Skip to main content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Sustainability Analysis in Industry 4.0 Using Computer Modelling and Simulation

Authors : Masoud Fakhimi, Navonil Mustafee

Published in: Simulation for Industry 4.0

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

Industry 4.0 proposes the use of digital and connected manufacturing technologies for enhanced value creation. The measures that are traditionally associated with value creation include the reduction in waste, increased productivity and efficiency improved profitability, etc. With a growing interest in sustainability, it is important to supplement the conventional definition of value-creation with factors related to the environment and the society. This inclusive definition could help the realisation of sustainable development. Computer simulation and modelling (M&S) could be valuable in providing the understandings and insights necessary for coping with such all-inclusive systems which have high levels of complexity. In addition, M&S could also provide immense opportunities for stakeholders to understand the underlying dynamics of industry 4.0’s contribution to sustainable development targets. Although, the researchers have recently been applying M&S to plan and test industry 4.0 approaches but our findings show that using M&S for analysing the contribution of industry 4.0 on sustainable development are scarce. The outcome of this chapter provides insights toward future research directions and needs. Finally, this research argues for a shift from normal to post-normal M&S paradigms for sustainability analysis this is achieved through a discussion on normal and post-normal science concepts and assumptions.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Fakhimi M, Mustafee N, Stergioulas LK (2016) An investigation into modeling and simulation approaches for sustainable operations management. Simul Trans SCS 92(10):907–919 CrossRef Fakhimi M, Mustafee N, Stergioulas LK (2016) An investigation into modeling and simulation approaches for sustainable operations management. Simul Trans SCS 92(10):907–919 CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Savitz A (2013) The triple bottom line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. Wiley Savitz A (2013) The triple bottom line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. Wiley
3.
go back to reference Gabriel M, Pessl E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara 14(2):131–136 Gabriel M, Pessl E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara 14(2):131–136
4.
go back to reference Burton I (1987) Report on reports: our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 29(5):25–29 Burton I (1987) Report on reports: our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 29(5):25–29
5.
go back to reference Wiengarten F, Ahmed MU, Longoni A, Pagell M, Fynes B (2017) Complexity and the triple bottom line: an information-processing perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 37(9):1142–1163 CrossRef Wiengarten F, Ahmed MU, Longoni A, Pagell M, Fynes B (2017) Complexity and the triple bottom line: an information-processing perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 37(9):1142–1163 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strategy Environ 25(3):193–204 CrossRef McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strategy Environ 25(3):193–204 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dornfeld DA (2014) Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 1(1):63–66 CrossRef Dornfeld DA (2014) Moving towards green and sustainable manufacturing. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 1(1):63–66 CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J Oper Manage 25(6):1075–1082 CrossRef Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J Oper Manage 25(6):1075–1082 CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blunck E, Werthmann H (2017) Industry 4.0–An opportunity to realize sustainable manufacturing and its potential for a circular economy. In: DIEM: Dubrovnik international economic meeting. Dubrovnik, Croatia, vol. 3, no. 1, 12–14 Oct 2017, pp 644–666 Blunck E, Werthmann H (2017) Industry 4.0–An opportunity to realize sustainable manufacturing and its potential for a circular economy. In: DIEM: Dubrovnik international economic meeting. Dubrovnik, Croatia, vol. 3, no. 1, 12–14 Oct 2017, pp 644–666
11.
go back to reference Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp 40:536–541 CrossRef Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp 40:536–541 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bauer W, Hämmerle M, Schlund S, Vocke C (2015) Transforming to a hyper-connected society and economy–towards an “Industry 4.0”. Procedia Manuf 3:417–424 CrossRef Bauer W, Hämmerle M, Schlund S, Vocke C (2015) Transforming to a hyper-connected society and economy–towards an “Industry 4.0”. Procedia Manuf 3:417–424 CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Müller JM, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2018) What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability 10(1):247 CrossRef Müller JM, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2018) What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability 10(1):247 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stock T, Obenaus M, Kunz S, Kohl H (2018) Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Saf Environ Prot 118:254–267 CrossRef Stock T, Obenaus M, Kunz S, Kohl H (2018) Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Saf Environ Prot 118:254–267 CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Caggiano A, Caiazzo F, Teti R (2015) Digital factory approach for flexible and efficient manufacturing systems in the aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 37(1):22–127 Caggiano A, Caiazzo F, Teti R (2015) Digital factory approach for flexible and efficient manufacturing systems in the aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 37(1):22–127
16.
go back to reference Tamas P, Illies B (2016) Process improvement trends for manufacturing systems in industry 4.0. Acad J Manuf Eng 14(4) Tamas P, Illies B (2016) Process improvement trends for manufacturing systems in industry 4.0. Acad J Manuf Eng 14(4)
17.
