Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2019

10-08-2018

Social Robots and Seniors: A Comparative Study on the Influence of Dynamic Social Features on Human–Robot Interaction

Authors: Christina Moro, Shayne Lin, Goldie Nejat, Alex Mihailidis

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Due to the world’s aging demographics and declining caregiver-to-senior ratio, socially assistive robots are being designed to assist seniors with activities of daily living. Beyond functionality, the integration of such robots also depends on the quality of the interaction between the robot and senior, including the provision of social support. Our research investigates the effectiveness of robot social features on human–robot interaction (HRI) with seniors when providing assistance. Specifically, we investigate how the dynamic social features of a robot, such as facial expressions and gestures, affect the interaction experience of cognitively impaired seniors during an assistive activity. In this paper, we present a comparative HRI study of seniors living with mild cognitive impairments preparing a cup of tea with the assistance from three different embodiments with varying social features. In particular, the platforms considered were a human-like robot, a character-like robot, and a tablet display. Our results show that a human-like robot having an expressive face and arm gestures significantly increased levels of engagement, positive affect, and perceived social intelligence during the interaction when compared to the other two platforms. Furthermore, even though all platforms had the same activity assistance functionality, participants preferred the human-like robot, treated it like a companion, perceived it to be more useful, and were more inclined to keep it in social or private areas in their homes. No statistically significant differences were found between interactions with the character-like robot and the tablet.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Population Division of the United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision Population Division of the United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision
2.
go back to reference Government of Canada (2005) Canada’s Aging Population Government of Canada (2005) Canada’s Aging Population
3.
go back to reference Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRef Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Boger J, Quraishi M, Turcotte N, Dunal L (2014) The identification of assistive technologies being used to support the daily occupations of community-dwelling older adults with dementia: a cross-sectional pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 9(1):17–30CrossRef Boger J, Quraishi M, Turcotte N, Dunal L (2014) The identification of assistive technologies being used to support the daily occupations of community-dwelling older adults with dementia: a cross-sectional pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 9(1):17–30CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mitzner TL et al (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1710–1721CrossRef Mitzner TL et al (2010) Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1710–1721CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rashidi P, Mihailidis A (2013) A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 17(3):579–590CrossRef Rashidi P, Mihailidis A (2013) A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 17(3):579–590CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pollack ME (2005) Intelligent technology for an aging population. The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. Am Assoc Artif Intell 26(2):9–24 Pollack ME (2005) Intelligent technology for an aging population. The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. Am Assoc Artif Intell 26(2):9–24
8.
go back to reference Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2006) Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int J ARM 7(3):33–43 Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2006) Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int J ARM 7(3):33–43
9.
go back to reference Fasola BJ, Mataric MJ (2012) Using socially assistive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proc IEEE 100(8):2512–2526CrossRef Fasola BJ, Mataric MJ (2012) Using socially assistive human–robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proc IEEE 100(8):2512–2526CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tapus A, Mataric M, Scassellati B (2007) Socially assistive robotics: the grand challenges in helping humans through social interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):35–42CrossRef Tapus A, Mataric M, Scassellati B (2007) Socially assistive robotics: the grand challenges in helping humans through social interaction. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):35–42CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40CrossRef Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14(1):27–40CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bemelmans R, Jan G, Jonker P, De Witte L (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13(2):114–120CrossRef Bemelmans R, Jan G, Jonker P, De Witte L (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13(2):114–120CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Flandorfer P (2012) Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int J Popul Res 2012:1–13CrossRef Flandorfer P (2012) Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int J Popul Res 2012:1–13CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Louie W-YG, Li J, Vaquero T, Nejat G (2014) A focus group study on the design considerations and impressions of a socially assistive robot for long-term care. In: ROMAN: the 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 237–242 Louie W-YG, Li J, Vaquero T, Nejat G (2014) A focus group study on the design considerations and impressions of a socially assistive robot for long-term care. In: ROMAN: the 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 237–242
15.
go back to reference McColl D, Louie W-YG, Nejat G (2013) Brian 2.1: a socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 20(1):74–83CrossRef McColl D, Louie W-YG, Nejat G (2013) Brian 2.1: a socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 20(1):74–83CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Begum M, Huq R, Wang R, Mihailidis A (2015) Collaboration of an assistive robot and older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology 13(4):405–419CrossRef Begum M, Huq R, Wang R, Mihailidis A (2015) Collaboration of an assistive robot and older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology 13(4):405–419CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coradeschi S et al (2013) GiraffPlus: combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living. In: The 6th international conference on human system interactions, pp 578–585 Coradeschi S et al (2013) GiraffPlus: combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living. In: The 6th international conference on human system interactions, pp 578–585
18.
go back to reference VGo Communications Inc. (2013) What is VGo. VGo VGo Communications Inc. (2013) What is VGo. VGo
19.
