Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

25-02-2021 | Original Paper

Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting

Authors: Carolina Johnson, H. Jacob Carlson, Sonya Reynolds

Published in: Political Behavior

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of local participatory democracy initiatives on individual voter turnout in ordinary elections, using the example of participatory budgeting (PB). Such initiatives often aspire to create more activated citizens, but there is still limited empirical research validating these claims. We link participants in New York City’s participatory budgeting process to their state voter file records to test whether PB increases participants’ likelihood of voting in regular elections. We use coarsened exact matching to identify similar voters from council districts where PB was not implemented. Comparing PB voters to similar individuals who were not exposed to PB, we find that engaging with participatory budgeting increased individuals’ probability of voting by an average of 8.4 percentage points. In addition, we find that these effects are greater for those who often have lower probabilities of voting—young people, lower educated and lower income voters, black voters, and people who are the minority race of their neighborhood.

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 58.000 Bücher
  • über 300 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Testen Sie jetzt 15 Tage kostenlos.

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
These goals were explicitly stated in the official rule books for PB in each of these cities (City of Vallejo 2013 and PBNYC 2013). These goals have not been not idle words hidden in formal documents; themes of political transformation and democratic renewal have pervaded the outreach materials, framing of meetings and public events, and the explicit hopes for PB shared between observers and practitioners in the field.
 
2
See up to date info on where PB is happening in North America here: https://​www.​participatorybud​geting.​org/​case-studies/​ (Accessed 12/21/2020).
 
3
For more information on participatory budgeting in New York City, particularly in the earlier years of its implementation, see the accounts in Gilman (2013), Johnson (2017), Community Development Project (2015), and Su (2017).
 
4
With the exception of one district, only capital projects are eligible for PB funding, not operations funding.
 
5
In New York City the “delegates,” who develop and deliberate on the proposed projects, represent on average 2% of the total voting body in a District.
 
6
Political efficacy is generally an outcome of interest because it is available as a self-reported characteristic, and, importantly, is seen as being an important predictor of further political participation (Gastil and Xenos 2010; Abramson and Aldritch 1982; Finkel 1985a, b).
 
7
Replication code and instructions to access data are available at https://​github.​com/​csjohns/​pb-voter-turnout. Individual level data was provided in partnership with New York Civic Engagement Table who retain the data but will make it freely available to researchers wishing to replicate the work upon request. Please follow contact instructions in the GitHub repository.
 
8
We use the 5-year 2011–2015 American Community Survey estimates, accessed directly from R using the acs package.
 
9
Two different cycles of Freedom of Information Act requests failed to elicit machine readable election results or results at the election district (the equivalent of precinct in most other jurisdictions).
 
10
In addition, a small subset of voters whose votes were recorded in 2012 in centrally held records, but who were not definitely assigned to a PB district are also included, as the first PB votes in the city occurred in 2012 and thus we are confident of recording these voters’ initial experience with PB.
 
11
See Online Appendix for detail on demographic balance of PB and non-PB voters before and after matching.
 
12
An extensive literature on statistical matching methods exists. For a good review of different methods, see King et al. 2011; Iacus et al. 2012; or Stuart 2010.
 
13
With many more controls than PB voters, we randomly sample one matching control individual for every PB voter in each strata. An alternative would be to allow many matches from the control population and then use appropriate weights in the subsequent regressions. With our relatively large treatment case sample size, one-to-many matching with weights actually provides a larger sample than is necessary to fit reliable and informative models, while significantly increasing complexity and computation time.
 
14
See the Online Appendix for comparisons across match specifications.
 
15
See Angrist and Pischke (2008) for a introduction to difference-in difference models of increasing complexity.
 
16
8.4% (95% CI 7.8–9%) is the marginal effect of the post-treatment variable in the best-fitting difference-in-difference model, without including any interactions of the post-treatment indicator with other covariates, calculated with the R margins package.
 
17
Model selection processes used in-sample percent correctly predicted and AIC/BIC criteria to identify and exclude appropriate transformations and redundant variables, such as a census-tract flag for majority white population (this variable was not informative once race and flag for majority race membership was included).
 
18
Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this ‘placebo’ framing of a non-PB comparison group.
 
19
Note, it is not entirely clear what the causal story behind the small district-level effect of PB may be. It could be that the effect of PB has has absorbed district characteristics correlated with the introduction of PB or it could be that the assorted effects of PB on community networks and civil society produce spillover effects that mean even non-voters are more activated in subsequent election cycles.
 
20
See the online appendix for more detail on the balance of in- and out-of-sample PB voters
 
Literature
go back to reference Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2012). Validation: What big data reveal about survey misreporting and the real electorate. Political Analysis, 20(4), 437–459. 23359641. CrossRef Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2012). Validation: What big data reveal about survey misreporting and the real electorate. Political Analysis, 20(4), 437–459. 23359641. CrossRef
go back to reference Baiocchi, G. (2003). Emergent public spheres: Talking politics in participatory governance. American Sociological Review, 52–74, 3088902. Baiocchi, G. (2003). Emergent public spheres: Talking politics in participatory governance. American Sociological Review, 52–74, 3088902.
go back to reference Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford University Press. Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
go back to reference Barreto, M. A., Segura, G. M., & Woods, N. D. (2004). The mobilizing effect of majority–minority districts on Latino turnout. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 65–75. CrossRef Barreto, M. A., Segura, G. M., & Woods, N. D. (2004). The mobilizing effect of majority–minority districts on Latino turnout. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 65–75. CrossRef
go back to reference Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 20. CrossRef Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 20. CrossRef
go back to reference Community Development Project. (2012). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on the pilot year of participatory budgeting in New York City. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY. Community Development Project. (2012). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on the pilot year of participatory budgeting in New York City. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY.
go back to reference Community Development Project. (2013). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on participatory budgeting in New York City: Cycle 2. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY. Community Development Project. (2013). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on participatory budgeting in New York City: Cycle 2. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY.
go back to reference Community Development Project. (2014). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on participatory budgeting in New York City: Cycle 3. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY. Community Development Project. (2014). A people’s budget: A research and evaluation report on participatory budgeting in New York City: Cycle 3. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center, New York, NY.
go back to reference Community Development Project. (2015). A People’s Budget: A Research and Evaluation Report on Participatory Budgeting in New York City - Cycle 4. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center. Community Development Project. (2015). A People’s Budget: A Research and Evaluation Report on Participatory Budgeting in New York City - Cycle 4. Tech. rep., Urban Justice Center.
go back to reference Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 us house elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231. CrossRef Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 us house elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231. CrossRef
go back to reference Crum, T., Salinas, E., & Weber, R. (2013). Building a People’s Budget: Research and Evaluation Report on the 2012-2013 Participatory Budgeting Process in Chicago. Tech. rep., Great Cities Institute: University of Illinois at Chicago. Crum, T., Salinas, E., & Weber, R. (2013). Building a People’s Budget: Research and Evaluation Report on the 2012-2013 Participatory Budgeting Process in Chicago. Tech. rep., Great Cities Institute: University of Illinois at Chicago.
go back to reference Denny, K., & Doyle, O. (2009). Does voting history matter? Analysing persistence in turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 17–35. CrossRef Denny, K., & Doyle, O. (2009). Does voting history matter? Analysing persistence in turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 17–35. CrossRef
go back to reference Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Finkel, S. E. (1985b). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 871. CrossRef Finkel, S. E. (1985b). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 871. CrossRef
go back to reference Fowler, J. H. (2006). Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 335–344. CrossRef Fowler, J. H. (2006). Habitual voting and behavioral turnout. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 335–344. CrossRef
go back to reference Fraga, B. L. (2016a). Candidates or districts? Reevaluating the role of race in voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 97–122. 24583053. CrossRef Fraga, B. L. (2016a). Candidates or districts? Reevaluating the role of race in voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 60(1), 97–122. 24583053. CrossRef
go back to reference Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking About Empowered Participatory Governance. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, no. 4 in The Real Utopias Project, Verso (pp. 3–44). Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Thinking About Empowered Participatory Governance. In A. Fung & E. O. Wright (Eds.), Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, no. 4 in The Real Utopias Project, Verso (pp. 3–44).
go back to reference Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: how jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. New York: Oxford University Press. Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., Weiser, P. J., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: how jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550. CrossRef Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Shachar, R. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 540–550. CrossRef
