Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. The Decision to Delist: International Empirical Evidence

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter reviews the empirical literature. There are essentially three streams of empirical literature on delisting. The first one studies, in voluntary delisting, the link between the decision to undertake the operation and the determinants in accordance with the different theoretical models. The other two literature streams highlight the reasons that lead to involuntary delisting and study the effects of delisting on firm value. Except for company size, ex-ante performance and company age, other variables do not show clear-cut results. Small firms, firms with poor ex-ante performance, and young firms are more likely to go private. In terms of value effect, voluntary delisting increases shareholders’ wealth, whereas involuntary delisting leads to value destruction.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Directive on takeover bids (Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 April 2004).
 
2
Quoted spread is the average daily closing ask-closing bid divided by the closing mid-quote.
 
3
Most studies rely on these models to estimate normal returns: (a) index model; (b) comparison period return approach; (c) market model; (d) CAPM; (e) control portfolio model.
 
4
The momentum strategy assumes that stocks with good performance in the past will have the same results in the future and vice versa. The strategy is therefore to buy stocks that have been highly profitable over the past 9–12 months and sell those with low performance.
 
Literature
go back to reference Achleitner, A. K., Betzer, A., Goergen, V., & Hinterramskogler, B. (2013). Private equity acquisitions of continental European firms: The impact of ownership and control on the likelihood of being taken private. European Financial Management, 19(1), 72–107.CrossRef Achleitner, A. K., Betzer, A., Goergen, V., & Hinterramskogler, B. (2013). Private equity acquisitions of continental European firms: The impact of ownership and control on the likelihood of being taken private. European Financial Management, 19(1), 72–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Andres, C., Betzer, A., & Weir, C. (2007). Shareholder wealth gains through better corporate governance. The case of European LBO-transactions. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 21, 403–424.CrossRef Andres, C., Betzer, A., & Weir, C. (2007). Shareholder wealth gains through better corporate governance. The case of European LBO-transactions. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 21, 403–424.CrossRef
go back to reference Angel, J., Harris, J., Panchapagesan, V., & Werner, I. (2004). From pink slips to pink sheets: Market quality around delisting from NASDAQ. Working paper, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics. Angel, J., Harris, J., Panchapagesan, V., & Werner, I. (2004). From pink slips to pink sheets: Market quality around delisting from NASDAQ. Working paper, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
go back to reference Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2011). Lemons or cherries? Growth opportunities and market temptations in going public and private. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(2), 489–526.CrossRef Aslan, H., & Kumar, P. (2011). Lemons or cherries? Growth opportunities and market temptations in going public and private. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(2), 489–526.CrossRef
go back to reference Bajo, E., Barbi, M., Bigelli, M., & Hillier, D. (2013). The role of institutional investors in public-to-private transactions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(11), 4327–4336.CrossRef Bajo, E., Barbi, M., Bigelli, M., & Hillier, D. (2013). The role of institutional investors in public-to-private transactions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(11), 4327–4336.CrossRef
go back to reference Baker, G. P., & Kennedy, R. E. (2002). Survivorship and the economic grim reaper. The Journal of Law. Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 324–361.CrossRef Baker, G. P., & Kennedy, R. E. (2002). Survivorship and the economic grim reaper. The Journal of Law. Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 324–361.CrossRef
go back to reference Bessler, W., Kaen, F., Kurmann, R., & Zimmermann, J. (2012). The listing and delisting of German firms on NYSE and NASDAQ: Were there any benefits? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 22(2), 1024–1053.CrossRef Bessler, W., Kaen, F., Kurmann, R., & Zimmermann, J. (2012). The listing and delisting of German firms on NYSE and NASDAQ: Were there any benefits? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 22(2), 1024–1053.CrossRef
go back to reference Bharath, S. T., & Dittmar, A. K. (2010). Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets? Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1771–1818.CrossRef Bharath, S. T., & Dittmar, A. K. (2010). Why do firms use private equity to opt out of public markets? Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1771–1818.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhattacharya, U., Borisov, A., & Yu, X. (2015). Firm mortality and Natal financial care. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1), 61–88.CrossRef Bhattacharya, U., Borisov, A., & Yu, X. (2015). Firm mortality and Natal financial care. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1), 61–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Boubaker, S., Cellier, A., & Rouatbi, W. (2014). The sources of shareholder wealth gains from going private transactions: The role of controlling shareholders. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43, 226–246.CrossRef Boubaker, S., Cellier, A., & Rouatbi, W. (2014). The sources of shareholder wealth gains from going private transactions: The role of controlling shareholders. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43, 226–246.CrossRef
go back to reference Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2015). Financial regulation and IPOs: Evidence from the history of the Italian stock market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 116–131.CrossRef Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2015). Financial regulation and IPOs: Evidence from the history of the Italian stock market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 116–131.CrossRef
