Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Summary: Executive Decision Synthesis Paradigm

Authors : Victor Tang, Kevin Otto, Warren Seering

Published in: Executive Decision Synthesis

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We have two goals for this chapter. The first is to present a summary of the key ideas of our prescriptive decision paradigm. Second is to state the overarching concepts of our paradigm. These concepts are “like the skeleton, which, invisible to the naked eye, gives form and function to the body” (Morgenthau, Politics among nations. Alferd A. Knopf, 1960). These concepts are faintly visible throughout the book, but they form the skeleton of our book. We must be clear that we are making no claims about paradigm as theory. We are grounded on theory, but we are not building theory. Third, we will argue that we a rigorous paradigm. To demonstrate rigor, we submit our paradigm to tests of theory formulated by scholars. These tests of theory are the “eye of the needle” to demonstrate the paradigm’s rigor, not to claim to theory. But nevertheless, we will thread the needle. We conclude that we have a rigorous prescriptive paradigm for robust executive decisions. The functionality and efficacy of our systematic process is verified by our simulations and case studies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2009). Organizations—Social systems conducting experiments. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Achterbergh, J., & Vriens, D. (2009). Organizations—Social systems conducting experiments. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Bacharach, S. B. (1999). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 496–515. Bacharach, S. B. (1999). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 496–515.
go back to reference Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Howard, R. A. (2007). The foundations of decision analysis revisited. In W. Edwards, R. F. Miles Jr., & D. von Winterfeldt (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis: From foundations to applications (pp. 32–56). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Howard, R. A. (2007). The foundations of decision analysis revisited. In W. Edwards, R. F. Miles Jr., & D. von Winterfeldt (Eds.), Advances in decision analysis: From foundations to applications (pp. 32–56). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Howard, R. A., & Matheson, J. E. (2004). The principles and applications of decision analysis (Vol. 1). San Mateo, CA: Strategic Decisions Group. Howard, R. A., & Matheson, J. E. (2004). The principles and applications of decision analysis (Vol. 1). San Mateo, CA: Strategic Decisions Group.
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Keren, G., & de Bruin, W. B. (2003). On the assessment of decision quality: Considerations regarding utility, conflict and accountability. In D. Hardman & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 347–363). Chichester: Wiley. Keren, G., & de Bruin, W. B. (2003). On the assessment of decision quality: Considerations regarding utility, conflict and accountability. In D. Hardman & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 347–363). Chichester: Wiley.
go back to reference Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
go back to reference Shepherd, D., & Suddaby, R. (2016). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. doi:10.1177/01492063166447102.CrossRef Shepherd, D., & Suddaby, R. (2016). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(1), 59–86. doi:10.1177/01492063166447102.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
go back to reference Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Spetzler, C. A. (2007). Building decision competency in organizations. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 450–468). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spetzler, C. A. (2007). Building decision competency in organizations. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 450–468). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.CrossRef Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384.CrossRef
go back to reference Tang, V., & Otto, K. N. (2009, August 30–September 2). Multifunctional enterprise readiness: Beyond the policy of build-test-fix cyclic rework. In Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Design Theory and Design. IDETC/DTM 2009. DETC2009-86740. San Diego, CA. Tang, V., & Otto, K. N. (2009, August 30–September 2). Multifunctional enterprise readiness: Beyond the policy of build-test-fix cyclic rework. In Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Design Theory and Design. IDETC/DTM 2009. DETC2009-86740. San Diego, CA.
go back to reference Thompson, J. D. (2004). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Thompson, J. D. (2004). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Wolpin, K. I. (2013). The limits of inference without theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wolpin, K. I. (2013). The limits of inference without theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Metadata
Title
Summary: Executive Decision Synthesis Paradigm
Authors
Victor Tang
Kevin Otto
Warren Seering
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63026-7_10