Skip to main content
Top

Study of charge transfer mechanisms in cobalt-substituted copper ferrites

  • Open Access
  • 01-11-2025
Published in:

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study delves into the charge transfer mechanisms in cobalt-substituted copper ferrites, synthesized via the citrate sol–gel autocombustion method. The research focuses on the impact of cobalt substitution on temperature- and frequency-dependent conductivity, activation energy of hopping processes, and transitions in conduction behavior. The investigation employs advanced dielectric fitting techniques, including Jonscher’s universal power law, the modified Jonscher model, and the Almond–West model, to extract detailed parameters such as dispersion exponents and onset frequency. The study reveals a transition from long-range hopping to localized dipolar relaxation in cobalt-rich ferrites, providing insights into the rational design of spinel-based materials with optimized electromagnetic and electronic functionalities. The findings highlight the potential of these ferrites for high-frequency applications such as EMI shielding, microwave absorption, and impedance-tunable devices. The research also underscores the importance of cation redistribution, valence fluctuations, and oxygen-vacancy formation in governing the dielectric and transport behavior of these materials.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Magnetic nanoparticles, particularly spinel ferrites, have gained considerable attention due to their wide-ranging applications in biomedicine [1], catalysis [2], environmental remediation [3], ferrofluids [4], magnetic sensors [5], and high-frequency electronic devices [6]. Among these, spinel ferrites of the general formula MFe2O4 (where M is a divalent transition metal) are of particular interest because of their tunable electrical, magnetic, and dielectric properties, which can be tailored through synthesis conditions [7], particle size control, and ionic substitution strategies [8, 9].
The ability to manipulate these properties makes spinel ferrites attractive for use in a variety of technologies, including electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding [10], microwave absorption [11], and energy storage [12]. With the rapid propagation of wireless communication systems, radar, and electronic devices, the issue of electromagnetic pollution has become a significant environmental and health concern. Prolonged exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic radiation has been linked to potential biological risks, prompting the urgent development of efficient electromagnetic wave absorbing materials [10, 11, 1315].
Spinel ferrites have emerged as one of the most promising classes of magnetic materials for microwave absorption applications due to their inherent magnetic loss capability, high resistivity, and chemical stability. However, pure ferrites often suffer from limitations such as narrow absorption bandwidths, low attenuation efficiency, and poor impedance matching with free space, which restrict their practical utility [1618]. To address these challenges, cation substitution – particularly with transition metal [19] or rare-earth ions [20] – has been widely adopted as a strategy to modulate the microstructure and enhance dielectric and magnetic properties. Such substitution can strongly influence key factors such as grain size, site occupancy, defect density, and conduction pathways, ultimately affecting the microwave absorption and charge transport characteristics of the material.
Among spinel ferrites, copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) is known for its mixed valence state of Fe and p-type conductivity [21]. However, its microwave and electrical performance can be significantly enhanced through partial substitution with cobalt [22, 23], which has a strong influence on the electronic structure and cation distribution. Cobalt ions (Co2+ and Co3+) can occupy both tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) sites and participate in variable valence states, introducing new conduction channels and modifying relaxation dynamics. Despite extensive studies on ferrite systems, there remains a lack of detailed understanding of how cobalt substitution affects the conduction mechanisms of copper ferrite over wide temperature and frequency ranges, particularly when modeled using advanced dielectric fitting techniques.
The main objective of this work is to investigate the impact of cobalt substitution on the charge transport mechanisms in CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (x = 0.0–1.0) ferrites synthesized via the citrate sol–gel autocombustion method. Special emphasis is placed on analyzing the temperature- and frequency-dependent conductivity, determining the activation energy of hopping processes, and identifying transitions in conduction behavior with increasing cobalt content. Unlike prior studies, this work applies a combination of Jonscher’s universal power law, the modified Jonscher model, and the Almond–West model to extract detailed parameters such as dispersion exponents and onset frequency, offering multi-model understandings of dielectric relaxation and hopping dynamics.
By correlating electrical behavior with cation site distribution and microstructural changes, this study provides a deeper understanding of how cobalt ions alter polaron pathways and induce short-range relaxation effects. The novelty lies in the systematic multi-frequency, multi-model evaluation of conductivity in relation to composition, enabling the identification of a clear transition from long-range hopping to localized dipolar relaxation in cobalt-rich ferrites. These insights are crucial for the rational design of spinel-based materials with optimized electromagnetic and electronic functionalities.

2 Synthesis and characterization techniques

2.1 Synthesis

Cobalt-substituted copper ferrite with the chemical composition CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (where x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) was synthesized using the sol–gel autocombustion method [24]. Citric acid served as both the fuel and chelating agent, with a 1:1 molar ratio to the total metal ions, to promote the formation of a homogeneous precursor gel and facilitate spinel phase formation. In the synthesis process, stoichiometric amounts of cobalt nitrate [Co(NO3)2·6H2O], copper nitrate [Cu(NO3)2·3H2O], and ferric nitrate [Fe(NO3)3·9H2O] were used as precursors. All chemicals were procured from Loba Chemie, India, and were of analytical grade to ensure high purity and reproducibility. The pH of the precursor solution was adjusted to 7 using ammonia solution [25] and monitored with a digital pH meter to optimize the conditions for gel formation. The resulting mixture was continuously stirred and heated to promote gelation, followed by autocombustion, leading to the formation of ferrite powders. The obtained powders were subsequently ground and subjected to further studies.
It should be emphasized that the sol–gel autocombustion parameters strongly influence the resulting cation distribution. The chelating ratio and pH govern the stability of metal–citrate complexes, ensuring homogeneous mixing and controlled oxidation states before combustion. The fuel-to-nitrate balance dictates the intensity of the combustion front: rapid, highly exothermic combustion can freeze in non-equilibrium site occupancies, while slower combustion and post-combustion annealing promote redistribution toward thermodynamically stable configurations. These factors ultimately determine whether Cu2+ remains predominantly in B-sites or is displaced by Co2+, and whether Co2+ migrates into both A- and B-sites. Since the electronic transport pathways in spinel ferrites rely on Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co2+/Co3+ redox couples, as well as oxygen vacancy concentration, the synthesis parameters provide a direct handle to tailor conduction and dielectric relaxation behavior in CoxCu1-xFe2O4.

2.2 Characterization techniques

2.2.1 X-ray diffraction studies

Phase identification and structural analysis were performed on powdered samples using a Malvern Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer (UK) operating in Bragg–Brentano geometry with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Instrumental broadening was corrected with a NIST LaB₆ standard. Diffraction data were analyzed by Rietveld refinement using the FullProf Suite software package, enabling determination of lattice parameters, crystallite size, and microstrain.

2.2.2 Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

Vibrational properties were investigated with a Bruker VERTEX 70v spectrometer (Germany) in the 400–4000 cm⁻1 spectral range at a resolution of 2 cm⁻1. Samples were prepared as KBr pellets by thoroughly mixing the ferrite powders with spectroscopic-grade KBr and pressing the mixture into transparent discs. The acquired spectra were processed using OPUS software, with emphasis on peak assignment to tetrahedral and octahedral metal–oxygen vibrations.

2.2.3 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Surface chemical states were probed using a PHI VersaProbeII Scanning XPS system equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα source (1486.6 eV). Measurements were acquired with a 100 µm beam spot at a 45° take-off angle. Survey spectra were collected at a pass energy of 117.5 eV, while high-resolution scans employed 46.95 eV. Charge compensation was achieved with dual-beam neutralization (7 eV Ar + ions and 1 eV electrons). All spectra were referenced to the C–C component of the C 1 s peak at 285.0 eV. The base pressure during analysis was below 3 × 10⁻⁷ mbar. Peak deconvolution was performed with PHI MultiPak software (v.9.9.3) using Shirley-type background subtraction.

