Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

24-02-2015 | ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT

Sustainability governance service providers: the role of third-party product certification in facilitating corporate life cycle management

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 7/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

This article aims to analyze the role that third-party product sustainability certifications play in supply chain sustainability governance and hence the impact that they may have on facilitating corporate life cycle management (LCM). Particular emphasis is given to exploring the extent to which such schemes allow firms to outsource the work of communication, motivation, enablement, and control of sustainability-related information and performance upstream in the supply chain.

Methods

The research design is based on a comparative case study methodology. The corporate practices of sourcing the sustainability certified products in the food retailing and textile sectors are compared, to explain when third-party product sustainability certification reduces the corporate need to engage in collaborative relationships with suppliers, thereby reducing efforts associated with implementation of corporate life cycle management.

Results and discussion

In our study, we found evidence that affirms the role of third-party product sustainability certification in reducing corporate necessity to actively engage with coordination of sustainability issues upstream in the supply chain. However, we also identified a range of factors—the intention of the buying company, the supply chain context, and the design of the certification scheme—that influence the extent, to which third-party product sustainability certification replaces the corporate need for additional work to facilitate supplier compliance. Some of these factors, e.g., the design of the certification scheme, are new and have been underexplored in the supply chain management and value chain governance literature yet.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that corporate LCM practitioners should consider third-party sustainability certification as an instrument for the transfer of significant life cycle information along the supply chain and as a tool to facilitate corporate life cycle management. The extent to which third-party product sustainability certification would be able to facilitate corporate life cycle management depends not only on whether certification requirements are based on the LCA studies but also on the market scope of the certification schemes, the scope of the certification requirements, and the architecture of the certification management services. If these parameters are aligned with corporate ambitions and allow buyers to fully outsource the work associated with communication, motivation, enablement, and control of sustainability-related information and supplier performance, the life cycle management can be exercised by companies by simply choosing to procure sustainability certified products.

previous article Organizing life cycle management in practice: challenges of a multinational manufacturing corporation

next article The state of play in disseminating LCM practices in the Western Balkan region: the attitude of Serbian SMEs

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Sustainability governance service providers is the term suggested by authors and herein defined as organizations, platforms, or initiatives that provide companies with relevant assistance to implement environmental and social sustainability in product chains. Different forms of assistance include outsourcing the task of defining sustainability requirements, collecting and sharing LCA data, as well as providing companies with services to motivate, enable, and monitor/verify supplier compliance with product and process sustainability criteria. Sustainability governance service providers are diverse including International Reference Life Cycle Data system, Supplier Ethical Data Exchange platform (SEDEX), Business Social Compliance Initiative (BSCI), and third-party product sustainability certification schemes. In this article, we focus on the latter type of sustainability governance service providers.

Governance can be defined “as the process of defining, communicating and imposing compliance with process and product parameters along the value chain” (Hagen and Alvarez 2011, p. 4).

For more information about the GlobalGAP standard, see http://www.globalgap.org/uk_en/.

For more information about the UTZ Certified standard, see https://www.utzcertified.org/.

For more information about the Fair-Trade standard, see http://www.fairtrade.net/.

For more information about the Nordic Swan standard, see http://www.nordic-ecolabel.org/. Please note that this case study was performed in 2001, and the discussion refers to the nature of the standard at the time of the study.

For more information about the Organic Exchange standard, see http://textileexchange.org/content/oe-standards. Please note that this case study was performed in 2004, and the discussion refers to the nature of the standard at the time of the study.

In Peru, the ginner often acts as a service provider for farmers offering not only the service of ginning the harvested fibers but also technical advice throughout the growing season and sometimes also financial services through the extension of credit for purchase of farming inputs.

Supply availability refers not only to volumes but also to price, quality, and ranges/variety of the sustainability certified products.

For more information about Green Seal, please see http://www.greenseal.org/AboutGreenSeal.aspx.

Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am J Sociol 113(2):297–351CrossRef

Baumann H (1996) LCA use in Swedish industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(3):122–126CrossRef

Bras-Klapwijk RM (1999) Adjusting life-cycle methodology for use in public policy discourse. Delft University of Technology

Bratt C, Hallstedt S, Robèrt K-H, Broman G, Oldmark J (2011). Eco-labelling criteria development for strategic life cycle management. Proceedings of the Life Cycle Management Conference LCM 2011—Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, August 28th–31st, Berlin, Germany

Chkanikova O (2013) Upstream activities of Swedish retailers and sustainability. Sustainability landscape of Swedish food retailers in the European context. O. Mont. Lund, Lund University, IIIEE. ISSBN 978-91-87357-07-7: 23-41

Cox A, Sanderson J et al (2001) Supply chains and power regimes: toward an analytic framework for managing extended networks of buyer and supplier relationships. J Supply Chain Manag 37(2):28–35CrossRef

Dolan C, Humphrey J (2004) Changing governance patterns in the trade in fresh vegetables between Africa and the United Kingdom. Environ Plan A 36(3):491–509CrossRef

ETI Forum (2006) Getting smarter at auditing—tackling the growing crisis in ethical trade auditing. London, UK, ETI (Ethical Trading Initiative): 17

Fawcett SE, Magnan GM (2002) The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration. Int J Phys Distrib 32(5):339–361CrossRef

Forman M, Jorgensen MS (2004) Organising environmental supply chain management. Experience from a sector with frequent product shifts and complex product chains: the case of the Danish textile sector. Greener Manag Int 45(spring 2004):43–62CrossRef

Gereffi G, Lee J (2009) A global value chain approach to food safety and quality standards. Global Health Diplomacy for Chronic Disease Prevention: 52

GlobalGAP (2014) GlobalGAP + Add-On. The customized solution for safe and sustainable agriculture. Retrieved February 1, 2014, from http://www.globalgap.org/uk_en/what-we-do/globalg.a.p.-00001/

Gmelin H, Seuring S (2014) Determinants of a sustainable new product development. J Clean Prod 69:1–9CrossRef

Gold S, Seuring S et al (2010) Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(4):230–245

Hagen O, Alvarez G (2011) The impact of private standards on global value chains. Literature review series on the impacts of private standards—part 1. International Trade Center 43

Hatanaka M, Bain C et al (2005) Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy 30(3):354–369CrossRef

Heiskanen E (2000) Managers’ interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial? BSE 9(4):239–254

Henson S, Humphrey J (2010) Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. J Dev Stud 46(9):1628–1646CrossRef

Humphrey J (2008) Private standards, small farmers and donor policy: EUREPGAP in Kenya. Brighton, Institute of Development Studies (IDS) at the University of Sussex: 93

Humphrey J, Memedovic O (2006) Global value chains in the agrifood sector. UNIDO Strategic Research and Economics Branch, Vienna

International Trade Center (2014) GlobalGAP. Retrieved January 22, 2014, from http://search.standardsmap.org/assets/media/GLOBALGAP/English/AtAGlance_EN.pdf

Johnson M (2004) Marks & Spencer implements an ethical sourcing program for its global supply chain. J Organ Excell 23(2):3–16CrossRef

Jorgensen MS, Jorgensen U et al (2010) Environmental management in Danish transnational textile product chains. Manag Res Rev 33(4):357–379CrossRef

Kalfagianni A, Fuchs D (2010) The GlobalGAP. Working paper. University of Münster

Kaplinsky R (2010) The role of standards in global value chains. The World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, International Trade Department: 20

Kapur A, Baldwin C et al (2012) Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and Green Seal-compliant industrial and institutional cleaning products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:377–387CrossRef

Kogg B (2009) Responsibility in the supply chain: interorganisational management of environmental and social aspects in the supply chain—case studies from the textile sector. IIIEE. Lund, Lund University. PhD: 262

Kurczewski P (2014) Life cycle thinking in small and medium enterprises: the results of research on the implementation of life cycle tools in Polish SMEs—part 1: LCA related aspects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:593–600CrossRef

Liu P, Casey S et al (2007) Regulations, standards and certification for agricultural exports. P. Liu. Rome, Trade and Markets Division (EST) and the Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (RAP) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

