Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Software to Determine the Readability of Written Documents by Implementing a Variation of the Gunning Fog Index Using the Google Linguistic Corpus

Authors : Luis Carlos Rodríguez Timaná, Diego Fernando Saavedra Lozano, Javier Ferney Castillo García

Published in: Applied Technologies

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In English linguistics the Gunning Fog Index is used to determine the readability of texts. This methodology isn’t as effective in the Spanish language because the complexity of words isn’t determined by the number of syllables, unlike what happens in English. Therefore, a software was developed that allows us to estimate the readability of an academic text written in Spanish in a quantitative way. This software allows to compare the traditional methodology of the Gunning fog index and a modification to it, using the corpus linguistics for the Spanish language, based on thousands of texts digitized by Google, where the frequency of use of certain words is related. Texts produced by students from first to last semester were evaluated. Each text was subjected to the Gunning fog index assessment methodology and the corpus methodology, changing the percentage of complex words to the percentage of unknown words. In the evaluation of first semester texts it was found that the average fog index was 29.25, and an average of 37.9 complex words, for these same texts was found a modified fog index of 18.62 and 5.1 unknown words. On the other hand, for the evaluation of the texts produced in the last semester, the average fog index was 27.55 and an average of 51.4 complex words, with the modified fog index was an average of 15.08 and 7.1 unknown words. With this study, aspects related to the best use of punctuation marks and the increase of vocabulary related to the profession can be identified in a quantitative way.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferrando Belart, V.: La legibilidad: un factor fundamental para comprender un texto. Aten. Primaria 34(3), 143–146 (2004)CrossRef Ferrando Belart, V.: La legibilidad: un factor fundamental para comprender un texto. Aten. Primaria 34(3), 143–146 (2004)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brucker, C.: Arkansas tech writing. English 2053(June), 109 (2009) Brucker, C.: Arkansas tech writing. English 2053(June), 109 (2009)
3.
go back to reference Mata San Juan, H.: Herramienta de análisis de legibilidad de contenidos educativos. Graduate theses, Departamento de Informática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2017) Mata San Juan, H.: Herramienta de análisis de legibilidad de contenidos educativos. Graduate theses, Departamento de Informática, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2017)
4.
go back to reference Frías Delgado, A.: Distribución De Frecuencias De La Longitud De Las Palabras En Español. A Survey of corpus-based Research, pp. 756–770 (2009) Frías Delgado, A.: Distribución De Frecuencias De La Longitud De Las Palabras En Español. A Survey of corpus-based Research, pp. 756–770 (2009)
6.
go back to reference Pitkowski, E.F., Vásquez Gamarra, J.: Tinkuy Boletin de investigación y debate. El uso los corpus lingüísticos como Herram. pedagógica para la enseñanza y Aprendiz. ELE*, no. 11, pp. 31–51 (2005) Pitkowski, E.F., Vásquez Gamarra, J.: Tinkuy Boletin de investigación y debate. El uso los corpus lingüísticos como Herram. pedagógica para la enseñanza y Aprendiz. ELE*, no. 11, pp. 31–51 (2005)
7.
go back to reference Mac Lean, A.: Comunicacion Escrita, pp. 5–17 (1975) Mac Lean, A.: Comunicacion Escrita, pp. 5–17 (1975)
8.
go back to reference Zamanian, M., Heydari, P.: Readability of texts: state of the art. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 2(1), 43–53 (2012)CrossRef Zamanian, M., Heydari, P.: Readability of texts: state of the art. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 2(1), 43–53 (2012)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Felipe Ovares, B., José Alberto, R.B.: Variación del Índice de Niebla Usando un Corpus Obtenido a Partir de los Libros Digitalizados por Google (2010) Felipe Ovares, B., José Alberto, R.B.: Variación del Índice de Niebla Usando un Corpus Obtenido a Partir de los Libros Digitalizados por Google (2010)
10.
