Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

23-07-2021 | Original Paper

The broken Borda rule and other refinements of approval ranking

Authors: Guy Barokas, Yves Sprumont

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare | Issue 1/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the social aggregation problem in the preference-approval model of Brams and Sanver (The mathematics of preference, choice and order: essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn. Springer, Berlin, 2009). Each voter reports a linear ordering of the alternatives and an acceptability threshold. A rule transforms every profile of such “opinions” into a social ordering. The approval rule ranks the alternatives according to the number of voters who find them acceptable. The broken Borda rule ranks them according to the total score they receive; the scores assigned by a voter follow the standard Borda scale except that a large break is introduced between the score of her worst acceptable alternative and the score of her best unacceptable alternative. We offer an axiomatization of this rule and other lexicographic combinations of the approval rule and a fixed social welfare function.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
List works in Sen’s (1970) social welfare functionals framework. He proposes the so-called ONC+0 axiom, which requires that the social ordering be invariant under increasing transformations of the individual utility functions that preserve the sets of alternatives with positive, negative, and zero utility respectively. This means that a social welfare functional is allowed to use precisely the information encoded in Brams and Sanver’s preference-approval model.
 
2
Axiomatizations of the Borda count (or the Borda choice rule) were proposed by Young (1974), Nitzan and Rubinstein (1981), Mihara (2017), Sato (2017), Maskin (2020), Heckelman and Ragan (2021).
 
3
This axiom is now incompatible with the Pareto criterion \([aP_{i}b\) for all \(i\in N]\Rightarrow \left[ a{\mathbf {P}}(P,C)b\right] .\) In the current framework, however, the Pareto criterion is not compelling because the voters’ views about the acceptability of the alternatives may conflict with their preferences.
 
Literature
go back to reference d'Aspremont C, Gevers L (2002) Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability. In: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (Eds) North-Holland 1:459–541 d'Aspremont C, Gevers L (2002) Social welfare functionals and interpersonal comparability. In: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (Eds) North-Holland 1:459–541
go back to reference Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1978) Approval voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 72(3):831–847CrossRef Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (1978) Approval voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 72(3):831–847CrossRef
go back to reference Brams SJ, Sanver MR (2009) Voting systems that combine approval and preference. In: Brams SJ (ed) The mathematics of preference, choice and order: essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–237CrossRef Brams SJ, Sanver MR (2009) Voting systems that combine approval and preference. In: Brams SJ (ed) The mathematics of preference, choice and order: essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–237CrossRef
go back to reference Erdamar B, García-Lapresta JL, Pérez-Román D, Sanver MR (2014) Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context. Inf Fusion 17:14–21CrossRef Erdamar B, García-Lapresta JL, Pérez-Román D, Sanver MR (2014) Measuring consensus in a preference-approval context. Inf Fusion 17:14–21CrossRef
go back to reference Gerasimou G (2018) Indecisiveness, undesirability and overload revealed through rational choice deferral. Econ J 128(614):2450–2479CrossRef Gerasimou G (2018) Indecisiveness, undesirability and overload revealed through rational choice deferral. Econ J 128(614):2450–2479CrossRef
go back to reference Heckelman J, Ragan R (2021) Symmetric scoring rules and a new characterization of the Borda count. Econ Inq 59(1):287–299CrossRef Heckelman J, Ragan R (2021) Symmetric scoring rules and a new characterization of the Borda count. Econ Inq 59(1):287–299CrossRef
go back to reference List C (2001) A note on introducing a zero-line of welfare as an escape route from Arrows theorem. Pac Econ Rev 6(2):223–238CrossRef List C (2001) A note on introducing a zero-line of welfare as an escape route from Arrows theorem. Pac Econ Rev 6(2):223–238CrossRef
go back to reference Maniquet F, Mongin P (2015) Approval voting and Arrows impossibility theorem. Soc Choice Welf 44(3):519–532CrossRef Maniquet F, Mongin P (2015) Approval voting and Arrows impossibility theorem. Soc Choice Welf 44(3):519–532CrossRef
go back to reference Maskin E (2020) Arrows IIA condition mays axioms and the Borda count. Mimeo, Harvard University, New York Maskin E (2020) Arrows IIA condition mays axioms and the Borda count. Mimeo, Harvard University, New York
go back to reference Mihara HR (2017) Characterizing the Borda ranking rule for a fixed population. Working Paper. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/78093 Mihara HR (2017) Characterizing the Borda ranking rule for a fixed population. Working Paper. https://​mpra.​ub.​uni-muenchen.​de/​id/​eprint/​78093
go back to reference Nitzan S, Rubinstein A (1981) A further characterization of Borda ranking method. Public Choice 36:153–158CrossRef Nitzan S, Rubinstein A (1981) A further characterization of Borda ranking method. Public Choice 36:153–158CrossRef
go back to reference Sanver MR (2010) Approval as an intrinsic part of preference. In: Laslier J-F, Sanver MR (eds) Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 469–481CrossRef Sanver MR (2010) Approval as an intrinsic part of preference. In: Laslier J-F, Sanver MR (eds) Handbook on approval voting. Springer, Berlin, pp 469–481CrossRef
go back to reference Sato N (2017) A simple characterization of Borda rule for fixed electorate. Working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2917013 Sato N (2017) A simple characterization of Borda rule for fixed electorate. Working paper. https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​2917013
go back to reference Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco Sen A (1970) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco
go back to reference Young HP (1974) An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. J Econ Theory 9:43–52CrossRef Young HP (1974) An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. J Econ Theory 9:43–52CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The broken Borda rule and other refinements of approval ranking
Authors
Guy Barokas
Yves Sprumont
Publication date
23-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0176-1714
Electronic ISSN: 1432-217X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01356-5

Premium Partner