McCloskey H, Walker S et al (2011) Organic cotton market report. Textile exchange: 38

Moreno A, Cappellaro G et al (2011) Application of product data technology standards to LCA data. J Ind Ecol 15(4):483–495CrossRef

Nakano K, Hirao M (2011) Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J Clean Prod 19(11):1189–1197CrossRef

Nowack M, Hoppe H et al (2012) Review and downscaling of life cycle decision support tools for the procurement of low-value products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:655–665CrossRef

Pagell M, Wu Z et al (2010) Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: an assessment of sustainable sourcing. J Supply Chain Manag 46(1):57–73CrossRef

Pennington D, Wolf M-A et al (2007) Overcomming barriers to the broader implementation of life cycle thinking in business and public administration. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):458–460CrossRef

Pesonen H-L, Horn S (2012) Evaluating the sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1780–1792CrossRef

Ponte S, Gibbon P (2005) Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains. Econ Soc 34(1):1–31CrossRef

Potts J, van der Meer J et al (2010) The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review 2010: sustainability and transparency. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). 161

Preuss L (2005) Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: a view from the supply chain management function. Bus Strateg Environ 14(2):123–139CrossRef

Raynolds L (2004) The globalization of organic agro-food networks. World Dev 32(5):725–743CrossRef

Raynolds L (2009) Mainstreaming fair-trade coffee: from partnership to traceability. World Dev 37(6):1083–1093CrossRef

Riisgaard L (2009) How the market for standards shapes competition in the market for goods: sustainability standards in the cut flower industry. Working Paper 2009:07, Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS): 29

Rosen CM, Beckman SL et al (2002) The role of voluntary industry standards in environmental supply-chain management. J Ind Ecol 6(3–4):103–123CrossRef

Seuring S (2011) Supply chain management for sustainable products—insights from research applying mixed methodologies. Bus Strateg Environ 20(7):471–484CrossRef

Seuring S, Muller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710CrossRef

Smith B (2007) Developing sustainable food supply chains. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:849–861CrossRef

Tallontire A, Opondo M et al (2011) Beyond the vertical? Using value chains and governance as a framework to analyse private standards initiatives in agri-food chains. Agric Hum Values 28(3):427–441CrossRef

Textile Exchange (2012) Textile exchange content claim standard. Version 1.0-2012, Textile Exchange: 27

UNEP DTIE (2009) Life cycle management—how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainable. UNEP DTIE SCP Branch: 48

UTZ Certified (2006) UTZ Kapeh supply and demand update. Production & market trends. UTZ Certified: 11

Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22(2):233–261CrossRef

Williamson O (2008) Outsourcing: transaction cost economics and supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 44(2):5–16CrossRef

Williamson OE (1990) The firm as a nexus of treaties: An introduction. In M. Aoki, B. Gustafsson and O. E. Williamson (Eds.). The firm as a nexus of treaties, London, Sage

Witczak J, Kasprzak J et al (2014) Life cycle thinking in small and medium enterprises: the results of research on the implementation of life cycle tools in Polish SMEs—part 2: LCA related aspects. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:891–900CrossRef

Young A, Kielkiewicz-Young A (2001) Sustainable supply network management. Corp Environ Strateg 8(3):260–268(269)CrossRef

Title: Sustainability governance service providers: the role of third-party product certification in facilitating corporate life cycle management
Publication date: 24-02-2015
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0865-z

Evaluating the carbon footprint of the cork sector with a dynamic approach including biogenic carbon flows

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

The legitimacy of life cycle assessment in the waste management sector

ADVANCING SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC KNOWLEDGE IN LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT

Integrating life cycle assessment and material flow cost accounting to account for resource productivity and economic-environmental performance

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

A triple bottom line evaluation of solid waste management strategies: a case study for an arid Gulf State, Kuwait

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Estimating the global warming emissions of the LCAXVII conference: connecting flights matter

ACLCA CORNER

Tracking current and forecasting future land-use impacts of agricultural value chains. 67th Discussion Forum on Life Cycle Assessment, 3rd of November 2017, Zurich, Switzerland

CONFERENCE REPORT