Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Quantitative Economics 1/2022

27-01-2022 | Original Article

State Ownership and Dividend Decisions: Economic Versus Political Determinants

Author: Ritika Jain

Published in: Journal of Quantitative Economics | Issue 1/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper integrates the effect of state ownership and political influence on dividend decisions. Dilution of state ownership in state owned enterprises is associated with admittance of private owners, weaker political influence and better corporate governance compliance—consequently, leading to higher dividend payouts. Studying the state owned enterprises (250 firms) in India between 2007 and 2016, we use instrumental variable regression models to account for the endogeneity between dividend decisions and state ownership. We find that dividend possibility and amount is negatively associated with state ownership. We also find that dividends are paid more frequently and in large amounts just ahead of elections. Finally, state ownership has a stronger effect on how election cycles affects dividend decisions. Our results are robust to a series of tests.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
2
Ratna status is awarded to firms based on past performance. Firms are awarded into Maharatna, Navaratna, Miniratna I and Miniratna II. Almost fifty percent of the firms have no ratna status. Ratna statuses bring in advantages of financial autonomy due to better financial performance. Memorandum of Understanding is a negotiated document between the government of India and the firm specifying the role and responsibilities of the two parties. It is intended to reduce political interference from the government.
 
3
The average of log (real dividends) per firm is 3.01. Since the coefficient is -0.176, the percentage reduction in log(real dividends) per firm is (-0.176*100)/3.01.
 