go back to reference Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N (2011) Applications of simulation within the healthcare context. J Oper Res Soc 62(8):1431–1451 CrossRef Katsaliaki K, Mustafee N (2011) Applications of simulation within the healthcare context. J Oper Res Soc 62(8):1431–1451 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shen LY, Wu YZ, Chan EHW, Hao JL (2005) Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 6(4):339–349 CrossRef Shen LY, Wu YZ, Chan EHW, Hao JL (2005) Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 6(4):339–349 CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3(2):469–499 CrossRef Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3(2):469–499 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jain S, Kibira D (2010) A framework for multi-resolution modelling of sustainable manufacturing. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds) Winter simulation conference, Baltimore, MD. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 5–8 Dec 2010, pp 3423–3434 Jain S, Kibira D (2010) A framework for multi-resolution modelling of sustainable manufacturing. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds) Winter simulation conference, Baltimore, MD. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 5–8 Dec 2010, pp 3423–3434
21.
go back to reference Sander GC, Zheng T, Heng P, Zhong Y, Barry DA (2011) Sustainable soil and water resources: modelling soil erosion and its impact on the environment. The 19th international congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. Perth, Australia, 12–16 Dec 2011, pp 45–56 Sander GC, Zheng T, Heng P, Zhong Y, Barry DA (2011) Sustainable soil and water resources: modelling soil erosion and its impact on the environment. The 19th international congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. Perth, Australia, 12–16 Dec 2011, pp 45–56
22.
go back to reference Hashmi MZ, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW (2009) Downscaling of future rainfall extreme events: a weather generator based approach. In: The 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 international congress on modelling and simulation, Cairns, Australia, 13–17 July 2009, pp 13–17 Hashmi MZ, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW (2009) Downscaling of future rainfall extreme events: a weather generator based approach. In: The 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 international congress on modelling and simulation, Cairns, Australia, 13–17 July 2009, pp 13–17
23.
go back to reference Widok AH, Wohlgemuth V, Page B (2011) Combining sustainability criteria with discrete event simulation. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP, Fu M (eds) Winter simulation conference, Arizona, USA. Piscataway, IEEE, 5–8 Dec 2018, pp 859-870 Widok AH, Wohlgemuth V, Page B (2011) Combining sustainability criteria with discrete event simulation. In: Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP, Fu M (eds) Winter simulation conference, Arizona, USA. Piscataway, IEEE, 5–8 Dec 2018, pp 859-870
24.
go back to reference Shao G, Bengtsson N, Johansson B (2010) Interoperability for simulation of sustainable manufacturing. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds) Winter simulation conference, Baltimore, MD. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 5–8 Dec 2010, pp 55–63 Shao G, Bengtsson N, Johansson B (2010) Interoperability for simulation of sustainable manufacturing. In: Johansson B, Jain S, Montoya-Torres J, Hugan J, Yücesan E (eds) Winter simulation conference, Baltimore, MD. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 5–8 Dec 2010, pp 55–63
25.
go back to reference Yang QZ, Sheng YZ, Shen ZQ (2011) Agent-based simulation of economic sustainability in waste-to-material recovery. In: The IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Singapore, IEEE. 6–9 Dec 2011, pp 1150–1154 Yang QZ, Sheng YZ, Shen ZQ (2011) Agent-based simulation of economic sustainability in waste-to-material recovery. In: The IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, Singapore, IEEE. 6–9 Dec 2011, pp 1150–1154
26.
go back to reference Memari A, Vom Berg BW, Gomez JM (2011) An agent-based framework for adaptive sustainable transportation. In: 20th IEEE international workshops on the enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE), Paris, France. IEEE, 17–29 June 2011, pp 87–93 Memari A, Vom Berg BW, Gomez JM (2011) An agent-based framework for adaptive sustainable transportation. In: 20th IEEE international workshops on the enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE), Paris, France. IEEE, 17–29 June 2011, pp 87–93
27.
go back to reference Fakhimi M, Mustafee N, Stergioulas LK (2015) An Investigation of hybrid simulation for modeling sustainability in healthcare. In: Yilmaz L, Chan WKV, Moon I, Roeder TMK, Macal C, Rossetti MD (eds) Winter simulation conference, Huntington Beach, California. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 6–9 Dec 2015, pp 1585–1596 Fakhimi M, Mustafee N, Stergioulas LK (2015) An Investigation of hybrid simulation for modeling sustainability in healthcare. In: Yilmaz L, Chan WKV, Moon I, Roeder TMK, Macal C, Rossetti MD (eds) Winter simulation conference, Huntington Beach, California. Piscataway, IEEE, Inc. 6–9 Dec 2015, pp 1585–1596
28.
