Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Events
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
12th International Engine Congress 2025 | 25. + 26. February 2025

Meeting Place for the Powertrain and Sustainable Fuels Community

The congress will examine the future role of the internal combustion engine and its non-fossil fuels from a global perspective with leading experts. Be part of it! More information and booking options are available on our website.
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Cognitive Computation
Published in:

01-05-2024

The Duo of Visual Servoing and Deep Learning-Based Methods for Situation-Aware Disaster Management: A Comprehensive Review

Authors: Senthil Kumar Jagatheesaperumal, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Md. Rafiul Hassan, Giancarlo Fortino

Published in: Cognitive Computation | Issue 5/2024

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become essential in disaster management due to their ability to provide real-time situational awareness and support decision-making processes. Visual servoing, a technique that uses visual feedback to control the motion of a robotic system, has been used to improve the precision and accuracy of UAVs in disaster scenarios. The study integrates visual servoing to enhance UAV precision while exploring recent advancements in deep learning. This integration enhances the precision and efficiency of disaster response by enabling UAVs to navigate complex environments, identify critical areas for intervention, and provide actionable insights to decision-makers in real time. It discusses disaster management aspects like search and rescue, damage assessment, and situational awareness, while also analyzing the challenges associated with integrating visual servoing and deep learning into UAVs. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis to offer real-time situational awareness and decision support in disaster management. It highlights that deep learning along with visual servoing enhances precision and accuracy in disaster scenarios. The analysis also summarizes the challenges and the need for high computational power, data processing, and communication capabilities. UAVs, especially when combined with visual servoing and deep learning, play a crucial role in disaster management. The review underscores the potential benefits and challenges of integrating these technologies, emphasizing their significance in improving disaster response and recovery, with possible means of enhanced situational awareness and decision-making.
previous article Synergy of Human-Centered AI and Cyber-Physical-Social Systems for Enhanced Cognitive Situation Awareness: Applications, Challenges and Opportunities
next article NeuralPMG: A Neural Polyphonic Music Generation System Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Cui F. Deployment and integration of smart sensors with IoT devices detecting fire disasters in huge forest environment. Comput Commun. 2020;150:818–27.
4.
Hildmann H, Kovacs E. Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as mobile sensing platforms (MSPS) for disaster response, civil security and public safety. Drones. 2019;3(3):59.
5.
Machkour Z, Ortiz-Arroyo D, Durdevic P. Classical and deep learning based visual servoing systems: a survey on state of the art. J Intell Robot Syst. 2022;104(1):1–27.
6.
Hai X, Qiu H, Wen C, Feng Q. A novel distributed situation awareness consensus approach for UAV swarm systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2023;24(12):14706–17.
7.
Xiong C, Li Q, Lu X. Automated regional seismic damage assessment of buildings using an unmanned aerial vehicle and a convolutional neural network. Autom Constr. 2020;109:102994.
8.
Atif M, Ahmad R, Ahmad W, Zhao L, Rodrigues JJ. UAV-assisted wireless localization for search and rescue. IEEE Syst J. 2021;15(3):3261–72.
9.
Cabreira TM, Brisolara LB, Ferreira PR Jr. Survey on coverage path planning with unmanned aerial vehicles. Drones. 2019;3(1):4.
10.