2.2.4 Electrical and dielectric measurements

Ferrite powders were pressed into cylindrical pellets (10 mm diameter, 0.6 mm thickness) under a uniaxial pressure of 3 MPa and dried at 65 °C for 5 h. Graphite paste was applied to both flat surfaces to obtain a parallel-plate capacitor configuration. Dielectric and impedance measurements were performed using an Autolab PGSTAT100N impedance analyzer (Metrohm, Switzerland) in the frequency range 0.01 Hz–100 kHz. AC conductivity and the real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) parts of the dielectric constant were evaluated. Temperature-dependent measurements were conducted up to 450 °C in 50 °C increments, with isothermal equilibration at each step to ensure thermal stability.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Structural and vibrational studies

Representative XRD patterns of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) are shown in Fig. 1. The unsubstituted sample (x = 0.0) contains mainly cubic spinel (Fd3m) with ~ 7 wt% CuFeO2, which disappears upon cobalt incorporation, yielding phase-pure ferrites. A systematic shift of the (311) reflection with increasing Co content indicates lattice distortion due to the ionic radius difference between Cu2+ (0.73 Å) and Co2+ (0.74 Å). Williamson–Hall analysis (Table 1) shows a reduction in crystallite size (28 to 21 nm) and relaxation of lattice stress with cobalt substitution.
Fig. 1
X-ray diffraction patterns of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) prepared by the sol–gel autocombustion method [24]
Full size image
Table 1 
Structural parameters of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites
Co2+ content (x)
Lattice constant a (nm)
Cell volume (10–3 nm3)
X-ray density (g/cm3)
Crystallite size (nm)
Lattice stress
0.0
0.8368
586.140
5.422
28
0.00170
0.2
0.8381
588.672
5.218
24
0.00196
0.4
0.8383
588.236
5.218
23
0.00190
0.6
0.8384
589.340
5.218
22
0.00159
0.8
0.8383
589.199
5.218
24
0.00179
1.0
0.8379
588.302
5.217
21
0.00201
Cation distribution was determined from Rietveld refinement of the XRD patterns, where site occupancies of Cu2+, Co2+, and Fe3+ ions were refined under the constraints of stoichiometry (AB2O4), charge neutrality, and site multiplicities of the spinel structure. The relative scattering factors allowed estimation of how these cations redistribute between tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) sublattices with increasing cobalt substitution (Table 2). The results indicate that Co2 + ions progressively occupy both A- and B-sites, while Cu2+ remains preferentially octahedrally coordinated. This redistribution alters Fe–O–Co and Fe–O–Cu superexchange interactions and modifies Fe2+/Fe3+ electron hopping, thereby influencing transport and photoactive properties. The XPS analysis presented in the following section provides independent evidence for these oxidation states and site preferences.
Table 2
Cation distribution of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites
Composition
Cation distribution
CuFe2O4
(Cu0.36Fe0.64)A[Cu0.64Fe1.36]B
Co0.2Cu0.8Fe2O4
(Co0.06Cu0.48Fe0.46)A[Co0.14Cu0.37Fe1.54]B
Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4
(Co0.16Cu0.28Fe0.36)A[Co0.24Cu0.32Fe1.64]B
Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4
(Co0.23Cu0.17Fe0.6)A[Co0.37Cu0.23Fe1.4]B
Co0.8Cu0.2Fe2O4
(Co0.43Cu0.16Fe0.41)A[Co0.37Cu0.04Fe1.59]B
CoFe2O4
(Co0.48Fe0.52)A[Co0.52Fe1.48]B
FTIR spectra [24] (Fig. 2) display the two characteristic spinel absorption bands: ~ 570–590 cm⁻1 (tetrahedral stretching) and ~ 400–430 cm⁻1 (octahedral vibrations). With increasing Co content, the octahedral band red-shifts from 413 cm⁻1 (x = 0.0) to 367 cm⁻1 (x = 1.0), while the tetrahedral band shifts only slightly (~ 4 cm⁻1). A Cu–O feature near 650 cm⁻1, evident in pure CuFe2O4, diminishes with cobalt substitution, consistent with Co2 + replacing Cu2 + in octahedral coordination.
Fig. 2
Room-temperature FTIR spectra of CoxCu1–xFe2O4 spinels: a 150–800 cm⁻.1 region highlighting metal–oxygen vibrations [24]
Full size image
X-ray diffraction, cation distribution, and FTIR confirm that cobalt incorporation stabilizes the spinel phase, introduces lattice distortion, and drives cation redistribution across A/B sites. These structural modifications are directly responsible for the observed changes in electronic transport and photoactivity, in line with earlier reports [24, 26, 27].

3.2 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis

To substantiate the cation distribution derived from refinement and to clarify the charge transfer mechanisms, XPS spectra of CoxCu1–xFe2O4 (x = 0.0–1.0) were collected and deconvoluted (Fig. 3). The corresponding surface compositions are summarized in Table 3.
Fig. 3
High-resolution XPS spectra of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 spinels. Panels show deconvoluted O 1 s, Fe 2p, Cu 2p, and Co 3 s regions, indicating the coexistence of Cu2+, Fe3+/Fe2+, and Co2+/Co3+ oxidation states together with lattice oxygen and surface defect contributions
Full size image
Table 3
Surface composition (atomic %) determined by fitting XPS spectra for all analyzed samples
 
C
N
O
Fe
Co
Cu
Energy [eV]
285.0
286.5
288.6
398.8
529.8
531.5
533.1
709.2
101.7
932.6
934.6
Sample
C–C
C–O–C
O-C = O
C-N = C
O-Fe
O-Co
O-Cu
O = C
O-C, OH
Fe3+
Co2+
Cu0
Cu2+
CuFe2O4
19.1
3.6
3.4
33.4
10.1
4.7
15.3
6.3
4.1
Co0.2Cu0.8Fe2O4
12.3
2.4
4.1
1.3
42.4
10.1
1.6
10.7
2.5
10.5
2.1
Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4
12.9
4.1
5.1
1.8
39.2
12.4
2.5
9.8
2.7
7.7
1.9
Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4
12.8
2.1
4.0
0.9
43.6
11.2
1.4
11.3
3.1
7.6
2.1
Co0.8Cu0.2Fe2O4
12.2
0.8
3.4
0.8
49.2
9.8
1.6
13.3
4.2
3.7
1.3
CoFe2O4
13.2
1.1
3.4
0.5
49.3
11.6
1.2
14.4
4.7
0.0
0.6
The Fe 2p3/2 spectra exhibit a main peak at ~ 710.2 eV accompanied by multiplet splitting and a shake-up satellite at ~ 718 eV, confirming Fe3+ as the predominant state [28, 29]. A minor Fe2+ component becomes more pronounced with cobalt substitution, supporting enhanced Fe3+/Fe2+ electron hopping within the B-sublattice. This mechanism supports long-range small polaron conduction in Cu-rich ferrites and remains a key transport pathway even as cobalt is introduced.
The Cu 2p spectra display a component at 932.6 eV, attributable to Cu0/Cu+, together with strong shake-up satellites at ~ 943–945 eV that are diagnostic of Cu2+ [30, 31]. The Cu2+ contribution systematically decreases with increasing Co content, reflecting the progressive displacement of Cu from octahedral sites. Although the 932.6 eV feature may include contributions from both metallic Cu and Cu+, the strong satellites confirm that Cu2+ remains dominant across the series. Quantitatively, the surface concentration of Cu2+ decreases from ~ 4.1 at.% for x = 0.0 to only ~ 0.6 at.% for x = 1.0, while the Co signal rises from 0 to ~ 11.6 at.% (Table 3). This trend is consistent with the redistribution of cations obtained from XRD refinement and illustrates the gradual replacement of the Fe–O–Cu superexchange network by Fe–O–Co interactions.
Co analysis was carried out using the Co 3 s region, given the overlap of Co 2p with Fe Auger features. A main peak at ~ 101.7 eV with a characteristic multiplet splitting of ~ 5.5 eV confirms high-spin Co2+, while a weaker higher-energy shoulder indicates partial oxidation to Co3+ in Co-rich ferrites (x ≥ 0.6) [32, 33]. The coexistence of Co2+ and Co3+ has important implications: in addition to Fe3+/Fe2+ hopping, valence fluctuations of Co2+/Co3+ introduce new localized conduction pathways, particularly at higher cobalt content. These additional redox-active centers favor short-range relaxation processes, which explains the anomalous dielectric dispersion and localized polarization observed in the frequency-dependent conductivity of Co-rich samples.
The O 1 s spectra can be resolved into three components: lattice oxygen in metal–oxygen bonds (~ 529.8 eV), defective oxygen or oxygen bound to carbon (~ 531.5 eV), and hydroxyl/adsorbed species (~ 533.1 eV). The defective oxygen fraction increases from ~ 10.1 at.% (x = 0.0) to ~ 11.6 at.% (x = 1.0), indicating enhanced lattice disorder and oxygen vacancy formation with cobalt substitution. Such non-stoichiometric oxygen plays a dual role: it facilitates charge compensation during cation redistribution and provides additional localized states for carrier trapping, further enhancing dielectric relaxation and interfacial polarization effects.
The XPS analysis establishes that Fe remains predominantly Fe3+ with minor Fe2+, Cu is mainly Cu2+ with traces of Cu0/Cu+, and Co is largely Co2+ with partial Co3+ in highly substituted ferrites. The simultaneous presence of Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co2+/Co3+ redox couples, coupled with an increased concentration of oxygen defects, generates multiple charge-transfer channels. This spectroscopic evidence directly supports the composition-driven transition identified in the transport and dielectric studies: from long-range polaron hopping dominated by Fe3+/Fe2+ in Cu-rich ferrites to localized relaxation and interfacial polarization mechanisms governed by Co redox chemistry and oxygen-vacancy-assisted conduction in Co-rich compositions.

