Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence and Trust in the Courts

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents the main results regarding the effects that a Criminal Procedure Reform had on trust in the courts in Chile. It uses public opinion, collected from crime surveys, to assess attitudes of both users of the system (victims) and general public. The results show that during the analysed period, trust in courts shows different paths for the general public, showing a consistent increase only in those for higher socio-economic status. Users, on the other hand, show an increase in their good views of the courts due to the Criminal Procedure Reform, although there is a decrease in those who have been exposed to it longer time. Using regression analysis, the results show that higher trust in the courts is affected by the perception of increased crime and the perception of victimisation risk and socio-economic status, supporting the idea of an instrumental view of the criminal justice system.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
DeShazo and Vargas, relying on expert opinion, note: “The Chilean example is broadly viewed as the most successful in the region, given its ambitious scope, the resources dedicated to the task, and the political commitment to see it through” (2006: 2).
 
Literature
go back to reference Baytelman, A. 2002. Evaluación de la Reforma Procesal Penal. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales/Justice Studies Center of the Americas. Baytelman, A. 2002. Evaluación de la Reforma Procesal Penal. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales/Justice Studies Center of the Americas.
go back to reference Baytelman, A., and M. Duce. 2003. Evaluación de la Reforma Procesal Penal: Análisis de una reforma en marcha. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales/Justice Studies Center of the Americas. Baytelman, A., and M. Duce. 2003. Evaluación de la Reforma Procesal Penal: Análisis de una reforma en marcha. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales/Justice Studies Center of the Americas.
go back to reference DeShazo, P., and J. Vargas. 2006. Judicial reform in Latin America: An assessment. Policy Papers on the Americas Volume XVII, Study 2. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies. DeShazo, P., and J. Vargas. 2006. Judicial reform in Latin America: An assessment. Policy Papers on the Americas Volume XVII, Study 2. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
go back to reference Hammergren, L. 2003. International assistance to Latin american justice programs: Towards and agenda for reforming the reformers. In Beyond common knowledge, eds. E. Jensen, and T. Heller. 290–335. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Hammergren, L. 2003. International assistance to Latin american justice programs: Towards and agenda for reforming the reformers. In Beyond common knowledge, eds. E. Jensen, and T. Heller. 290–335. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Jackson, J., and J. Sunshine. 2007. Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology 47: 214–233.CrossRef Jackson, J., and J. Sunshine. 2007. Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology 47: 214–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Tankebe, J. 2009. Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology 47: 1265–1293.CrossRef Tankebe, J. 2009. Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology 47: 1265–1293.CrossRef
go back to reference Toharia, J. 2003. Evaluating systems of justice through public opinion: Why, what, who, how, and what for? In Beyond Common Knowledge, eds. E. Jensen, and T. Heller, 21–62. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Toharia, J. 2003. Evaluating systems of justice through public opinion: Why, what, who, how, and what for? In Beyond Common Knowledge, eds. E. Jensen, and T. Heller, 21–62. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Tyler, T.R., and Y. Huo. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Tyler, T.R., and Y. Huo. 2002. Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Metadata
Title
The Effects of Judicial Reform on Confidence and Trust in the Courts
Author
Juan Carlos Oyanedel
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14249-0_8