1 Introduction
1.1 Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA)
1.2 Chocolate and its impacts
1.3 Related work: environmental and social assessments of chocolate production
1.4 Our chocolate case study and its local context
1.5 Contributions
2 Methods
2.1 Goal and scope definition
2.1.1 Goal definition
2.1.2 Scope definition

2.2 Life cycle inventory
2.2.1 Data collection procedures
2.2.2 Definition of inventory indicators and type of data required
2.2.3 Interview design and implementation
Stakeholder | Value-chain location | Number of people involved | Planned sample size | Number of people interviewed | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Workers | El Rosario farm—cocoa production | 67 (Luker Agrícola) + 103 (contract employees) | 23 employees | 16 employees | 2 interviewees from the managing staff and 2 contract workers |
Manufacturing plant—dark chocolate line only | 25 employees | 12 employees | 7 employees | Maintenance, warehouse, and mechanics personnel were not interviewed because they had no direct involvement with the product | |
Luker Chocolate headquarters | 23 administrative employees | 4 employees | 4 employees | Casa Luker’s CEO, the sustainability director, head of HR, and the sustainability coordinator were interviewed | |
Local community | Villages surrounding the farm | Number of families Caribia: 160 Limoncito: 168 Buenos Aires: 102 Alto Carito: 40 Guacamaya: 146 Gariton: 91 | 10 members of the community | 6 members of the community | The sample size was restricted due to safety concerns |
2.3 Life cycle impact assessment
2.3.1 Reference scale approach
2.3.2 Data processing procedure


2.4 Interpretation
3 Results
3.1 Stakeholder and subcategory selection
3.1.1 Social hotspots assessment

3.1.2 Comparison to materiality assessment
Stakeholder | Stakeholder characterization | Subcategory | |
---|---|---|---|
Luker Chocolate | Luker Agrícola | ||
Workers | Employees of the manufacturing plant in Bogotá (including administrative personnel) involved exclusively in the dark chocolate production lines | Employees of the farm “El Rosario” in Necoclí, Antioquia (including administrative personnel) and contract workers of the company “Agrícola El Poleo” | Child labor |
Fair salary | |||
Working hours | |||
Health and safety | |||
Equal opportunities/discrimination | |||
Social benefits/social security | |||
Employment relationship | |||
Society | Group of people involved with each other directly or indirectly, sharing the same geographical territory, here Colombia, subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations | Public commitments to sustainability issues | |
Prevention and mitigation of armed conflicts | |||
Corruption | |||
Poverty alleviation | |||
Local community | Communities surrounding the manufacturing plant in the city of Bogotá, which have direct contact with the company | Communities surrounding the farm “El Rosario” in the city of Necoclí, which have direct contact with the company (includes the villages: Caribia, Limoncito, Buenos Aires, Alto Carito, Guacamaya, and Gariton) | Delocalization and migration |
Cultural heritage | |||
Respect of indigenous rights | |||
Access to material resources | |||
Community engagement |
3.2 Inventory results
Impact subcategory | Indicator | Data collection method |
---|---|---|
Child labor | Absence of working children under the legal age of 15 years old (14 years old for developing economies) | Review of the human rights policy |
Records on all workers stating names and ages or dates of birth are kept on file | Review of the HR reports | |
Working children younger than 15 and under the local compulsory age are attending school | Visit to the facilities | |
Fair salary | The lowest-paid workers consider that their wages meet their needs | Interviews with workers |
Regular and documented payment of workers (weekly, bi-weekly) | Review of the wage records | |
Lowest-paid worker, compared to the minimum wage | Review of the wage records | |
Working hours | Number of hours effectively worked by employees (at each level of employment) | Review of the time records |
Number of holidays effectively used by employees (at each level of employment) | Review of the time records | |
Clear communication of working hours and overtime arrangements | Interviews with workers and coordinators | |
Health and safety | Number/percentage of injuries in the organization by job qualification within the company | Review of the company’s OSH reports |
The presence of a formal policy concerning health and safety | Review of the company’s OSH reports | |
Adequate general occupational safety measures are taken | Interviews with workers and coordinators | |
Equal opportunities/ discrimination | Presence of formal policies on equal opportunities | Review of the human rights policy |
Ratio of the basic salary of men to women by employee category | Review of the sustainability report and validation through review of the wage records | |
Social benefits/ social security | List and description of social benefits provided to the workers | Interviews with managers and workers |
Percentage of permanent workers receiving paid time off | Review of the attendance reports and contracts | |
Employment relationship | There is a written contract which defines the relationship between the employers and workers | Interviews with workers |
Impact subcategory | Indicator | Data collection method |
---|---|---|
Public commitment to sustainability issues | Presence of publicly available documents such as promises or agreements on sustainability issues | Review of the sustainability report |
Presence of mechanisms to follow-up the realization of promises | Interview with the sustainability director | |
The organization has pledged to comply with the Global Compact Principles and has engaged itself to present a yearly Communication on Progress (UNGC 2015) | Review of the sustainability report | |
Prevention and mitigation of armed conflicts | Organization’s role in the development of conflicts | Interviews with the sustainability director and local community members combined with further internet research |
Corruption | Formalized commitment of the organization to prevent corruption, referring to recognized standards (OECD et al. 2013) | Review of the human rights policy and the supplier relations policy |
The organization carries out an anti-corruption program | Interviews with the sustainability director and sales manager | |
The organization installs or co-operates with internal and external controls to prevent corruption | Interview with the sustainability director | |
Poverty alleviation | The organization carries out poverty alleviation programs, has an emergency management plan, training programs, and a recovery/restoration plan | Review of the sustainability report and an interview with the sustainability director |
Formalized commitment of the organization to reduce poverty | Review of the sustainability report and an interview with the sustainability director |
Impact subcategory | Indicator | Data collection method |
---|---|---|
Delocalization and migration | Strength of organizational procedures for integrating migrant workers into the community | Interviews with members of the local community and the sustainability director |
Cultural heritage | Strength of policies in place to protect cultural heritage | Interview with the sustainability director |
Presence/strength of an organizational program to include cultural heritage expression in product design/production | Interviews with members of the local community and the sustainability director | |
Respect of indigenous rights | Strength of policies in place to protect the rights of indigenous community members | Interview with the sustainability director |
Annual meetings held with the indigenous community members | Review of the Materiality Assessment and interviews with members of the local community | |
Access to material resources | Development of infrastructure with mutual community access and benefit | Review of the sustainability report and a site visit |
The existence of a certified environmental management system | Review of the human rights policy and the sustainability report | |
Community engagement | Diversity of the community stakeholder groups that engage with the organization | Review of the Materiality Assessment |
Number and quality of the meetings with community stakeholders | Review of the Materiality Assessment and interview with the sustainability director | |
Organizational support provided by the company (volunteer-hours or financial) for community initiatives | Interview with the regional sustainability coordinator |
3.2.1 Workers
3.2.2 Society
3.2.3 Local community
3.3 Social life cycle impact assessment and interpretation
3.3.1 Reference scale approach