go back to reference Barrio-Cantalejo, I.M., Simón-Lorda, P., Melguizo, M., Escalona, I., Marijuán, M.I., Hernando, P.: Validación de la escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 31(2), 135–152 (2008)CrossRef Barrio-Cantalejo, I.M., Simón-Lorda, P., Melguizo, M., Escalona, I., Marijuán, M.I., Hernando, P.: Validación de la escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 31(2), 135–152 (2008)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang, L.W., Miller, M.J., Schmitt, M.R., Wen, F.K.: Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 9(5), 503–516 (2013)CrossRef Wang, L.W., Miller, M.J., Schmitt, M.R., Wen, F.K.: Assessing readability formula differences with written health information materials: application, results, and recommendations. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 9(5), 503–516 (2013)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Navarro-Royo, C., Monteagudo-Piqueras, O., Rodríquez-Suárez, L., Valentín-López, B., García-Caballero, J.: Legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado del hospital La Paz. Rev. Calid. Asist. 17(6), 331–336 (2002)CrossRef Navarro-Royo, C., Monteagudo-Piqueras, O., Rodríquez-Suárez, L., Valentín-López, B., García-Caballero, J.: Legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado del hospital La Paz. Rev. Calid. Asist. 17(6), 331–336 (2002)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Simón Lorda, P., Barrio Cantalejo, I.M., Carro, L.C.: Legibilidad de los formularios escritos de consentimiento informado (1996) Simón Lorda, P., Barrio Cantalejo, I.M., Carro, L.C.: Legibilidad de los formularios escritos de consentimiento informado (1996)
14.
go back to reference Blanco Pérez, A., Gutiérrez Couto, U.: Legibilidad de las páginas web sobre salud dirigidas a pacientes y lectores de la población general. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 76(4), 321–331 (2002)CrossRef Blanco Pérez, A., Gutiérrez Couto, U.: Legibilidad de las páginas web sobre salud dirigidas a pacientes y lectores de la población general. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 76(4), 321–331 (2002)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fitzsimmons, P.R., Michael, B.D., Hulley, J.L., Scott, G.O.: A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. J. R. Coll. Phys. Edinb. 40(4), 292–296 (2010)CrossRef Fitzsimmons, P.R., Michael, B.D., Hulley, J.L., Scott, G.O.: A readability assessment of online Parkinson’s disease information. J. R. Coll. Phys. Edinb. 40(4), 292–296 (2010)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Friedman, D.B., Hoffman-Goetz, L.: A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Heal. Educ. Behav. 33(3), 352–373 (2006)CrossRef Friedman, D.B., Hoffman-Goetz, L.: A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Heal. Educ. Behav. 33(3), 352–373 (2006)CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Svider, P.F., et al.: Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am. J. Otolaryngol. - Head Neck Med. Surg. 34(1), 31–35 (2013) Svider, P.F., et al.: Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am. J. Otolaryngol. - Head Neck Med. Surg. 34(1), 31–35 (2013)
18.
go back to reference Badarudeen, S., Sabharwal, S.: Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(10), 2572–2580 (2010)CrossRef Badarudeen, S., Sabharwal, S.: Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(10), 2572–2580 (2010)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference O’Mahony, M.P., Smyth, B.: Using readability tests to predict helpful product reviews (2010) O’Mahony, M.P., Smyth, B.: Using readability tests to predict helpful product reviews (2010)
20.
go back to reference Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N.S., Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decis. Support Syst. 52(3), 674–684 (2012)CrossRef Hu, N., Bose, I., Koh, N.S., Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: an analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. Decis. Support Syst. 52(3), 674–684 (2012)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Seely, J.: Oxford Guide to Effective Writing and Speaking: How to Communicate Clearly (2013) Seely, J.: Oxford Guide to Effective Writing and Speaking: How to Communicate Clearly (2013)
22.
go back to reference Aluisio, S., Specia, L., Gasperin, C., Scarton, C.: Readability Assessment for Text Simplification (2010) Aluisio, S., Specia, L., Gasperin, C., Scarton, C.: Readability Assessment for Text Simplification (2010)
23.
go back to reference Montemurro, M.A.: Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics. Phys. A 300, 567–578 (2001)CrossRef Montemurro, M.A.: Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in quantitative linguistics. Phys. A 300, 567–578 (2001)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Michel, J.-B., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)CrossRef Michel, J.-B., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pechenick, E.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Characterizing the Google Books corpus: strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0137041 (2015)CrossRef Pechenick, E.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Characterizing the Google Books corpus: strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0137041 (2015)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Software to Determine the Readability of Written Documents by Implementing a Variation of the Gunning Fog Index Using the Google Linguistic Corpus
Authors
Luis Carlos Rodríguez Timaná
Diego Fernando Saavedra Lozano
Javier Ferney Castillo García
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42517-3_31

Premium Partner