Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 5/2021

29-01-2021 | Original Empirical Research

Synergistic and cannibalization effects in a partnership loyalty program

Authors: Matilda Dorotic, Dennis Fok, Peter C. Verhoef, Tammo H. A. Bijmolt

Published in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Issue 5/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The implicit promise of a partnership in a loyalty program (LP) is that the partners will gain new customers and the LP will reinforce the loyalty to focal partners. Although customers may be encouraged to cross-purchase from partners (which may create positive synergies), they can also switch among partners without forfeiting rewards (which may lead to the cannibalization of sales among partners). To explore these cross-partner effects, we analyze the evolution of customer purchases in a partnership LP across 33 partners from 16 industry sectors. We find that cannibalizations arise more frequently than synergies among partners, contributing to a “rich-get-richer” effect for high-penetration partners; e.g., 10% increase in transactions at department stores reduce transactions at apparel partners (by .04% for new transactions and by 1.18% for recurring customers); but in turn, they attract positive synergies from apparel (.11% increase in transactions by new customers and .37% for recurring transactions).
previous article Seller marketing capability, brand reputation, and consumer journeys on e-commerce platforms

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
“Partnership LP”, as a generic term, refers to both proprietary LPs with external partners and multivendor or coalition LPs (Breugelmans et al. 2015; Dorotic et al. 2011).
 
2
We only observe transactions in the partnership LP that are linked to the partnership LP card. Customers might have used other types of payments (e.g., cash) that would not be included in this data set. However, since this is in essence a payment card because it is a credit-card-based LP, customers likely use the card regularly as a general means of payment. Moreover, if the same effect occurs repeatedly across each subsequent cohort that joins the LP, we have reason to believe that the effect is not sporadic.
 
3
Semi-elasticity is preferred over standard elasticity for these variables because, for the ZIP model, it gives a simple expression that is easy to interpret. Semi-elasticity only depends on the parameters and the probability of excess zeros. (Standard) elasticity would also depend on the level of the explanatory variable. A downside of semi-elasticity is that it depends on the scale at which the x-variable is measured.
 
4
These three variables will be highly correlated, but this is not a problem for the estimation because we are predominantly interested in controlling for any time trend that may be present rather than in accurately attributing the time trend to the linear, quadratic, and log parts.
 
Literature
Berman, B. (2006). Developing an effective customer loyalty program. California Management Review, 49(1), 123–148.CrossRef
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., & Bramlett, M. D. (2000). Implications of loyalty program membership and service experiences for customer retention and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 95–108.CrossRef
Bombaij, N., & Dekimpe, M. (2020). When do loyalty programs work? The moderating role of design, retailer-strategy, and country characteristics. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(1), 175–195.CrossRef
Breugelmans, E., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Zhang, J., Basso, L. J., Dorotic, M., Kopalle, P., Minnema, A., Mijnlieff, W. J., & Wünderlich, N. V. (2015). Advancing research on loyalty programs: a future research agenda. Marketing Letters, 26, 127–139.CrossRef
Capizzi, M. T., & Ferguson, R. (2005). Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(2), 72–80.CrossRef
Chaudhuri, M., Voorhees, C. M., & Beck, J. M. (2019). The effects of loyalty program introduction and design on short-and long-term sales and gross profits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(4), 640–658.CrossRef
Chung, J., & Rao, V. R. (2003). A general choice model for bundles with multiple-category products: application to market segmentation and optimal pricing for bundles. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 115–130.CrossRef
De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Zanderighi, L. (2014). Coalition loyalty-programme adoption and urban commercial-network effectiveness evaluation. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(9), 818–838.CrossRef
Dorotic, M., Fok, D., Verhoef, P. C., & Bijmolt, T.H.A. (2011). Do vendors benefit from promotions in a multi-vendor loyalty program? Marketing Letters, 22(4), 341–356.CrossRef
Dorotic, M., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Verhoef, P. C. (2012). Loyalty programmes: cu rrent knowledge and research directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 217–237.CrossRef
Dorotic, M., Verhoef, P. C., Fok, D., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2014). Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(4), 339–355.CrossRef
Dowling, G. R., & Uncles, M. (1997). Do customer loyalty programs really work? Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 71.
Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2011). Recurring goals and learning: The impact of successful reward attainment on purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2):268–281.
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11–27.CrossRef
Evanschitzky, H., Ramaseshan, B., Woisetschläger, D. M., Richelsen, V., Blut, M., & Backhaus, C. (2012). Consequences of customer loyalty to the loyalty program and to the company. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 625–638.CrossRef
Geyskens, I., Gielens, K., & Wuyts, S. (2015). United we stand: the impact of buying groups on retailer productivity. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 16–33.CrossRef
Heilman, C. M., Bowman, D., & Wright, G. P. (2000). The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 139–155.CrossRef
Kim, S. J., Wang, R. J. H., & Malthouse, E. C. (2015). The effects of adopting and using a brand’s mobile application on customers' subsequent purchase behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 31, 28–41.CrossRef
Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–58.CrossRef
Lara, P. R., & De Madariaga, J. G. (2007). The importance of rewards in the management of multisponsor loyalty programmes. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 15(1), 37–48.CrossRef
Lederman, M. (2008). Are frequent-flyer programs a cause of the “hub premium”? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 17(1), 35–66.CrossRef
Leenheer, J., Van Heerde, H. J., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Smidts, A. (2007). Do loyalty programs really enhance behavioral loyalty? An empirical analysis accounting for self-selecting members. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 31–47.CrossRef
Lemon, K. N., & Wangenheim, F. V. (2009). The reinforcing effects of loyalty program partnerships and core service usage: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Service Research, 11(4), 357–370.CrossRef
Liu, Y. (2007). The long-term impact of loyalty programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 19–35.CrossRef
Moore, G., & Sekhon, H. (2005). Multi-brand loyalty cards: a good idea. Journal of Marketing Management, 21((5–6)), 625–640.CrossRef
Roehm, M. L., Pullins, E. B., & Roehm Jr., H. A. (2002). Designing loyalty-building programs for packaged goods brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 202–213.CrossRef
Schumann, J. H., Wünderlich, N. V., & Evanschitzky, H. (2014). Spillover effects of service failures in coalition loyalty programs: the buffering effect of special treatment benefits. Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 111–118.CrossRef
Sharp, B., & Sharp, A. (1997). Loyalty programs and their impact on repeat-purchase loyalty patterns. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 473–486.CrossRef
Villacé-Molinero, T., Reinares-Lara, P., & Reinares-Lara, E. (2016). Multi-vendor loyalty programs: influencing customer behavioral loyalty? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 204.CrossRef
Wang, R. J. H., Krishnamurthi, L., & Malthouse, E. C. (2018). When reward convenience meets a mobile app: Increasing customer participation in a coalition loyalty program. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 3(3), 314–329.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Synergistic and cannibalization effects in a partnership loyalty program
Authors
Matilda Dorotic
Dennis Fok
Peter C. Verhoef
Tammo H. A. Bijmolt
Publication date
29-01-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Electronic ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00759-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 5/2021 Go to the issue

Original Empirical Research

Exploring embeddedness, centrality, and social influence on backer behavior: the role of backer networks in crowdfunding

Original Empirical Research

How does consumer engagement evolve when brands post across multiple social media?

Review Paper

Pandemics and marketing: insights, impacts, and research opportunities

Commentary

On salesperson judgment and decision making

Original Empirical Research

Seller marketing capability, brand reputation, and consumer journeys on e-commerce platforms

Original Empirical Research

Does your skin color matter in buyer–seller negotiations? The implications of being a Black salesperson