Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Education and Information Technologies 2/2016

14-05-2014

Teachers’ use of PowerPoint in kindergarten: An empirical investigation in China

Authors: Xia Liu, Yunrong Xu, Jenny Pange

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 2/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, with the rapid progress of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), the integration of ICTs in education has attracted more and more attention of educators and researchers. However, there are different situations between developed and less-developed nations both in ICT application and in ICT research. PowerPoint is a readily available and most popular tool for teaching in some less-developed countries. Under this particular circumstance, it is not an outdated issue to explore teachers’ use of PowerPoint in teaching. Thus, this paper systematically looked at teachers’ PowerPoint use in the setting of Chinese kindergartens. Specifically, four questions were explored: (i) the status of PowerPoint-related infrastructures in the kindergartens; (ii) teachers’ use of PowerPoint in teaching; (iii) teachers’ design, competences and training related to PowerPoint; (iv) teachers’ perceptions and attitudes toward PowerPoint in teaching. A sample of 62 kindergarten teachers was investigated with a self-created questionnaire. Finally, it was found that the kindergartens had been well equipped with PowerPoint-related equipments; teachers frequently implemented teaching activities with PowerPoint and in an intelligent manner; the majority of teachers had positive perceptions and attitudes toward PowerPoint’s general effects, but there was an imbalance of perceptions and attitudes toward children’ emotional-social aspects and children’s cognitive aspects. Besides, the influencing factors of the availability and access to PowerPoint equipments in kindergartens, PowerPoint’s location, teachers’ using years of PowerPoint, teachers’ knowledge and skills, teachers’ training were also emphasized by this study.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ahmed, C. (1998). PowerPoint versus traditional overheads: Which is more effective for learning? Paper presented at the conference of the South Dakota Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. Sioux Falls, SD (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429037). Ahmed, C. (1998). PowerPoint versus traditional overheads: Which is more effective for learning? Paper presented at the conference of the South Dakota Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation. Sioux Falls, SD (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429037).
go back to reference Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47, 373–398.CrossRef Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47, 373–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: the case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211–216.CrossRef Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: the case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 50(1), 148–153.CrossRef Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 50(1), 148–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 267–270). Vancouver, BC, Canada. Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 267–270). Vancouver, BC, Canada.
go back to reference Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41(1), 77–86.CrossRef Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41(1), 77–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint: from basic features to multimedia. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 24–35.MathSciNet Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint: from basic features to multimedia. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 24–35.MathSciNet
go back to reference Blalock, M. G., & Montgomery, R. D. (2005). The effectiveness of PowerPoint on student performance in principles of economics: an exploratory study. Journal for Economics Educators, 5(3), 1–7. Blalock, M. G., & Montgomery, R. D. (2005). The effectiveness of PowerPoint on student performance in principles of economics: an exploratory study. Journal for Economics Educators, 5(3), 1–7.
go back to reference Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 136–155. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 136–155.
go back to reference Cavanaugh, T., & Cavanaugh, C. (2000). Interactive PowerPoint for teachers and students. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Cavanaugh, T., & Cavanaugh, C. (2000). Interactive PowerPoint for teachers and students. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
go back to reference Chen, J., & Chang, C. (2006). Using computers in early childhood classrooms: teachers’ attitudes, skills and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(2), 169–188.CrossRef Chen, J., & Chang, C. (2006). Using computers in early childhood classrooms: teachers’ attitudes, skills and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(2), 169–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide within and between countries. IT & Society, 1(7), 39–45. Chen, W., & Wellman, B. (2004). The global digital divide within and between countries. IT & Society, 1(7), 39–45.