3.3 Analysis of electrical transport properties

The electrical transport properties were explored through temperature-dependent AC and DC conductivity measurements. Figure 4 shows the variation of ln(σT) with 1000/T for DC conductivity, demonstrating a thermally activated conduction mechanism across all compositions.
Fig. 4
Temperature dependence of DC conductivity for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 systems
Full size image
Notably, for samples with high cobalt substitution levels (x = 0.8 and 1.0), a distinct inflection point in the high-temperature regime (T ≥ 373 K) suggests a change in the dominant conduction mechanism. Such behavior is often indicative of a transition from small polaron hopping at low temperatures to variable-range hopping or mixed-valence conduction at elevated temperatures [34]; however, as later discussed in the context of Jonscher and Almond–West model fittings, these changes may instead reflect a shift toward localized dielectric relaxation and interfacial polarization in Co-rich compositions.
The temperature dependence of electrical conductivity, interpreted within the framework of hopping conduction theory, is described by the following expression [35]:
$$\sigma = \frac{{ne^{2} d^{2} \nu }}{kT}\exp \left( {\frac{{ - W{}_{H}}}{kT}} \right)$$
(1)
Here e represents the elementary charge of an electron, n denotes the concentration of charge carriers, and d is the hopping length of charge carriers, corresponding to the average distance between adjacent octahedral sites (~ 0.295 nm) in the investigated compounds. Value k refers to the Boltzmann constant, while ν is the threshold activation frequency associated with the hopping process. The value of ν was estimated from the IR spectra [24] (Table 4). Finally, WH represents the hopping activation energy.
Table 4
IR absorption band of the B-site and the corresponding threshold activation frequency (ν) estimated from IR spectra
Sample
IR absorption band of the B-site,
cm−1
Threshold activation frequency, ν × 1013, Hz
CuFe2O4
413
1.768
Co0.2Cu0.8Fe2O4
376
1.610
Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4
377
1.614
Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4
364
1.559
Co0.8Cu0.2Fe2O4
364
1.557
CoFe2O4
367
1.572
The activation energies derived from the linear regions of ln(σT) vs. 1000/T plots confirm that hopping conduction is dominant at low to moderate temperatures.
Figure 2 presents the temperature dependence of AC conductivity for all samples across a range of measurement frequencies. (Figure 5)
Fig. 5
Temperature dependence of AC conductivity for samples with composition CoxCu1-xFe2O4 at different frequencies
Full size image
At lower temperatures (298–348 K), the AC conductivity exhibits weak temperature dependence but strong frequency sensitivity, consistent with Maxwell–Wagner interfacial polarization [36] and hopping conduction through localized states [37]. These localized states likely originate from structural inhomogeneities, oxygen vacancies, and interfacial grain boundaries [38]. The change in slope at higher temperatures suggests enhanced thermally activated mobility of carriers [39], which may be influenced by the emergence of interfacial polarization effects and Co3+/Co2+ redox dynamics. These mechanisms become more pronounced in Co-rich compositions and are consistent with the localized relaxation behavior observed in the dielectric analysis and possibly a change in the dominant charge transfer path. For cobalt-rich compositions, such behavior could be related to the increased presence of Co3+/Co2+ redox pairs and altered cation distribution in the spinel lattice, modifying both hopping distances and available conduction pathways.
In the temperature range of 348–448 K, electrical conductivity exhibits a pronounced increase with rising temperature. In this regime, the carrier concentration remains nearly constant, as the thermal energy is insufficient to excite electrons across the band gap into extended conduction states [40]. Instead, the observed enhancement in conductivity is attributed to increased mobility of localized charge carriers, consistent with small polaron hopping rather than band conduction. This conclusion is further supported by the behavior of the Jonscher exponent s and Almond–West dispersion parameter n, both of which indicate thermally activated hopping in this temperature range for Cu-rich compositions.
In ferrites, charge carriers are localized on transition metal ions [41], and conductivity primarily originates from electron exchange between ions in different valence states. In particular, electron hopping between Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co3+/Co2+ pairs play a key role. Due to their larger ionic radius, Fe2+ ions preferentially occupy the octahedral (B) sites, making them the principal contributors to the hopping mechanism in the studied spinel structure.
In the dispersive region (Region II), the activation energy (Eₐ) for conductivity decreases with increasing frequency (Fig. 3), indicative of a hopping conduction mechanism. At higher frequencies, the energy barrier for carrier transitions between localized states is reduced, aligning with the predictions of small polaron hopping theory.
Charge transport in semiconducting ferrites is typically governed by two primary mechanisms [34]: hopping conduction and band-like (activation) conduction. These are distinguished by the density of localized states near the Fermi level and the available thermal energy [42, 43]: hopping conduction dominates when the density of localized states is high. In this regime, charge carriers move between neighboring localized states via phonon-assisted hopping, without excitation into extended bands. This process is prominent at lower temperatures and/or high frequencies, where short-range mobility governs charge transport; band conduction (activation mechanism) becomes significant at elevated temperatures when thermal energy is sufficient to excite carriers into the conduction or valence bands. In this case, carriers move as extended states under an external electric field, and conductivity follows the Arrhenius law.
Both mechanisms can coexist, with a crossover in dominance observable through changes in the temperature dependence of conductivity. Specifically, a linear relationship in a ln(σT⁻1) vs. 1/T plot indicates thermally activated transport governed by the Arrhenius equation [44]:
$$\sigma (E) = \sigma_{0} \exp \left( { - \frac{\Delta E}{{kT}}} \right)$$
(2)
where ΔE is the activation energy for the conduction process (measured in eV); k denotes the Boltzmann constant, and σ0 is the pre-exponential factor, representing the conductivity at T = 0 K (an approximate value).
This expression describes the thermally activated transport of charge carriers, where electrical conductivity increases with temperature as carriers acquire sufficient energy to overcome potential barriers between localized states or within energy bands. The slope of the linear plot in ln(σT⁻1) coordinates allows direct determination of the activation energy (ΔE), providing insight into the dominant conduction mechanism in the investigated material.
To determine the activation energy, data points are selected at the boundaries of the linear region in the temperature dependence of electrical conductivity. From these points, perpendicular lines (normals) are projected onto the coordinate axes, yielding the values σ1, σ2, T1, and T2 [45]:
$$\ln \sigma_{1} = \ln \sigma_{0} - \frac{\Delta E}{{kT_{1} }}$$
(3)
$$\ln \sigma_{2} = \ln \sigma_{0} - \frac{\Delta E}{{kT_{2} }}$$
(4)
By subtracting the logarithmic form of the conductivity equation term by term, the following relationship is derived:
$$\ln \sigma_{1} - \ln \sigma_{2} = \frac{\Delta E}{k}\left( {\frac{1}{{T_{2} }} - \frac{1}{{T_{1} }}} \right)$$
(5)
From this expression, the activation energy can be calculated as [45]:
$$\Delta E = \frac{{\ln \frac{{\sigma_{1} }}{{\sigma_{2} }}T_{1} T_{2} }}{{k\left( {T_{1} - T_{2} } \right)}}$$
(6)
As shown in Fig. 3, activation energy decreases with increasing frequency, further confirming the hopping nature of conduction. This frequency dependence of Eₐ reflects the reduced thermal energy required for charge carrier transitions at higher frequencies and supports the interpretation based on localized polaronic transport. (Figure 6)
Fig. 6
Variation of the activation energy (Ea) for hopping conductivity as a function of frequency for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites. Ea decreases systematically with increasing frequency, confirming thermally activated small polaron hopping. The strongest frequency dependence is observed in Cu-rich samples, while Co-rich compositions show reduced Ea values, consistent with the emergence of localized relaxation pathways
Full size image
The activation energy associated with hopping conduction in CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites decreases notably with increasing frequency. Its behavior is well-explained by Koops’ phenomenological model [46], which treats ferrites as inhomogeneous dielectric materials composed of well-conducting grains (crystallites) separated by poorly conducting grain boundaries. These grain boundaries typically harbor a high density of structural defects that serve as charge carrier traps, impeding electron mobility, particularly at low frequencies.
At lower frequencies, charge transport is dominated by the grain boundaries and interphase regions, where defects lead to higher activation energies and lower conductivities. As the measurement frequency increases, the applied alternating field enhances the probability of localized electron hopping between transition metal ions of variable valence, such as Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co3+/Co2+. Under high-frequency excitation, polarization of the electron clouds occurs more rapidly, thereby facilitating valence fluctuation and short-range charge transfer [47]. This dynamic reduces the effective energy barrier, resulting in lower activation energies and enhanced conductivity at elevated frequencies [48].
The dominant hopping mechanism also evolves with increasing cobalt substitution. At low cobalt ion concentrations, the primary contribution to the hopping conduction mechanism arises from the valence transition Fe3+  + e⁻ → Fe2+, which predominantly occurs at the B-sites of the spinel structure due to the octahedral coordination preference of Fe2+. However, as the cobalt content increases, cobalt ions begin to actively participate in the conduction process.
The smaller ionic radius of Co3+ compared to Co2+, along with the ability of Co2+ to occupy both A-sites (tetrahedral) and B-sites (octahedral), introduces an additional conduction pathway: Co2+  + h ↔ Co3+. This redox mechanism can occur within both sublattices, further enhancing the electrical conductivity of the material.
Therefore, the overall conductivity in these ferrites is governed not only by the cobalt content, but also by the specific cation distribution across A and B sites in the spinel lattice. The refined cation distribution, derived via cationic occupancy modeling and previously reported in [24], is presented in Table 2.
Figure 4 presents the dependence of the B-site Fe ion concentration and the corresponding activation energy for hopping conduction on cobalt content. (Figure 7)
Fig. 7
Dependence of the iron ion concentration in the B-sublattice and the activation energy for hopping conduction on the cobalt ion content in CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites
Full size image
The results show an inverse correlation between the Fe concentration at B-sites and the hopping activation energy. As the number of Fe ions participating in Fe3+/Fe2+ hopping decreases due to substitution by Co, the contribution of Co-mediated conduction increases. This compositional transition is reflected in the nonlinear behavior of ln(σT) vs. 1000/T plots at high cobalt levels, indicating a dual-conduction mechanism involving both Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co3+/Co2+redox pairs.