Mozaffari M, Saad W, Bennis M, Nam Y-H, Debbah M. A tutorial on UAVs for wireless networks: applications, challenges, and open problems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2019;21(3):2334–60.
11.
Sanchez-Lopez JL, Fernández RAS, Bavle H, Sampedro C, Molina M, Pestana J, Campoy P. Aerostack: an architecture and open-source software framework for aerial robotics. In: 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE; 2016. pp. 332–41.
12.
13.
Mardani A, Chiaberge M, Giaccone P. Communication-aware UAV path planning. IEEE. Access. 2019;7:52609–21.
14.
Fotia L, Delicato F, Fortino G. Trust in edge-based internet of things architectures: state of the art and research challenges. ACM Comput Surv. 2023;55(9):1–34.
15.
Yang Z, Xu W, Shikh-Bahaei M. Energy efficient UAV communication with energy harvesting. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2019;69(2):1913–27.
16.
Zeng Y, Zhang R. Energy-efficient UAV communication with trajectory optimization. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun. 2017;16(6):3747–60.
17.
Nguyen M-N, Nguyen LD, Duong TQ, Tuan HD. Real-time optimal resource allocation for embedded UAV communication systems. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett. 2018;8(1):225–8.
18.
Tan X, Zuo Z, Su S, Guo X, Sun X, Jiang D. Performance analysis of routing protocols for UAV communication networks. IEEE Access. 2020;8:92212–24.
19.
Ji B, Li Y, Zhou B, Li C, Song K, Wen H. Performance analysis of UAV relay assisted IoT communication network enhanced with energy harvesting. IEEE Access. 2019;7:38738–47.
20.
Ahmad A, Cheema AA, Finlay D. A survey of radio propagation channel modelling for low altitude flying base stations. Comput Netw. 2020;171:107122.
21.
Coombes M, Chen W-H, Liu C. Boustrophedon coverage path planning for UAV aerial surveys in wind. In: 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE; 2017. pp. 1563–71.
22.
Li W, Wang L, Fei A. Minimizing packet expiration loss with path planning in UAV-assisted data sensing. IEEE Wireless Commun Lett. 2019;8(6):1520–3. Publisher: IEEE.
23.
Wang C, Wang J, Shen Y, Zhang X. Autonomous navigation of UAVs in large-scale complex environments: a deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2019;68(3):2124–36.
24.
Xu T, Wang N, Lin H, Sun Z. UAV autonomous reconnaissance route planning based on deep reinforcement learning. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS). IEEE; 2019. pp. 761–6.
25.
Wan K, Gao X, Hu Z, Zhang W. A RDA-based deep reinforcement learning approach for autonomous motion planning of UAV in dynamic unknown environments. JPhCS. 2020;1487(1): 012006.
26.
Li B, Mu C, Wu B. A survey of vision based autonomous aerial refueling for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: 2012 Third International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing. IEEE; 2012. pp. 1–6.
27.
Kong W, Zhou D, Zhang D, Zhang J. Vision-based autonomous landing system for unmanned aerial vehicle: a survey. In: 2014 International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Information Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI). IEEE; 2014. pp. 1–8.
28.
Máthé K, Buşoniu L. Vision and control for UAVs: a survey of general methods and of inexpensive platforms for infrastructure inspection. Sensors. 2015;15(7):14887–916.
29.
30.
Jenssen R, Roverso D, et al. Automatic autonomous vision-based power line inspection: a review of current status and the potential role of deep learning. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2018;99:107–20.
31.
Fraga-Lamas P, Ramos L, Mondéjar-Guerra V, Fernández-Caramés TM. A review on IoT deep learning UAV systems for autonomous obstacle detection and collision avoidance. Remote Sens. 2019;11(18):2144.
32.
Samaras S, Diamantidou E, Ataloglou D, Sakellariou N, Vafeiadis A, Magoulianitis V, Lalas A, Dimou A, Zarpalas D, Votis K, et al. Deep learning on multi sensor data for counter UAV applications-a systematic review. Sensors. 2019;19(22):4837.
33.
