Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. Stakeholders as Uncertainty Sources

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

LEPs are not defined once and for all, rather they are shaped progressively from an initial concept by the dialectical interaction of stakeholders (Arrto et al. 2008; Miller and Lessard 2001), and hence specific attention should be devoted by management to the attitude of the various stakeholders. It should also be noted that the dialectical interaction of the stakeholders may generate unpredictable consequences (Cooke-Davies et al. 2007) and changes of stakeholders’ interests may result in the re-planning of the project (Soderholm 2008).

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference A. Al Khattab, J. Anchor, E. Davies, Managerial perceptions of political risk in international projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 25, 734–743 (2007)CrossRef A. Al Khattab, J. Anchor, E. Davies, Managerial perceptions of political risk in international projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 25, 734–743 (2007)CrossRef
go back to reference K. Artto, J. Kujala, P. Dietrich, M. Martinsuo, What is project strategy. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 4–12 (2008)CrossRef K. Artto, J. Kujala, P. Dietrich, M. Martinsuo, What is project strategy. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 4–12 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference R. Atkinson, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Project Manage. 17(6), 337–342 (1999)CrossRef R. Atkinson, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Project Manage. 17(6), 337–342 (1999)CrossRef
go back to reference D. Baccarini, The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Manage. J. 30(4), 25–32 (1999) D. Baccarini, The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Manage. J. 30(4), 25–32 (1999)
go back to reference P. L. Bannerman, Defining success: a multilevel framework. in Proceedings PMI Research Conference 2008, Warsaw, Project Management Institute, (2008) P. L. Bannerman, Defining success: a multilevel framework. in Proceedings PMI Research Conference 2008, Warsaw, Project Management Institute, (2008)
go back to reference F. Caron, F. Marini, F. Salvatori, Improving value with a risk based approach to stakeholder management. in Proceedings of SAVE international 50th annual conference, Long Beach, CA, 7–10 June, pp. 1–11, 2010 F. Caron, F. Marini, F. Salvatori, Improving value with a risk based approach to stakeholder management. in Proceedings of SAVE international 50th annual conference, Long Beach, CA, 7–10 June, pp. 1–11, 2010
go back to reference A.P.C. Chan, A.P.L. Chan, Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: Int. J. 11(2), 203–221, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd A.P.C. Chan, A.P.L. Chan, Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: Int. J. 11(2), 203–221, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
go back to reference S. Cicmil, D. Marshall, Insights into collaboration at project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Build. Res. Inf. 33(6), 523–535 S. Cicmil, D. Marshall, Insights into collaboration at project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms. Build. Res. Inf. 33(6), 523–535
go back to reference M.E. Clarkson, A risk model based of stakeholder theory. in Proceedings of the 2nd Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, (1994) M.E. Clarkson, A risk model based of stakeholder theory. in Proceedings of the 2nd Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, (1994)
go back to reference M.B.E. Clarkson, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 92–117 (1995) M.B.E. Clarkson, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 92–117 (1995)
go back to reference D.I. Cleland, Project Management Handbook (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998) D.I. Cleland, Project Management Handbook (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1998)
go back to reference T. Cooke-Davies, S. Cicmil, L. Crawford, K. Richardson, We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Manage. J. 38(2), 50–61 (2007) T. Cooke-Davies, S. Cicmil, L. Crawford, K. Richardson, We’re not in Kansas anymore, Toto: mapping the strange landscape of complexity theory, and its relationship to project management. Project Manage. J. 38(2), 50–61 (2007)
go back to reference A. Diallo, D. Thuillier, The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 23, 237–252 (2005)CrossRef A. Diallo, D. Thuillier, The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. Int. J. Project Manage. 23, 237–252 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference L.R. Jauch, K.L. Kraft, Strategic management of uncertainty. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11(4), 777–790 (1986) L.R. Jauch, K.L. Kraft, Strategic management of uncertainty. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11(4), 777–790 (1986)
go back to reference S. Kaplan, Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5), 729–752 (2008)CrossRef S. Kaplan, Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5), 729–752 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference R. Miller, D. Lessard, Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 19, 437–443 (2001)CrossRef R. Miller, D. Lessard, Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 19, 437–443 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood, Towards a theory of stakeholder identification & salience: defining the principles of who and what really count. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 853–886 (1997) R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood, Towards a theory of stakeholder identification & salience: defining the principles of who and what really count. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 853–886 (1997)
go back to reference B.A. Neville, B. Menguc, Stakeholder multiplicity: toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. J. Bus. Ethics 66, 377–391 (2006)CrossRef B.A. Neville, B. Menguc, Stakeholder multiplicity: toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. J. Bus. Ethics 66, 377–391 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference R. Newcombe, From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Constr. Manage. Econ. 21, 841–848 (2003)CrossRef R. Newcombe, From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Constr. Manage. Econ. 21, 841–848 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference S.A. Leybourne, Classifying improvisation: comments on managing chaotic evolution. in Proceedings of 2010 PMI Research Conference, (Washington, USA, 2010) S.A. Leybourne, Classifying improvisation: comments on managing chaotic evolution. in Proceedings of 2010 PMI Research Conference, (Washington, USA, 2010)
go back to reference J.E. Post, L.E. Preston, S. Sachs, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organization Wealth, (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2002) J.E. Post, L.E. Preston, S. Sachs, Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organization Wealth, (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2002)
go back to reference Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th edn. (PMI, Newtown Square, 2012) Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th edn. (PMI, Newtown Square, 2012)
go back to reference T.J. Rowley, Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 887–910 (1997) T.J. Rowley, Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 887–910 (1997)
go back to reference A.J. Shenar, D. Dvir, O. Levy, A.C. Maltz, Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plan. 34(6), 699–725 (2001)CrossRef A.J. Shenar, D. Dvir, O. Levy, A.C. Maltz, Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plan. 34(6), 699–725 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference A. Soderholm, Project management of unexpected events. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 80–86 (2008)CrossRef A. Soderholm, Project management of unexpected events. Int. J. Project Manage. 26, 80–86 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference L. Stukenbruck, Who determines project success?. in Proceedings PMI Annual Symposium, Montreal 1986, (1986), pp. 85–93 L. Stukenbruck, Who determines project success?. in Proceedings PMI Annual Symposium, Montreal 1986, (1986), pp. 85–93
go back to reference R. Turner, R. Zolin, Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manage. J. 43(5), 87–99 (2012)CrossRef R. Turner, R. Zolin, Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Manage. J. 43(5), 87–99 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference S. Ward, C. Chapman, Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Constr. Manage. Econ. 26, 563–577 (2008)CrossRef S. Ward, C. Chapman, Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Constr. Manage. Econ. 26, 563–577 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference R.M. Wideman, How to motivate stakeholders to work together, in Field Guide to project management, ed. by D.I. Cleland (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1998), pp. 212–216 R.M. Wideman, How to motivate stakeholders to work together, in Field Guide to project management, ed. by D.I. Cleland (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1998), pp. 212–216
Metadata
Title
Stakeholders as Uncertainty Sources
Author
Franco Caron
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Milan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5244-4_9