Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. The Ethics of Corporate Whistleblowing Rewards

Author : Vivienne Brand

Published in: Corporate Whistleblowing Regulation

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Corporate whistleblowing regulation has experienced rapid evolution in a number of significant jurisdictions in recent years, most notably in the United States. One of the most controversial aspects of contemporary reform in corporate whistleblowing regimes is the debate over whether or not to introduce whistleblowing rewards or ‘bounties’. This chapter considers the ethical analysis that can be brought to bear in relation to the offering of corporate whistleblowing rewards, and how that might assist in ensuring that rewards have a place in an effective corporate whistleblowing regulatory environment.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See for instance De George (2010, p. 303), Rapp (2007, pp. 95–6, 118) and Gobert and Punch (2000, pp. 34–6).
 
2
See for instance recent empirical work on the direct relationship between whistleblowers and increased speed and efficacy of enforcement: Call et al. (2018).
 
3
Dodd-Frank Act § 922(a); FCPA § 78dd-1.
 
4
The highest reward paid by the SEC to a whistleblower as of 2018 stood at almost $US50M: US Securities and Exchange Commission (2018, p. 9).
 
5
Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, July 2016.
 
6
Callahan and Dworkin (1992, p. 279), and the legislation cited there.
 
7
Blount and Markel (2012, p. 1028) and the sources cited there (footnotes omitted from quotation).
 
8
Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014, p. 3).
 
9
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Parliament of Australia, Whistleblower Protections (September 2017); Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Whistleblower Protections) Act, 2018 (Cth).
 
10
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Parliament of Australia, Whistleblower Protections (September 2017), 130.
 
11
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 771).
 
12
De George (2015, p. 801).
 
13
Ibid.
 
14
Ibid.
 
15
See generally, De George (2010, Chap. 14).
 
16
De George (2010, p. 311).
 
17
De George (2010, p. 304).
 
18
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 774).
 
19
Velasquez (2018, p. 362).
 
20
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 774).
 
21
Ibid., p. 777.
 
22
Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Whistleblower Protections) Act, 2018 (Cth), inserting s 1317AAD: ‘Public interest disclosure and emergency disclosure’ into the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth).
 
23
Andrade (2015).
 
24
Ibid., p. 334.
 
25
Ibid., p. 332.
 
26
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 777).
 
27
Ibid.
 
28
Ibid., p. 774.
 
29
Ibid., p. 775.
 
30
A requirement of this kind does not, for instance, form part of the existing whistleblowing systems created by the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth), the Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, or the United States Securities Exchange Commission, Office of the Whistleblower, Final Rules, § 240.21F-6 Criteria for determining amount of award.
 
31
De George (2010, Chap. 14), Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 775), and the commentators discussed there.
 
32
See Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 775), and the commentators discussed there.
 
33
For whistleblowing to be morally required, De George argues the whistleblower must (amongst other things) be able to produce ‘documented evidence that would convince a reasonable, impartial observer that one’s view of the situation is correct’: De George (2010, pp. 310–311).
 
34
De George (2010, p. 310).
 
35
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 776).
 
36
Callahan and Dworkin (1992, p. 319).
 
37
Many of these issues were discussed by a 2017 Australian Parliamentary Joint Inquiry on Whistleblower Protections, in which the introduction of rewards was considered, offering a rare opportunity for the ethical considerations associated with whistleblower rewards to be interrogated in a public forum: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017.
 
38
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.34], Dr Simon Longstaff, the Ethics Centre.
 
39
Ebersole (2011, p. 139).
 
40
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.56].
 
41
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.32], the Institute of Internal Auditors.
 
42
Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014, p. 3).
 
43
On the potential for financial incentives to increase the risk of external whistleblowing without earlier internal disclosure see Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 773).
 
44
Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014, p. 2).
 
45
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.14].
 
46
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections (2017) [11.35], Mr. Matthew Chesher.
 
47
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections (2017) [11.30], [11.31].
 
48
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.39], Vivienne Brand and Sulette Lombard, Flinders University; and at [11.40], Lucas Ryan. Senior Policy Advisor, Australian Institute of Company Directors.
 
49
Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014, p. 3); noted by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.14].
 
50
Ebersole (2011, pp. 146–7).
 
51
See, for instance, the evidence of the Institute of Internal Auditors to the 2017 Australian Federal Inquiry: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.45].
 
52
The US SEC notes in its 2018 Annual Report that it received over 5200 whistleblower tips in the 2018 financial year, representing a nearly 75% increase on the same period 6 years earlier: US Securities and Exchange Commission (2018, p. 2).
 
53
Call et al. (2018).
 
54
Schwartz (2016, p. 755).
 
55
Callahan and Dworkin (1992, p. 283).
 
56
Ibid., p. 301.
 
57
Ibid., p. 302.
 
58
Feldman and Lobel (2010).
 
59
Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, at [11.34], Dr. Simon Longstaff, the Ethics Centre.
 