go back to reference Clark, J. (2008). PowerPoint and pedagogy: maintaining student interest in university lecture. College Teaching, 56(1), 39–45.CrossRef Clark, J. (2008). PowerPoint and pedagogy: maintaining student interest in university lecture. College Teaching, 56(1), 39–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 147–160.CrossRef Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 147–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Daniels, L. (1999). Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as the first step. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 42–56.CrossRefMathSciNet Daniels, L. (1999). Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as the first step. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10(2), 42–56.CrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Ercan, T. (2010). Effective use of cloud computing in educational institutions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 938–942.CrossRef Ercan, T. (2010). Effective use of cloud computing in educational institutions. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 938–942.CrossRef
go back to reference Gabriel, Y. (2008). Against the tyranny of PowerPoint: technology-in-use and technology abuse. Organization Studies, 29, 255–276.CrossRef Gabriel, Y. (2008). Against the tyranny of PowerPoint: technology-in-use and technology abuse. Organization Studies, 29, 255–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., & Farokhi, M. (2012). PowerPoint as an innovative tool for teaching and learning in modern classes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 559–563.CrossRef Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., & Farokhi, M. (2012). PowerPoint as an innovative tool for teaching and learning in modern classes. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 559–563.CrossRef
go back to reference Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648–1663.CrossRef Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1648–1663.CrossRef
go back to reference Holzl, J. (1997). Twelve tips for effective PowerPoint presentations for the technologically challenged. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 175–179.CrossRef Holzl, J. (1997). Twelve tips for effective PowerPoint presentations for the technologically challenged. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 175–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Εxamining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173.CrossRef Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Εxamining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahraman, S., Çevik, C., & Kodan, H. (2011). Investigation of university students’ attitude toward the use of powerpoint according to some variables. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1341–1347.CrossRef Kahraman, S., Çevik, C., & Kodan, H. (2011). Investigation of university students’ attitude toward the use of powerpoint according to some variables. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1341–1347.CrossRef
go back to reference Kinchin, I. (2006). Developing PowerPoint handouts to support meaningful learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 647–650.CrossRef Kinchin, I. (2006). Developing PowerPoint handouts to support meaningful learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 647–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: a tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397.CrossRef Li, Q. (2007). Student and teacher views about technology: a tale of two cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377–397.CrossRef
go back to reference Looi, C., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H., Chen, W., & Wong, L. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.CrossRef Looi, C., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H., Chen, W., & Wong, L. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Lowry, R. B. (1999). Electronic presentation of lectures–effect upon student performance. University Chemistry Education, 3(1), 18–21. Lowry, R. B. (1999). Electronic presentation of lectures–effect upon student performance. University Chemistry Education, 3(1), 18–21.
go back to reference Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and PowerPoint in physical geology lecture: comparing the success of computer technology with traditional teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301–305. Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and PowerPoint in physical geology lecture: comparing the success of computer technology with traditional teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301–305.
go back to reference Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: the case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125.CrossRef Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: the case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125.CrossRef
go back to reference Murray, B. (2002). Tech enrichment or overkill? Monitor on Psychology, 33(4), 42. Murray, B. (2002). Tech enrichment or overkill? Monitor on Psychology, 33(4), 42.
go back to reference Nouri, H., & Shahid, A. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53–73. Nouri, H., & Shahid, A. (2005). The effect of PowerPoint presentations on student learning and attitudes. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 53–73.
go back to reference Ogunsola, L. A., & Okusaga, T. O. (2006). Digital divide between developed and less-developed countries: the way forward. Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 137–146. Ogunsola, L. A., & Okusaga, T. O. (2006). Digital divide between developed and less-developed countries: the way forward. Journal of Social Science, 13(2), 137–146.
go back to reference Oommen, A. (2012). Teaching English as a global language in smart classrooms with PowerPoint presentation. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 54–61.CrossRef Oommen, A. (2012). Teaching English as a global language in smart classrooms with PowerPoint presentation. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 54–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Parette, H. P., Hourcade, J. J., Nichole, M., Boeckmann, N. M., & Blum, C. (2008). Using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ to support emergent literacy skill development for young children at-risk or who have disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 233–239.CrossRef Parette, H. P., Hourcade, J. J., Nichole, M., Boeckmann, N. M., & Blum, C. (2008). Using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ to support emergent literacy skill development for young children at-risk or who have disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 233–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Parette, H. P., Blum, C., Boeckmann, N. M., & Watts, E. H. (2009). Teaching word recognition to young children who are at risk using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ coupled with direct instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 393–401.CrossRef Parette, H. P., Blum, C., Boeckmann, N. M., & Watts, E. H. (2009). Teaching word recognition to young children who are at risk using Microsoft® PowerPoint™ coupled with direct instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 393–401.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, R. E., Bianchi, A., & Cheah, T. Y. (2008). Perceptions of instructional technology: factors of influence and anticipated consequences. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 274–293. Parker, R. E., Bianchi, A., & Cheah, T. Y. (2008). Perceptions of instructional technology: factors of influence and anticipated consequences. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 274–293.
