Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Technology 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Paper

Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires

Authors: Kevin T. Fuji, Amy A. Abbott, Kimberly A. Galt, Andjela Drincic, Mark Kraft, Ted Kasha

Published in: Health and Technology | Issue 3/2012

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Personal health records (PHRs) are electronic tools for patients to maintain a comprehensive record of their health information. Despite the potential for PHRs to increase patient involvement in their overall health care and lead to shared decision-making with their health care providers, only 11 % of consumers in the United States maintain a PHR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how standalone PHRs address the reported desires of patients. An Internet search identified nineteen web-based standalone PHRs that were available free-of-charge. A literature search was conducted to identify patient-reported desires for a PHR. A checklist was constructed with an evaluation procedure to assess the presence of functionalities within each standalone PHR that met identified patient desires. Each of the nineteen identified PHRs was then assessed using this checklist. Providing security and privacy protections for patients’ health information; having information presented in layman’s terms; and generating a printed report of health information were the only desires met by more than half of the evaluated PHRs. Only five PHRs met over half of the patient desires. Findings reveal that current standalone PHRs are designed to serve as a repository of health information, rather than as an interactive tool to help patients become more knowledgeable about and involved in their own care. There is a need for patient perspectives to be considered and integrated into the design of PHRs in order for PHRs to achieve their full potential.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
3.
go back to reference American Health Information Management Association and the American Medical Informatics Association. The value of personal health records: a joint position statement for consumers of health care. J AHIMA. 2007;78:22–24. American Health Information Management Association and the American Medical Informatics Association. The value of personal health records: a joint position statement for consumers of health care. J AHIMA. 2007;78:22–24.
5.
go back to reference Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS. Personal health records: empowering consumers. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007;21:76–86. Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS. Personal health records: empowering consumers. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007;21:76–86.
6.
go back to reference Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:45.CrossRef Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:45.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, et al. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:509–17.CrossRef Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, et al. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:509–17.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:729–36.CrossRef Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:729–36.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff. 2009;28:369–76.CrossRef Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff. 2009;28:369–76.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Patel VN, Abramson E, Edwards AM, Cheung MA, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a Beacon community. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:e104–20. Patel VN, Abramson E, Edwards AM, Cheung MA, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a Beacon community. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:e104–20.
11.
go back to reference Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:121–6.CrossRef Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:121–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:515–22.CrossRef Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:515–22.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kaelber D, Pan EC. The value of personal health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:343–347. Kaelber D, Pan EC. The value of personal health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:343–347.
15.
go back to reference DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2011. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2011.
19.
go back to reference Lafky DB, Horan TA. Prospective personal health record use among different user groups: results of a multi-wave study. Proc Hawaii Int Conf Sys Sci. 2008:233. Lafky DB, Horan TA. Prospective personal health record use among different user groups: results of a multi-wave study. Proc Hawaii Int Conf Sys Sci. 2008:233.
20.
go back to reference Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR. Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. Proc iConf. 2011:363–370. Liu LS, Shih PC, Hayes GR. Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems. Proc iConf. 2011:363–370.
22.
go back to reference Nazi KM. Veterans’ voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users’ characteristics, needs, and preferences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:203–11.CrossRef Nazi KM. Veterans’ voices: use of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) Survey to identify My HealtheVet personal health record users’ characteristics, needs, and preferences. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:203–11.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:38–43. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54:38–43.
24.
go back to reference Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Access to electronic health records in primary care—a survey of patients’ views. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:SR17–22. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Access to electronic health records in primary care—a survey of patients’ views. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:SR17–22.
25.
go back to reference Weitzman ER, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e14.CrossRef Weitzman ER, Kaci L, Mandl KD. Acceptability of a personally controlled health record in a community-based setting: implications for policy and design. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e14.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:306–14.CrossRef Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:306–14.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Walker J, Ahern DK, Le LX, Delbanco T. Insights for internists: “I want the computer to know who I am”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:727–32.CrossRef Walker J, Ahern DK, Le LX, Delbanco T. Insights for internists: “I want the computer to know who I am”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:727–32.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Keselman A, Slaughter L, Smith CA, et al. Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients’ experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:399–403. Keselman A, Slaughter L, Smith CA, et al. Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients’ experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:399–403.
30.
go back to reference Hourcade JP, Chrischilles EA, Gryzlak BM, et al. Design lessons for older adult personal health records software from older adults. Univers Access HCI. 2011:176–185. Hourcade JP, Chrischilles EA, Gryzlak BM, et al. Design lessons for older adult personal health records software from older adults. Univers Access HCI. 2011:176–185.
31.
go back to reference Denton IC. Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2011;15:251–9. Denton IC. Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2011;15:251–9.
32.
go back to reference Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:505–13.CrossRef Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:505–13.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:514–518. Lober WB, Zierler B, Herbaugh A, et al. Barriers to the use of a personal health record by an elderly population. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:514–518.
34.
go back to reference Jones DA, Shipman JP, Plaut DA, Selden CR. Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:243–9.CrossRef Jones DA, Shipman JP, Plaut DA, Selden CR. Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010;98:243–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standalone personal health records in the United States: meeting patient desires
Authors
Kevin T. Fuji
Amy A. Abbott
Kimberly A. Galt
Andjela Drincic
Mark Kraft
Ted Kasha
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Health and Technology / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 2190-7188
Electronic ISSN: 2190-7196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-012-0028-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Health and Technology 3/2012 Go to the issue

Premium Partner