20.
go back to reference Louie W-Y, Li J, Mohamed C, Despond F, Lee V, Nejat G (2015) Tangy the robot bingo facilitator: a performance review. J Med Device 9(2):8–10 Louie W-Y, Li J, Mohamed C, Despond F, Lee V, Nejat G (2015) Tangy the robot bingo facilitator: a performance review. J Med Device 9(2):8–10
21.
go back to reference Johnson DO et al (2014) Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent living. Int J Soc Robot 6(2):195–211CrossRef Johnson DO et al (2014) Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent living. Int J Soc Robot 6(2):195–211CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric MJ (2009) The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 924–929 Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric MJ (2009) The use of socially assistive robots in the design of intelligent cognitive therapies for people with dementia. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 924–929
23.
go back to reference Mast M et al (2015) Design of the human–robot interaction for a semi-autonomous service robot to assist elderly people. In: Ambient assisted living. Advanced technologies and societal change. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–29 Mast M et al (2015) Design of the human–robot interaction for a semi-autonomous service robot to assist elderly people. In: Ambient assisted living. Advanced technologies and societal change. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–29
24.
go back to reference Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. In: ROMAN: the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 55–60 Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human–robot cooperation. In: ROMAN: the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 55–60
25.
go back to reference Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Koay KL (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots 24(2):159–178CrossRef Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, te Boekhorst R, Koay KL (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robots 24(2):159–178CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Woods SN, Walters ML, Koay KL (2007) Looking good? Appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance. In: AAAI Spring symposium: multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics, pp 86–92 Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Woods SN, Walters ML, Koay KL (2007) Looking good? Appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance. In: AAAI Spring symposium: multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics, pp 86–92
27.
go back to reference Wu Y, Fassert C, Rigaud A (2012) Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 54(1):121–126CrossRef Wu Y, Fassert C, Rigaud A (2012) Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 54(1):121–126CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lee KM, Jung Y, Kim J, Kim SR (2006) Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(10):962–973CrossRef Lee KM, Jung Y, Kim J, Kim SR (2006) Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(10):962–973CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric M (2009) The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments. In: ROMAN: the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 103–107 Tapus A, Tapus C, Mataric M (2009) The role of physical embodiment of a therapist robot for individuals with cognitive impairments. In: ROMAN: the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 103–107
30.
go back to reference Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, p 145 Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, p 145
31.
go back to reference Kose-Bagci H, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Adv Robot 23(14):1951–1996CrossRef Kose-Bagci H, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Adv Robot 23(14):1951–1996CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Looije R, Neerincx MA, Cnossen F (2010) Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(6):386–397CrossRef Looije R, Neerincx MA, Cnossen F (2010) Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(6):386–397CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zhang T, Kaber DB, Zhu B, Swangnetr M, Mosaly P, Hodge L (2010) Service robot feature design effects on user perceptions and emotional responses. Intell Serv Robot 3(2):73–88CrossRef Zhang T, Kaber DB, Zhu B, Swangnetr M, Mosaly P, Hodge L (2010) Service robot feature design effects on user perceptions and emotional responses. Intell Serv Robot 3(2):73–88CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo I-H, Li X, Broadbent E (2015) People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Hum Behav 43:112–117CrossRef Mann JA, MacDonald BA, Kuo I-H, Li X, Broadbent E (2015) People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput Hum Behav 43:112–117CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1480):679–704CrossRef Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1480):679–704CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, Rigaud A (2015) ‘Are we ready for robots that care for us?’ Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci 7:1–15CrossRef Pino M, Boulay M, Jouen F, Rigaud A (2015) ‘Are we ready for robots that care for us?’ Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci 7:1–15CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Robot therapy in a care house—change of relationship among the residents and seal robot during a 2-month long study. In: ROMAN: the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 107–112 Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Robot therapy in a care house—change of relationship among the residents and seal robot during a 2-month long study. In: ROMAN: the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 107–112
38.
go back to reference Sabanovic S, Bennett CC, Chang W-L, Huber L (2013) PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–6 Sabanovic S, Bennett CC, Chang W-L, Huber L (2013) PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–6
39.
go back to reference Pollack ME, Engberg S, Matthews JT, Dunbar-Jacob J, McCarthy CE, Thrun S (2002) Pearl: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In: Proceedings of workshop automation as caregiver: the role of intelligent technology in elder care, pp 85–91 Pollack ME, Engberg S, Matthews JT, Dunbar-Jacob J, McCarthy CE, Thrun S (2002) Pearl: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In: Proceedings of workshop automation as caregiver: the role of intelligent technology in elder care, pp 85–91
40.
go back to reference Louie W-YG, McColl D, Nejat G (2012) Playing a memory game with a socially assistive robot: a case study at a long-term care facility. In: ROMAN: the 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 345–350 Louie W-YG, McColl D, Nejat G (2012) Playing a memory game with a socially assistive robot: a case study at a long-term care facility. In: ROMAN: the 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 345–350
41.
go back to reference Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 37–44 Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 37–44
42.
go back to reference Werner K, Oberzaucher J, Werner F (2012) Evaluation of human robot interaction factors of a socially assistive robot together with older people. In: The 6th international conference on complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems, pp 455–460 Werner K, Oberzaucher J, Werner F (2012) Evaluation of human robot interaction factors of a socially assistive robot together with older people. In: The 6th international conference on complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems, pp 455–460
43.
go back to reference Li J, Louie W-YG, Mohamed S, Despond F, Nejat G (2016) A user-study with tangy the bingo facilitating robot and long-term care residents. In: IEEE international symposium on robotics and intelligent sensors (IRIS), pp 109–115 Li J, Louie W-YG, Mohamed S, Despond F, Nejat G (2016) A user-study with tangy the bingo facilitating robot and long-term care residents. In: IEEE international symposium on robotics and intelligent sensors (IRIS), pp 109–115
44.
go back to reference Fischinger D et al (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Rob Auton Syst 75:60–78CrossRef Fischinger D et al (2016) Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: first prototype and lessons learned. Rob Auton Syst 75:60–78CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Rae I, Takayama L, Mutlu B (2013) In-body experiences: embodiment, control, and trust in robot-mediated communication. In: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1921–1930 Rae I, Takayama L, Mutlu B (2013) In-body experiences: embodiment, control, and trust in robot-mediated communication. In: SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1921–1930
46.
go back to reference Bovbel P, Nejat G (2014) Casper: an assistive kitchen robot to promote aging in place1. J Med Dev 8(3):30945CrossRef Bovbel P, Nejat G (2014) Casper: an assistive kitchen robot to promote aging in place1. J Med Dev 8(3):30945CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Autonomous Systems and Biomechatronics Lab (2013) Casper—socially assistive humanoid robot. Youtube Autonomous Systems and Biomechatronics Lab (2013) Casper—socially assistive humanoid robot. Youtube
49.
go back to reference Begum M, Wang R, Huq R, Mihailidis A (2013) Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: the role of an assistive robot. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–8 Begum M, Wang R, Huq R, Mihailidis A (2013) Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: the role of an assistive robot. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–8
50.
go back to reference Cepstral—IVR/Telephony system TTS software. Cepstral (2015) Cepstral—IVR/Telephony system TTS software. Cepstral (2015)
51.
go back to reference McColl D, Nejat G (2013) Meal-time with a socially assistive robot and older adults at a long-term care facility. J Hum Robot Interact 2(1):152–171CrossRef McColl D, Nejat G (2013) Meal-time with a socially assistive robot and older adults at a long-term care facility. J Hum Robot Interact 2(1):152–171CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Czarnuch S, Mihailidis A (2011) The design of intelligent in-home assistive technologies: assessing the needs of older adults with dementia and their caregivers. Gerontechnology 10(3):169–182CrossRef Czarnuch S, Mihailidis A (2011) The design of intelligent in-home assistive technologies: assessing the needs of older adults with dementia and their caregivers. Gerontechnology 10(3):169–182CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Mihailidis A, Boger JN, Craig T, Hoey J (2008) The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: an efficacy study. BMC Geriatr 8(1):28CrossRef Mihailidis A, Boger JN, Craig T, Hoey J (2008) The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: an efficacy study. BMC Geriatr 8(1):28CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Nasreddine ZS et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):695–699CrossRef Nasreddine ZS et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):695–699CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Gill DJ, Freshman A, Blender JA, Ravina B (2008) The Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 23(7):1043–1046CrossRef Gill DJ, Freshman A, Blender JA, Ravina B (2008) The Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 23(7):1043–1046CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C (2007) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry 52(5):329–332CrossRef Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C (2007) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. Can J Psychiatry 52(5):329–332CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Hoops S et al (2009) Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology 73(21):1738–1745CrossRef Hoops S et al (2009) Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology 73(21):1738–1745CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S (2006) A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3972–3976 Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S (2006) A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3972–3976
59.
go back to reference Philips Research. Koninklijke Philips N.V. (2017) Philips Research. Koninklijke Philips N.V. (2017)
60.
go back to reference Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) (2015) Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) (2015)
61.
go back to reference Information and Robot Technology Research Initiative—University of Tokyo (2008) Information and Robot Technology Research Initiative—University of Tokyo (2008)
62.
63.
