Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems

Author : Peter H. Jones

Published in: Social Systems and Design

Publisher: Springer Japan

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Systems theory and design thinking both share a common orientation to the desired outcomes of complex problems, which is to effect highly-leveraged, well-reasoned, and preferred changes in situations of concern. Systems thinking (resulting from its theoretical bias) promotes the understanding of complex problem situations independently of solutions, and demonstrates an analytical bias. Design disciplines demonstrate an action-oriented or generative bias toward creative solutions, but design often ignores deep understanding as irrelevant to future-oriented change. While many practitioners believe there to be compatibility between design and systems theory, the literature shows very few examples of their resolution in theoretical explanation or first principles. This work presents a reasoned attempt to reconcile the shared essential principles common to both fundamental systems theories and design theories, based on meta-analyses and a synthesis of shared principles. An argument developed on current and historical scholarly perspectives is illuminated by relevant complex system cases demonstrating the shared principles. While primarily oriented to complex social systems, the shared systemic design principles apply to all complex design outcomes, product and service systems, information systems, and social organizational systems.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ackoff, R. L. (1993). Idealized design: Creative corporate visioning. OMEGA, 21(4), 401–410.CrossRef Ackoff, R. L. (1993). Idealized design: Creative corporate visioning. OMEGA, 21(4), 401–410.CrossRef
go back to reference Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. Third International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, May 19, 2004, Philadelphia, PA. Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. Third International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, May 19, 2004, Philadelphia, PA.
go back to reference Ackoff, R. L., & Emery, F. E. (1972). On purposeful systems: An interdisciplinary analysis of individual and social behavior as a system of purposeful events. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, Inc. Ackoff, R. L., & Emery, F. E. (1972). On purposeful systems: An interdisciplinary analysis of individual and social behavior as a system of purposeful events. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, Inc.
go back to reference Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. London: Routledge. Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order: An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Ashby, R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 1–17. Ashby, R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 1–17.
go back to reference Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In H. Von Foerster & G. W. Zopf Jr. (Eds.), Principles of Self-Organization: Transactions of the University of Illinois Symposium (pp. 255–278). London: Pergamon. Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In H. Von Foerster & G. W. Zopf Jr. (Eds.), Principles of Self-Organization: Transactions of the University of Illinois Symposium (pp. 255–278). London: Pergamon.
go back to reference Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum.CrossRef Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum.CrossRef
go back to reference Baskerville, R. L., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2009). Soft design science methodology. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST '09) (pp. 1–11), Philadelphia. Baskerville, R. L., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2009). Soft design science methodology. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST '09) (pp. 1–11), Philadelphia.
go back to reference Bendor, J., Huberman, B. A., & Wu, F. (2009). Management fads, pedagogies, and other soft technologies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1), 290–304.CrossRef Bendor, J., Huberman, B. A., & Wu, F. (2009). Management fads, pedagogies, and other soft technologies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 72(1), 290–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Bousbaci, R. (2008). “Models of man” in design thinking: The “bounded rationality” episode. Design Issues, 24(4), 38–52.CrossRef Bousbaci, R. (2008). “Models of man” in design thinking: The “bounded rationality” episode. Design Issues, 24(4), 38–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, T. (2009a). Design for social impact. New York: Rockefeller Foundation: IDEO. Brown, T. (2009a). Design for social impact. New York: Rockefeller Foundation: IDEO.
go back to reference Brown, T. (2009b). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperBusiness. Brown, T. (2009b). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: HarperBusiness.
go back to reference Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 2010, 31–35. Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 2010, 31–35.
go back to reference Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRef Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Christakis, A. N., & Bausch, K. C. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom and power to construct the future in co-laboratories of democracy. Greenwich: Information Age. Christakis, A. N., & Bausch, K. C. (2006). How people harness their collective wisdom and power to construct the future in co-laboratories of democracy. Greenwich: Information Age.
go back to reference Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(2), 61–86.CrossRef Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(2), 61–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Cisneros, R. T., Hisijara, B. A., & Bausch, K. C. (2013). Strategic articulation of actions to cope with the huge challenges or our world: A platform for reflection. Atlanta: Institute for 21st Century Agoras. Cisneros, R. T., Hisijara, B. A., & Bausch, K. C. (2013). Strategic articulation of actions to cope with the huge challenges or our world: A platform for reflection. Atlanta: Institute for 21st Century Agoras.
go back to reference Collopy, F. (2009). Lessons learned: Why the failure of systems thinking should inform the future of design thinking. Fast Company, June 7, 2009. Retrieved from fastcompany.com/1291598/lessons-learned-why-failure-systems-thinking-should-inform-future-design-thinking Collopy, F. (2009). Lessons learned: Why the failure of systems thinking should inform the future of design thinking. Fast Company, June 7, 2009. Retrieved from fastcompany.com/1291598/lessons-learned-why-failure-systems-thinking-should-inform-future-design-thinking
go back to reference Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of design ability. Design Studies, 2(3), 127–140.CrossRef Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of design ability. Design Studies, 2(3), 127–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.CrossRef Cross, N. (2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(4), 512–523.CrossRef Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(4), 512–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Espejo, R. (2000). Giving requisite variety to strategic and implementation processes: Theory and practice. Lincoln: University of Lincolnshire and Humberside. Espejo, R. (2000). Giving requisite variety to strategic and implementation processes: Theory and practice. Lincoln: University of Lincolnshire and Humberside.