Mittal P, Singh R, Sharma A. Deep learning-based object detection in low-altitude UAV datasets: a survey. Image Vis Comput. 2020;104:104046.
34.
Azimi M, Eslamlou AD, Pekcan G. Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: state-of-the-art review. Sensors. 2020;20(10):2778.
35.
36.
37.
Diez Y, Kentsch S, Fukuda M, Caceres MLL, Moritake K, Cabezas M. Deep learning in forestry using UAV-acquired RGB data: a practical review. Remote Sens. 2021;13(14):2837.
38.
Srivastava S, Narayan S, Mittal S. A survey of deep learning techniques for vehicle detection from UAV images. J Syst Archit. 2021;117:102152.
39.
40.
Bouguettaya A, Zarzour H, Kechida A, Taberkit AM. Recent advances on UAV and deep learning for early crop diseases identification: a short review. In: 2021 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT). IEEE; 2021. pp. 334–9.
41.
Bouguettaya A, Zarzour H, Kechida A, Taberkit AM. Vehicle detection from UAV imagery with deep learning: a review. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021;33(11):6047–67.
42.
Wu J, Jin Z, Liu A, Yu L, Yang F. A survey of learning-based control of robotic visual servoing systems. J Frankl Inst. 2022;359(1):556–77.
43.
Munawar HS, Hammad AW, Waller ST, Thaheem MJ, Shrestha A. An integrated approach for post-disaster flood management via the use of cutting-edge technologies and UAVs: a review. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7925.
44.
Bouguettaya A, Zarzour H, Taberkit AM, Kechida A. A review on early wildfire detection from unmanned aerial vehicles using deep learning-based computer vision algorithms. Signal Process. 2022;190:108309.
45.
Adams SM, Friedland CJ. A survey of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage for imagery collection in disaster research and management. In: 9th International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Response, vol 8. 2011. pp. 1–8.
46.
Li G, Zhou X, Yin J, Xiao Q. An UAV scheduling and planning method for post-disaster survey. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2014;40(2):169.
47.
Yuan C, Zhang Y, Liu Z. A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring, detection, and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques. Can J For Res. 2015;45(7):783–92.
48.
Chan B, Guan H, Jo J, Blumenstein M. Towards UAV-based bridge inspection systems: a review and an application perspective. Struct Monit Maint. 2015;2(3):283–300.
49.
Erdelj M, Natalizio E. UAV-assisted disaster management: applications and open issues. In: 2016 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). IEEE; 2016. pp. 1–5.
50.
Gomez C, Purdie H. UAV-based photogrammetry and geocomputing for hazards and disaster risk monitoring-a review. Geoenvironmental Disasters. 2016;3(1):1–11.
51.
Liu H, Wang X, Li L, Tu X, Wang Y, Liao X, Zhang L. Application of UAV aerial photogrammetry for rockfall disaster survey. J Eng Geol. 2017;25(Z1):82–7.
52.
Hinterhofer T, Pfennigbauer M, Ullrich A, Rothbacher D, Schraml S, Hofstätter M. UAV-based lidar and gamma probe with real-time data processing and downlink for survey of nuclear disaster locations. In: Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing XIX, vol 10629. 2018. pp. 106290. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
53.
Grogan S, Pellerin R, Gamache M. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and drones in search and rescue operations–a survey. Proceedings of the PROLOG. 2018. pp. 1–13.
54.
Yu M, Yang C, Li Y. Big data in natural disaster management: a review. Geosciences. 2018;8(5):165.
55.
Recchiuto CT, Sgorbissa A. Post-disaster assessment with unmanned aerial vehicles: a survey on practical implementations and research approaches. J Field Rob. 2018;35(4):459–90.
56.
Kim S, Kim T, Sim J. Applicability assessment of UAV mapping for disaster damage investigation in Korea. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2019. pp. 209–14.
57.
Popescu D, Stoican F, Stamatescu G, Chenaru O, Ichim L. A survey of collaborative UAV-WSN systems for efficient monitoring. Sensors. 2019;19(21):4690.
58.
