Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Social Barriers to Innovation in Higher Education: Key Stakeholders’ Perception

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper the results of an ascertaining experiment are presented. The experiment took place in Samara State University of Economics, Russia. The purpose of this study was to determine the individual barriers to technological innovations within higher educational institutions and to find possible remedies that could overcome the resistance to innovation among key internal stakeholders of universities. The methodological approach taken in this study is a mixed methodology based on content analysis of students’ interviews and mathematical statistics. The cohort of students, who previously took part in the distance learning projects, was examined for their negative perceptions of technological innovations. The students’ responses were then analysed and, the factors that could block the innovation were selected. The data analysis revealed the prevalence of non-affective barriers over the affective ones. This study suggests that innovation managers, who are responsible for implementing distance learning at universities, should closely monitor social factors that could block innovative projects, and support sustainable communication process with the internal stakeholders.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Bower, E.A., Girard, D.E., Wessel, K., Becker, T.M., Choi, D.: Barriers to innovation in continuing medical education. J. Cont. Educ. Health Prof. 28(3), 148–156 (2008)CrossRef Bower, E.A., Girard, D.E., Wessel, K., Becker, T.M., Choi, D.: Barriers to innovation in continuing medical education. J. Cont. Educ. Health Prof. 28(3), 148–156 (2008)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chapleo, C., Simms, C.: Stakeholder analysis in higher education: a case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives 14(1), 12–20 (2010) Chapleo, C., Simms, C.: Stakeholder analysis in higher education: a case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives 14(1), 12–20 (2010)
3.
go back to reference Heckman, J.J., Rubinstein, Y.: The importance of non-cognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 145–149 (2001)CrossRef Heckman, J.J., Rubinstein, Y.: The importance of non-cognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(2), 145–149 (2001)CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hueske, A.K., Guenther, E.: What hampers innovation? External stakeholders, the organization, groups and individuals: a systematic review of empirical barrier research. Manag. Rev. Q. 65(2), 113–148 (2015)CrossRef Hueske, A.K., Guenther, E.: What hampers innovation? External stakeholders, the organization, groups and individuals: a systematic review of empirical barrier research. Manag. Rev. Q. 65(2), 113–148 (2015)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ilyuk, V.V.: The methodological approach to managing innovative project stakeholders. Prod. Org. 4(71), 38–55 (2016) Ilyuk, V.V.: The methodological approach to managing innovative project stakeholders. Prod. Org. 4(71), 38–55 (2016)
6.
go back to reference Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., Cakula, S.: Self-discipline as a key indicator to improve learning outcomes in e-learning environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 231, 256–262 (2016)CrossRef Gorbunovs, A., Kapenieks, A., Cakula, S.: Self-discipline as a key indicator to improve learning outcomes in e-learning environment. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 231, 256–262 (2016)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krskova, H., Breyer, Y., Baumann, C., Wood, L.: An exploration of university student perceptions of discipline: Introducing F.I.R.S.T. discipline principles. High. Educ. Skills Work Based Learn. 10(1), 61–82 (2019) Krskova, H., Breyer, Y., Baumann, C., Wood, L.: An exploration of university student perceptions of discipline: Introducing F.I.R.S.T. discipline principles. High. Educ. Skills Work Based Learn. 10(1), 61–82 (2019)
8.
go back to reference Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, Ľ., Dedze, I.: Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across Ten European Universities. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 55, 69–79 (2017)CrossRef Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, Ľ., Dedze, I.: Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across Ten European Universities. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 55, 69–79 (2017)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Martynova, I.A.: Development of oral reading fluency in foreign language through a blended course in a non-linguistic university. Kazan Pedag. 1(138), 128–135 (2020) Martynova, I.A.: Development of oral reading fluency in foreign language through a blended course in a non-linguistic university. Kazan Pedag. 1(138), 128–135 (2020)
10.
go back to reference Oxford, R.: Who are our students? A synthesis of foreign and second language research on individual differences with implications for instructional practice. TESL Canada J. 9(2), 30–49 (1992)CrossRef Oxford, R.: Who are our students? A synthesis of foreign and second language research on individual differences with implications for instructional practice. TESL Canada J. 9(2), 30–49 (1992)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oxford, R.L.: Language learning styles and strategies: concepts and relationships. Iral 41(4), 271–278 (2003)CrossRef Oxford, R.L.: Language learning styles and strategies: concepts and relationships. Iral 41(4), 271–278 (2003)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rahardjo, W., Juneman, S.Y.: Computer anxiety, academic stress, and academic procrastination on college students. J. Educ. Learn. 7(3), 147–152 (2013) Rahardjo, W., Juneman, S.Y.: Computer anxiety, academic stress, and academic procrastination on college students. J. Educ. Learn. 7(3), 147–152 (2013)
13.
go back to reference Serdyukov, P.: Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn. 10(1), 4–33 (2017)CrossRef Serdyukov, P.: Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? J. Res. Innov. Teach. Learn. 10(1), 4–33 (2017)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Watkins, M.: Discipline, consciousness and the formation of a scholarly habitus. Continuum 19(4), 545–557 (2005)CrossRef Watkins, M.: Discipline, consciousness and the formation of a scholarly habitus. Continuum 19(4), 545–557 (2005)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yaro, I., Arshad, R., Salleh, D.: Relevance of stakeholders in policy implementation. J. Public Manag. Res. 3(1), 1–16 (2017)CrossRef Yaro, I., Arshad, R., Salleh, D.: Relevance of stakeholders in policy implementation. J. Public Manag. Res. 3(1), 1–16 (2017)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Social Barriers to Innovation in Higher Education: Key Stakeholders’ Perception
Author
I. A. Martynova
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60926-9_7