64.
go back to reference Nexi—Personal Robots Group. Personal Robotics Group (2015) Nexi—Personal Robots Group. Personal Robotics Group (2015)
65.
go back to reference T. Laboratory (2013) Whole-body emotional expression robot. Waseda University T. Laboratory (2013) Whole-body emotional expression robot. Waseda University
66.
go back to reference Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratory. Telenoid. Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR) Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratory. Telenoid. Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR)
67.
go back to reference Steinfeld A et al (2006) Common metrics for human–robot interaction. In: ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, pp 33–40 Steinfeld A et al (2006) Common metrics for human–robot interaction. In: ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, pp 33–40
68.
go back to reference Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2016) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 58(3):377–400CrossRef Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2016) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 58(3):377–400CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Fox JE (1996) The effects of information accuracy on user trust and compliance. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems common ground—CHI’96, pp 35–36 Fox JE (1996) The effects of information accuracy on user trust and compliance. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems common ground—CHI’96, pp 35–36
70.
go back to reference Mukhamejanova Z, Korbo KL (2015) Consumer emotional response as a predictor of preferences: a case of hotel style design. University of Stavanger, Norway Mukhamejanova Z, Korbo KL (2015) Consumer emotional response as a predictor of preferences: a case of hotel style design. University of Stavanger, Norway
71.
go back to reference Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Marx MS (2009) Engagement in persons with dementia: the concept and its measurement. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17(4):299–307CrossRef Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Marx MS (2009) Engagement in persons with dementia: the concept and its measurement. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17(4):299–307CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Rich C, Ponsler B, Holroyd A, Sidner CL (2010) Recognizing engagement in human–robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 375–382 Rich C, Ponsler B, Holroyd A, Sidner CL (2010) Recognizing engagement in human–robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 375–382
73.
go back to reference Freedy A, DeVisser E, Weltman G, Coeyman N (2007) Measurement of trust in human–robot collaboration. In: International symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, pp 106–114 Freedy A, DeVisser E, Weltman G, Coeyman N (2007) Measurement of trust in human–robot collaboration. In: International symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, pp 106–114
74.
go back to reference Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, de Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527CrossRef Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, de Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human–robot interaction. Hum Factors 53(5):517–527CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(6):1122–1131CrossRef Isen AM, Daubman KA, Nowicki GP (1987) Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(6):1122–1131CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Morris D (1981) Gestures: their origins and distribution. Stein & Day Publishing, New York Morris D (1981) Gestures: their origins and distribution. Stein & Day Publishing, New York
77.
go back to reference Dautenhahn K (2003) Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica 21(4):443–452CrossRef Dautenhahn K (2003) Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica 21(4):443–452CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Kendon A (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol (Amst) 26(1):22–63CrossRef Kendon A (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol (Amst) 26(1):22–63CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):361–375CrossRef Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):361–375CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Louise Barriball K, While A (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs 19(2):328–335CrossRef Louise Barriball K, While A (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs 19(2):328–335CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Friedman M (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32(200):675–701MATHCrossRef Friedman M (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 32(200):675–701MATHCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(1–2):119–155CrossRef Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(1–2):119–155CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Kahn PH et al (2008) Design patterns for sociality in human–robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 97–104 Kahn PH et al (2008) Design patterns for sociality in human–robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 97–104
84.
go back to reference de Ruyter B, Saini P, Markopoulos P, van Breemen A (2005) Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interact Comput 17(5):522–541CrossRef de Ruyter B, Saini P, Markopoulos P, van Breemen A (2005) Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interact Comput 17(5):522–541CrossRef
85.
go back to reference Andrist S, Tan XZ, Gleicher M, Mutlu B (2014) Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 25–32 Andrist S, Tan XZ, Gleicher M, Mutlu B (2014) Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 25–32
86.
go back to reference Smarr C-A, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzner TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2012) Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 56(1):153–157CrossRef Smarr C-A, Prakash A, Beer JM, Mitzner TL, Kemp CC, Rogers WA (2012) Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 56(1):153–157CrossRef
87.
go back to reference Lee JD, See KA, City I (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors Ergon Soc 46(1):50–80CrossRef Lee JD, See KA, City I (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Factors Ergon Soc 46(1):50–80CrossRef
88.
go back to reference Wang Y (2014) Gendering human–robot interaction: exploring how a person’s gender impacts attitudes toward and interaction with robots. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba Wang Y (2014) Gendering human–robot interaction: exploring how a person’s gender impacts attitudes toward and interaction with robots. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba
Metadata
Title
Social Robots and Seniors: A Comparative Study on the Influence of Dynamic Social Features on Human–Robot Interaction
Authors
Christina Moro
Shayne Lin
Goldie Nejat
Alex Mihailidis
Publication date
10-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0488-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal of Social Robotics 1/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partners