go back to reference Chaplinsky, S., & Ramchand, L. (2012). What drives delistings of foreign firms from US exchanges? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 22, 1126–1148.CrossRef Chaplinsky, S., & Ramchand, L. (2012). What drives delistings of foreign firms from US exchanges? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 22, 1126–1148.CrossRef
go back to reference Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (1999). A theory of the going-public decision. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 249–279.CrossRef Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (1999). A theory of the going-public decision. Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 249–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, K. C. W., & Schoderbek, M. P. (1999). The role of accounting information in security exchange delisting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 31–57.CrossRef Chen, K. C. W., & Schoderbek, M. P. (1999). The role of accounting information in security exchange delisting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 31–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Croci, E., & Del Giudice, A. (2014). Delistings, controlling shareholders and firm performance in Europe. European Financial Management, 20(2), 374–405.CrossRef Croci, E., & Del Giudice, A. (2014). Delistings, controlling shareholders and firm performance in Europe. European Financial Management, 20(2), 374–405.CrossRef
go back to reference DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, A., & Rice, E. (1984). Going private: Minority freeze outs and stockholder wealth. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 367–401.CrossRef DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, A., & Rice, E. (1984). Going private: Minority freeze outs and stockholder wealth. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 367–401.CrossRef
go back to reference Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2013). The U.S. left behind? Financial globalization and the rise of IPOs outside the U.S. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 546–573.CrossRef Doidge, C., Karolyi, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2013). The U.S. left behind? Financial globalization and the rise of IPOs outside the U.S. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 546–573.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisdorfer, A. (2008). Delisted firms and momentum profits. Journal of Financial Markets, 11(2), 160–179.CrossRef Eisdorfer, A. (2008). Delisted firms and momentum profits. Journal of Financial Markets, 11(2), 160–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Engel, E., Hayes, R. M., & Wang, X. (2007). The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and firms’ going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1), 116–145.CrossRef Engel, E., Hayes, R. M., & Wang, X. (2007). The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and firms’ going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1), 116–145.CrossRef
go back to reference Faccio, M., & Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.CrossRef Faccio, M., & Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 229–269.CrossRef Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 229–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Gao, X., Ritter, J. R., & Zhongyan, Z. (2013). Where have all the IPOs gone? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(6), 1663–1692.CrossRef Gao, X., Ritter, J. R., & Zhongyan, Z. (2013). Where have all the IPOs gone? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(6), 1663–1692.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerakos, J., Lang, M., & Maffett, M. (2013). Post-listing performance and private sector regulation: The experience of London’s alternative investment market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2), 189–215.CrossRef Gerakos, J., Lang, M., & Maffett, M. (2013). Post-listing performance and private sector regulation: The experience of London’s alternative investment market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2), 189–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Geranio, M., & Zanotti, G. (2012). Equity markets do not fit all: An analysis of public-to-private deals in Continental Europe. European Financial Management, 18(5), 867–895.CrossRef Geranio, M., & Zanotti, G. (2012). Equity markets do not fit all: An analysis of public-to-private deals in Continental Europe. European Financial Management, 18(5), 867–895.CrossRef
go back to reference Halpern, P., Kieschnick, R., & Rotenberg, W. (1999). On the heterogeneity of leveraged going private transactions. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 281–309.CrossRef Halpern, P., Kieschnick, R., & Rotenberg, W. (1999). On the heterogeneity of leveraged going private transactions. The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 281–309.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, J. H., Panchapagesan, V., & Werner, I. M. (2008). Off but not gone: A study of Nasdaq delistings. Working paper, Fisher College of Business. Harris, J. H., Panchapagesan, V., & Werner, I. M. (2008). Off but not gone: A study of Nasdaq delistings. Working paper, Fisher College of Business.
go back to reference Hostak, P., Lys, T., & Yang, Y. G. (2013). An examination of the impact of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on the attractiveness of U.S. capital markets for foreign firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(2), 522–559.CrossRef Hostak, P., Lys, T., & Yang, Y. G. (2013). An examination of the impact of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act on the attractiveness of U.S. capital markets for foreign firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(2), 522–559.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
go back to reference Jensen, M. C. (1989). Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review, 67(5), 61–37. Jensen, M. C. (1989). Eclipse of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review, 67(5), 61–37.
go back to reference Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–350.CrossRef Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S. (1989a). The effects of management buyouts on operations and value. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(2), 217–254.CrossRef Kaplan, S. (1989a). The effects of management buyouts on operations and value. Journal of Financial Economics, 24(2), 217–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S. (1989b). Management buyouts: Evidence of taxes as a source of value. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 611–632.CrossRef Kaplan, S. (1989b). Management buyouts: Evidence of taxes as a source of value. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 611–632.CrossRef
go back to reference Kashefi Pour, E., & Lasfer, M. (2013). Why do companies delist voluntarily from the stock market? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(12), 4850–4860.CrossRef Kashefi Pour, E., & Lasfer, M. (2013). Why do companies delist voluntarily from the stock market? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(12), 4850–4860.CrossRef
go back to reference Kieschnick, R. L. (1998). Free cash-flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions revisited. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(l−2), 187–202.CrossRef Kieschnick, R. L. (1998). Free cash-flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions revisited. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(l−2), 187–202.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, W. S., & Lyn, E. O. (1991). Going private: Corporate restructuring under information asymmetry and agency problems. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 18(2), 637–648.CrossRef Kim, W. S., & Lyn, E. O. (1991). Going private: Corporate restructuring under information asymmetry and agency problems. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 18(2), 637–648.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, W., & Weisbach, M. S. (2008). Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 281–307.CrossRef Kim, W., & Weisbach, M. S. (2008). Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 281–307.CrossRef
go back to reference Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771–787.CrossRef Lehn, K., & Poulsen, A. (1989). Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 771–787.CrossRef
go back to reference Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediations. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.CrossRef Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediations. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.CrossRef
go back to reference Leuz, C. (2007). Was the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 really this costly? A discussion of evidence from event returns and going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 140–165. Leuz, C. (2007). Was the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 really this costly? A discussion of evidence from event returns and going-private decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 140–165.
go back to reference Leuz, C., Triantis, A., & Wang, T. Y. (2008). Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 45, 181–208.CrossRef Leuz, C., Triantis, A., & Wang, T. Y. (2008). Why do firms go dark? Causes and economic consequences of voluntary SEC deregistrations. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 45, 181–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, J., & Zhou, J. (2006). Earning management and delisting risk of initial public offering. Working paper, Simon School, University of Rochester. Li, J., & Zhou, J. (2006). Earning management and delisting risk of initial public offering. Working paper, Simon School, University of Rochester.
go back to reference Macey, J., O’Hara, M., & Pompilio, D. (2008). Down and out in the stock market: The law and economics of the delisting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 683–713.CrossRef Macey, J., O’Hara, M., & Pompilio, D. (2008). Down and out in the stock market: The law and economics of the delisting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 683–713.CrossRef
go back to reference Marosi, A., & Massoud, N. (2007). Why do firms go dark? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(2), 421–442.CrossRef Marosi, A., & Massoud, N. (2007). Why do firms go dark? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(2), 421–442.CrossRef
go back to reference Martinez, I., & Serve, S. (2011). The delisting decision: The case of buyout offer with squeeze-out (BOSO). International Review of Law and Economics, 31(4), 229–239.CrossRef Martinez, I., & Serve, S. (2011). The delisting decision: The case of buyout offer with squeeze-out (BOSO). International Review of Law and Economics, 31(4), 229–239.CrossRef
go back to reference Martinez, I., & Serve, S. (2017). Reasons for delisting and consequences: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3), 733–770.CrossRef Martinez, I., & Serve, S. (2017). Reasons for delisting and consequences: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3), 733–770.CrossRef
go back to reference Mehran, H., & Peristiani, S. (2010). Financial visibility and the decision to go private. Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 519–547.CrossRef Mehran, H., & Peristiani, S. (2010). Financial visibility and the decision to go private. Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 519–547.CrossRef
go back to reference Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.CrossRef Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Myers, S. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592.CrossRef Myers, S. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592.CrossRef
go back to reference Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: Free cash flow vs. financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985–1999.CrossRef Opler, T., & Titman, S. (1993). The determinants of leveraged buyout activity: Free cash flow vs. financial distress costs. Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1985–1999.CrossRef
go back to reference Peristiani, S., & Hong, G. (2004). Pre-IPO financial performance and aftermarket survival. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 10(2), 1–8. Peristiani, S., & Hong, G. (2004). Pre-IPO financial performance and aftermarket survival. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 10(2), 1–8.