go back to reference Fakhimi M, Anagnostou A, Taylor SJE, Stergioulas LK (2014) A hybrid agent-based and discrete-event simulation approach for sustainable strategy planning and simulation analytics. In: Tolk A, Diallo SY, Ryzhov IO, Yilmaz L, Buckley S, Miller JA (eds.) Winter simulation conference. Piscataway, Savannah, USA. IEEE, 7–10 Dec 2014, pp 1573–1584 Fakhimi M, Anagnostou A, Taylor SJE, Stergioulas LK (2014) A hybrid agent-based and discrete-event simulation approach for sustainable strategy planning and simulation analytics. In: Tolk A, Diallo SY, Ryzhov IO, Yilmaz L, Buckley S, Miller JA (eds.) Winter simulation conference. Piscataway, Savannah, USA. IEEE, 7–10 Dec 2014, pp 1573–1584
29.
go back to reference Lyons GJ, Duggan J (2015) System dynamics modelling to support policy analysis for sustainable health care. J Simul 9(2):129–139 CrossRef Lyons GJ, Duggan J (2015) System dynamics modelling to support policy analysis for sustainable health care. J Simul 9(2):129–139 CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Smith HK, Harper PR (2015) Can you model growth of trust? A study of the sustainability of a rural community health centre in North India. J Simul 9(2):170–181 CrossRef Smith HK, Harper PR (2015) Can you model growth of trust? A study of the sustainability of a rural community health centre in North India. J Simul 9(2):170–181 CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A (2012) Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):35–47 CrossRef Gunasekaran A, Spalanzani A (2012) Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):35–47 CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mani M, Johansson B, Lyons KW, Sriram RD, Ameta G (2013) Simulation and analysis for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1129–1136 CrossRef Mani M, Johansson B, Lyons KW, Sriram RD, Ameta G (2013) Simulation and analysis for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1129–1136 CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bastan M, Delshad Sisi S, Nikoonezhad Z, Ahmadvand AM. (2016) Sustainable development analysis of agriculture using system dynamics approach. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference of the system dynamics society, Delft, Netherlands. System Dynamics Society, July 17–21 Bastan M, Delshad Sisi S, Nikoonezhad Z, Ahmadvand AM. (2016) Sustainable development analysis of agriculture using system dynamics approach. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference of the system dynamics society, Delft, Netherlands. System Dynamics Society, July 17–21
34.
go back to reference Singh A (2014) Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management. Agric Water Manag 141:23–29 CrossRef Singh A (2014) Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management. Agric Water Manag 141:23–29 CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yao H, Shen L, Tan Y, Hao J (2011) Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. Autom Constr 20(8):1060–1069 CrossRef Yao H, Shen L, Tan Y, Hao J (2011) Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects. Autom Constr 20(8):1060–1069 CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L, Skitmore M (2014) A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int J Project Manage 32(1):66–76 CrossRef Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L, Skitmore M (2014) A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int J Project Manage 32(1):66–76 CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sayyadi R, Awasthi A (2017) A system dynamics based simulation model to evaluate regulatory policies for sustainable transportation planning. Int J Model Simul 37(1):25–35 CrossRef Sayyadi R, Awasthi A (2017) A system dynamics based simulation model to evaluate regulatory policies for sustainable transportation planning. Int J Model Simul 37(1):25–35 CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Shen L, Du L, Yang X, Du X, Wang J, Hao J (2018) Sustainable strategies for transportation development in emerging cities in china: a simulation approach. Sustainability 10(3):844 CrossRef Shen L, Du L, Yang X, Du X, Wang J, Hao J (2018) Sustainable strategies for transportation development in emerging cities in china: a simulation approach. Sustainability 10(3):844 CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rodič B (2017) Industry 4.0 and the new simulation modelling paradigm. Organizacija 50(3):193–207 CrossRef Rodič B (2017) Industry 4.0 and the new simulation modelling paradigm. Organizacija 50(3):193–207 CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kannan RM, Santhi HM (2013) Automated construction layout and simulation of concrete formwork systems using building information modeling. In: The 4th international conference of euro asia civil engineering forum 2013 (EACEF), vol. 64. Singapore, 26–27 June 2013, pp 7–12 Kannan RM, Santhi HM (2013) Automated construction layout and simulation of concrete formwork systems using building information modeling. In: The 4th international conference of euro asia civil engineering forum 2013 (EACEF), vol. 64. Singapore, 26–27 June 2013, pp 7–12
41.