3.4 Analysis of dielectric properties with theoretical correlation

In spinel ferrites, dielectric behavior is governed by the interplay of cation distribution, structural disorder, grain boundary effects, and thermally activated charge dynamics [49, 50]. These factors influence both carrier mobility and the polarization response under an external field. To disentangle these contributions, three theoretical models were employed in a complementary fashion. Jonscher’s universal power law was first applied to describe frequency-dependent conductivity in Cu-rich samples, where long-range polaron hopping between Fe2+/Fe3+ dominates and the exponent s remains within its physical range (0 < s < 1). However, in Co-rich ferrites, anomalous values (s > 1) revealed that a single-exponent description was insufficient. In these cases, the modified Jonscher model was used, introducing two exponents (n and m) to separately capture low-frequency hopping processes and high-frequency localized relaxation. Finally, the Almond–West model was employed to quantify the dynamic crossover between DC and AC conduction via the onset frequency ωH, which provides a direct measure of carrier hopping rates. Together, these models establish a coherent framework: Jonscher identifies the dominant conduction mechanism, the modified Jonscher resolves coexisting hopping and relaxation processes, and Almond–West quantifies their frequency-domain dynamics across the CoxCu1-xFe2O4 series.

3.4.1 Joncher's power law fit

Jonscher’s universal power law is widely applied to disordered systems, particularly ferrites, where conduction occurs via thermally activated hopping between localized states. It describes the frequency dependence of the real part of AC conductivity as [51]:
$$\sigma \left( \omega \right) = \sigma_{DC} + A\omega^{s}$$
(7)
Here σDC is the frequency – independent DC conductivity; A is a temperature – dependent constant; ω = 2πf is the angular frequency; s is the frequency exponent, typically 0 < s < 1.
The value of the power s reflects the dominant conduction mechanism. Values near 1 suggest long-range translational motion or ideal Debye-type behavior, whereas lower values (s < 1) indicate short-range hopping conduction, typical of ferrites with localized charge transport via Fe2+/Fe3+ transitions at B-sites.
The frequency-dependent AC conductivity data at room temperature for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites, presented in Fig. 5, exhibit a typical dispersive behavior that is well-described by Jonscher’s Power Law, as evidenced by the close agreement between the experimental data and the fitted curves. (Figure 8)
Fig. 8
Frequency dependence of AC conductivity for CoxCu1–xFe2O4 ferrites at room temperature, with solid lines representing fits to Jonscher’s Power Law model. Cu-rich samples (x ≤ 0.4) display typical sublinear dispersion (s < 1), characteristic of long-range hopping conduction, while Co-rich samples (x ≥ 0.6) exhibit anomalously steep slopes (s > 1), indicating a transition toward dipolar relaxation and interfacial polarization effects
Full size image
For Cu-rich compositions (x = 0.0–0.4), the values range from 0.558 to 0.682 (Table 5), which is consistent with long-range polaron hopping via Fe2+/Fe3+ pairs in a moderately disordered spinel lattice. In this regime, Cu2+ ions occupy octahedral sites without significantly disrupting the Fe2+/Fe3+ hopping network.
Table 5
Summarizes the fitted Jonscher’s and modified Jonscher’s exponents for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites
Composition
Jonscher
s
R2
Modified Jonscher
n
Modified Jonscher
m
R2
CuFe2O4
0.627
0.99
Co0.2Cu0.8Fe2O4
0.682
0.99
Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4
0.558
0.98
Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4
1.180
0.99
0.142
1.217
0.99
Co0.8Cu0.2Fe2O4
1.146
0.99
0.153
1.227
0.99
CoFe2O4
1.351
0.99
0.146
1.770
0.99
In contrast, Co-rich compositions (x ≥ 0.6) exhibit high s values (1.180–1.351), which exceed the theoretical limits of the classical model. Such values imply an unphysical super-linear increase in conductivity with frequency and indicate that a single hopping mechanism is no longer sufficient to describe the dielectric response. This behavior is attributed to the increased substitution of Co2+ ions, which alters the cation distribution, introduces stronger structural distortion, and enhances localization of carriers. The redistribution of Co2+ into both tetrahedral and octahedral sites disrupts the Fe2+/Fe3+ network and promotes the emergence of interfacial polarization and short-range relaxation processes [52], particularly at high frequencies. An alternative explanation for the observed increase in the power-law exponent may be the contribution of additional conduction processes to the overall transport mechanism [53]. Specifically, increasing cobalt concentration introduces a higher density of charge carriers, thereby enhancing conductivity through supplementary pathways such as Co2 + /Co3 + valence fluctuations.

3.4.2 Temperature-dependent evolution of the Jonscher exponent

To better understand the conduction dynamics in CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites, the variation of the Jonscher frequency exponent s was analyzed as a function of temperature from 300 to 475 K (Table 6, Fig. 9). The exponent s offers insight into the underlying conduction mechanism: values.
Table 6
Jonscher exponent s versus temperature for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites (x = 0.0–1.0), showing the evolution of conduction mechanisms with composition and temperature
Temperature, K
Jonscher exponent s
x = 0.0
x = 0.2
x = 0.4
x = 0.6
x = 0.8
x = 1.0
300
0.627
0.682
0.558
1.180
1.146
1.351
325
0.568
0.605
0.398
0.984
0.932
1.057
350
0.523
0.476
0.350
0.910
0.452
0.892
375
0.552
0.394
0.271
0.870
0.627
0.792
400
0.526
0.365
0.482
0.851
0.550
0.692
425
0.590
0.929
0.665
0.931
0.627
1.227
450
0.656
0.896
0.768
1.006
0.939
1.148
475
0.776
0.654
0.844
1.175
0.990
1.014
Fig. 9
Temperature dependence of the Jonscher exponent s for Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4 (x = 0.4) and CoFe2O4 (x = 1.0). For x = 0.4, two distinct conduction regions are observed: (R-I) a decreasing s trend with temperature from 300 to 375 K, characteristic of small polaron hopping (CBH model), and (R-II) an increasing s trend above 375 K, suggesting the onset of localized dielectric relaxation. In contrast, the Co-rich sample (x = 1.0) exhibits s > 1 over most of the range, indicating dominant dipolar relaxation and interfacial polarization mechanisms
Full size image
s < 1 typically reflect hopping conduction (as described by the CBH model [54]), whereas s > 1 suggests more complex behaviors, including interfacial polarization or fit artifacts when a single power law becomes insufficient.
As seen in Fig. 8, Cu-rich samples (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4) exhibit an overall decrease in s with increasing temperature, especially notable for x = 0.4 (from 0.524 at 300 K to 0.271 at 375 K). This trend supports the Correlated Barrier Hopping (CBH) mechanism [54], where higher temperatures enhance carrier mobility and reduce the frequency dispersion of AC conductivity. It also aligns with the small polaron hopping model, in which thermally activated electrons hop between localized Fe2+/Fe3+ states at octahedral sites. A partial recovery of s at higher temperatures (e.g., 0.844 at 475 K for x = 0.4) could reflect thermal activation of additional hopping pathways or onset of interfacial effects.
In contrast, Co-rich compositions (x = 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) start with anomalously high s values at 300 K (1.46–1.35), exceeding the theoretical range of Jonscher’s model. These values suggest dominance of localized dielectric relaxation, possibly linked to interfacial polarization or grain boundary effects. For x = 0.6, s gradually decreases with temperature, consistent with a transition toward thermally assisted hopping. However, for x = 1.0 (CoFe2O4), the exponent remains close to or above unity across the temperature range, indicating persistent short-range relaxation or composite-like dielectric behavior.
Notably, at 425 K, a discontinuous jump in s is observed for several compositions: for x = 0.2, s increases from 0.682 to 0.929; for x = 0.4, from 0.558 to 0.665. This discontinuity may result from a microstructural transition, such as cation redistribution between tetrahedral and octahedral sites or thermally induced strain near grain boundaries, temporarily increasing carrier localization and enhancing frequency dispersion [55].
These temperature trends provide strong evidence for a compositionally tunable conduction mechanism: for Cu-rich samples favor long-range hopping at elevated temperatures, for Co-rich samples exhibit localized relaxation mechanisms, likely associated with enhanced disorder and cation substitution.

