Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

The Dynamic Function of Innovative Entrepreneurship in Evolutionary Economics for Middle-Income Countries

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the contemporary world, the term ‘innovation’ is generally used as a central concept to define socioeconomic change, progress, development and adaptation. The dynamic nature of economic phenomena requires new paradigms as complex economic systems evolve through time.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRef Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Batten, D. F. (1994). The evolutionary network economy: Historical parallels from Europe and Japan. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef Batten, D. F. (1994). The evolutionary network economy: Historical parallels from Europe and Japan. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
go back to reference Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. The American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71. Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. The American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71.
go back to reference Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Bodde, D. (1948). Chinese ideas in the west. Washington: American Council on Education. Bodde, D. (1948). Chinese ideas in the west. Washington: American Council on Education.
go back to reference Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93–118.CrossRef Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlsson, B., & Westing, L. (1994). Patterns of a network economy—an introduction. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Carlsson, B., & Westing, L. (1994). Patterns of a network economy—an introduction. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
go back to reference Courvisanos, J. (2012). Cycles, crises, innovation: Path to sustainable development —A Kaleckian-Schumpeterian synthesis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Courvisanos, J. (2012). Cycles, crises, innovation: Path to sustainable development —A Kaleckian-Schumpeterian synthesis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
go back to reference Courvisanos, J., & Mackenzie, S. (2014). Innovation economics and the role of the innovative entrepreneur in economic theory. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2(14), 41–46.CrossRef Courvisanos, J., & Mackenzie, S. (2014). Innovation economics and the role of the innovative entrepreneur in economic theory. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2(14), 41–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Dahmén, E. (1989). Development blocks in industrial economics. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Industrial Dynamics (pp. 109–121). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Dahmén, E. (1989). Development blocks in industrial economics. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Industrial Dynamics (pp. 109–121). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B. Å. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems—A comparative analysis (pp. 265–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B. Å. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems—A comparative analysis (pp. 265–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 41–63). London: Pinter Publishers. Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 41–63). London: Pinter Publishers.
go back to reference Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
go back to reference Gani, M. O. (2003). Foundations of economic science. Dhaka: Scholars. Gani, M. O. (2003). Foundations of economic science. Dhaka: Scholars.
go back to reference Gelsing, L. E. (1989). Knowledge networks: Industrial flexibility and innovation. In F. Borum & P. H. Kristensen (Eds.), Technological innovation and organizational change—Danish patterns of knowledge, networks and culture. Copenhagen: Danish Social Science Research Council. Gelsing, L. E. (1989). Knowledge networks: Industrial flexibility and innovation. In F. Borum & P. H. Kristensen (Eds.), Technological innovation and organizational change—Danish patterns of knowledge, networks and culture. Copenhagen: Danish Social Science Research Council.
go back to reference Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1988). Formal and informal cooperation strategies in international industrial networks. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington: Lexington Books. Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1988). Formal and informal cooperation strategies in international industrial networks. In F. J. Contractor & P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business. Lexington: Lexington Books.
go back to reference Heidegger, M. (1977). The question of technology and other essays. (W. Lovett, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question of technology and other essays. (W. Lovett, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
go back to reference High Level Group on Innovation Policy Management. (2013). Report & recommendations. Brussels: High Level Group on Innovation Policy Management. Accessed March 10, 2017. High Level Group on Innovation Policy Management. (2013). Report & recommendations. Brussels: High Level Group on Innovation Policy Management. Accessed March 10, 2017.
go back to reference Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Hultén, S., & Mölleryd, B. (2003). Entrepreneurs, innovations and market processes in the evolution of Swedish mobile telecommunications industry. In J. Metcalfe & U. Cantner (Eds.), Change, transformation and development. Berlin: Physica-Verlag. Hultén, S., & Mölleryd, B. (2003). Entrepreneurs, innovations and market processes in the evolution of Swedish mobile telecommunications industry. In J. Metcalfe & U. Cantner (Eds.), Change, transformation and development. Berlin: Physica-Verlag.