go back to reference Gilman, H. (2013). The Participatory Turn: Participatory Budgeting Comes to America. (Doctoral Dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses., Harvard University. Gilman, H. (2013). The Participatory Turn: Participatory Budgeting Comes to America. (Doctoral Dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses., Harvard University.
go back to reference Gilman, H. R. (2016). Democracy reinvented: Participatory budgeting and civic innovation in America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Gilman, H. R. (2016). Democracy reinvented: Participatory budgeting and civic innovation in America. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
go back to reference Gonçalves, S. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94–110. CrossRef Gonçalves, S. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94–110. CrossRef
go back to reference Grillos, T. (2014). Youth Lead the Change: The City of Boston’s Youth-Focused Participatory Budgeting Process. Pilot year evaluation, Harvard University. Grillos, T. (2014). Youth Lead the Change: The City of Boston’s Youth-Focused Participatory Budgeting Process. Pilot year evaluation, Harvard University.
go back to reference Hagelskamp, C., Rinehart, C., Silliman, R., & Schleifer, D. (2016). Public Spending, By the People: Participatory Budgeting in the United States and Canada in 2014–15. Tech. rep., Public Agenda. Hagelskamp, C., Rinehart, C., Silliman, R., & Schleifer, D. (2016). Public Spending, By the People: Participatory Budgeting in the United States and Canada in 2014–15. Tech. rep., Public Agenda.
go back to reference Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, C. (2017). Engaging democracy: An institutional theory of participatory budgeting. PhD thesis, University of Washington. Johnson, C. (2017). Engaging democracy: An institutional theory of participatory budgeting. PhD thesis, University of Washington.
go back to reference Jovanovic, S., & Russell, V. (2016). Greensboro Participatory Budgeting 2015–2016 Research and Evaluation Report. Tech. rep., University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Jovanovic, S., & Russell, V. (2016). Greensboro Participatory Budgeting 2015–2016 Research and Evaluation Report. Tech. rep., University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
go back to reference King, G., Nielsen, R., Coberley, C., & Pope, J.E. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from, https://​j.​mp/​2nydGlv King, G., Nielsen, R., Coberley, C., & Pope, J.E. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. Retrieved December 12, 2020, from, https://​j.​mp/​2nydGlv
go back to reference Lerner, J., & Schugurensky, D. (2007). Who learns what in participatory democracy: Participatory budgeting in Rosario, Argentina. Democratic Practices as Learning Opportunities Lerner, J., & Schugurensky, D. (2007). Who learns what in participatory democracy: Participatory budgeting in Rosario, Argentina. Democratic Practices as Learning Opportunities
go back to reference Macedo, S. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Macedo, S. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
go back to reference Mansbridge, J. (1995). Does participation make better citizens? The Good Society, 5(2), 4–7. Mansbridge, J. (1995). Does participation make better citizens? The Good Society, 5(2), 4–7.
go back to reference Mansbridge, J. (1999). On the idea that participation makes better citizens. In: Stephen L. Elkin & K. E. Sołtan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Mansbridge, J. (1999). On the idea that participation makes better citizens. In: Stephen L. Elkin & K. E. Sołtan (Eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
go back to reference Matsusaka, J. G., & Palda, F. (1993). The downsian voter meets the ecological fallacy. Public Choice, 77(4), 855–878. CrossRef Matsusaka, J. G., & Palda, F. (1993). The downsian voter meets the ecological fallacy. Public Choice, 77(4), 855–878. CrossRef
go back to reference Nabatchi, T. (2010b). Deliberative democracy and citizenship: In search of the efficacy effect. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2), 1–9. Nabatchi, T. (2010b). Deliberative democracy and citizenship: In search of the efficacy effect. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2), 1–9.
go back to reference Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef
go back to reference Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming an habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56. CrossRef Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming an habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56. CrossRef
go back to reference Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
go back to reference Talpin, J. (2011). Schools of democracy: How ordinary citizens (sometimes) become competent in participatory budgeting institutions. Bergen: ECPR Press. Talpin, J. (2011). Schools of democracy: How ordinary citizens (sometimes) become competent in participatory budgeting institutions. Bergen: ECPR Press.
go back to reference Touchton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442–1469. CrossRef Touchton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442–1469. CrossRef
go back to reference Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Wampler, B. (2008). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 61–81. 20434105. CrossRef Wampler, B. (2008). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 61–81. 20434105. CrossRef
go back to reference Wampler, B., McNulty, S., & Touchton, M. (2018). Participatory Budgeting: Spreading Across the Globe. Tech. rep., Transparency and Accountability Initiative. Wampler, B., McNulty, S., & Touchton, M. (2018). Participatory Budgeting: Spreading Across the Globe. Tech. rep., Transparency and Accountability Initiative.
go back to reference World Bank (2008) Toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre: Main report. Tech. Rep. 40144-BR, World Bank, Washington, D.C. World Bank (2008) Toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre: Main report. Tech. Rep. 40144-BR, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Metadata
Title
Testing the Participation Hypothesis: Evidence from Participatory Budgeting
Authors
Carolina Johnson
H. Jacob Carlson
Sonya Reynolds
Publication date
25-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09679-w

Premium Partner