3.4.3 Modified Joncher's power law fit

To describe the frequency response of Co-rich samples, the modified Jonscher power law was applied [56]:
$$\sigma \left( \omega \right) = \sigma_{DC} + A\omega^{n} + B\omega^{m}$$
(8)
where the exponents n and m capture low-and high-frequency dispersion, respectively (Fig. 9).
As summarized in Table 5, the low-frequency exponent n (0.142–0.153) indicates that hopping conduction remains active, though increasingly constrained as cobalt content rises. In contrast, the high-frequency exponent m grows markedly with substitution—from 1.217 for Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4 to 1.770 for CoFe2O4 – signaling a stronger contribution from dipolar relaxation and interfacial polarization at elevated cobalt levels [57, 58]. (Figure 10)
Fig. 10
Modified Jonscher power law model applied to Co-rich CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites, capturing both long-range hopping (n) and localized relaxation (m) effects
Full size image
These results demonstrate that cobalt incorporation progressively suppresses extended polaron pathways and enhances localized dielectric processes, producing a mixed conduction regime where both hopping and relaxation mechanisms coexist.

3.4.4 Almond–west model analysis

To complement the Jonscher analysis and obtain dynamic parameters of carrier relaxation, the Almond–West model was applied to the AC conductivity data. Unlike Jonscher’s framework, which characterizes dispersion behavior, the Almond–West model introduces the onset frequency (ωH), corresponding to the average hopping or relaxation rate of mobile charge carriers [56, 59]:
$$\sigma \left( \omega \right) = \sigma_{DC} \left[ {1 + \left( {\frac{\omega }{{\omega_{H} }}} \right)^{n} } \right]$$
(9)
where ωH defines the frequency at which conductivity transition from frequency independent (DC) to frequency dependent (AC) behavior, and the exponent n reflects the degree of dispersion related to hopping dynamics.
The fitting results (Table 7) reveal a clear compositional dependence. In Cu-rich ferrites (x ≤ 0.4), n lies well below unity (0.234–0.392), and ωH remains relatively low (4–32 kHz). These values are consistent with long-range Fe2 + /Fe3 + polaron hopping across continuous B–O–B pathways, where carriers require higher thermal activation to participate in conduction.
Table 7
Almond–West model fitting for CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites
Composition
n
ωH, Hz
R2
CuFe2O4
0.38
14,524.9
0.97
Co0.2Cu0.8Fe2O4
0.39
32,037.5
0.96
Co0.4Cu0.6Fe2O4
0.23
4239.8
0.97
Co0.6Cu0.4Fe2O4
1.14
17,808.5
0.99
Co0.8Cu0.2Fe2O4
1.07
25,483.8
0.99
CoFe2O4
1.00
87,029.4
0.95
As cobalt content increases (x ≥ 0.6), ωH rises sharply, reaching nearly 87 kHz in CoFe2O4, while n approaches or slightly exceeds unity (1.0–1.15). This reflects faster carrier dynamics dominated by short-range relaxation and interfacial processes. The steep increase in ωH indicates that localized hopping and dipolar polarization processes occur at much shorter timescales than in Cu-rich ferrites. Such behavior is consistent with enhanced structural disorder, oxygen vacancy formation, and cation redistribution, which fragment the Fe–O–Fe hopping network and favor Co2+/Co3+ valence fluctuations. In addition, Maxwell–Wagner-type interfacial polarization at grain boundaries likely contributes to the relaxation features observed in Co-rich samples, reinforcing the role of microstructural heterogeneity.
Taken together, the Almond–West parameters demonstrate a composition-driven transition from slow, long-range hopping conduction in Cu-rich samples to fast, localized dielectric relaxation in Co-rich ferrites. Importantly, ωH serves as a quantitative marker of this transition, providing direct evidence that Co substitution accelerates carrier dynamics and increases the frequency window where relaxation dominates.
These insights highlight the importance of using complementary models: while the modified Jonscher approach identifies the coexistence of hopping and relaxation processes, the Almond–West analysis quantifies their dynamic crossover through ωH. This dual-model perspective reinforces the strong coupling between cation distribution, oxygen vacancy concentration, and charge carrier mobility in mixed-metal ferrite systems.
Due to their tunable conduction mechanisms, enhanced dielectric relaxation, and strong interfacial polarization effects, cobalt-substituted copper ferrites (CoxCu1-xFe2O4) are promising candidates for a range of electronic and functional device applications. The observed transition from long-range polaron hopping in Cu-rich samples to localized dielectric relaxation in Co-rich compositions makes these spinels suitable for high-frequency electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, magnetoelectric sensors, and high-permittivity dielectric components [6062]. The increase of onset frequency (ωH up to 87 kHz), combined with significant AC conductivity and frequency-dependent activation energy, further indicates potential for microwave absorption and impedance-tunable varistors [63]. Moreover, the ability to engineer charge dynamics and carrier localization through controlled cation distribution provides a pathway for optimizing these ferrites in spintronic devices, magnetoresistive elements, and multifunctional memory architectures [6466]. To further contextualize these findings in terms of state-of-the-art ferrite applications, a benchmarking analysis is provided below.

3.4.5 Applied relevance

To contextualize the dielectric and transport behavior of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites, it is useful to benchmark them against representative ferrite and composite systems (Table 8). Conventional soft ferrites such as NiZn and MnZn typically exhibit onset frequencies (ωH) below 10 kHz, limiting their performance in high-frequency regimes, despite their widespread use in EMI filters, power electronics, and sensors. By comparison, the present Co-substituted Cu ferrites reach ωH values up to 87 kHz, placing them among the faster-responding spinel systems reported to date. This frequency upshift is particularly advantageous for microwave absorption and EMI shielding, where rapid polarization and relaxation are needed to dissipate incident energy.
Table 8
Benchmarking of dielectric/transport properties of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 ferrites against representative ferrite systems
Material system
Frequency range (ωH)
Dielectric/conduction behavior
Typical application relevance
Reference
NiZnCo ferrite
10 kHz to 120 MHz
ε′ and tan δ decrease with increasing frequency and Co content; conduction via Fe2+/Fe3+ hopping. Impedance decreases with T and frequency.
High-frequency applications, energy storage, and microelectronics
[67]
MnZn ferrite
 ~ 10 kHz
Higher σDC than pure Mn ferrite; conduction via electron hopping between localized states (VRH)
Power electronics, EMI filters, magnetic cores, sensors, biomedical
[68]
YbCoZn ferrite
 < 10 kHz
High ε′ at low frequencies due to interfacial polarization; decreases with frequency/Yb content. Grain effects dominate conduction
Magnetoelectric applications, EM-enhanced devices
[69]
CoMnZn ferrite
 ~ 10 kHz
ε′ and ε″ decrease with frequency (Maxwell–Wagner + Koops’ theory). High AC resistivity at low frequencies, reduced at high f
High-frequency EM devices requiring low ε′ and loss
[70]
PVDF-ZFO-SDS composites
100 Hz to 1 MHz
ε′ high at low f due to space-charge polarization; ε′ increases with SDS/ZFO content; σAC increasing with f and filler loading (TPT)
Energy storage, high-ε′ dielectrics, ferroelectric devices
[71]
CoFe2O4/Carbon nanocomposites
0.01 Hz
Low Rct reduced by carbon; nanointerfaces create conductive networks enhancing charge transport
Electrochemical supercapacitors, magnetically assisted devices
[72]
CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (present study)
up to 87 kHz
Transition from long-range Fe2+/Fe3+ hopping (Cu-rich) to localized relaxation and Co2+/Co3+ valence fluctuations (Co-rich). Tunable via cation redistribution
High-frequency EMI shielding, microwave absorption
This work
Other complex ferrite systems, such as CoMnZn or YbCoZn, show enhanced dielectric constants and interfacial polarization but remain constrained by ωH near the 10 kHz regime. Similarly, ferrite–polymer or ferrite–nanocarbon composites (e.g., PVDF–ZFO–SDS and CoFe2O4/carbon) improve dielectric constant or conductivity through interfacial engineering, yet their behavior is strongly dependent on filler content and percolation pathways. In contrast, CoxCu1-xFe2O4 achieves comparable improvements through intrinsic cation redistribution and oxygen-vacancy formation, without the need for composite additives.
From a design perspective, the tunable conduction pathway is the distinctive advantage of the present system. Cu-rich ferrites favor long-range Fe2+/Fe3+ hopping, resulting in relatively low activation energies and moderate dielectric losses, suitable for capacitors and varistors. In contrast, Co-rich ferrites (x ≥ 0.8) exhibit localized dielectric relaxation and high ωH, making them particularly suited for high-frequency EMI shielding, microwave absorbers, and impedance-tunable devices. Intermediate compositions (x = 0.4–0.6) provide a balance between conduction and relaxation, offering promise for energy-storage capacitors and multifunctional components.
The benchmarking underscores that the CoxCu1-xFe2O4 series bridges the gap between conventional soft ferrites and engineered ferrite composites, providing comparable or superior frequency response through controlled cation distribution. These findings position the system as a versatile and tunable platform for next-generation electronic, spintronic, and electromagnetic devices, with EMI shielding applications identified as a key direction for future experimental validation.