Kerle N, Nex F, Gerke M, Duarte D, Vetrivel A. UAV-based structural damage mapping: a review. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 2020;9(1):14.
59.
Nikhil N, Shreyas S, Vyshnavi G, Yadav S. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in disaster management applications. In: 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT). IEEE; 2020. pp. 140–8.
60.
Akram T, Awais M, Naqvi R, Ahmed A, Naeem M. Multicriteria UAV base stations placement for disaster management. IEEE Syst J. 2020;14(3):3475–82.
61.
Chamola V, Hassija V, Gupta S, Goyal A, Guizani M, Sikdar B. Disaster and pandemic management using machine learning: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020;8(21):16047–71.
62.
Qadir Z, Ullah F, Munawar HS, Al-Turjman F. Addressing disasters in smart cities through UAVs path planning and 5G communications: a systematic review. Comput Commun. 2021;168:114–35.
63.
Garnica-Peña RJ, Alcántara-Ayala I. The use of UAVs for landslide disaster risk research and disaster risk management: a literature review. J Mt Sci. 2021;18(2):482–98.
64.
Furutani T, Minami M. Drones for disaster risk reduction and crisis response. In: Emerging Technologies for Disaster Resilience. Springer; 2021. pp. 51–62.
65.
Khan A, Gupta S, Gupta SK. Cooperative control between multi-UAVs for maximum coverage in disaster management: review and proposed model. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT). IEEE; 2022. pp. 271–7.
66.
Munawar HS, Mojtahedi M, Hammad AW, Kouzani A, Mahmud MP. Disruptive technologies as a solution for disaster risk management: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806:151351.
67.
D’Aniello G, Gravina R, Gaeta M, Fortino G. Situation aware sensor-based wearable computing systems: a reference architecture-driven review. IEEE Sensors J. 2022;22(14):13853–63.
68.
Yang J, You X, Wu G, Hassan MM, Almogren A, Guna J. Application of reinforcement learning in UAV cluster task scheduling. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2019;95:140–8.
69.
AlAli ZT, Alabady SA. A survey of disaster management and SAR operations using sensors and supporting techniques. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022;82:103295.
70.
Haider SA, Zikria YB, Garg S, Ahmad S, Hassan MM, AlQahtani SA. Ai-based energy-efficient UAV-assisted IoT data collection with integrated trajectory and resource optimization. IEEE Wirel Commun. 2022;29(6):30–6.
71.
Chhikara P, Tekchandani R, Kumar N, Guizani M, Hassan MM. Federated learning and autonomous UAVs for hazardous zone detection and AGI prediction in IoT environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021;8(20):15456–67.
72.
Chien W-C, Hassan MM, Alsanad A, Fortino G. UAV-assisted joint wireless power transfer and data collection mechanism for sustainable precision agriculture in 5G. IEEE Micro. 2021;42(1):25–32.
73.
Savaglio C, Fortino G. A simulation-driven methodology for IoT data mining based on edge computing. ACM Trans Internet Technol (TOIT). 2021;21(2):1–22.
74.
Zhang H, Wang L, Tian T, Yin J. A review of unmanned aerial vehicle low-altitude remote sensing (UAV-LARS) use in agricultural monitoring in China. Remote Sens. 2021;13(6):1221.
75.
Barbosa Júnior MR, Moreira BRDA, Brito Filho ALD, Tedesco D, Shiratsuchi LS, Silva RPD. UAVs to monitor and manage sugarcane: integrative review. Agronomy. 2022;12(3):661.
76.
Zhang R, Li H, Duan K, You S, Liu K, Wang F, Hu Y. Automatic detection of earthquake-damaged buildings by integrating UAV oblique photography and infrared thermal imaging. Remote Sens. 2020;12(16):2621.
77.
França Pereira F, Mendes Sussel Gonçalves T, Jorge Coelho Simões S, Roberto Magalhães de Andrade M, Luiz Lopes Reiss M, Fortes Cavalcante Renk J, orreia da Silva Santos T. Comparison of lidar-and UAV-derived data for landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest algorithm. Landslides. 2023;20(3):579–600.
78.
Kashihara H, Sumantyo JTS, Izumi Y, Ito K, Gao S, Namba K. X-band microstrip array antenna for UAV onboard full circularly polarized synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2023;71(2):1943–8.