go back to reference Kalecki, M. (1968). Trend and business cycles reconsidered. The Economic Journal, 78(310), 263–276.CrossRef Kalecki, M. (1968). Trend and business cycles reconsidered. The Economic Journal, 78(310), 263–276.CrossRef
go back to reference Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.
go back to reference Kobayashi, K., & Andersson, A. E. (1994). A dynamic input-output model with endogenous technical change. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Kobayashi, K., & Andersson, A. E. (1994). A dynamic input-output model with endogenous technical change. In B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, & L. Westin (Eds.), Patterns of a network economy (pp. 91–98). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
go back to reference Langlois, R. (1989). Economic change and the boundaries of the firm. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Industrial dynamics (pp. 85–107). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef Langlois, R. (1989). Economic change and the boundaries of the firm. In B. Carlsson (Ed.), Industrial dynamics (pp. 85–107). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Leontief, W. (1941). The structure of American economy, 1919–1929: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Leontief, W. (1941). The structure of American economy, 1919–1929: An empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
go back to reference Marshall, A. (1898). Distribution and exchange. The Economic Journal, 8(29), 37–59.CrossRef Marshall, A. (1898). Distribution and exchange. The Economic Journal, 8(29), 37–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Von Mises, L. (1996). Human action: A treatise on economics. Bettina Bien Graves (Ed.), (4th rev. ed.) Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education. Von Mises, L. (1996). Human action: A treatise on economics. Bettina Bien Graves (Ed.), (4th rev. ed.) Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education.
go back to reference Muller, A. L. (1978). Quesnay’s theory of growth: A comment. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 3(1), 150–156.CrossRef Muller, A. L. (1978). Quesnay’s theory of growth: A comment. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 3(1), 150–156.CrossRef
go back to reference Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15(2), 207–227.CrossRef Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B., & Crow, M. (1993). National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society, 15(2), 207–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “X-Efficient” (and X-Effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31, 291–302.CrossRef Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “X-Efficient” (and X-Effective): Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31, 291–302.CrossRef
go back to reference OECD, (1997). National innovation systems. Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy. OECD, (1997). National innovation systems. Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy.
go back to reference Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: Why are they important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 77–95.CrossRef Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National innovation systems: Why are they important, and how they might be measured and compared. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 77–95.CrossRef
go back to reference Perez, C. (2004). Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change. In E. Reinert (Ed.), Globalization, economic development and inequality: An alternative perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Perez, C. (2004). Technological revolutions, paradigm shifts and socio-institutional change. In E. Reinert (Ed.), Globalization, economic development and inequality: An alternative perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Philips, A. W. (1950). Mechanical models in economic dynamics. Economica, New Series, 17(67), 283–305.CrossRef Philips, A. W. (1950). Mechanical models in economic dynamics. Economica, New Series, 17(67), 283–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Quesnay, F. (1758) Le tableau économique. (1st ed.) (Tableau with base of 400 l., accompanied by Remarques sur les variations de la distribution des revenus annuels d’une nation) [manuscript]. Quesnay, F. (1758) Le tableau économique. (1st ed.) (Tableau with base of 400 l., accompanied by Remarques sur les variations de la distribution des revenus annuels d’une nation) [manuscript].
go back to reference Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
go back to reference Stigler, G. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extend of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 85–193.CrossRef Stigler, G. (1951). The division of labor is limited by the extend of the market. Journal of Political Economy, 59, 85–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmookler, J. (1962). Economic sources of inventive activity. Journal of Economic History, 22(1), 1–20.CrossRef Schmookler, J. (1962). Economic sources of inventive activity. Journal of Economic History, 22(1), 1–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. (1928). The instability of capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361–386.CrossRef Schumpeter, J. (1928). The instability of capitalism. The Economic Journal, 38(151), 361–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.CrossRef Schumpeter, J. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.CrossRef
go back to reference Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.CrossRef Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Veblen, T. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(2), 373–397.CrossRef Veblen, T. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 12(2), 373–397.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Dynamic Function of Innovative Entrepreneurship in Evolutionary Economics for Middle-Income Countries
Authors
Sefer Sener
Volkan Hacioglu
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55926-1_4