4 Conclusion

In this study, a series of CoxCu1-xFe2O4 (x = 0.0–1.0) ferrite samples were synthesized via the citrate sol–gel autocombustion method and systematically investigated over broad temperature and frequency ranges to elucidate their charge transport behavior.
Electrical conductivity increased with temperature for all compositions, consistent with thermally activated processes. In Co-rich samples (x = 0.8 and 1.0), a pronounced slope change in the ln(σT) vs. 1000/T plots above 373 K signaled a transition in the dominant conduction mechanism. At low temperatures (298–348 K), conduction was primarily governed by grain boundary effects and defect-assisted hopping, showing strong frequency dispersion but weak temperature dependence. At elevated temperatures, long-range small-polaron hopping between Fe3+/Fe2+ ions at B-sites dominated, while increasing cobalt substitution introduced additional Co2+/Co3+ valence fluctuations, producing a more complex transport landscape.
XPS analysis confirmed that Fe is predominantly Fe3+ with minor Fe2+, Cu is mainly Cu2+ with traces of Cu0/Cu+, and Co exists largely as Co2+ with partial oxidation to Co3+ in Co-rich ferrites. The coexistence of Fe3+/Fe2+ and Co2+/Co3+ redox couples, combined with an increased concentration of oxygen-vacancy–related states, establishes multiple charge-transfer channels. This spectroscopic evidence directly links cation redistribution and defect chemistry to the observed transition from long-range polaron hopping in Cu-rich samples to localized dielectric relaxation and interfacial polarization in Co-rich compositions.
Dielectric analysis further supported this conclusion. The frequency-dependent decrease in activation energy indicated enhanced carrier mobility under alternating fields. Modeling with Jonscher’s power law, its modified form, and the Almond–West model captured both long-range and localized conduction processes. Notably, anomalously high dispersion parameters (s > 1, m > 1) in Co-rich compositions highlighted the dominance of short-range dipolar relaxation and interfacial polarization. The Almond–West analysis revealed a composition-driven increase in onset frequency ωH from ~ 4 kHz (CuFe2O4) to ~ 87 kHz (CoFe2O4), providing a quantitative marker of accelerated carrier dynamics in Co-substituted ferrites.
These findings, reinforced by Koops’ model, establish that cation redistribution, valence fluctuations, and oxygen-vacancy formation govern the dielectric and transport behavior of CoxCu1-xFe2O4. The compositional tunability demonstrated here highlights the potential of these ferrites for high-frequency applications such as EMI shielding, capacitive components, and impedance-based sensors.