go back to reference Evenson, S., & Dubberly, H. (2010). Designing for service: Creating an experience advantage. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Introduction to service engineering (pp. 403–413). New York: Wiley. Evenson, S., & Dubberly, H. (2010). Designing for service: Creating an experience advantage. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Introduction to service engineering (pp. 403–413). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Fox, W. (1995). Sociotechnical system principles and guidelines: Past and present. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 31, 91–105.CrossRef Fox, W. (1995). Sociotechnical system principles and guidelines: Past and present. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 31, 91–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. Oxford: Berg. Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. Oxford: Berg.
go back to reference Fuller, R. B. (1981). Critical path. New York: St. Martin’s. Fuller, R. B. (1981). Critical path. New York: St. Martin’s.
go back to reference Glenn, J. C., Olsen, T. D., & Florescu, E. (2012). 2012 State of the future. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project. Glenn, J. C., Olsen, T. D., & Florescu, E. (2012). 2012 State of the future. Washington, DC: The Millennium Project.
go back to reference Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
go back to reference Jackson, M. (2010). Reflections on the development and contribution of critical systems thinking and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 133–139.CrossRef Jackson, M. (2010). Reflections on the development and contribution of critical systems thinking and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 133–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Jantsch, E. (1975). Design for evolution: Self-organization and planning in the life of human systems. New York: George Braziller. Jantsch, E. (1975). Design for evolution: Self-organization and planning in the life of human systems. New York: George Braziller.
go back to reference Jones, P. H. (2008). We tried to warn you: Innovations in leadership for the learning organization. Ann Arbor: Nimble Books. Jones, P. H. (2008). We tried to warn you: Innovations in leadership for the learning organization. Ann Arbor: Nimble Books.
go back to reference Jones, P. H. (2009). Learning the lessons of systems thinking: Exploring the gap between thinking and leadership. Integral Leadership Review, IX(4), 1–8. Jones, P. H. (2009). Learning the lessons of systems thinking: Exploring the gap between thinking and leadership. Integral Leadership Review, IX(4), 1–8.
go back to reference Jones, P. H. (2012). Design for care: Innovating healthcare experience. Brooklyn: Rosenfeld Media. Jones, P. H. (2012). Design for care: Innovating healthcare experience. Brooklyn: Rosenfeld Media.
go back to reference Jones, P. H., & Van Patter, G. K. (2009). Design 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0: The rise of visual sensemaking. New York: NextDesign Leadership Institute (article). Retrieved from http://humantific.com Jones, P. H., & Van Patter, G. K. (2009). Design 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0: The rise of visual sensemaking. New York: NextDesign Leadership Institute (article). Retrieved from http://​humantific.​com
go back to reference Krippendorf, K. (1996). A second-order cybernetics of otherness. Systems Research, 13(3), 311–328.CrossRef Krippendorf, K. (1996). A second-order cybernetics of otherness. Systems Research, 13(3), 311–328.CrossRef
go back to reference Latour B. (2008). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design. Meeting of the Design History Society, September 3, 2008, Falmouth, Cornwall. Latour B. (2008). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design. Meeting of the Design History Society, September 3, 2008, Falmouth, Cornwall.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes. London: Sage. Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes. London: Sage.
go back to reference Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
go back to reference Metcalf, G. S. (2010). Service as mutualism: A question of viability in systems. Service Science, 2(1/2), 93–102. Metcalf, G. S. (2010). Service as mutualism: A question of viability in systems. Service Science, 2(1/2), 93–102.
go back to reference Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269–1280.CrossRef Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269–1280.CrossRef
go back to reference Nadler, G., & Hibino, S. (1998). Breakthrough thinking: The seven principles of creative problem solving. Roseville: Prima Lifestyles. Nadler, G., & Hibino, S. (1998). Breakthrough thinking: The seven principles of creative problem solving. Roseville: Prima Lifestyles.
go back to reference Nelson, H. (1994). The necessity of being undisciplined and out of control: Design action and systems thinking. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 22–29.CrossRef Nelson, H. (1994). The necessity of being undisciplined and out of control: Design action and systems thinking. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(3), 22–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT.
go back to reference Ostrom, E. (1985). Actions and rules. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, February 28, 1985, Champaign, IL. Bloomington, IN: Indiana State University. Ostrom, E. (1985). Actions and rules. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, February 28, 1985, Champaign, IL. Bloomington, IN: Indiana State University.
