Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9476-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Replication files can be found on the Political Behavior Dataverse.
Recent work on the nature of mass polarization has revealed that individuals perceive more polarization than actually exists, meaning they assume that out-party members are farther from them on the liberal-conservative continuum than they actually are according to measures of their personal preferences. But what are the consequences of this biased perception, and how do they differ from the consequences of actual polarization? In this paper, we use American National Election Studies data to estimate actual and perceived polarization at the individual level from 1972–2012. We find that the two types of polarization, while related themselves, are differentially related to other attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of normative interest. Namely, we find that perceived polarization is more strongly related to negative affective evaluations of out-parties and out-party candidates, voting, participation, trust, and efficacy than is actual polarization, which shares much weaker relationships with these constructs.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 109 KB)11109_2018_9476_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Abramowitz, A. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(02), 542–555. CrossRef
Ahler, D. & Sood, G. (2018). The Parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Journal of Politics .
Ahler, D. J. (2014). Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 76(3), 607–620. CrossRef
Alford, John R., Hatemi, Peter K., Hibbing, John R., Martin, Nicholas G., & Eaves, Lindon J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379. CrossRef
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232. CrossRef
Bishop, B. (2009). The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-minded America is Tearing us Apart. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Chapin, A. (2015). Republicans and democrats can’t even agree on where to shop. Racked. 21 December 2015. https://www.racked.com/2015/12/21/10633884/shopping-retailers-conservative-liberal.
Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2018). Disgust, anxiety, and political learning in the face of threat. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 266–279.
Davis, N. T. (2015). The role of Indifference in split-ticket voting. Political Behavior, 37(1), 67–86. CrossRef
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American’s social attitudes become more polarized?’. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690–755. CrossRef
Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. CrossRef
Federico, C. M. (2004). Predicting attitude extremity: The interactive effects of schema development and the need to evaluate and their mediation by evaluative Integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1281–1294. CrossRef
Fiorina, M., & Levendusky, M. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. In D. Brady & P. Nivola (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Characteristics, causes, and consequences of America’s polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and the Hoover Institution Press.
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. CrossRef
Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 611. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. Red and Blue Nation, 2, 1–33.
Hetherington, M. J. (2011). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(01), 1–17. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not Ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. CrossRef
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. CrossRef
Kenyon, T. (2014). False polarization: Debiasing as applied social epistemology. Synthese, 191(11), 2529–2547. CrossRef
Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. CrossRef
Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016a). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. CrossRef
Levendusky, Matthew S., & Malhotra, Neil. (2016b). (Mis) perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 378–391. CrossRef
Levendusky, M. S., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Red states versus blue states: Going beyond the mean. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(2), 227–248. CrossRef
Mason, L. (2015). I disrespectfully agree: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. CrossRef
McDermott, R., Tingley, D., & Hatemi, Peter K. (2014). Assortative mating on ideology could operate through olfactory cues. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 997–1005. CrossRef
Moral, M. (2017). The bipolar voter: On the effects of actual and perceived party polarization on voter Turnout in European multiparty democracies. Political Behavior, 39(4), 935–965. CrossRef
Palfrey, T. R., & Poole, K. T. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 511–530. CrossRef
Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Lee, R. (2002). Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political Behavior, 38, 485–508. CrossRef
Sherman, D. K., Nelson, L. D., & Ross, L. D. (2003). Naive realism and affirmative action: Adversaries are more similar than they think. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(4), 275–289. CrossRef
Smidt, C. D. (2017). Polarization and the decline of the American floating voter. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 365–381. CrossRef
Suhay, E. (2015). Explaining group influence: The role of identity and emotion in political conformity and polarization. Political Behavior, 37(1), 221–251. CrossRef
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.
Thornton, J. R. (2013). The impact of elite polarization on partisan ambivalence and indifference. Political Behavior, 35(2), 409–428. CrossRef
Westfall, J., Chambers, J., Judd, C. & van Boven, L.. (2012). The exaggeration of political polarization. Unpublished Manuscript .
Westfall, Jb, Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015). Perceiving political polarization in the United States party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 145–158. CrossRef
- The Differential Effects of Actual and Perceived Polarization
Adam M. Enders
Miles T. Armaly
- Publication date
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta