AM (2005) Evaluation of the SWAT model’s snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed. Transactions of the ASAE 48(4):1–18CrossRef Wang X, Messe AM (2005) Evaluation of the SWAT model’s snowmelt hydrology in a northwestern Minnesota watershed. Transactions of the ASAE 48(4):1–18CrossRef
go back to reference Watson BM, Putz G (2012) Comparison of temperature-index snowmelt models for use within an operational water quality model. J Environmental Quality. doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0369 Watson BM, Putz G (2012) Comparison of temperature-index snowmelt models for use within an operational water quality model. J Environmental Quality. doi:10.​2134/​jeq2011.​0369
go back to reference Willis JC, Arnold NS, Brock BW (2002) Effect of snowpack removal on energy balance melt and runoff in small supra-glacial catchment. Hydrol Process 16:2721–2749CrossRef Willis JC, Arnold NS, Brock BW (2002) Effect of snowpack removal on energy balance melt and runoff in small supra-glacial catchment. Hydrol Process 16:2721–2749CrossRef
go back to reference WMO (1986) Inter-comparison of models of snowmelt. Operational Hydrology, WMO, Report no. 23, No. 646 WMO (1986) Inter-comparison of models of snowmelt. Operational Hydrology, WMO, Report no. 23, No. 646
Metadata
Title
Snowmelt Modelling Approaches in Watershed Models: Computation and Comparison of Efficiencies under Varying Climatic Conditions
Authors
Anand Verdhen
Bhagu R. Chahar
Om P. Sharma
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Water Resources Management / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0662-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Water Resources Management 11/2014 Go to the issue