go back to reference Roehling, P. V., & Trent-Brown, S. (2011). Differential use and benefits of PowerPoint in upper level versus lower level courses. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 113–124.CrossRef Roehling, P. V., & Trent-Brown, S. (2011). Differential use and benefits of PowerPoint in upper level versus lower level courses. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 113–124.CrossRef
go back to reference Sadik, A. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ attitudes toward personal use and school use of computers: new evidence from a developing nation. Evaluation Review, 30(1), 86–113.CrossRefMathSciNet Sadik, A. (2006). Factors influencing teachers’ attitudes toward personal use and school use of computers: new evidence from a developing nation. Evaluation Review, 30(1), 86–113.CrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Savoy, A., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Information retention from PowerPoint and traditional lectures. Computers & Education, 52, 858–867.CrossRef Savoy, A., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Information retention from PowerPoint and traditional lectures. Computers & Education, 52, 858–867.CrossRef
go back to reference Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3–12.CrossRef Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(2), 57–67. Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(2), 57–67.
go back to reference Simpson, C. L., Pollacia, L., Speers, J., Willis, T. H., & Tarver, R. (2003). An analysis of certain factors related to the use of PowerPoint. Communications of the International Information Management Association, 3(2), 73–84. Simpson, C. L., Pollacia, L., Speers, J., Willis, T. H., & Tarver, R. (2003). An analysis of certain factors related to the use of PowerPoint. Communications of the International Information Management Association, 3(2), 73–84.
go back to reference Steinweg, S. B., Williams, S. C., & Stapleton, J. N. (2010). Faculty use of tablet PCs in teacher education and K-12 settings. TechTrends, 54(3), 54–61.CrossRef Steinweg, S. B., Williams, S. C., & Stapleton, J. N. (2010). Faculty use of tablet PCs in teacher education and K-12 settings. TechTrends, 54(3), 54–61.CrossRef
go back to reference Stewart, T. A. (2001). Ban it now! Friends don’t let friends use PowerPoint. Fortune, 143, 210. Stewart, T. A. (2001). Ban it now! Friends don’t let friends use PowerPoint. Fortune, 143, 210.
go back to reference Sugahara, S., & Boland, G. (2006). The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in the accounting classroom. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15(4), 391–403.CrossRef Sugahara, S., & Boland, G. (2006). The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in the accounting classroom. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15(4), 391–403.CrossRef
go back to reference Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers and Education, 45, 203–215.CrossRef Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint’s power in the classroom: enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers and Education, 45, 203–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Susskind, J. E. (2008). Limits of PowerPoint’s power: enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1228–1239.CrossRefMathSciNet Susskind, J. E. (2008). Limits of PowerPoint’s power: enhancing students’ self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1228–1239.CrossRefMathSciNet
go back to reference Szaboa, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35(3), 175–187.CrossRef Szaboa, A., & Hastings, N. (2000). Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? Computers & Education, 35(3), 175–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479–494.CrossRef Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479–494.CrossRef
go back to reference Turkle, S. (2004). How computers change the way we think. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(21), B26. Turkle, S. (2004). How computers change the way we think. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(21), B26.
go back to reference Uz, Ç., Orhan, F., & Bilgiç, G. (2010). Prospective teachers’ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2051–2059.CrossRef Uz, Ç., Orhan, F., & Bilgiç, G. (2010). Prospective teachers’ opinions on the value of PowerPoint presentations in lecturing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2051–2059.CrossRef
go back to reference Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2007). Towards the ‘informed use’ of information and communication technology in education: a response to Adams’ ‘PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 219–227.CrossRef Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2007). Towards the ‘informed use’ of information and communication technology in education: a response to Adams’ ‘PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 219–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.CrossRef Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. (2009). A comparison of graduate and undergraduate teacher education students’ perceptions of their instructors’ use of Microsoft PowerPoint. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 361–380.CrossRef Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. (2009). A comparison of graduate and undergraduate teacher education students’ perceptions of their instructors’ use of Microsoft PowerPoint. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 361–380.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Teachers’ use of PowerPoint in kindergarten: An empirical investigation in China
Authors
Xia Liu
Yunrong Xu
Jenny Pange
Publication date
14-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Education and Information Technologies / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9330-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Education and Information Technologies 2/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner