Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. The Early Oligopolistic Models: Market Power in the Paretian Tradition

Author : Mario Pomini

Published in: Power in Economic Thought

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The study of non-competitive markets was a very active field of research in the period between the two World Wars. The chapter focuses on the developments that emerged within the Paretian tradition. The Italian followers of Pareto participated actively in this debate, and indeed Luigi Amoroso played a prominent role. The Italian mathematical economist was recognized as the main proponent of Cournot’s approach. Other Paretians who made important contributions were Arrigo Bordin, Felice Vinci, and especially Emilio Zaccagnini. The analysis of this strand of literature can help us to understand the reasons why Cournot’s perspective became the dominant approach to the oligopoly theory only in the postwar period.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This difference can be considered a rough measure of market power as in the case of Lerner Index (Giocoli 2012).
 
2
The translation of quotations is mine, except when indicated otherwise.
 
3
English transl. “The theory of general equilibrium by prof. Pareto.”
 
4
The translation of quotations are mine.
 
5
English translation “The tragic sophism.”
 
6
English translation “The crisis of principles and the mathematical economics.”
 
7
In the article, de Finetti considers the general case with n functions and q variables. In the exposition, we follow Zaccagnini (1947).
 
8
Emilio Zaccagnini (1903–1979) held the chair of Economics at the Faculty of Law of Turin (Italy) from 1953 to 1974. He was also a Fellow of Econometric Society. Both his scientific training and his research career were centered on the theory of general equilibrium.
 
9
Giuseppe Palomba (1908–1986), a second-generation member of the Italian Paretian School, devoted his scientific activity to devise an original axiomatic framework for economic dynamics, primarily designed to address economic change.
 
10
Valentino Dominedò (1905–1985) did many contributions in the field of demand theory. He was the first economist at the international level to grasp the relevance of the Slutsky’s article on the theory of consumers’ choice.
 