go back to reference Renneboog, L., Simons, T., & Wright, M. (2007). Why do public firms go private in the UK? The impact of private equity investors, incentive realignment and undervaluation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(4), 591–628.CrossRef Renneboog, L., Simons, T., & Wright, M. (2007). Why do public firms go private in the UK? The impact of private equity investors, incentive realignment and undervaluation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(4), 591–628.CrossRef
go back to reference Sanger, G. C., & Peterson, J. D. (1990). An empirical analysis of common stock delisting. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 261–273.CrossRef Sanger, G. C., & Peterson, J. D. (1990). An empirical analysis of common stock delisting. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(2), 261–273.CrossRef
go back to reference Sannajust, A. (2010). Motivations and performance of public to private operations: An international study. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6(9), 1–19. Sannajust, A. (2010). Motivations and performance of public to private operations: An international study. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6(9), 1–19.
go back to reference Seguin, P. J., & Smoller, M. M. (1997). Share price and mortality: An empirical evaluation of newly listed Nasdaq stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 333–363.CrossRef Seguin, P. J., & Smoller, M. M. (1997). Share price and mortality: An empirical evaluation of newly listed Nasdaq stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 333–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1992). Liquidation value an debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1343–1366.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1992). Liquidation value an debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1343–1366.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomsen, S., & Vinten, F. (2014). Delistings and the costs of governance: A study of European stock exchanges 1996–2004. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(3), 793–833.CrossRef Thomsen, S., & Vinten, F. (2014). Delistings and the costs of governance: A study of European stock exchanges 1996–2004. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(3), 793–833.CrossRef
go back to reference Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.CrossRef Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Vulcheva, M. I. (2011). International accounting standardization across countries with unequal enforcement – Questionable benefits at a high price? Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of the James T. Laney School Emory University. Vulcheva, M. I. (2011). International accounting standardization across countries with unequal enforcement – Questionable benefits at a high price? Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of the James T. Laney School Emory University.
go back to reference Wagner, S., & Cockburn, I. (2010). Patents and the survival of internet-related IPOs. Research Policy, 39, 214–228.CrossRef Wagner, S., & Cockburn, I. (2010). Patents and the survival of internet-related IPOs. Research Policy, 39, 214–228.CrossRef
go back to reference Weir, C., & Wright, M. (2006). Governance and takeovers: Are public-to-private transactions different from traditional acquisitions of listed corporations? Accounting and Business Research, 36(4), 289–307.CrossRef Weir, C., & Wright, M. (2006). Governance and takeovers: Are public-to-private transactions different from traditional acquisitions of listed corporations? Accounting and Business Research, 36(4), 289–307.CrossRef
go back to reference Weir, C., Laing, D., & Wright, W. (2005a). Incentive effects, monitoring mechanisms and the market for corporate control: An analysis of the factors affecting public to private transactions in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(5), 909–943.CrossRef Weir, C., Laing, D., & Wright, W. (2005a). Incentive effects, monitoring mechanisms and the market for corporate control: An analysis of the factors affecting public to private transactions in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(5), 909–943.CrossRef
go back to reference Weir, C., Laing, D., & Wright, M. (2005b). Undervaluation, private information, agency costs and the decision to go private. Applied Financial Economics, 15(3), 947–961.CrossRef Weir, C., Laing, D., & Wright, M. (2005b). Undervaluation, private information, agency costs and the decision to go private. Applied Financial Economics, 15(3), 947–961.CrossRef
go back to reference Weir, C., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. (2008). Public-to-private buy-outs, distress costs and private equity. Applied Financial Economics, 18(10), 801–819.CrossRef Weir, C., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. (2008). Public-to-private buy-outs, distress costs and private equity. Applied Financial Economics, 18(10), 801–819.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, M., Renneboog, L., Simons, T., & Scholes, L. (2006). Leveraged buyouts in the U.K. and Continental Europe: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(3), 38–55. Wright, M., Renneboog, L., Simons, T., & Scholes, L. (2006). Leveraged buyouts in the U.K. and Continental Europe: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(3), 38–55.
go back to reference Zingales, L. (1995). Insider ownership and the decision to go public. Review of Economic Studies, 62(3), 425–448.CrossRef Zingales, L. (1995). Insider ownership and the decision to go public. Review of Economic Studies, 62(3), 425–448.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Decision to Delist: International Empirical Evidence
Author
Barbara Fidanza
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95049-5_3