Acknowledgements

J. Mazurenko acknowledge the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange. Authors thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine for funding the project 24BF051-01M (0124U001654). J. Mazurenko acknowledges the National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic for the Support of Mobility of Students, PhD Students, University Teachers, Researchers and Artists for financial support (application number 53157). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and inspiration provided by the II European Chemistry School for Ukrainians (https://acmin.agh.edu.pl/en/detail/s/ii-european-chemistry-school-for-ukrainians), which contributed to the development of the research ideas presented in this work.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Title
Study of charge transfer mechanisms in cobalt-substituted copper ferrites
Authors
Julia Mazurenko
Larysa Kaykan
Volodymyr Mokliak
Mateusz M. Marzec
Ludmila Matzui
Ludmila Vovchenko
Olena Yakovenko
Publication date
01-11-2025
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics / Issue 33/2025
Print ISSN: 0957-4522
Electronic ISSN: 1573-482X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-025-16193-w
1.
go back to reference S. Thammarong, X. Yu, P. Yin, R. Yang, W. Zhang, Co2+ doped zinc manganese ferrite nanoparticles for magnetic induction hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 628, 173216 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173216CrossRef
2.
go back to reference J. Duan, S. Fan, X. Li, S. Liu, Enhanced conversion of methane to liquid-phase oxygenates via hollow ferrite nanotube@horseradish peroxidase based photoenzymatic catalysis. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 361, 124593 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124593CrossRef
3.
go back to reference A.A. Ibrahim, M. Saed, S.A. Abdullah, K. Dellinger, S.O. Obare, G. Pathiraja, Magnetic zinc ferrite nanostructures: recent advancements for environmental and biomedical applications. J. Alloys Compd. Commun. 4, 100038 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacomc.2024.100038CrossRef
4.
go back to reference K. Paulovicova, M. Rajnak, J. Tothova, B. Dolnik, M. Timko, P. Kopcansky, Rheodielectric study of transformer-oil-based ferrofluids. Phys. Rev. E (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.111.045403CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference B. Patil, V.M. Jali, Z. Li, N. Shukla, S.F. Shaikh, M. Ubaidullah, B. Chethan, V. Jagadeesha Angadi, Tailoring structural, magnetic, and humidity sensing properties of Cu-Zn ferrites for multifunctional sensor applications. Ceram. Int. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.05.020CrossRef
6.
go back to reference O. Yakovenko, L. Matzui, L. Vovchenko, V. Zagorodnii, Experimental studies of absorption properties of polymer composites based on core–shell fillers with hybrid shells. Ceram. Int. 50(24), 52480–52489 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.099CrossRef
7.
go back to reference V. Seetha Rama Raju, C-TAB and magnetic field assisted hydrothermal synthesis of cobalt ferrite for the mid-range 5G frequency band applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 628, 173146 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173146CrossRef
8.
go back to reference B.K. Ostafiychuk, L.S. Kaykan, J.S. Mazurenko, B.Y. Deputat, S.V. Koren, Effect of substitution on the mechanism of conductivity of ultra dispersed lithium - iron spinel, substituted with magnesium ions. J. Nano-Electron. Phys. 9(5), 05018-1-05018–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.9(5).05018CrossRef
9.
go back to reference B. Naresh, N. Hari Kumar, J.L. Naik, The effects of Ce3+ ions on the structural, optical, Raman, photoluminescence, photocatalysis, magnetic, and electric properties of Co-Mg-Bi ferrites. Ceram. Int. 51(20), 32033–32048 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.393CrossRef
10.
go back to reference LYu. Matzui, O.A. Syvolozhskyi, L.L. Vovchenko, O.S. Yakovenko, T.A. Len, O.V. Ischenko, A.V. Vakaliuk, V.V. Oliynyk, V.V. Zagorodnii, A. Naumenko, M. Cojocari, G. Fedorov, P. Kuzhir, Segregated conductive polymer composite with Fe3O4-decorated graphite nanoparticles for microwave shielding. Materials 17(12), 2808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17122808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference D. Wen, J. Zhang, A. Kulikov, J. Cui, Z. Chen, Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, J. Guo, R. Li, The effect of Al3+ ion substitution on microwave dielectric and magnetic properties of YIG ferrites. Ceram. Int. 51(5), 6272–6280 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.12.072CrossRef
12.
go back to reference S. Nayak, S.S. Nayak, A.A. Kittur, S. Nayak, D.R. Joshi, Synthesis, fabrication, and performance evaluation of lanthanum doped nickel cobalt ferrite electrode for supercapacitors in energy storage applications. J. Energy Storage 101, 113918 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.113918CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Z. Wang, S. Lei, C. Liu, L. Zhang, X. Ma, M. Gao, Q. Li, C. Chen, W. Zhao, Facile synthesis and green high-performance electromagnetic wave absorbing composite material based on biomass cotton and Ni @ nanoporous carbon. Chem. Phys. 595, 112716 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2025.112716CrossRef
14.
go back to reference N.Y. Ivanichok, I.M. Budzuliak, M.I. Moiseienko, R.P. Lisovskiy, B.I. Rachii, A.M. Gamarnyk, L.V. Turovska, S.A. Lisovska, Electrochemical properties of nanoporous carbon materials obtained from raw materials of plant origin (hemp shives). Фізика і хімія твердого тіла 21(1), 35–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15330/pcss.21.1.35-42CrossRef
15.
go back to reference X. Wu, A. Dong, S. Xu, H. Huang, K. Xiao, Y. Jiang, K. Wang, X. Zhang, Efficient broadband sea urchin-like Fe3O4@C electromagnetic wave absorbing materials. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 600, 172124 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172124CrossRef
16.
go back to reference D. Fei, Y. Guo, J. Zhou, J. Tao, N. Chen, Z. Yao, X. Tao, L. Duan, J. Liu, B. Ouyang, Chemical silver plating synergistically enhances the contribution of interfaces and defects in the Ni-Zn-Nd spinel ferrite-based electromagnetic wave absorbing material. Mater. Res. Bull. 173, 112662 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112662CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Q.J. Ziadzi, H. Wu, K. Deng, Y. Li, B. Chao, S. Deng, F. Zhang, Development of lightweight microwave-absorbing composites incorporating NFG/MZFO resin-matrix materials via selective laser sintering. J. Mater. Res. Technol. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.06.005CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Y. Duan, Z. Xie, M. Du, X. Feng, Q. Chang, Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of NiCo2O4 with high-performance electromagnetic wave absorption. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 629, 173207 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173207CrossRef
19.
go back to reference P. Kumar, P. Negi, A.K. Dixit, H.B. Baskey, S. Kumar, A.K. Mishra, A. Kumar, Superparamagnetic nanocubes of Co and Cu co-doped Mn-based ferrites as microwave absorbing material. Mater. Chem. Phys. 319, 129360 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129360CrossRef
20.
go back to reference S.H. Dewi, D.S. Winatapura, J. Setiawan, A. Mulyawan, Y.E. Gunanto, W.A. Adi, Exploring the structural and magnetic properties of La-doped nickel ferrite for microwave absorbing application. J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater. 603, 172267 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.172267CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Z. Lin, S. Hao, Z. Li, J. Hu, A. Song, Elucidation of the optical, electronic, and photoelectrochemical properties of p-type CuFe2O4 photocathodes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 77, 511–519 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.248CrossRef
22.
go back to reference S.N. Khan, A. Mir, I. Saeed, I. Sultana, H.T. Masood, Effect of cobalt substitution on electromagnetic response of Manganese-Zinc spinel ferrite composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 319, 118344 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2025.118344CrossRef
23.
go back to reference I.S. Kapte, S. Niyogi, P.J. Qureshi, V. Khade, T. Avanish Babu, K.V. Siva kumar, W. Madhuri, Microwave assisted cobalt nickel ferrite as exhaust thrust sensor and EMI shield. Ceram. Int. 50(17), 30754–30762 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.05.376CrossRef
24.
go back to reference J. Mazurenko, E. Szostak, L. Gondek, L. Kaykan, A. Zywczak, O. Vyshnevskyi, Structural and magnetic studies of Cobalt-substituted copper ferrites for efficient photocatalytic dye degradation. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 171, 113648 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113648CrossRef
25.
go back to reference L.S. Kaykan, J.S. Mazurenko, N.V. Ostapovych, A.K. Sijo, N.Y. ’Ivanichok, Effect of pH on structural morphology and magnetic properties of ordered phase of cobalt doped lithium ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel auto-combustion method. J. Nano-Electron. Phys. 12(4), 04008-1-04008–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.12(4).04008CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Z. Wang, J. Huang, L. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Liu, S. Zhao, Z. Liu, Cation‐tuning induced d‐band center modulation on Co‐based spinel oxide for oxygen reduction/evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202114696CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference L. Song, H. Zhang, J. Xiong, Z. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Zhou, W. Yang, D. Cao, H. Huang, L. Chen, M. Fu, D. Ye, Doped Mn modulates the local charge distribution of cobalt-based spinel catalysts to promote the availability of ligand lattice oxygen for complete oxidation of methane. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 343, 123547 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123547CrossRef
28.
go back to reference A.P. Grosvenor, B.A. Kobe, M.C. Biesinger, N.S. McIntyre, Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf. Interface Anal. 36(12), 1564–1574 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1984CrossRef
29.
go back to reference M.C. Biesinger, B.P. Payne, A.P. Grosvenor, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson, R.S.C. Smart, Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257(7), 2717–2730 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051CrossRef
30.
go back to reference M.C. Biesinger, Advanced analysis of copper X-ray photoelectron spectra. Surf. Interface Anal. 49(13), 1325–1334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.6239CrossRef
31.
go back to reference P.C. Healy, S. Myhra, A.M. Stewart, XPS studies of planar four-coordinate copper(II) and copper(III) complexes. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 26(11), L1884–L1887 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.26.L1884CrossRef
32.
go back to reference T.J. Chuang, C.R. Brundle, D.W. Rice, Interpretation of the x-ray photoemission spectra of cobalt oxides and cobalt oxide surfaces. Surf. Sci. 59(2), 413–429 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(76)90026-1CrossRef
33.
go back to reference N.S. McIntyre, M.G. Cook, X-ray photoelectron studies on some oxides and hydroxides of cobalt, nickel, and copper. Anal. Chem. 47(13), 2208–2213 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60363a034CrossRef