Literature
go back to reference Amoroso, L. (1909). La teoria dell’equilibrio economico secondo il prof. Vilfredo Pareto. Giornale degli Economisti, 19, 353–367. Amoroso, L. (1909). La teoria dell’equilibrio economico secondo il prof. Vilfredo Pareto. Giornale degli Economisti, 19, 353–367.
go back to reference Amoroso, L. (1921). Lezioni di Economia Matematica. Zanichelli: Bologna. Amoroso, L. (1921). Lezioni di Economia Matematica. Zanichelli: Bologna.
go back to reference Amoroso, L. (1930). La curva statica di offerta. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica, 1, 1–24. Amoroso, L. (1930). La curva statica di offerta. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica, 1, 1–24.
go back to reference Amoroso, L. (1935). La produzione in regime di concentrazione industriale. Rivista Italiana di Scienze Economiche, 8, 15–32. Amoroso, L. (1935). La produzione in regime di concentrazione industriale. Rivista Italiana di Scienze Economiche, 8, 15–32.
go back to reference Amoroso, L. (1942). Meccanica Economica. Città di Castello: Macrì. Amoroso, L. (1942). Meccanica Economica. Città di Castello: Macrì.
go back to reference Bordin, A. (1934). Lezioni di economia politica. La statica: parte prima. Padova: Cedam. Bordin, A. (1934). Lezioni di economia politica. La statica: parte prima. Padova: Cedam.
go back to reference Bordin, A. (1936). Lezioni di economia politica. La statica: parte seconda. Padova: Cedam. Bordin, A. (1936). Lezioni di economia politica. La statica: parte seconda. Padova: Cedam.
go back to reference Bordin, A. (1948). Di taluni massimi di utilità collettiva. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 9, 174–189. Bordin, A. (1948). Di taluni massimi di utilità collettiva. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 9, 174–189.
go back to reference Bowley, A. (1924). The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics. Londra: Macmillan. Bowley, A. (1924). The Mathematical Groundwork of Economics. Londra: Macmillan.
go back to reference Chamberlin, E. (1929). Value Where Sellers are Few. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44, 63–100.CrossRef Chamberlin, E. (1929). Value Where Sellers are Few. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44, 63–100.CrossRef
go back to reference De Finetti, B. (1935a). Il tragico sofisma. Rivista italiana di scienze economiche, 7, 362–382. De Finetti, B. (1935a). Il tragico sofisma. Rivista italiana di scienze economiche, 7, 362–382.
go back to reference De Finetti, B. (1935b). Vilfredo Pareto di fronte ai suoi critici odierni. Nuovi Studi di Diritto, Economia, Politica, 8, 225–244. De Finetti, B. (1935b). Vilfredo Pareto di fronte ai suoi critici odierni. Nuovi Studi di Diritto, Economia, Politica, 8, 225–244.
go back to reference De Finetti, B. (1937a). Problemi di optimum, Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 8, pp. 48–67. English transl. Problems of Constrained Optimum. In L. Pasinetti (Ed.), Italian Economic Papers, vol. III, London: Oxford University Press. De Finetti, B. (1937a). Problemi di optimum, Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 8, pp. 48–67. English transl. Problems of Constrained Optimum. In L. Pasinetti (Ed.), Italian Economic Papers, vol. III, London: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference De Finetti, B. (1937b). Problemi di “optimum” vincolato. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 8, 112–126. De Finetti, B. (1937b). Problemi di “optimum” vincolato. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 8, 112–126.
go back to reference De Finetti, B. (1943). La crisi dei principi e l’economia matematica. Acta Seminarii, II, 33–68. De Finetti, B. (1943). La crisi dei principi e l’economia matematica. Acta Seminarii, II, 33–68.
go back to reference Edgeworth, F. (1897). La teoria pura del monopolio, Il Giornale degli Economisti, 15, pp. 17–31, 307–320, 405–414. Edgeworth, F. (1897). La teoria pura del monopolio, Il Giornale degli Economisti, 15, pp. 17–31, 307–320, 405–414.
go back to reference Edgeworth, F. (1922). The Mathematical Economics of Professor Amoroso. The Economic Journal, 32, 400–407.CrossRef Edgeworth, F. (1922). The Mathematical Economics of Professor Amoroso. The Economic Journal, 32, 400–407.CrossRef
go back to reference Edgeworth, F. (1925). Papers Relating to Political Economy. Londra: Macmillan. Edgeworth, F. (1925). Papers Relating to Political Economy. Londra: Macmillan.
go back to reference Gaeta, A. (1967). Concorrenza e monopolio nel pensiero di Amoroso. Il Giornale degli Economisti, 26, 942–956. Gaeta, A. (1967). Concorrenza e monopolio nel pensiero di Amoroso. Il Giornale degli Economisti, 26, 942–956.
go back to reference Giocoli, N. (2012). Who Invented the Lerner Index? Luigi Amoroso, the Dominant Firm Model, and the Measurement of Market Power. Review of Industrial Organization, 41, 181–191.CrossRef Giocoli, N. (2012). Who Invented the Lerner Index? Luigi Amoroso, the Dominant Firm Model, and the Measurement of Market Power. Review of Industrial Organization, 41, 181–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Guccione, A., & Minelli, E. (1999). Consumer Theory and Axiomatics: A Note on the Early Contribution by Luigi Amoroso. History of Politic Economy, 31, 587–589.CrossRef Guccione, A., & Minelli, E. (1999). Consumer Theory and Axiomatics: A Note on the Early Contribution by Luigi Amoroso. History of Politic Economy, 31, 587–589.CrossRef