Literature
go back to reference Brav, A., J.R. Graham, C.R. Harvey, and R. Michaely. 2005. Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77 (3): 483–527.CrossRef Brav, A., J.R. Graham, C.R. Harvey, and R. Michaely. 2005. Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77 (3): 483–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Brockman, P., and E. Unlu. 2009. Dividend policy, creditor rights, and the agency costs of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 92 (2): 276–299.CrossRef Brockman, P., and E. Unlu. 2009. Dividend policy, creditor rights, and the agency costs of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 92 (2): 276–299.CrossRef
go back to reference Chay, J.B., and J. Suh. 2009. Payout policy and cash-flow uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 93 (1): 88–107.CrossRef Chay, J.B., and J. Suh. 2009. Payout policy and cash-flow uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 93 (1): 88–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, S. 2009. Fixing market failures or fixing elections? Agricultural credit in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1 (1): 219–250. Cole, S. 2009. Fixing market failures or fixing elections? Agricultural credit in India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1 (1): 219–250.
go back to reference Collins, M.C., A.K. Saxena, and J.W. Wansley. 1996. The role of insiders and dividend policy: A comparison of regulated and unregulated firms. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 9 (2): 1–9. Collins, M.C., A.K. Saxena, and J.W. Wansley. 1996. The role of insiders and dividend policy: A comparison of regulated and unregulated firms. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 9 (2): 1–9.
go back to reference DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and R.M. Stulz. 2006. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics 81 (2): 227–254.CrossRef DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and R.M. Stulz. 2006. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics 81 (2): 227–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Dinç, I.S. 2005. Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics 77 (2): 453–479.CrossRef Dinç, I.S. 2005. Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics 77 (2): 453–479.CrossRef
go back to reference Dinc, I.S., and N. Gupta. 2011. The decision to privatize: Finance and politics. The Journal of Finance 66 (1): 241–269.CrossRef Dinc, I.S., and N. Gupta. 2011. The decision to privatize: Finance and politics. The Journal of Finance 66 (1): 241–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2001. Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60 (1): 3–43.CrossRef Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. 2001. Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60 (1): 3–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Fujiwara, K. 2007. Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 92 (1): 51–65.CrossRef Fujiwara, K. 2007. Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 92 (1): 51–65.CrossRef
go back to reference Goyal, A., S.P. Jategaonkar, and C.B. Muckley. 2020. Why do privatized firms pay higher dividends? Journal of Corporate Finance 60: 101493.CrossRef Goyal, A., S.P. Jategaonkar, and C.B. Muckley. 2020. Why do privatized firms pay higher dividends? Journal of Corporate Finance 60: 101493.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, N. 2005. Partial privatization and firm performance. The Journal of Finance 60 (2): 987–1015.CrossRef Gupta, N. 2005. Partial privatization and firm performance. The Journal of Finance 60 (2): 987–1015.CrossRef
go back to reference Harford, J., S.A. Mansi, and W.F. Maxwell. 2008. Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (3): 535–555.CrossRef Harford, J., S.A. Mansi, and W.F. Maxwell. 2008. Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (3): 535–555.CrossRef
go back to reference Inoue, C. 2020. Election cycles and organizations: How politics shapes the performance of state-owned enterprises over time. Administrative Science Quarterly 65 (3): 677–709.CrossRef Inoue, C. 2020. Election cycles and organizations: How politics shapes the performance of state-owned enterprises over time. Administrative Science Quarterly 65 (3): 677–709.CrossRef
go back to reference Jain, R. 2017a. Public sector enterprise disinvestment in India: Efficiency gains in a political context. Journal of Asian Economics 53: 18–36.CrossRef Jain, R. 2017a. Public sector enterprise disinvestment in India: Efficiency gains in a political context. Journal of Asian Economics 53: 18–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Jain, R. 2017b. Influence of Political Alignment and Federal Structure on Public Sector Employment: The case of India. Economics Bulletin 37 (1): 305–313. Jain, R. 2017b. Influence of Political Alignment and Federal Structure on Public Sector Employment: The case of India. Economics Bulletin 37 (1): 305–313.
go back to reference Jain, R., and S. Sarkar. 2019. An empirical analysis of disinvestment policy in India: Does ideology matter? Journal of Economic Policy Reform 22 (4): 384–398.CrossRef Jain, R., and S. Sarkar. 2019. An empirical analysis of disinvestment policy in India: Does ideology matter? Journal of Economic Policy Reform 22 (4): 384–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M.C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76 (2): 323–329. Jensen, M.C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review 76 (2): 323–329.
go back to reference John, K., and J. Williams. 1985. Dividends, dilution, and taxes: A signalling equilibrium. The Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1053–1070.CrossRef John, K., and J. Williams. 1985. Dividends, dilution, and taxes: A signalling equilibrium. The Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1053–1070.CrossRef
go back to reference La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 2000. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance 55 (1): 1–33.CrossRef La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 2000. Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance 55 (1): 1–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, Y.H., J.R. Chiou, and Y.R. Chen. 2010. Ownership structure and dividend preference: Evidence from China’s privatized state-owned enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 46 (1): 56–74.CrossRef Lin, Y.H., J.R. Chiou, and Y.R. Chen. 2010. Ownership structure and dividend preference: Evidence from China’s privatized state-owned enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 46 (1): 56–74.CrossRef
go back to reference Matsumura, T. 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70 (3): 473–483.CrossRef Matsumura, T. 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70 (3): 473–483.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, M.H., and K. Rock. 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. The Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1031–1051.CrossRef Miller, M.H., and K. Rock. 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. The Journal of Finance 40 (4): 1031–1051.CrossRef
go back to reference Mishra, C.S., and V. Narender. 1996. Dividend policy of SOEs in India: An analysis. Finance India 10 (3): 633–645. Mishra, C.S., and V. Narender. 1996. Dividend policy of SOEs in India: An analysis. Finance India 10 (3): 633–645.
go back to reference Pinkowitz, L., R. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 2006. Does the contribution of corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on governance? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Finance 61 (6): 2725–2751.CrossRef Pinkowitz, L., R. Stulz, and R. Williamson. 2006. Does the contribution of corporate cash holdings and dividends to firm value depend on governance? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Finance 61 (6): 2725–2751.CrossRef
go back to reference Rozeff, M.S. 1982. Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research 5 (3): 249–259.CrossRef Rozeff, M.S. 1982. Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research 5 (3): 249–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1994. Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 995–1025.CrossRef Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1994. Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (4): 995–1025.CrossRef
go back to reference Von Eije, H., and W.L. Megginson. 2008. Dividends and share repurchases in the European Union. Journal of Financial Economics 89 (2): 347–374.CrossRef Von Eije, H., and W.L. Megginson. 2008. Dividends and share repurchases in the European Union. Journal of Financial Economics 89 (2): 347–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press. Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
Metadata
Title
State Ownership and Dividend Decisions: Economic Versus Political Determinants
Author
Ritika Jain
Publication date
27-01-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Quantitative Economics / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0971-1554
Electronic ISSN: 2364-1045
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00285-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of Quantitative Economics 1/2022 Go to the issue