Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Statistical Algorithms for Sustainability Measurement and Decision Making

Authors : Subhas K. Sikdar, Debalina Sengupta, Rajib Mukherjee

Published in: Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sustainability assertions are holistic in nature because they represent commentaries on the impacts of process and products on three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and societal. A large number of indicators (or metrics) may be used to observe the sustainability behavior of a process or product system. Because of the complex way these indicators interact with each other in influencing system performance, it is useful to construct a holistic measure to observe sustainability performance. The Euclidean distance, composed of the indicator values representing a system, was introduced as such a measure, and has been called the sustainability footprint. In this chapter detailed computations are shown on a test system to illustrate how the sustainability footprint is calculated and how it is used to compare among competing alternatives of a system in terms of sustainability. This method based on Euclidean distance is compared with other proposed methods for indicator aggregation, such as Vector Space Theory, Canberra distance, zCanberra distance, and Mahalanobis distance. In addition, two other objectives are achieved. First, by applying the principal component analysis, the redundant indicators are identified, and second, the rank order of the indicators in terms of their contribution to sustainability is calculated. This information will be helpful in improving sustainability performance at the redesign stage based on the relative contributions of the indicators and their controllability.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
We made the point previously that metrics and indicators are used interchangeably; both are quantified measures.
 
2
The sustainability discussions in this book apply equally to processes and products. Even when we focus on processes, it needs to be understood that the same conclusions apply to products as well. Also we imply systems when stating products or processes.
 
3
Frequently for simplicity we use sustainability. But always we mean relative sustainability.
 
4
Exergy can be thought of as quality of energy. It is the maximum mechanical work that is obtainable from energy under reversible conditions. Dissipation of entropy is related to exergy loss.
 
5
The term index in this book has been exclusively used for overall sustainability, where an aggregate indicator, which has been composed of some underlying indicators, each of which measures a particular type of impact, never the overall process or product sustainability.
 
Literature
go back to reference Brandi HS, Daroda RJ, Olinto AC (2014) The use of the Canberra metrics to aggregate metrics to sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(5):911–920CrossRef Brandi HS, Daroda RJ, Olinto AC (2014) The use of the Canberra metrics to aggregate metrics to sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(5):911–920CrossRef
go back to reference Chong I, Jun C (2005) Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 78:103–112CrossRef Chong I, Jun C (2005) Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 78:103–112CrossRef
go back to reference Čuček L, Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z (2015) Chapter 5 – overview of environmental footprints. In: Klemeš JJ (ed) Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 131–193. ISBN 9780127999685 Čuček L, Klemeš JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z (2015) Chapter 5 – overview of environmental footprints. In: Klemeš JJ (ed) Assessing and measuring environmental impact and sustainability. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 131–193. ISBN 9780127999685
go back to reference Dos Santos SF, Brandi HS (2015) Model framework to construct a single aggregate sustainability indicator: an application to the biodiesel supply chain. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(7):1963CrossRef Dos Santos SF, Brandi HS (2015) Model framework to construct a single aggregate sustainability indicator: an application to the biodiesel supply chain. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(7):1963CrossRef
go back to reference Dos Santos SF, Brandi HS (2016) Application of the GUM approach to estimate uncertainty in measurements of sustainability systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(2):493–505CrossRef Dos Santos SF, Brandi HS (2016) Application of the GUM approach to estimate uncertainty in measurements of sustainability systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(2):493–505CrossRef
go back to reference Eason T, Cabezas H (2012) Evaluating the sustainability of a regional system using Fisher information in the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J Environ Manage 94(1):41–49CrossRef Eason T, Cabezas H (2012) Evaluating the sustainability of a regional system using Fisher information in the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J Environ Manage 94(1):41–49CrossRef
go back to reference Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (2010) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (2010) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
go back to reference Fath BD, Cabezas H, Pawlowski CW (2003) Regime changes in ecological systems: an information theory approach. J Theor Biol 222(4):517–530CrossRef Fath BD, Cabezas H, Pawlowski CW (2003) Regime changes in ecological systems: an information theory approach. J Theor Biol 222(4):517–530CrossRef
go back to reference Hopton ME, Cabezas H, Campbell D, Eason T, Garmestani AG, Heberling MT, Karunanithi A, Templeton JJ, White D, Zanowick M (2010) Development of a multidisciplinary approach to assess regional sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 17(1):48–56CrossRef Hopton ME, Cabezas H, Campbell D, Eason T, Garmestani AG, Heberling MT, Karunanithi A, Templeton JJ, White D, Zanowick M (2010) Development of a multidisciplinary approach to assess regional sustainability. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 17(1):48–56CrossRef
go back to reference Ingwersen W, Cabezas H, Weisbrod AV, Eason T, Demeke B, Ma X, Hawkins TR, Lee S-J, Bare JC, Ceja M (2014) Integrated metrics for improving the life cycle approach to assessing product system sustainability. Sustainability 6:1386–1413CrossRef Ingwersen W, Cabezas H, Weisbrod AV, Eason T, Demeke B, Ma X, Hawkins TR, Lee S-J, Bare JC, Ceja M (2014) Integrated metrics for improving the life cycle approach to assessing product system sustainability. Sustainability 6:1386–1413CrossRef
go back to reference Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
go back to reference Krotscheck C, Narodoslawsky M (1996) The sustainable process index. A new dimension in ecological evaluation. Ecol Eng 6(4):241–258CrossRef Krotscheck C, Narodoslawsky M (1996) The sustainable process index. A new dimension in ecological evaluation. Ecol Eng 6(4):241–258CrossRef
go back to reference Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar SK (2013) Parsimonious use of indicators for evaluating sustainability systems with multivariate statistical analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(4):699–706CrossRef Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar SK (2013) Parsimonious use of indicators for evaluating sustainability systems with multivariate statistical analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(4):699–706CrossRef
go back to reference Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1996) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. Focus 6:45–60 Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1996) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. Focus 6:45–60
go back to reference Sikdar SK (2009) On aggregating multiple indicators into a single metric for sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11(2):157–161CrossRef Sikdar SK (2009) On aggregating multiple indicators into a single metric for sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 11(2):157–161CrossRef
go back to reference Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Harten P (2012) More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):765–773CrossRef Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Harten P (2012) More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(5):765–773CrossRef
go back to reference Vermeulen I, Block C, Van Caneghem J, Dewulf W, Sikdar S, Vandecasteele C (2012) Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes. The case of automotive shredder residue. Resour Conserv Recycle 69:17–28CrossRef Vermeulen I, Block C, Van Caneghem J, Dewulf W, Sikdar S, Vandecasteele C (2012) Sustainability assessment of industrial waste treatment processes. The case of automotive shredder residue. Resour Conserv Recycle 69:17–28CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Statistical Algorithms for Sustainability Measurement and Decision Making
Authors
Subhas K. Sikdar
Debalina Sengupta
Rajib Mukherjee
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42719-5_7