Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. The Ambivalence of Federalism and Democracy: The Challenging Case of Authoritarianism—With Evidence from the Russian Case

share
SHARE

Abstract

Although federalism is often conceptualized as a subcomponent of democracy, a considerable number of hybrid and authoritarian regimes feature federal structures as well. To explore this puzzle, the chapter discusses basic tensions with which ‘authoritarian federalism’ is faced: one arising from the defective rule of law, another one from restrictions of plurality, and, finally, from loyalty conflicts to which sub-federal incumbents are exposed. It is argued that similar tensions resulting from federal organization also occur in democracies, but authoritarian and democratic federations respond differently to these challenges. Moreover, the chapter reveals that even though federalism triggers uncertainty in authoritarian regimes, rulers at the central level profit from federal organization. Evidence is taken from the Russian case which can be understood as a ‘typical case’ in this respect.
Literature
go back to reference Bednar, J. (2009). The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bednar, J. (2009). The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Benz, A. (2013). Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: Constitutional Change in Federal Systems. West European Politics, 36(4), 726–749. CrossRef Benz, A. (2013). Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: Constitutional Change in Federal Systems. West European Politics, 36(4), 726–749. CrossRef
go back to reference Benz, A. (2015). Making Democracy Work in a Federal System. German Politics, 24(1), 8–25. CrossRef Benz, A. (2015). Making Democracy Work in a Federal System. German Politics, 24(1), 8–25. CrossRef
go back to reference Benz, A., & Kropp, S. (2014). Föderalismus in Demokratien und Autokratien – Vereinbarkeiten, Spannungsfelder und Dynamiken. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Comparative Governance and Politics, 8, 1–27. Benz, A., & Kropp, S. (2014). Föderalismus in Demokratien und Autokratien – Vereinbarkeiten, Spannungsfelder und Dynamiken. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Comparative Governance and Politics, 8, 1–27.
go back to reference Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (2017). Patterns of Federal Democracy: Tensions, Friction, or Balance Between Two Government Dimensions. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 3–25. CrossRef Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (2017). Patterns of Federal Democracy: Tensions, Friction, or Balance Between Two Government Dimensions. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 3–25. CrossRef
go back to reference Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchange Access Good for Access: A Comparative Study of Business Lobbying in the EU Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369. CrossRef Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchange Access Good for Access: A Comparative Study of Business Lobbying in the EU Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369. CrossRef
go back to reference Buckley, N., & Reuter, O. J. (2018). Performance Incentives Under Autocracy: Evidence from Russia’s Regions. Comparative Politics. Buckley, N., & Reuter, O. J. (2018). Performance Incentives Under Autocracy: Evidence from Russia’s Regions. Comparative Politics.
go back to reference Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge. Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
go back to reference Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Filippov, M., & Shvetsova, O. (2013). Federalism, Democracy, and Democratization. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics (pp. 167–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef Filippov, M., & Shvetsova, O. (2013). Federalism, Democracy, and Democratization. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics (pp. 167–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Fraenkel, E. (2001). Der Doppelstaat. Hamburg: Europäische Verlagsanstalt. Fraenkel, E. (2001). Der Doppelstaat. Hamburg: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
go back to reference Gel’man, V. (2010). The Dynamics of Sub-National Authoritarianism: Russia in Comparative Perspective. In V. Gel’man & C. Ross (Eds.), The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia (pp. 1–18). Farnham: Ashgate. Gel’man, V. (2010). The Dynamics of Sub-National Authoritarianism: Russia in Comparative Perspective. In V. Gel’man & C. Ross (Eds.), The Politics of Sub-National Authoritarianism in Russia (pp. 1–18). Farnham: Ashgate.
go back to reference Gel’man, V., & Ryzhenkov, S. (2011). Local Regimes, Sub-National Governance and the ‘Power Vertical’ in Contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 449–465. CrossRef Gel’man, V., & Ryzhenkov, S. (2011). Local Regimes, Sub-National Governance and the ‘Power Vertical’ in Contemporary Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 449–465. CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson, E. L. (2013). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gibson, E. L. (2013). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Golosov, G. V. (2011). The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 623–639. CrossRef Golosov, G. V. (2011). The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 623–639. CrossRef
go back to reference Goode, P. J. (2013). The Revival of Russia’s Gubernatorial Elections: Liberalization or Potemkin Reform? Russian Analytical Digest, 2013(139), 9–11. Goode, P. J. (2013). The Revival of Russia’s Gubernatorial Elections: Liberalization or Potemkin Reform? Russian Analytical Digest, 2013(139), 9–11.
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2011a). Hybrid Regimes—When Autocracy and Democracy Mix. In N. J. Brown (Ed.), Dynamics of Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion (pp. 23–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Hale, H. E. (2011a). Hybrid Regimes—When Autocracy and Democracy Mix. In N. J. Brown (Ed.), Dynamics of Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion (pp. 23–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2011b). Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 63(4), 581–617. CrossRef Hale, H. E. (2011b). Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics: Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia. World Politics, 63(4), 581–617. CrossRef
go back to reference Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1989). The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam. Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1989). The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam.
go back to reference Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740. CrossRef Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725–740. CrossRef
go back to reference Holmes, L. (2012). Corruption in Post-Soviet Russia. Global Change, Peace & Security, 24(2), 235–250. CrossRef Holmes, L. (2012). Corruption in Post-Soviet Russia. Global Change, Peace & Security, 24(2), 235–250. CrossRef
go back to reference Kailitz, S. (2013). Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability. Democratization, 20(1), 39–60. CrossRef Kailitz, S. (2013). Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability. Democratization, 20(1), 39–60. CrossRef
go back to reference Kropp, S. (2015). Federalism, People’s Legislation, and Associative Democracy. In C. Fraenkel-Haeberle, S. Kropp, F. Palermo, & K.-P. Sommermann (Eds.), Citizen Participation in Multilevel Democracies (pp. 48–66). Leiden and Boston: Brill. CrossRef Kropp, S. (2015). Federalism, People’s Legislation, and Associative Democracy. In C. Fraenkel-Haeberle, S. Kropp, F. Palermo, & K.-P. Sommermann (Eds.), Citizen Participation in Multilevel Democracies (pp. 48–66). Leiden and Boston: Brill. CrossRef
go back to reference Kropp, S., & Aasland, A. (2018). Patterns of Governance in Russia—Feedback of Empirical Findings into Governance Theory. In S. Kropp, A. Aasland, M. Berg-Nordlie, J. Holm-Hansen, & J. Schuhmann (Eds.), Governance in Russian Regions: A Policy Comparison (pp. 219–245). Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Kropp, S., & Aasland, A. (2018). Patterns of Governance in Russia—Feedback of Empirical Findings into Governance Theory. In S. Kropp, A. Aasland, M. Berg-Nordlie, J. Holm-Hansen, & J. Schuhmann (Eds.), Governance in Russian Regions: A Policy Comparison (pp. 219–245). Houndmills and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Lane, J.-E., & Ersson, S. (2005). The Riddle of Federalism: Does Federalism Impact on Democracy? Democratization, 12, 163–182. CrossRef Lane, J.-E., & Ersson, S. (2005). The Riddle of Federalism: Does Federalism Impact on Democracy? Democratization, 12, 163–182. CrossRef
go back to reference Lauth, H.-J. (2000). Informal Institutions and Democracy. Democratization, 7(4), 21–50. CrossRef Lauth, H.-J. (2000). Informal Institutions and Democracy. Democratization, 7(4), 21–50. CrossRef
go back to reference Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Lorenz, A. (2010). Verfassungsänderungen in föderalen und unitarischen Demokratien im Vergleich. Befunde einer empirischen Analyse für den Zeitraum von 1945 bis 2004. In J. von Blumenthal & J. Bröchler (Eds.), Föderalismusreform in Deutschland. Bilanz und Perspektiven im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 13–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. CrossRef Lorenz, A. (2010). Verfassungsänderungen in föderalen und unitarischen Demokratien im Vergleich. Befunde einer empirischen Analyse für den Zeitraum von 1945 bis 2004. In J. von Blumenthal & J. Bröchler (Eds.), Föderalismusreform in Deutschland. Bilanz und Perspektiven im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 13–36). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. CrossRef
go back to reference Melville, A., Stukal, D., & Mironiuk, M. (2014). ‘King of the Mountain’ or Why Postcommunist Autocracies Have Bad Institutions. Russian Politics & Law, 52, 7–29. CrossRef Melville, A., Stukal, D., & Mironiuk, M. (2014). ‘King of the Mountain’ or Why Postcommunist Autocracies Have Bad Institutions. Russian Politics & Law, 52, 7–29. CrossRef
go back to reference Obydenkova, A., & Swenden, W. (2013). Autocracy-Sustaining Versus Democratic Federalism: Explaining the Divergent Trajectories of Territorial Politics in Russia and Western Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 86–112. CrossRef Obydenkova, A., & Swenden, W. (2013). Autocracy-Sustaining Versus Democratic Federalism: Explaining the Divergent Trajectories of Territorial Politics in Russia and Western Europe. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 86–112. CrossRef
go back to reference O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Panov, P., & Ross, C. (2016). Levels of Centralisation and Autonomy in Russia’s ‘Party of Power’: Cross-Regional Variations. Europe-Asia Studies, 68, 232–252. CrossRef Panov, P., & Ross, C. (2016). Levels of Centralisation and Autonomy in Russia’s ‘Party of Power’: Cross-Regional Variations. Europe-Asia Studies, 68, 232–252. CrossRef
go back to reference Reuter, O. J. (2010). The Politics of Dominant Party Formation: United Russia and Russia’s Governors. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 293–327. CrossRef Reuter, O. J. (2010). The Politics of Dominant Party Formation: United Russia and Russia’s Governors. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 293–327. CrossRef
go back to reference Reuter, O. J., & Remington, T. F. (2009). Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 501–526. CrossRef Reuter, O. J., & Remington, T. F. (2009). Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 501–526. CrossRef
go back to reference Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown. Riker, W. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little Brown.
go back to reference Ross, C. (2009). Local Politics and Democratization in Russia. London and New York: Routledge. Ross, C. (2009). Local Politics and Democratization in Russia. London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Sakwa, R. (2010). The Dual State in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 26(3), 185–206. CrossRef Sakwa, R. (2010). The Dual State in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 26(3), 185–206. CrossRef
go back to reference Schedler, A., & Hoffmann, B. (2016). Communicating Authoritarian Elite Cohesion. Democratization, 23(1), 93–117. CrossRef Schedler, A., & Hoffmann, B. (2016). Communicating Authoritarian Elite Cohesion. Democratization, 23(1), 93–117. CrossRef
go back to reference Sharafutdinova, G. (2009). Subnational Governance in Russia: How Putin Changed the Contract with His Agents and the Problems It Created for Medvedev. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40, 672–696. CrossRef Sharafutdinova, G. (2009). Subnational Governance in Russia: How Putin Changed the Contract with His Agents and the Problems It Created for Medvedev. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 40, 672–696. CrossRef
go back to reference Smyth, R., Lowry, A., & Wilkening, B. (2007). Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs, 23, 118–137. CrossRef Smyth, R., Lowry, A., & Wilkening, B. (2007). Engineering Victory: Institutional Reform, Informal Institutions, and the Formation of a Hegemonic Party Regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs, 23, 118–137. CrossRef
go back to reference Solnick, S. L. (1996). The Political Economy of Russian Federalism: A Framework for Analysis. Problems of Post-Communism, 29, 13–25. CrossRef Solnick, S. L. (1996). The Political Economy of Russian Federalism: A Framework for Analysis. Problems of Post-Communism, 29, 13–25. CrossRef
go back to reference Starodubtsev, A. (2018). Federalism and Regional Policy in Contemporary Russia. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossRef Starodubtsev, A. (2018). Federalism and Regional Policy in Contemporary Russia. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossRef
go back to reference Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34. CrossRef Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34. CrossRef
go back to reference Stoliarov, M. (2003). Federalism and the Dictatorship in Russia. New York: Routledge. CrossRef Stoliarov, M. (2003). Federalism and the Dictatorship in Russia. New York: Routledge. CrossRef
go back to reference Svolik, M. W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Svolik, M. W. (2012). The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Toubeau, S., & Massetti, E. (2013). The Party Politics of Territorial Reforms in Europe. West European Politics, 36(2), 297–316. CrossRef Toubeau, S., & Massetti, E. (2013). The Party Politics of Territorial Reforms in Europe. West European Politics, 36(2), 297–316. CrossRef
go back to reference Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Wintrobe, R. (2009). Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 363–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wintrobe, R. (2009). Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 363–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Wurster, S., Kropp, S., & Dukalskis, A. (2017, September). Regional Competition in Hybrid and Authoritarian Regimes. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo. Wurster, S., Kropp, S., & Dukalskis, A. (2017, September). Regional Competition in Hybrid and Authoritarian Regimes. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo.
go back to reference Zubarevich, N. (2016). Bad But Stable. Russian Politics & Law, 54, 365–373. CrossRef Zubarevich, N. (2016). Bad But Stable. Russian Politics & Law, 54, 365–373. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Ambivalence of Federalism and Democracy: The Challenging Case of Authoritarianism—With Evidence from the Russian Case
Author
Sabine Kropp
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_12