34.
go back to reference K. Ugendar, G. Markandeyulu, S. Mallesh, Polaron conduction mechanism in Nickel ferrite and its rare-earth derivatives. Phys. B Condens. Matter 606, 412819 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2021.412819CrossRef
35.
go back to reference A.M. Abdeen, Electric conduction in Ni–Zn ferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 185(2), 199–206 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(97)01144-xCrossRef
36.
go back to reference R.A. Mondal, B.S. Murty, V.R.K. Murthy, Maxwell-Wagner polarization in grain boundary segregated NiCuZn ferrite. Curr. Appl. Phys. 14(12), 1727–1733 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2014.10.005CrossRef
37.
go back to reference E. Veena Gopalan, K.A. Malini, S. Saravanan, D. Sakthi Kumar, Y. Yoshida, M.R. Anantharaman, Evidence for polaron conduction in nanostructured manganese ferrite. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41(18), 185005 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/18/185005CrossRef
38.
go back to reference P.J. Phillips, T.E. Whall, V.A.M. Brabers, Hopping conduction and possible Coulomb gap effects in manganese and zinc ferrous ferrite. Philos. Mag. B 71(1), 23–39 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/01418639508240290CrossRef
39.
go back to reference L.S. Kaykan, J.S. Mazurenko, I.P. Yaremiy, K.V. Bandura, N.V. Ostapovych, Effect of nickel ions substitution on the structural and electrical properties of a nanosized lithium-iron ferrite obtained by the sol-gel auto-combustion method. J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 11(5), 05041-1-05041–05047 (2019). https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.11(5).05041CrossRef
40.
go back to reference S.K. Mandal, S. Singh, P. Dey, J.N. Roy, P.R. Mandal, T.K. Nath, Frequency and temperature dependence of dielectric and electrical properties of TFe 2 O 4 (T = Ni, Zn, Zn 0.5 Ni 0.5) ferrite nanocrystals. J. Alloys Compd. 656, 887–896 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.045CrossRef
41.
go back to reference P. Chand, S. Vaish, P. Kumar, Structural, optical and dielectric properties of transition metal (MFe2O4; M = Co, Ni and Zn) nanoferrites. Phys. B Condens. Matter 524, 53–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2017.08.060CrossRef
42.
go back to reference A.A. Khan, M.U. Fayaz, M.N. Khan, M. Iqbal, A. Majeed, R. Bilkees, S. Mukhtar, M. Javed, Investigation of charge transport mechanism in semiconducting La0.5Ca0.5Mn0.5Fe0.5O3 manganite prepared by sol–gel method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29(16), 13577–13587 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9485-2CrossRef
43.
go back to reference T. Das, J.D. Nicholas, Y. Qi, Long-range charge transfer and oxygen vacancy interactions in strontium ferrite. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(9), 4493–4506 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta10357jCrossRef
44.
go back to reference M. Azizar Rahman, A.K.M. Akther Hossain, Electrical transport properties of Mn–Ni–Zn ferrite using complex impedance spectroscopy. Phys. Scr. 89(2), 025803 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/89/02/025803CrossRef
45.
go back to reference A. Lungu, I. Malaescu, C.N. Marin, P. Vlazan, P. Sfirloaga, The electrical properties of manganese ferrite powders prepared by two different methods. Phys. B Condens. Matter 462, 80–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2015.01.025CrossRef
46.
go back to reference C.G. Koops, On the dispersion of resistivity and dielectric constant of some semiconductors at audiofrequencies. Phys. Rev. 83(1), 121–124 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.83.121CrossRef
47.
go back to reference R.K. Panda, D. Behera, Investigation of electric transport behavior of bulk CoFe2O4 by complex impedance spectroscopy. J. Alloys Compd. 587, 481–486 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.195CrossRef
48.
go back to reference S. Minz, S.C. Sahoo, S.K. Rout, B. Behera, Structural, temperature/frequency dependence of dielectric, electrical and magnetic properties of Ni-doped inverse spinel CuFe2O4 nanoferrite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09791-5CrossRef
49.
go back to reference R.K. Panda, R. Muduli, S.K. Kar, D. Behera, Dielectric relaxation and conduction mechanism of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 615, 899–905 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.031CrossRef
50.
go back to reference R. Tang, C. Jiang, W. Qian, J. Jian, X. Zhang, H. Wang, H. Yang, Dielectric relaxation, resonance and scaling behaviors in Sr3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrite. Sci. Rep. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference A. Messaoudi, A. Omri, N. Hamdaoui, A. Benali, R. Ajjel, M.F.P. Graca, B.F.O. Costa, K. Khirouni, Advanced spinel ferrite Co06Zn03Ca01Fe2O4 nanoparticles: structural, optical, and electrical insights for functional applications. J. Australian Ceram. Soc. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-025-01235-7CrossRef
52.
go back to reference R.S.A. Raj, A. Joseph, S. Hussain, M. Fahad, T. Maity, P.M. Sarun, L.K. Joy, Frequency and temperature dependent dielectric properties of CoFe2−xYxO4: polarization and conduction mechanisms related to crystallographic symmetry and electronic transitions. J. Mater. Chem. C 13(11), 5880–5910 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4tc04677cCrossRef
53.
go back to reference M. Murtaza, M.U. Islam, M. Danish, M. Waqas, F. Ahmad, S. Atiq, M. Alsharef, A. Althobaiti, Synthesis and multifunctional properties of Ni-Co Co-doped lithium ferrites for structural, electrical, and dielectric performance in device applications. Ionics 31(6), 6495–6512 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-025-06342-wCrossRef
54.
go back to reference R. Megha, Y.T. Ravikiran, S.C. Vijaya Kumari, S. Thomas, Influence of n-type nickel ferrite in enhancing the AC conductivity of optimized polyaniline-nickel ferrite nanocomposite. Appl. Phys. A (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-017-0866-9CrossRef
55.
go back to reference R.N. Bhowmik, Temperature- and frequency-activated semiconductor-to-metal transition in soft ferromagnetic Li0.5Mn0.5Fe2O4ferrite. Mater. Res. Express 1(1), 015903 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/1/1/015903CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Y. Abbas, M. Anis-ur-Rehman, Structural, dielectric and transport properties of samarium-doped cobaltites. Ceram. Int. 48(8), 10638–10649 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.278CrossRef
57.
go back to reference S. Lenka, T. Badapanda, P. Nayak, S. Sarangi, S. Anwar, Compositional induced dielectric relaxation and electrical conduction behavior of samarium modified bismuth sodium titanate ceramic. Ceram. Int. 47(4), 5477–5486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.130CrossRef
58.
go back to reference S. Minz, S.C. Sahoo, S.K. Rout, M. Kar, B. Behera, Structural, magnetic, impedance and electric modulus response and dielectric relaxation in Co-doped inverse spinel CuFe2O4 nanoferrite. Chem. Phys. Impact 8, 100592 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100592CrossRef
59.
go back to reference D.P. Almond, A.R. West, Anomalous conductivity prefactors in fast ion conductors. Nature 306(5942), 456–457 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/306456a0CrossRef
60.
go back to reference O. Yakovenko, L. Matzui, L. Vovchenko, Y. Perets, D. Shpylka, L. Kaykan, A. Żywczak, Ł Gondek, J. Mazurenko, Electrodynamic properties of epoxy composites enhanced with nanosized ferrite fillers. Ceram. Int. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.05.151CrossRef
61.
go back to reference B. Chandra Sekhar, G.S.N. Rao, O.F. Caltun, B. Dhana Lakshmi, B. Parvatheeswara Rao, P.S.V. Subba Rao, Magnetic and magnetostrictive properties of Cu substituted Co-ferrites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 398, 59–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.09.028CrossRef
62.
go back to reference A. Murugan, V. Siva, A. Shameem, R. Deepika, S. Bharathkumar, H. Valdés, S.A. Bahadur, Electrochemical properties of nanoscale Cu Co spinel ferrite system: a promising positive electrode for high performance supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 99, 113179 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.113179CrossRef
63.
go back to reference M. Hjiri, S. Soltani, A. Jbeli, N. Mustapha, N. Ahmed Althumairi, M. Benamara, M.A. Valente, Tunable electrical properties of cobalt-doped maghemite nanoparticles for advanced resistive and thermistor applications. Nanomaterials 15(7), 534 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070534CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
64.
go back to reference A. Hirohata, H. Sukegawa, H. Yanagihara, I. Zutic, T. Seki, S. Mizukami, R. Swaminathan, Roadmap for emerging materials for spintronic device applications. IEEE Trans. Magn. 51(10), 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2015.2457393CrossRef
65.
go back to reference K.V. Siva, A. Kumar, J.A. Chelvane, A. Arockiarajan, Structural, magnetic, magnetostrictive and optical properties of Mn and Cu codoped cobalt ferrite. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 284, 115885 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115885CrossRef
66.
go back to reference K.V. Ramesh, D. Venkatesh, Effect of copper substitution on structural, electrical, and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline cobalt ferrites for memory storage applications. Physica Status Solidi (b) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202400453CrossRef
67.
go back to reference S. Jangra, P. Thakur, S. Singh, A. Thakur, Frequency and temperature dependent impedance studies: impact of cobalt substitution on Ni-Zn ferrites for high frequency applications. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 174, 113948 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2025.113948CrossRef
68.
go back to reference I. Malaescu, P. Sfirloaga, C.N. Marin, M.O. Bunoiu, P. Vlazan, Experimental investigations on the electrical conductivity and complex dielectric permittivity of ZnxMn1−xFe2O4 (x = 0 and 0.4) ferrites in a low-frequency field. Crystals 14(5), 437 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14050437CrossRef
69.
go back to reference H. Badiger, B.G. Hegde, S.P. Kubrin, N. Chougala, S. Matteppanavar, Structural, magnetic, electrical, and Mössbauer study of Yb-doped cobalt zinc ferrite nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-025-15632-yCrossRef
70.
go back to reference P. Saha, S.K. Shil, P. Roy, R.S. Auntu, N.I. Khan, S.S. Sikder, Exploring the structural, magnetic, dielectric and electrical properties of solid state method synthesized Mn3+ substituted Co–Zn ferrites. J. Mater. Sci. 60(37), 17051–17064 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-11449-6CrossRef
71.
go back to reference M. Sethy, S. Moharana, S. Chakroborty, S.C. Sahu, B. Behera, R.N. Mahaling, N. Asthana, Effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate on the dielectric and electrical properties of poly (vinylidene fluoride)-zinc ferrite composites. J. Mol. Struct. 1321, 139782 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.139782CrossRef
72.
go back to reference K. Prabakaran, T. Kavinkumar, M. Shafi, L.R. Shobin, R.V. Mangalaraja, V.R. Bhaviripudi, C.V. Abarzúa, A. Thirumurugan, Pyrolytic carbon decorated cobalt ferrite nanostructures as a negative electrode material for improved supercapacitor applications. Diamond Relat. Mater. 151, 111822 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2024.111822CrossRef