60
Feldman and Lobel (2010, p. 1179).
 
61
Ibid.
 
62
Ibid., p. 1202.
 
63
Ibid., p. 1205.
 
64
Ibid., p. 1189.
 
65
Ibid., pp. 1183–4; Sunstein (1996).
 
66
Sunstein (1996, p. 2026).
 
67
Ibid., p. 2031.
 
68
McGinn (2015, p. 1).
 
69
Feldman and Lobel (2010, p. 1184).
 
70
McGinn (2015, p. 1).
 
71
Sunstein (1996, p. 2053).
 
72
Ibid., p. 2051. For a comparison between different design elements in whistleblowing bounty systems and their capacity to influence behavior, see Blount and Markel (2012, pp. 1029–36).
 
73
De George (2015, p. 801).
 
74
Pittroff (2016, p. 715).
 
75
Kohlberg (1981, 1984).
 
76
Kohlberg (1973, p. 631).
 
77
Kohlberg (1981, 1984).
 
78
Gilligan (1982).
 
79
Chang-Ho (1997) and Ma and Cheung (1996).
 
80
Trevino (1992, p. 445).
 
81
Gibbs (2015).
 
82
Empirical evidence suggests that the higher moral reasoning levels 5 and 6 occur with low frequency, although Kohlberg argued this did not mean the stages do not exist: Kohlberg (1984, p. 328).
 
83
Feldman and Lobel (2010, pp. 1183–4), see also Sunstein (1996) and Anderson and Pildes (2000).
 
84
Sunstein (1996, p. 2043).
 
85
De George (2010, p. 304).
 
86
As occurs under the Australian whistleblowing reforms of 2019: Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Whistleblower Protections) Act, 2018 (Cth), inserting s1317AI into the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth).
 
87
Varelius (2009, p. 272).
 
88
United States Securities Exchange Commission, Office of the Whistleblower, Final Rules, § 240.21F-6 Criteria for Determining Amount of Award. See also the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2017, p. 14).
 
89
Andrade (2015, p. 334).
 
90
In terms of, for example, s 172 of the Companies Act, 2006 UK.
 
91
Securities Exchange Act 1934 (US) s 21F(b)(1).
 
92
Securities Exchange Commission, Final Rules Implementing the Whistleblowing Program, § 240.21F-4 Other definitions.
 
93
See, for instance, the comments of the Queensland Ombudsman cited in the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, [11.37].
 
94
Hoffman and Schwartz (2015, p. 776).
 
95
Ibid.
 
96
Sunstein (1996, p. 2026).
 
97
United States Securities Exchange Commission, Office of the Whistleblower, Final Rules, § 240.21F-6 Criteria for Determining Amount of Award. Similarly, the Australian 2017 PJC Report recommended that the timeliness with which a disclosure is made ought to influence the level of reward paid: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services, Whistleblower Protections, September 2017, Recommendation 11.2, [11.59].
 
98
Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, July 2016: Part 5: 18. Amount of Whistleblower Award.
 
99
Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, July 2016, 11.
 
100
Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, 3, 9.
 