79.
Rezwan S, Choi W. Artificial intelligence approaches for UAV navigation: recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Access. 2022;10:26320–39.
80.
Alptekin A, Çelik MÖ, Doğan Y, Yakar M. Mapping of a rockfall site with an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal. 2019;1(1):12–6.
81.
Koutalakis P, Tzoraki O, Zaimes G. UAVs for hydrologic scopes: application of a low-cost UAV to estimate surface water velocity by using three different image-based methods. Drones. 2019;3(1):14.
82.
Lynch KM, Banks VA, Roberts AP, Radcliffe S, Plant KL. Maritime autonomous surface ships: can we learn from unmanned aerial vehicle incidents using the perceptual cycle model? Ergonomics. 2023;66(6):772–90.
83.
Kumar JS, Gupta A, Tanwar S, Kumar N, Akleylek S. Security enhancement in cellular networks employing D2D friendly jammer for V2V communication. Clust Comput. 2023;26(2):865–78.
84.
Uddin K, Matin MA. Potential flood hazard zonation and flood shelter suitability mapping for disaster risk mitigation in Bangladesh using geospatial technology. Prog Disaster Sci. 2021;11:100185.
85.
Perera C, Jayasooriya D, Jayasiri G, Randil C, Bandara C, Siriwardana C, Dissanayake R, Hippola S, Sylva K, Kamalrathne T, et al. Evaluation of gaps in early warning mechanisms and evacuation procedures for coastal communities in Sri Lanka. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ. 2020;11(3):415–33.
86.
Gundran CPD, Lam HY, Tuazon ACA, Cleofas JV, Garcia FB, Puli TEM. Simulation training needs assessment for disaster preparedness and disaster response among selected agencies in National Capital Region, Philippines. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023;94:103824.
87.
Cavdur F, Sebatli A. A decision support tool for allocating temporary-disaster-response facilities. Decis Support Syst. 2019;127:113145.
88.
Sufri S, Dwirahmadi F, Phung D, Rutherford S. A systematic review of community engagement (CE) in disaster early warning systems (EWSS). Progress in Disaster Science. 2020;5:100058.
89.
Khankeh HR, Hosseini SH, Farrokhi M, Hosseini MA, Amanat N. Early warning system models and components in emergency and disaster: a systematic literature review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8:1–4.
90.
Goniewicz K, Burkle FM. Disaster early warning systems: the potential role and limitations of emerging text and data messaging mitigation capabilities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019;13(4):709–12.
91.
Esposito M, Palma L, Belli A, Sabbatini L, Pierleoni P. Recent advances in internet of things solutions for early warning systems: a review. Sensors. 2022;22(6):2124.
92.
Damaševičius R, Bacanin N, Misra S. From sensors to safety: internet of emergency services (IOES) for emergency response and disaster management. J Sens Actuator Netw. 2023;12(3):41.
93.
Kucharczyk M, Hugenholtz CH. Remote sensing of natural hazard-related disasters with small drones: global trends, biases, and research opportunities. Remote Sens Environ. 2021;264:112577.
94.
Abdalzaher MS, Krichen M, Yiltas-Kaplan D, Ben Dhaou I, Adoni WYH. Early detection of earthquakes using IoT and cloud infrastructure: a survey. Sustainability. 2023;15(15):11713.
95.
Sánchez-Partida D, Martínez-Flores J-L, Caballero-Morales S-O, Cano-Olivos P, Sánchez-Partida D, Rosas-Guevara GG, Martínez-Flores JL, Casiano-Ramos A. Risk analysis of unmanned aerial systems to supply survival kits in search-and-rescue (SAR) operations. Disaster Risk Reduction in Mexico: Methodologies, Case Studies, and Prospective Views. 2021;1:223–44.
96.
Hasan MM, Rahman MA, Sedigh A, Khasanah AU, Asyhari AT, Tao H, Bakar SA. Search and rescue operation in flooded areas: a survey on emerging sensor networking-enabled IoT-oriented technologies and applications. Cogn Syst Res. 2021;67:104–23.
97.
Perrucci DV. Methods for scenario modeling of post-disaster temporary housing. PhD thesis, Vanderbilt University. 2021.
98.