go back to reference Ostrom, E. (2009). Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: what have we learned?. Property Rights and Land Policies. K. Gregory Ingram, Yu-Hung Hong, eds., Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Ostrom, E. (2009). Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: what have we learned?. Property Rights and Land Policies. K. Gregory Ingram, Yu-Hung Hong, eds., Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
go back to reference Owen, H. (2008). Wave rider: Leadership for high performance in a self-organizing world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Owen, H. (2008). Wave rider: Leadership for high performance in a self-organizing world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
go back to reference Özbekhan, H. (1968). Toward a general theory of planning. Santa Monica: System Development Co. Özbekhan, H. (1968). Toward a general theory of planning. Santa Monica: System Development Co.
go back to reference Özbekhan, H. (1969). The predicament of mankind: A quest for structured responses to growing world-wide complexities and uncertainties. New York: Club of Rome. Özbekhan, H. (1969). The predicament of mankind: A quest for structured responses to growing world-wide complexities and uncertainties. New York: Club of Rome.
go back to reference Paton, B., & Dorst, K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32(6), 573–587.CrossRef Paton, B., & Dorst, K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32(6), 573–587.CrossRef
go back to reference Pourdehnad, J., Wexler, E. R., & Wilson, D. V. (2011). Systems and design thinking: A conceptual framework for their integration. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, July 17–22, 2011, Hull, UK. Pourdehnad, J., Wexler, E. R., & Wilson, D. V. (2011). Systems and design thinking: A conceptual framework for their integration. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, July 17–22, 2011, Hull, UK.
go back to reference Rittel, H. W. J., & Weber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef Rittel, H. W. J., & Weber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Sanders, E. B. N., & van Stappers, P.-J. (2013). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers. Sanders, E. B. N., & van Stappers, P.-J. (2013). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
go back to reference Sevaldson, B. (2011). Gigamapping: Visualization for complexity and systems thinking in design. Helsinki: Nordic Design Research Conference. Sevaldson, B. (2011). Gigamapping: Visualization for complexity and systems thinking in design. Helsinki: Nordic Design Research Conference.
go back to reference Simon, H. E. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT. Simon, H. E. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT.
go back to reference Slaughter, R. (1999). Futures for the third millennium: Enabling the forward view. Sydney: Prospect. Slaughter, R. (1999). Futures for the third millennium: Enabling the forward view. Sydney: Prospect.
go back to reference SSHRC-CRSH (2013). Imagining Canada’s future. Technical Report. Ottawa, Canada: Government of Canada. SSHRC-CRSH (2013). Imagining Canada’s future. Technical Report. Ottawa, Canada: Government of Canada.
go back to reference Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Stockholm Memorandum. (2011). Stockholm Memorandum. Third Nobel Laureate Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, May 16–19, 2011. Stockholm Memorandum. (2011). Stockholm Memorandum. Third Nobel Laureate Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, May 16–19, 2011.
go back to reference Upward, A. (2013). Towards an ontology and canvas for strongly sustainable business models: a systemic design science exploration. Unpublished thesis. York University, Toronto, Canada Upward, A. (2013). Towards an ontology and canvas for strongly sustainable business models: a systemic design science exploration. Unpublished thesis. York University, Toronto, Canada
go back to reference van Alstyne, G., & Logan, R. (2007). Designing for emergence and innovation: Redesigning design. Artifact, 1(2), 120–129.CrossRef van Alstyne, G., & Logan, R. (2007). Designing for emergence and innovation: Redesigning design. Artifact, 1(2), 120–129.CrossRef
go back to reference van Patter, G. K., Pastor, E., & OPEN Innovation Consortium. (2013). Innovation methods mapping: De-mystifying 80+ years of innovation process design. New York: OPEN Innovation Consortium. van Patter, G. K., Pastor, E., & OPEN Innovation Consortium. (2013). Innovation methods mapping: De-mystifying 80+ years of innovation process design. New York: OPEN Innovation Consortium.
go back to reference Varela, F., Maturana, H., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.CrossRef Varela, F., Maturana, H., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.CrossRef
go back to reference Warfield, J. N. (1990). A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Ames: Iowa State University Press. Warfield, J. N. (1990). A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
go back to reference Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink: Explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(l), 5–14. Warfield, J. N. (1995). Spreadthink: Explaining ineffective groups. Systems Research, 12(l), 5–14.
go back to reference Warfield, J. N. (1999). The problematique: Evolution of an idea. Systems Research, 16, 221–226. Warfield, J. N. (1999). The problematique: Evolution of an idea. Systems Research, 16, 221–226.
go back to reference Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood: Ablex. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood: Ablex.
go back to reference Yanez, X. D., & Maturana, H. (2013). Systemic and meta-systemic laws. Interactions, 20(3), 76–79.CrossRef Yanez, X. D., & Maturana, H. (2013). Systemic and meta-systemic laws. Interactions, 20(3), 76–79.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems
Author
Peter H. Jones
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4