go back to reference Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.CrossRef Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Hurwicz, L. (1953). What Happened to the Game Theory? The American Economic Review, 43, 398–405. Hurwicz, L. (1953). What Happened to the Game Theory? The American Economic Review, 43, 398–405.
go back to reference Keppler, J. H. (1994). Luigi Amoroso (1866–1965): Mathematical Economist, Italian Corporatist. History of Political Economy, 26, 589–611.CrossRef Keppler, J. H. (1994). Luigi Amoroso (1866–1965): Mathematical Economist, Italian Corporatist. History of Political Economy, 26, 589–611.CrossRef
go back to reference Leontief, W. (1935). Stackelberg on Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 44, 554–559.CrossRef Leontief, W. (1935). Stackelberg on Monopolistic Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 44, 554–559.CrossRef
go back to reference Martin, S. (2002). Advanced Industrial Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Martin, S. (2002). Advanced Industrial Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Mistri, M. (1970). Su due formule amorosiane di concentrazione della concorrenza. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 29, 257–270. Mistri, M. (1970). Su due formule amorosiane di concentrazione della concorrenza. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 29, 257–270.
go back to reference Pareto, V. (1909). Manuel d’économie politique. Paris: Giarde et Briere. Pareto, V. (1909). Manuel d’économie politique. Paris: Giarde et Briere.
go back to reference Pareto, V. (2014) [1909]. Manual of Political Economy. A Critical and Variorum Edition, edited by A. Montesano, A. Zanni, L. Bruni, J.S. Chipman and M. McLure. New York: Oxford University Press. Pareto, V. (2014) [1909]. Manual of Political Economy. A Critical and Variorum Edition, edited by A. Montesano, A. Zanni, L. Bruni, J.S. Chipman and M. McLure. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Pigou, A. C. (1924). Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan. Pigou, A. C. (1924). Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.
go back to reference Pomini, M., & Tusset, G. (2009). Habits and Expectations: Dynamic General Equilibrium in the Italian Paretian School. History of Political Economy, 41, 311–342.CrossRef Pomini, M., & Tusset, G. (2009). Habits and Expectations: Dynamic General Equilibrium in the Italian Paretian School. History of Political Economy, 41, 311–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumpeter J. (1982) [1908]. L’essenza e i principi dell’economia teorica. Roma: Laterza. Schumpeter J. (1982) [1908]. L’essenza e i principi dell’economia teorica. Roma: Laterza.
go back to reference Shackle, G. (1967). The Years of High Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shackle, G. (1967). The Years of High Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Vinci, F. (1944). Gli ordinamenti economici, Milano, Giuffrè. English trans. Economic Institutional System. The Particular Case of Free Competition. In L. Pasinetti (Ed.), Italian Economic Papers. London: Oxford University Press. Vinci, F. (1944). Gli ordinamenti economici, Milano, Giuffrè. English trans. Economic Institutional System. The Particular Case of Free Competition. In L. Pasinetti (Ed.), Italian Economic Papers. London: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Von Neumann J. e O. Morgenstern. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Von Neumann J. e O. Morgenstern. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Von Stackelberg, H. (2011) [1934]. Market Structure and Equilibrium. Berlino: Springer. Von Stackelberg, H. (2011) [1934]. Market Structure and Equilibrium. Berlino: Springer.
go back to reference Wicksell, A. K. (1926). Lectures on Political Economy. Londra: Routledge. Wicksell, A. K. (1926). Lectures on Political Economy. Londra: Routledge.
go back to reference Zaccagnini, E. (1942). Legami tra curve di indifferenza, di baratto e di domanda. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 4, 546–562. Zaccagnini, E. (1942). Legami tra curve di indifferenza, di baratto e di domanda. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 4, 546–562.
go back to reference Zaccagnini, E. (1947). Massimi simultanei in economia pura, Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 6, 1947, pp. 258–292. English trasl. Simultaneous Maxima in Pure Economics. In A. Peacock, H. Houtakker, R. Turvey, F. Lutz, E. Henderson (Eds.), International Economic Papers. London: Macmillan, 1951. Zaccagnini, E. (1947). Massimi simultanei in economia pura, Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 6, 1947, pp. 258–292. English trasl. Simultaneous Maxima in Pure Economics. In A. Peacock, H. Houtakker, R. Turvey, F. Lutz, E. Henderson (Eds.), International Economic Papers. London: Macmillan, 1951.
go back to reference Zaccagnini E. (1953). Scienza economica e postulato edonistico, in Studi in onore di Gino Borgatta. Bologna: Arti Grafiche. Zaccagnini E. (1953). Scienza economica e postulato edonistico, in Studi in onore di Gino Borgatta. Bologna: Arti Grafiche.
go back to reference Zaccagnini, E. (1958). Sulle condizioni di massimo simultaneo. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 16, 565–594. Zaccagnini, E. (1958). Sulle condizioni di massimo simultaneo. Il Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 16, 565–594.
Metadata
Title
The Early Oligopolistic Models: Market Power in the Paretian Tradition
Author
Mario Pomini
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94039-7_9