Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Society 2/2020

16-03-2020 | Symposium: The Achievement of David Martin

Symbolism and Power in David Martin’s Sociology of Religion

Author: Nikos Kokosalakis

Published in: Society | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article suggests that symbolism and power are central concepts in the massive volume of David Martin’s work, which is underpinned and sustained by a dynamic dialectic tension between the religious and the secular. For Martin, the core characteristic element of the religious is the transcendent which is in constant dialectic with the secular in history and society through the functions and uses and abuses of power. Politics and religion, thus, are explored within the same mythic symbolic theoretical/methodological framework as, according to Martin, ‘there is no logos without mythos’. All this is theoretically depicted and empirically documented mainly in his General Theory of Secularization (1978), his Religion and Power (2014) and in his Breaking of the Image (1980). The latter is a masterpiece of symbolist analysis and interpretation of Christian theory and practice with a universal sociological application and significance. This specific hermeneutic symbolist approach of Martin is original and promotes a diachronic and synchronic sociological and theological understanding of religion as such and of religion in society. Within this framework Martin also provides us with a wider understanding of social change beyond the context and the limits of modernity.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See his complete bibliography in Joas 2018:191–208)
 
2
This impasse is clearly stated at the end in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. (‘No one knows who will live in this cage in the future…..’) (Weber 1968 : 182).
 
3
See for example: Douglas (1970), Sperber (1975), Leach (1976); Geertz (1975); Dolgin et al. (1979); Firth (1973); Turner (1967, 1969); Pritchard (1956).
 
4
For a general sociological statement on the nature and function of religious symbols see Kokosalakis (2001)
 
5
In the Eastern Orthodox Church icons are windows to the sacred and represent it anthropomorphically in condensed pictorial form. They are non-verbal carriers of essential Christian theology (Kokosalakis 1995).
 
6
See for example Lipset (1960), Shils (1975), Foucault (1980), among others. For the relation of religion and political power see some interesting articles in Benavides (1989).
 
7
God’s omnipotence is stated in the first article of the Nicene Creed: ‘I believe in one God the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth and all things visible and invisible.’ It is also stated in the concluding statement of the Lord’s Prayer: ‘For Thine is the Kingdom the power and the Glory of the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit, now and for ever and into the ages of ages.’
 
8
See my review of these books Kokosalakis (2013; 2015).
 
9
11 Here, Martin (1980:177-204) discusses further the similarities and differences between the Christian and the Marxist paradigm. The concept of martyrdom, for instance, is common to both but there is a diametrically opposed interpretation of it by each. Martin further shows how freedom of conscience and individual freedom generally is allowed and sustained in the former and curtailed or abolished in the latter(p.186).
 