Di B, Li J, Dandoulaki M, Cruz AM, Zhang R, Niu Z. Household recovery strategies in Longmen Mountain area, Sichuan, China, following the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake disaster. Nat Hazards. 2020;104:123–37.
99.
Bahmani H, Zhang W. A conceptual framework for integrated management of disasters recovery projects. Nat Hazards. 2022;113(2):859–85.
100.
Mojtahedi M, Sunindijo RY, Lestari F, Suparni, Wijaya O. Developing hospital emergency and disaster management index using TOPSIS method. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):5213.
101.
102.
Lee I, Babu V, Caesar M, Nicol D. Deep reinforcement learning for UAV-assisted emergency response. In: MobiQuitous 2020-17th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. 2020. pp. 327–336.
103.
Gumaei A, Al-Rakhami M, Hassan MM, Pace P, Alai G, Lin K, Fortino G. Deep learning and blockchain with edge computing for 5G-enabled drone identification and flight mode detection. IEEE Network. 2021;35(1):94–100.
104.
Zhai D, Wang C, Cao H, Garg S, Hassan MM, AlQahtani SA. Deep neural network based UAV deployment and dynamic power control for 6G-envisioned intelligent warehouse logistics system. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2022;137:164–72.
105.
Chen C, Chen S, Hu G, Chen B, Chen P, Su K. An auto-landing strategy based on pan-tilt based visual servoing for unmanned aerial vehicle in GNSS-denied environments. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2021;116:106891.
106.
107.
Kumar A. Real-time performance comparison of vision-based autonomous landing of quadcopter on a ground moving target. IETE J Res. 2023;68(9):5455–72.
108.
109.
Rodriguez-Ramos A, Sampedro C, Bavle H, De La Puente P, Campoy P. A deep reinforcement learning strategy for UAV autonomous landing on a moving platform. J Intell Robot Syst. 2019;93(1–2):351–66.
110.
Polvara R, Patacchiola M, Sharma S, Wan J, Manning A, Sutton R, Cangelosi A. Toward end-to-end control for UAV autonomous landing via deep reinforcement learning. In: 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE; 2018. pp. 115–23.
111.
Rodriguez-Ramos A, Sampedro C, Bavle H, Moreno IG, Campoy P. A deep reinforcement learning technique for vision-based autonomous multirotor landing on a moving platform. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2018. pp. 1010–7.
112.
Jin Z, Wu J, Liu A, Zhang W-A, Yu L. Policy-based deep reinforcement learning for visual servoing control of mobile robots with visibility constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2021;69(2):1898–908.
113.
Zhao J, Sun J, Cai Z, Wang L, Wang Y. End-to-end deep reinforcement learning for image-based UAV autonomous control. Appl Sci. 2021;11(18):8419.
114.
Patel N, Krishnamurthy P, Tzes A, Khorrami F. Overriding learning-based perception systems for control of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. In: 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). IEEE; 2021. pp. 258–64.
115.
Touil DE, Terki N, Hamiane M, Aouina A, Sidi Brahim K. Image-based visual servoing control of a quadcopter air vehicle. Int J Model Simul. 2021;42(2):203–16.
116.
Sampedro C, Rodriguez-Ramos A, Gil I, Mejias L, Campoy P. Image-based visual servoing controller for multirotor aerial robots using deep reinforcement learning. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2018. pp. 979–86.
117.
Sampedro C, Rodriguez-Ramos A, Bavle H, Carrio A, de la Puente P, Campoy P. A fully-autonomous aerial robot for search and rescue applications in indoor environments using learning-based techniques. J Intell Robot Syst. 2019;95(2):601–27.
118.
Carrio A, Sampedro C, Rodriguez-Ramos A, Campoy P. A review of deep learning methods and applications for unmanned aerial vehicles. J Sens. 2017;2017:1–13.
119.
Li J, Xie H, Low KH, Yong J, Li B. Image-based visual servoing of rotorcrafts to planar visual targets of arbitrary orientation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2021;6(4):7861–8.
120.