3.3.2 Impact assessment results and interpretation
3.3.2.1 Workers

3.3.2.2 Society

3.3.2.3 Local community

4 Discussion
4.1 Primary findings
4.2 Limitations
5 Conclusions
-
Fair salary: The legal minimum wage in Colombia is not enough to cover the modest expenses of the families of Luker Chocolate’s lowest-paid employees. This is particularly evident in Necoclí, where workers often are the only source of income in their households and are affected by volatile food price fluctuations, but constant wages. Therefore, we recommend an analysis of regional economic changes and appropriate measures to counteract the economic instability suffered by workers as a result of external changes. Beyond an increase in salaries, further beneficial measures could include a subsidized lunch service at the farm restaurant or transportation subsidies in line with current prices.
-
Working hours: The need for extra resources serves as a motivation to work the maximum allowed overtime hours. Although a voluntary decision, it is underpinned by a need. Hence, it is recommended to pursue strategies to address the core need, so that workers have the time to take care of themselves and their families. Furthermore, the allegations of non-documentation of extra hours in the cocoa plantation need to be investigated.
-
Equal opportunities/discrimination: Women employees highlighted three main reasons why women are underrepresented in Luker Agrícola’s workforce: (1) most of the work is more suitable for men; (2) the villages do not have a place where they can leave their children, so only the husband can go to work; and (3) due to transportation reasons, as the farm is very far away and the roads are not good, which hinders the access to work. Strategies addressing the latter two points should be developed. To further promote gender equality in a sector heavily influenced by a male-dominated workforce, it is recommended that the gender pay gap is measured by the company.
-
Employment relationship: To strengthen the organization’s relations with its employees, it is advisable to reactivate the feedback rounds, thus promoting spaces dedicated to the exchange and generating valuable insights that can be used for the development of internal engagement projects.