Literature
go back to reference Benavides, G. 1989. In M. Daly (Ed.), Religion and Political Power. New York: State of New York University Press. Benavides, G. 1989. In M. Daly (Ed.), Religion and Political Power. New York: State of New York University Press.
go back to reference Dolgin, J., Kemnitzer, S., & Schneuder, D. (Eds.) 1979. Symbolic Anthropology: A Reader in the Study of Symbols and Meanings. New York:Columbia University Press. Dolgin, J., Kemnitzer, S., & Schneuder, D. (Eds.) 1979. Symbolic Anthropology: A Reader in the Study of Symbols and Meanings. New York:Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Douglas, M. 1970. Natural Symbols. London:The Cresset Press. Douglas, M. 1970. Natural Symbols. London:The Cresset Press.
go back to reference Duncan, D. D. 1969. Symbols and Social Theory. New York:Oxford University Press. Duncan, D. D. 1969. Symbols and Social Theory. New York:Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.) 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilization. New York:State of New York University Press. Eisenstadt, S. N. (Ed.) 1986. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilization. New York:State of New York University Press.
go back to reference Eisenstadt, S. N. 2000. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 121(1), 1–29. Eisenstadt, S. N. 2000. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 121(1), 1–29.
go back to reference Eliade, M. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane. New York:Harcourt, Brace. Eliade, M. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane. New York:Harcourt, Brace.
go back to reference Firth, R. 1973. Symbols: Public and Private. London:Routledge. Firth, R. 1973. Symbols: Public and Private. London:Routledge.
go back to reference Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London:Harvester Press. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and other writings 1972-1977. London:Harvester Press.
go back to reference Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Prentice Hall. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Geertz, C. 1975. The Interpretation of Cultures. London:Hutchinson. Geertz, C. 1975. The Interpretation of Cultures. London:Hutchinson.
go back to reference Gellner, E. 1992. Postmodernism Reason and Religion. London:Routledge. Gellner, E. 1992. Postmodernism Reason and Religion. London:Routledge.
go back to reference Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London:MacMillan.CrossRef Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. London:MacMillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Hasenclever, A. 2018. ‘Taking Religion Back Out’ in Joas, H. (ed.). Hasenclever, A. 2018. ‘Taking Religion Back Out’ in Joas, H. (ed.).
go back to reference Joas, H. (Ed.) 2018. David Martin and the Sociology of Religion. London and New York, Routledge. Joas, H. (Ed.) 2018. David Martin and the Sociology of Religion. London and New York, Routledge.
go back to reference Kokosalakis, N. 1985. Legitimation, Power and Religion in Modern Society. Sociological Analysis, 46(4), 367–376.CrossRef Kokosalakis, N. 1985. Legitimation, Power and Religion in Modern Society. Sociological Analysis, 46(4), 367–376.CrossRef
go back to reference Kokosalakis, N. 1995. Icons and non-verbal Religion in the Orthodox Tradition. Social Compass, 42(4), 433–449.CrossRef Kokosalakis, N. 1995. Icons and non-verbal Religion in the Orthodox Tradition. Social Compass, 42(4), 433–449.CrossRef
go back to reference Kokosalakis, N. 2001. ‘Symbolism (religious) and Icon’. in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam. Eslevier. Kokosalakis, N. 2001. ‘Symbolism (religious) and Icon’. in International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Amsterdam. Eslevier.
go back to reference Kokosalakis, N. 2013. Review (Martin, D., The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy Religion and Secularization). Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 197–199.CrossRef Kokosalakis, N. 2013. Review (Martin, D., The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy Religion and Secularization). Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 197–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Kokosalakis, N. 2015. Review (Martin, D., Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos). In Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30(3), 526–528.CrossRef Kokosalakis, N. 2015. Review (Martin, D., Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos). In Journal of Contemporary Religion, 30(3), 526–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Leach, E. 1976. Culture and Communication: The Logic by which Symbols Connected. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Leach, E. 1976. Culture and Communication: The Logic by which Symbols Connected. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lipset, S. 1960. Political Man. New York. Doubleday and company. Lipset, S. 1960. Political Man. New York. Doubleday and company.
go back to reference Martin, D. 1965. Towards Eliminating the Concept of Secularization. In J. Gould (Ed.), Penguin Survey of Social Sciences (pp. 168–182). Penguin: Hardworth. Martin, D. 1965. Towards Eliminating the Concept of Secularization. In J. Gould (Ed.), Penguin Survey of Social Sciences (pp. 168–182). Penguin: Hardworth.
go back to reference Martin, D. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford:Basil Blackwell. Martin, D. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
go back to reference Martin, D. 1980. The Breaking of the Image. Oxford:Basil Blackwell. Martin, D. 1980. The Breaking of the Image. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
go back to reference Martin, D. 2011. The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy, Religion and Secularization. Farnham:Ashgate. Martin, D. 2011. The Future of Christianity: Reflections on Violence and Democracy, Religion and Secularization. Farnham:Ashgate.
go back to reference Martin, D. 2013. The Education of David Martin: The Making of an Unlikely Sociologist. London:SPCK. Martin, D. 2013. The Education of David Martin: The Making of an Unlikely Sociologist. London:SPCK.
go back to reference Martin, D. 2014. Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos. Farnham:Ashgate. Martin, D. 2014. Religion and Power: No Logos without Mythos. Farnham:Ashgate.
go back to reference Martin, D. 2018. ‘Thinking with your Life’, in Joas, H. (ed.), pp. 162-190. Martin, D. 2018. ‘Thinking with your Life’, in Joas, H. (ed.), pp. 162-190.
go back to reference Niebuhr, R. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York:Scribner. Niebuhr, R. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York:Scribner.
go back to reference Niebuhr, R, 1944. The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness. Niebuhr, R, 1944. The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness.
go back to reference Otto, R. 1953. Das Helige. (The Idea of the Holy) (Transl. Harvey J.). London, Oxford University Press. Otto, R. 1953. Das Helige. (The Idea of the Holy) (Transl. Harvey J.). London, Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Pritchard, E. 1956. Nuer Religion. Oxford:Clarendon Press. Pritchard, E. 1956. Nuer Religion. Oxford:Clarendon Press.
go back to reference Shils, E. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press. Shils, E. 1975. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Sperber, D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Sperber, D. 1975. Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Turner, V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell. Turner, V. 1967. The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell.
go back to reference Turner, V. 1969. The Ritual Process. New York:Aldine De Gruyter. Turner, V. 1969. The Ritual Process. New York:Aldine De Gruyter.
go back to reference Van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. London:Routledge. Van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. London:Routledge.
go back to reference Weber, M. 1948. The social Psychology of the World Religions’; ‘Religious Rejection of the World and their Directions. In H. Gerth, & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford and New York. Oxford University Press. Weber, M. 1948. The social Psychology of the World Religions’; ‘Religious Rejection of the World and their Directions. In H. Gerth, & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford and New York. Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Weber, M. 1968. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London:Unwin University Book. Weber, M. 1968. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London:Unwin University Book.
Metadata
Title
Symbolism and Power in David Martin’s Sociology of Religion
Author
Nikos Kokosalakis
Publication date
16-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Society / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0147-2011
Electronic ISSN: 1936-4725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00462-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Society 2/2020 Go to the issue

Symposium: The Achievement of David Martin

David Martin’s Forbidden Revolutions