go back to reference Lattner AD, Bogon T, Lorion Y, Timm IJ (2010) A knowledge-based approach to automated simulation model adaptation. In: Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Multi-conference (SpringSim), Society for Computer Simulation International, Orlando, FL. San Diego, 11–15 April 2010, pp 200–207 Lattner AD, Bogon T, Lorion Y, Timm IJ (2010) A knowledge-based approach to automated simulation model adaptation. In: Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Multi-conference (SpringSim), Society for Computer Simulation International, Orlando, FL. San Diego, 11–15 April 2010, pp 200–207
42.
go back to reference Rodič B, Kanduč T (2015) Optimisation of a complex manufacturing process using discrete event simulation and a novel heuristic algorithm. Int J Math Models Methods Appl Sci 9 Rodič B, Kanduč T (2015) Optimisation of a complex manufacturing process using discrete event simulation and a novel heuristic algorithm. Int J Math Models Methods Appl Sci 9
43.
go back to reference Gimenez C, Sierra V, Rodon J (2012) Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):149–159 CrossRef Gimenez C, Sierra V, Rodon J (2012) Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):149–159 CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Chahal K, Eldabi T, Young T (2013) A conceptual framework for hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for healthcare. J Enterp Inf Manage 26(1/2):50–74 CrossRef Chahal K, Eldabi T, Young T (2013) A conceptual framework for hybrid system dynamics and discrete event simulation for healthcare. J Enterp Inf Manage 26(1/2):50–74 CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Routledge Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Routledge
46.
go back to reference Gilchrist A (2016) Introducing Industry 4.0. In: Industry 4.0. Apress, Berkeley, CA. pp 195–215 Gilchrist A (2016) Introducing Industry 4.0. In: Industry 4.0. Apress, Berkeley, CA. pp 195–215
47.
go back to reference Schluse M, Rossmann J (2016) From simulation to experimentable digital twins: simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on systems engineering (ISSE), Edinbrough, UK, IEEE, 3–5 Oct 2016, pp 1–6 Schluse M, Rossmann J (2016) From simulation to experimentable digital twins: simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on systems engineering (ISSE), Edinbrough, UK, IEEE, 3–5 Oct 2016, pp 1–6
48.
go back to reference Goossens P (2017) Industry 4.0 and the power of the digital twin. Retrieved, 5(3), p 2017 Goossens P (2017) Industry 4.0 and the power of the digital twin. Retrieved, 5(3), p 2017
49.
go back to reference Heylighen F, cilliers p, Gershenson C (2007) Complexity and philosophy. In: Complexity, science and society, Radcliffe Publishing, London, pp 11–32 Heylighen F, cilliers p, Gershenson C (2007) Complexity and philosophy. In: Complexity, science and society, Radcliffe Publishing, London, pp 11–32
50.
go back to reference Ludovic-Alexandre V, Franck M, Jean-Claude B (2007) Modelling project complexity. Guidelines for a decision support method adapted to NPD processes Ludovic-Alexandre V, Franck M, Jean-Claude B (2007) Modelling project complexity. Guidelines for a decision support method adapted to NPD processes
51.
go back to reference Vidal LA, Marle F (2008) Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes 37(8):1094–1110 CrossRef Vidal LA, Marle F (2008) Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes 37(8):1094–1110 CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Bagheri A, Hjorth P (2007) Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustain Dev 15(2):83–96 CrossRef Bagheri A, Hjorth P (2007) Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustain Dev 15(2):83–96 CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Clark N, Perez-Trejo F, Allen P (1995) Evolutionary dynamics and sustainable development. A system approach. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, United Kingdom Clark N, Perez-Trejo F, Allen P (1995) Evolutionary dynamics and sustainable development. A system approach. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, United Kingdom
54.
go back to reference Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755 CrossRef Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755 CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Ravetz JR (2006) Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecol complex 3:275–284 CrossRef Ravetz JR (2006) Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecol complex 3:275–284 CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Turnpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzoni I (2010) Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Human Values, 36(3):287–306 CrossRef Turnpenny J, Jones M, Lorenzoni I (2010) Where now for post-normal science? A critical review of its development, definitions, and uses. Sci Technol Human Values, 36(3):287–306 CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht CrossRef Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Loeber A (2004) Practical wisdom in the risk society. Methods and practice of interpretive analysis on questions of sustainable development. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands Loeber A (2004) Practical wisdom in the risk society. Methods and practice of interpretive analysis on questions of sustainable development. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Metadata
Title
Sustainability Analysis in Industry 4.0 Using Computer Modelling and Simulation
Authors
Masoud Fakhimi
Navonil Mustafee
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_6

Premium Partners