Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Production Engineering 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Production Management

Solving multi-criteria problems under risk: an approach explained using the example of rescheduling in dynamic environments

Authors: N. Stricker, R. Kopf, G. Lanza

Published in: Production Engineering | Issue 4/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is a decent number of possible heuristic methods to solve an actual problem in production planning and control. Usually, each solving method leads to a different alternative. In dynamic production environments, decision makers often have to decide between uncertainty and risk. Making multi-criteria decisions under risk is a well-known problem. In this paper, we will consider rescheduling as an example for decision-making in a dynamic production environment. It is used to present an intelligent manufacturing approach for multi-criteria decisions under risk that combines a method for decision-making under risk and a multi-attribute decision-making method. Moreover, for frequently appearing problems, such as rescheduling, a procedure to evaluate the used solving methods is presented. We use this information to achieve a sustainable improvement for the solving procedure of future manufacturing problems.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Aytug H et al (2005) Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: a review and some future directions. Eur J Oper Res 161:86–110CrossRefMATHMathSciNet Aytug H et al (2005) Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: a review and some future directions. Eur J Oper Res 161:86–110CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
2.
go back to reference Blohm H, Lüder K, Schaefer C (2012) Investition –Schwachstellen-analyse des Investitionsbereichs und Investitionsrechnung. Vahlen, Franz, München Blohm H, Lüder K, Schaefer C (2012) Investition –Schwachstellen-analyse des Investitionsbereichs und Investitionsrechnung. Vahlen, Franz, München
3.
go back to reference Butler J, Jia J, Dyer J (1997) Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur J Oper Res 103:531–546CrossRefMATH Butler J, Jia J, Dyer J (1997) Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur J Oper Res 103:531–546CrossRefMATH
4.
go back to reference Götze U (2008) Investitionsrechnung - Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Götze U (2008) Investitionsrechnung - Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
5.
go back to reference Guitouni A, Martel J (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Oper Res 109:501–521CrossRefMATH Guitouni A, Martel J (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Oper Res 109:501–521CrossRefMATH
6.
go back to reference Herroelen W, Leus R (2005) Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. Eur J Oper Res 165:289–306CrossRefMATH Herroelen W, Leus R (2005) Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. Eur J Oper Res 165:289–306CrossRefMATH
7.
go back to reference Horn J (1997) Multicriterion decision making. Handbook of evolutionary computation. Oxford, IOP Publishing and Oxford University Press, pp F1.9:1–F1.9:15 Horn J (1997) Multicriterion decision making. Handbook of evolutionary computation. Oxford, IOP Publishing and Oxford University Press, pp F1.9:1–F1.9:15
8.
go back to reference Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATH Hwang C, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATH
9.
go back to reference Katragjini K, Vallada E, Ruiz R (2013) Flow shop rescheduling under different types of disruption. Int J Prod Res 51(3):780–797CrossRef Katragjini K, Vallada E, Ruiz R (2013) Flow shop rescheduling under different types of disruption. Int J Prod Res 51(3):780–797CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kempf K, Uzsoy R, Smith S, Garty K (2000) Evaluation and comparison of production schedules. Comput Ind 42:203–220CrossRef Kempf K, Uzsoy R, Smith S, Garty K (2000) Evaluation and comparison of production schedules. Comput Ind 42:203–220CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Laaribi A, Chevallier J, Martel J (1996) A spatial decision aid—a multicriterion evaluation approach. Comput Environ Urban Syst 20(6):351–366CrossRef Laaribi A, Chevallier J, Martel J (1996) A spatial decision aid—a multicriterion evaluation approach. Comput Environ Urban Syst 20(6):351–366CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Matos M (2007) Decision under risk as a multicriteria problem. Eur J Oper Res 181:1516–1529CrossRefMATH Matos M (2007) Decision under risk as a multicriteria problem. Eur J Oper Res 181:1516–1529CrossRefMATH
13.
go back to reference Roy B, Bouyssou D (1991) Decision-aid: an elementary introduction with emphasis on multiple criteria. Investigación Operativa 2:95–110 Roy B, Bouyssou D (1991) Decision-aid: an elementary introduction with emphasis on multiple criteria. Investigación Operativa 2:95–110
15.
go back to reference Ude J (2010) Entscheidungsunterstützung für die Konfiguration globaler Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke: Ein Bewertungsansatz unter Berücksichtigung multikriterieller Zielsysteme, Dynamik und Unsicherheit. Shaker, Aachen Ude J (2010) Entscheidungsunterstützung für die Konfiguration globaler Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke: Ein Bewertungsansatz unter Berücksichtigung multikriterieller Zielsysteme, Dynamik und Unsicherheit. Shaker, Aachen
16.
go back to reference Vieira G, Herrmann J, Lin E (2003) Rescheduling manufacturing systems—a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. J Sched 6:39–62CrossRefMATHMathSciNet Vieira G, Herrmann J, Lin E (2003) Rescheduling manufacturing systems—a framework of strategies, policies, and methods. J Sched 6:39–62CrossRefMATHMathSciNet
Metadata
Title
Solving multi-criteria problems under risk: an approach explained using the example of rescheduling in dynamic environments
Authors
N. Stricker
R. Kopf
G. Lanza
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Production Engineering / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Electronic ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0556-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Production Engineering 4/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partners