Zhang K, Shi Y, Sheng H. Robust nonlinear model predictive control based visual servoing of quadrotor UAVs. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2021;26(2):700–8.
121.
Kang M, Chen H, Dong J. Adaptive visual servoing with an uncalibrated camera using extreme learning machine and q-leaning. Neurocomputing. 2020;402:384–94.
122.
Shi H, Li X, Hwang K-S, Pan W, Xu G. Decoupled visual servoing with fuzzy q-learning. IEEE Trans Industr Inf. 2016;14(1):241–52.
123.
Tang J, Lao S, Wan Y. Systematic review of collision-avoidance approaches for unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Syst J. 2021.
124.
Durdevic P, Ortiz-Arroyo D. A deep neural network sensor for visual servoing in 3D spaces. Sensors. 2020;20(5):1437.
125.
Kim S, Park J, Yun J-K, Seo J. Motion planning by reinforcement learning for an unmanned aerial vehicle in virtual open space with static obstacles. Control. In: 2020 20th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). IEEE; 2020. pp. 784–7.
126.
Akhloufi MA, Arola S, Bonnet A. Drones chasing drones: reinforcement learning and deep search area proposal. Drones. 2019;3(3):58.
127.
128.
Yuksel T. Sliding surface designs for visual servo control of quadrotors. Drones. 2023;7(8):531.
129.
Aggarwal N, Jain V, Singh T, Vishwakarma DK, et al. DLVS: time series architecture for image-based visual servoing. In: 2023 8th International Conference on Control and Robotics Engineering (ICCRE). IEEE; 2023. pp. 101–7.
130.
Mosali NA, Shamsudin SS, Alfandi O, Omar R, Al-Fadhali N. Twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient-based target tracking for unmanned aerial vehicle with achievement rewarding and multistage training. IEEE Access. 2022;10:23545–59.
131.
Collins J, Chand S, Vanderkop A, Howard D. A review of physics simulators for robotic applications. IEEE Access. 2021;9:51416–31.
132.
Rafique MA, Lynch AF. Output-feedback image-based visual servoing for multirotor unmanned aerial vehicle line following. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2020;56(4):3182–96.
133.
Hu C, Cao W, Ning B. Visual servoing with deep reinforcement learning for rotor unmanned helicopter. Int J Adv Rob Syst. 2022;19(2):17298806221084824.
134.
Mitakidis A, Aspragkathos SN, Panetsos F, Karras GC, Kyriakopoulos KJ. A deep reinforcement learning visual servoing control strategy for target tracking using a multirotor UAV. Automation. In: 2023 9th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications (ICARA). IEEE; 2023. pp. 219–24.
135.
Wu J, Wang H, Li N, Yao P, Huang Y, Yang H. Path planning for solar-powered UAV in urban environment. Neurocomputing. 2018;275:2055–65. Publisher: Elsevier.
136.
Popović M, Vidal-Calleja T, Hitz G, Sa I, Siegwart R, Nieto J. Multiresolution mapping and informative path planning for UAV-based terrain monitoring. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2017. pp. 1382–8.
137.
Metadata
Title
The Duo of Visual Servoing and Deep Learning-Based Methods for Situation-Aware Disaster Management: A Comprehensive Review
Authors
Senthil Kumar Jagatheesaperumal
Mohammad Mehedi Hassan
Md. Rafiul Hassan
Giancarlo Fortino
Publication date
01-05-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Cognitive Computation / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Electronic ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-024-10290-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Vision-Enabled Large Language and Deep Learning Models for Image-Based Emotion Recognition

  • Research

Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases Using Data Mining Approaches: Application of an Ensemble-Based Model

  • Research

SPEI-FL: Serverless Privacy Edge Intelligence-Enabled Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare Systems

  • Open Access
  • Research

The Strange and Promising Relationship Between EEG and AI Methods of Analysis

Does Deep Learning Have Epileptic Seizures? On the Modeling of the Brain

What AI, Neuroscience, and Cognitive Science Can Learn from Each Other: An Embedded Perspective

Premium Partner

    Image Credits