101
Feldman and Lobel (2010, pp. 1155, 1202).
 
102
See the discussion in Brand (2018, p. 418).
 
103
Securities Exchange Act 1934 (US) section 21F; Ontario Securities Commission, OSC Policy 15-601, Whistleblower Program, July 2016, 11.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anderson E, Pildes R (2000) Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement. U Pa L Rev 148:1503CrossRef Anderson E, Pildes R (2000) Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement. U Pa L Rev 148:1503CrossRef
go back to reference Andrade J (2015) Reconceptualising Whistleblowing in a Complex World. J Bus Ethics 128:321CrossRef Andrade J (2015) Reconceptualising Whistleblowing in a Complex World. J Bus Ethics 128:321CrossRef
go back to reference Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014) Financial Incentives for Whistleblowers, July 2014 Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority (2014) Financial Incentives for Whistleblowers, July 2014
go back to reference Blount J, Markel S (2012) The End of the Internal Compliance World as We Know It, or an Enhancement of the Effectiveness of Securities Law Enforcement? Bounty Hunting Under the Dodd-Frank Act’s Whistleblower Provisions. Fordham J Corp & Fin L XVII:1023 Blount J, Markel S (2012) The End of the Internal Compliance World as We Know It, or an Enhancement of the Effectiveness of Securities Law Enforcement? Bounty Hunting Under the Dodd-Frank Act’s Whistleblower Provisions. Fordham J Corp & Fin L XVII:1023
go back to reference Brand V (2018) Ethics and Corporate Whistleblowing Rewards in Australia. Aust J Corp L 33:402 Brand V (2018) Ethics and Corporate Whistleblowing Rewards in Australia. Aust J Corp L 33:402
go back to reference Call A, Martin G, Sharp N et al (2018) Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions. J Account Res 56:123CrossRef Call A, Martin G, Sharp N et al (2018) Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions. J Account Res 56:123CrossRef
go back to reference Callahan E, Dworkin T (1992) Do Good and Get Rich: Financial Incentives for Whistleblowing and the False Claims Act. Vill L Rev 37:273 Callahan E, Dworkin T (1992) Do Good and Get Rich: Financial Incentives for Whistleblowing and the False Claims Act. Vill L Rev 37:273
go back to reference De George RT (2010) Business Ethics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River De George RT (2010) Business Ethics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
go back to reference De George RT (2015) A Response to My Critics. J Bus Ethics 127:189 De George RT (2015) A Response to My Critics. J Bus Ethics 127:189
go back to reference Ebersole D (2011) Blowing the Whistle on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions. Entrepreneurial Bus L J 6:123 Ebersole D (2011) Blowing the Whistle on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions. Entrepreneurial Bus L J 6:123
go back to reference Feldman Y, Lobel O (2010) The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality. Tex L Rev 88:1151 Feldman Y, Lobel O (2010) The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties, and Protections for Reporting Illegality. Tex L Rev 88:1151
go back to reference Gilligan C (1982) In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Gilligan C (1982) In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Gobert J, Punch M (2000) Whistleblowers, the Public Interest and the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Mod L Rev 63:25CrossRef Gobert J, Punch M (2000) Whistleblowers, the Public Interest and the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Mod L Rev 63:25CrossRef
go back to reference Hoffman WM, Schwartz M (2015) The Morality of Whistleblowing: A Commentary on Richard T De George. J Bus Ethics 127:771CrossRef Hoffman WM, Schwartz M (2015) The Morality of Whistleblowing: A Commentary on Richard T De George. J Bus Ethics 127:771CrossRef
go back to reference Kohlberg L (1973) The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgment. J Philos 70:630CrossRef Kohlberg L (1973) The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgment. J Philos 70:630CrossRef
go back to reference Kohlberg L (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row, New York Kohlberg L (1981) The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper & Row, New York
go back to reference Kohlberg L (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco Kohlberg L (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row, San Francisco
go back to reference Ma H, Cheung C (1996) A Cross-Cultural Study of Moral Stage Structure in Hong Kong Chinese, English and Americans. J Cross-Cult Psychol 27:700CrossRef Ma H, Cheung C (1996) A Cross-Cultural Study of Moral Stage Structure in Hong Kong Chinese, English and Americans. J Cross-Cult Psychol 27:700CrossRef
go back to reference McGinn T (2015) The Expressive Function of the Law and the Lex Imperfecta. Roman Legal Trad 11:1 McGinn T (2015) The Expressive Function of the Law and the Lex Imperfecta. Roman Legal Trad 11:1
go back to reference Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (2017) Whistleblower Protections, Parliament of Australia, September 2017 Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services (2017) Whistleblower Protections, Parliament of Australia, September 2017
go back to reference Pittroff E (2016) Whistle-Blowing Regulation in Different Corporate Governance Systems: An Analysis of the Regulation Approaches from the View of Path Dependence Theory. J Manag Gov 20:703CrossRef Pittroff E (2016) Whistle-Blowing Regulation in Different Corporate Governance Systems: An Analysis of the Regulation Approaches from the View of Path Dependence Theory. J Manag Gov 20:703CrossRef
go back to reference Rapp GC (2007) Beyond Protection: Invigorating Incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate and Securities Fraud Whistleblowers. BUL Rev 87:91 Rapp GC (2007) Beyond Protection: Invigorating Incentives for Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate and Securities Fraud Whistleblowers. BUL Rev 87:91
go back to reference Schwartz M (2016) Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach. J Bus Ethics 139:755CrossRef Schwartz M (2016) Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach. J Bus Ethics 139:755CrossRef
go back to reference Trevino LK (1992) Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management. J Bus Ethics 11:445CrossRef Trevino LK (1992) Moral Reasoning and Business Ethics: Implications for Research, Education, and Management. J Bus Ethics 11:445CrossRef
go back to reference United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2017) 2017 Annual Report to Congress: Whistleblower Program United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2017) 2017 Annual Report to Congress: Whistleblower Program
go back to reference United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) 2018 Annual Report to Congress: Whistleblower Program United States Securities and Exchange Commission (2018) 2018 Annual Report to Congress: Whistleblower Program
go back to reference Varelius J (2009) Is Whistle-Blowing Compatible with Employee Loyalty? J Bus Ethics 85:263CrossRef Varelius J (2009) Is Whistle-Blowing Compatible with Employee Loyalty? J Bus Ethics 85:263CrossRef
go back to reference Velasquez M (2018) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Pearson Velasquez M (2018) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Pearson
Metadata
Title
The Ethics of Corporate Whistleblowing Rewards
Author
Vivienne Brand
Copyright Year
2020
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0259-0_2